Bufkin v. McDonough: Oral Argument Analysis

https://is1-ssl.mzstatic.com/image/thumb/Podcasts116/v4/e2/e9/b2/e2e9b215-e364-3bb8-7bc8-7025dd62517b/mza_233084391252504741.jpg/600x600bb.jpg

Arguendo: The Veterans Law Pod

CCK Law

8 episodes

4 days ago

Hosts Amy Odom, attorney at Chisholm Chisholm & Kilpatrick, and Amy Kretkowski, attorney at The Law Office of Amy B. Kretkowski, delve into the most important recent cases in veterans law coming out of the Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims and the Federal Circuit. As experienced VA disability lawyers, Amy and Amy offer listeners careful analyses of these cases and provide insights into their potential impacts on VA law.

Government

RSS

All content for Arguendo: The Veterans Law Pod is the property of CCK Law and is served directly from their servers with no modification, redirects, or rehosting. The podcast is not affiliated with or endorsed by Podjoint in any way.

Government

https://d3t3ozftmdmh3i.cloudfront.net/staging/podcast_uploaded_nologo/39225053/39225053-1696254585213-28bde2e12c65f.jpg

Bufkin v. McDonough: Oral Argument Analysis

Arguendo: The Veterans Law Pod

42 minutes 2 seconds

11 months ago

Bufkin v. McDonough: Oral Argument Analysis

In this episode of Arguendo: The Veterans Law Podcast, Amy Odom and Amy Kretkowski discuss the Supreme Court's October 16, 2024, oral arguments in Bufkin v. McDonough. The case centers on the interpretation of 38 U.S.C. § 7261(b)(1) and the scope of review that the U.S. Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims must apply regarding the VA's benefit of the doubt rule. Get as the hosts analyze key points raised by advocates and justices, from the standard of review to Congress's intent behind the statute.

For more information, visit our websites at ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠cck-law.com⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠ and abkveteranslaw.com