Arguendo: The Veterans Law Pod

https://is1-ssl.mzstatic.com/image/thumb/Podcasts116/v4/e2/e9/b2/e2e9b215-e364-3bb8-7bc8-7025dd62517b/mza_233084391252504741.jpg/600x600bb.jpg

CCK Law

8 episodes

4 days ago

Hosts Amy Odom, attorney at Chisholm Chisholm & Kilpatrick, and Amy Kretkowski, attorney at The Law Office of Amy B. Kretkowski, delve into the most important recent cases in veterans law coming out of the Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims and the Federal Circuit. As experienced VA disability lawyers, Amy and Amy offer listeners careful analyses of these cases and provide insights into their potential impacts on VA law.

Government

RSS

All content for Arguendo: The Veterans Law Pod is the property of CCK Law and is served directly from their servers with no modification, redirects, or rehosting. The podcast is not affiliated with or endorsed by Podjoint in any way.

Government

Episodes (8/8)

Arguendo: The Veterans Law Pod

Chisholm, Adams, Ingram, and More: Your NOVA Questions Answered

This special episode brings NOVA Fall Conference questions to the mic. Amy Odom and Amy Kretkowski walk through key precedential cases like Chisholm, Adams, Ingram, and Rice, while exploring broader issues of supplemental claims, implicit denial, and how advocates can best serve veterans navigating the VA system.

For more information, visit our websites at ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠cck-law.com⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠ and abkveteranslaw.com

1 month ago

47 minutes 15 seconds

Arguendo: The Veterans Law Pod

Boehringer v. Collins: Can Supplemental Claims Trigger Continuous Pursuit?

In this episode of Arguendo, Amy Odom and Amy Kowski analyze Boehringer v. Collins, a case testing whether a veteran can trigger AMA’s continuous pursuit rules by filing a supplemental claim within a year of a legacy Board decision. They break down the statutory argument under Section 2(x) of the AMA, the government’s position on finality, and the broader implications for effective dates in a dual-system world. A must-listen for those tracking how AMA and legacy rules intersect.

For more information, visit our websites at ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠cck-law.com⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠ and abkveteranslaw.com

4 months ago

24 minutes 10 seconds

Arguendo: The Veterans Law Pod

Deal v. Collins Analysis: Revisiting Effective Dates and Pending Claims

In this episode of Arguendo, Amy Odom and Amy Kretkowsi return from hiatus to unpack Deal v. Collins, a Federal Circuit case that challenges the reach of 38 C.F.R. § 3.156(b). They explore the history and implications of legacy regulations on effective dates, dissect arguments presented by both sides, and consider how this case could shape the future of pending claim doctrine. They also discuss its potential impact on other cases. Tune in to learn more!

For more information, visit our websites at ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠cck-law.com⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠ and abkveteranslaw.com

5 months ago

24 minutes 25 seconds

Arguendo: The Veterans Law Pod

Bufkin v. McDonough: Oral Argument Analysis

In this episode of Arguendo: The Veterans Law Podcast, Amy Odom and Amy Kretkowski discuss the Supreme Court's October 16, 2024, oral arguments in Bufkin v. McDonough. The case centers on the interpretation of 38 U.S.C. § 7261(b)(1) and the scope of review that the U.S. Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims must apply regarding the VA's benefit of the doubt rule. Get as the hosts analyze key points raised by advocates and justices, from the standard of review to Congress's intent behind the statute.

For more information, visit our websites at ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠cck-law.com⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠ and abkveteranslaw.com

11 months ago

42 minutes 2 seconds

Arguendo: The Veterans Law Pod

Frantzis and Hamilton: Oral Argument Analysis

In this episode of "Arguendo: The Veterans Law Pod," hosts Amy Kretkowski and Amy Odom dissect two pivotal cases from the U.S. Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims and the Federal Circuit. They explore the complexities of Frantzis v. Wilkie, discussing the removal of statutory language and its impact on the rights of veterans within the AMA framework, and delve into Hamilton v. McDonough, where the intricacies of the attorney work-product doctrine in veterans' benefits claims are scrutinized. This episode provides a deep dive into the legal arguments, judicial interpretations, and broader implications of these decisions.

For more information, visit our websites at ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠cck-law.com⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠ and abkveteranslaw.com

1 year ago

47 minutes 32 seconds

Arguendo: The Veterans Law Pod

Greenidge, Spigner, and SCOTUS: Oral Argument Analysis

Join hosts Amy Odom and Amy Kretkowski as they analyze important oral arguments and legal trends observed at the Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims and the Federal Circuit. In this episode, they discuss two cases from the Veterans Court: Greenidge v. McDonough, and Spigner v. McDonough. They also briefly look at two Supreme Court (SCOTUS) cases: Rudisill v. McDonough, and Loper Bright Enterprises, Inc. v. Raimondo, Sec. of Comm. Join them as they offer listeners a glimpse into the challenges veterans face during the appeals process.

For more information, visit our websites at ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠cck-law.com⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠ and abkveteranslaw.com

1 year ago

51 minutes 48 seconds

Arguendo: The Veterans Law Pod

Haskell & Held: Oral Argument Analysis

Join hosts Amy Odom and Amy Kretkowski as they delve into oral arguments and legal trends observed at the Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims and the Federal Circuit. In this episode, they discuss three cases from the Veterans Court: Haskell v. McDonough, and Held v. McDonough. They offer listeners a glimpse into the challenges veterans face during the appeals process.

For more information, visit our websites at ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠cck-law.com⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠ and abkveteranslaw.com

1 year ago

47 minutes 55 seconds

Arguendo: The Veterans Law Pod

CAVC Cases in June 2023: An Analysis

Join hosts Amy Odom and Amy Kretkowski for the début episode of “Arguendo: The Veterans Law Pod.” Amy and Amy delve into oral arguments and legal trends observed at the Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims and the Federal Circuit. In this episode, they discuss three cases from the Veterans Court: Kernz v. McDonough, Ferko v. McDonough, and Bolds v. McDonough. They offer listeners a glimpse into the challenges veterans face during the appeals process.

For more information, visit our websites at ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠cck-law.com⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠ and abkveteranslaw.com

2 years ago

1 hour 1 minute 41 seconds