How does AI impact the world of design education, where human-centered and even planetary-conscious approaches have long been the foundation?
In the sixth and last episode of Legally Wired’s first podcast season, Professor Alexandra Andhov speaks with Nan O’Sullivan, former Head of the School of Design Innovation at the University of Victoria, about how design thinking and creative education are grappling with the integration of AI.
The discussion covers substantial questions that arise when technology meets creativity. Together, we reflect on the mixed emotional mindsets surrounding AI implementation - excitement, hesitation, and fear - and consider the challenges educators and students face as they navigate expectations, skills, and responsibilities. The conversation explores how design has always evolved alongside technology, how ethical reflection must remain central, and whether AI can truly enhance human-centred design rather than diminish it. At its heart, this dialogue is about agency, critical thinking, and the role of lived experience in shaping creative practice.
This episode invites you to explore how design, education, and AI might intersect - and what possibilities could unfold for the future.
How can New Zealand businesses successfully implement AI into their organisation to drive innovation while building the talent pathways needed for the future?
In the fifth episode of the Legally Wired podcast, Professor Alexandra Andhov speaks with Midu Chandra, co-founder of Seen Ventures, a company on a mission to empower New Zealand's business world with AI capabilities and cultivate the next generation of talent.
From the opportunities and challenges AI brings to organisations in New Zealand, we explore the evolving role of people and organisations, particularly in the context of SMEs (Small and Medium-sized Enterprises). The conversation touches on the questions of why a more experimental mindset is needed, how to balance legal risks with creativity, and why it is important to build organisational intelligence in a diverse environment. We also reflect on how New Zealand's unique context and datasets can serve as a source of insight and inspiration, and why nurturing emerging talent is central to shaping the future of work.
This episode invites you to reflect on how AI might transform the way we learn, work, and connect – and what it could mean for organisations and people in New Zealand.
TIMESTAMPS
(00:50) Episode Starts
(01:32) Midu's Introduction - What are we currently seeing in the SME space regarding AI
(03:54) What does it mean to use AI in business?
(05:12) Capability Building Beyond the Universities - Micro Credentials
(07:10) Why is it important for business teams that are building AI to have a roster more diverse than just tech experts?
(10:48) AI is not just for Big Tech - Make AI work for you; however, why have there been minimal benefits to AI implementation on an organisational level?
(14:18) No one is an expert; therefore, it's important that we experiment with the right boundaries with leadership actively involved.
(16:03) Beyond a Technologist's point of view - Regulation is helpful.
(16:55) Most common issues/challenges facing SMEs for AI implementation.
(19:00) Local NZ industry examples of AI implementation that reflect NZ.
(24:03) Midu's Three Main Takeaways
(27:07) Conclusion
How can New Zealand build AI systems that truly reflect our unique cultural values and protect our creative industries from being overwhelmed by global tech giants?
In the fourth episode of the ALTeR Legally Wired podcast, Professor Alexandra Andhov welcomes Paula Browning CMInstD, Chair of WeCreate: the alliance representing 30,000+ Kiwi creators and creative businesses across fashion, advertising, design, gaming, photography, and beyond.
Drawing from insights at the AI Creative Summit, they explore the critical absence of New Zealand perspectives in globally trained AI systems and debate whether the country should develop its own sovereign AI. The conversation tackles practical challenges around IP protection, particularly how creators struggle to safeguard their work on Big Tech Platforms with constantly shifting rules.
Browning CMInstD addresses the frustrating dynamic where creatives get labelled "anti-innovation" for seeking fair protection, while emphasising the importance of funding AI education for both our teachers and creatives to guide them in the new digital era. Additionally, they discuss the urgent need to update the country's outdated Copyright Act (1994) and Browning CMInstD shares examples of New Zealand AI tools that embody Kiwi values.
This episode highlights new ways to protect, amplify, and future-proof New Zealand’s cultural voice on the global stage. It is essential listening for anyone interested in technology, creativity, and cultural sovereignty in Aotearoa.
Timestamps
(00:50) Introduction
(01:40) What does Wecreate do, and what are they seeing in the creative space?
(07:00) Reflection on the AI Creative Summit: What are your experiences and impressions on where the creative industry in Aotearoa is going?
(08:40) What might a unique New Zealand AI look like and how could it reflect our values?
(14:17) What is a specific example from the Summit showcasing what made New Zealand AI tools distinctly Kiwi?
(15:42) Should New Zealand create its own sovereign AI?
(20:13) Where do we stand in New Zealand when it comes to replicating human work with AI?
(25:21) The difficulties in protecting New Zealand IP in global markets, when they are often subject to changing rules on Big Tech platforms.
(28:30) How creatives get labelled as anti-innovation when protecting their work
(30:15) Big Tech lobbying in NZ
(32:00) Ending on a positive note - what can we do to improve the future
(34:55) Conclusion
How can emerging technologies like blockchain, artificial intelligence, or 3D scanning and printing help us preserve, protect, and reimagine cultural heritage?
In the third episode of the ALTeR Legally Wired podcast, Professor Alexandra Andhov welcomes Sarah Elsie Baker, Research Director of the New Zealand-founded Digitaonga project, which is dedicated to preserving, reconnecting, and repatriating taonga tūturu (protected Māori cultural objects).
What began as a student project exploring blockchain has grown into a powerful platform with the potential of Digitaonga to transform how cultural artefacts are preserved in the future. Together, we explore both the cultural implications and the ways technology can contribute to this vision. Sarah explains why a taonga-led approach, the involvement of kaitiaki principles (guardianship) and collective decision-making have been cornerstones in the development of Digitaonga. Along the way, we examine the creative potential of AI-driven 3D scanning and how blockchain can secure the preservation of cultural artefacts.
This episode invites you to re-think cultural heritage in the digital age and provides new perspectives on the relationship between people, cultural artefacts, and technology.
Timestamps:
(00:53) Episode Begins
(01:32) Sarah's Introduction and what she does in the Media Design School
(04:11) What is Digitaonga? How did this begin?
(06:59) What were the initial thoughts behind Digitaonga, how did we think it could be used?
(08:51) What is the technology behind the digital replication of Taonga?
(11:00) When did AI start playing a part in this? With an explanation of Photogrammetry and AI.
(13:24) How does Kaitiaki play a part in Digitaonga and what value does it bring?
(14:48) How would you imagine this working in practice?
(17:20) An example of Digitaonga in practice
(20:37) What should we take away from Māori practices in establishing our digital frameworks in relation to Taonga?
(23:38) The place of animism in Artificial Intelligence and importance of atmosphere in design.
(27:50) Looking to the future and ending remarks
How do we preserve the irreplaceable human element in journalism and creativity as AI transforms the media landscape?
In the second episode of ALTeR Legally Wired's "AI in Creativity" season, Professor Alexandra Andhov speaks with Laura Ellis, whose journey from BBC journalism into AI development offers unique insights into the media's evolving relationship with artificial intelligence.
From translation services to productivity tools, Laura reveals how AI is revolutionising media production while examining the crucial balance between leveraging AI's capabilities and maintaining journalistic trust. The conversation tackles one of the media's most pressing challenges: personalising content without creating dangerous filter bubbles or losing the shared experience that traditional news provides. Through compelling examples—including an Italian publication caught using AI-generated articles—we dive into the broader implications for creativity and engage in a philosophical conversation about context in art. As AI offers "infinite context and no context at the same time," discover whether artificial intelligence can truly replicate the human context that gives meaning to creative work, and what this means for the future of human-made art.
Timestamps:
(00:00) Introduction
(01:41) Laura's journey from journalism to AI R&D
(03:15) How is AI being used in traditional news media? (05:45) Trust and responsibility in AI journalism
(08:50) The BBC's approach to AI deployment
(13:50) How do we implement media feed personalisation responsibly?
(18:27) How will the public's relationship change with media when AI-generated content becomes prominent?
(22:32) What elements of creativity will remain unchanged as AI capabilities advance?
(29:00) Examples of AI in other forms of art
(31:00) Concluding Remarks
This episode is produced in collaboration with AI Forum NZ at the University of Auckland, Faculty of Law.
What does it mean to build AI that truly serves Aotearoa New Zealand's unique cultural landscape and creative communities?
In our debut episode of ALTeR Legally Wired, we lay the foundation for understanding AI's evolving role in New Zealand. ALTeR Director Professor Alexandra Andhov sits down with Madeline Newman, Executive Director of AI Forum NZ, for an insightful conversation about the current state and future potential of artificial intelligence in Aotearoa.
From the mission and impact of AI Forum NZ to the intersection of technology and creativity, this episode explores how New Zealand is positioning itself in the global AI landscape. We dive into the local AI ecosystem, examine inspiring international examples of culturally-sensitive AI development, and discover how technology can be used to preserve and celebrate indigenous languages and cultures. Plus, get a sneak peek at the incredible experts joining us throughout this season as we explore the complex relationship between artificial intelligence, law, creativity, and society.
This episode is produced in collaboration with AI Forum NZ at the University of Auckland, Faculty of Law.
Join us for a sneak peek at what’s in store and why you’ll want to stick around.
Are We Ready to Share Our Skies with Drones?
In the rapidly evolving landscape of technology, the integration of drones into our daily lives is no longer a question of "if" but "when." The latest episode of the Copenhagen Legal Tech Lab Podcast, "Rethinking Big Tech," hosted by Alexandra, delves deep into this topic with guest Anna Zenz, a PhD candidate deeply immersed in the study of drone technology's development, regulation, and societal impact.
The conversation unveils the complexities of drone technology from its military origins to its current and potential civilian applications, including delivery services. It critically examines the regulatory challenges, public sentiment, and the broader implications of drones on privacy, safety, and environmental concerns. With commercial drone delivery on the rise, particularly highlighted through the case study of Google's Wing in Australia, the episode provides invaluable insights into the ongoing debate around technological advancement versus community well-being.
This episode is not just a discussion; it's a call to action for policymakers, legal professionals, technologists, and the public to engage in meaningful dialogue about the future we want to create with these technologies. The balance between innovation and regulation, the importance of community engagement, and the need for nuanced regulatory approaches are central themes.
As we stand at the crossroads of embracing drone technology, this episode serves as a crucial resource for understanding the multifaceted implications of drones in our skies. It's a must-listen for anyone interested in the intersection of technology, law, and society.
Is the inevitability of tech-driven legislation a foregone conclusion? Dive into our latest podcast episode "Challenging Inevitability" for a compelling discussion on reshaping tech policy through human-centric approaches.
🎧 In this insightful discussion, Dr. Hannah Smith of the UWA Tech and Policy Lab and UWA Law School sheds light on crafting technology regulations with public interest at the core. Discover the transformative power of inclusive legislative processes and the crucial role of citizen participation in establishing norms that resonate with societal values.
We explore the pivotal influence of major tech entities on policy-making and the imperative of fostering a legislative ecosystem that is transparent, participatory, and reflective of the community's aspirations. Dr. Smith points to successful models like V Taiwan, showcasing the tangible benefits of integrating citizen voices in governance.
🌐 Join us in this thought-provoking journey to unravel the complexities of adapting participatory models across diverse cultural landscapes, emphasizing the significance of iterative, citizen-focused frameworks in lawmaking.
This episode, a part of the "Rethinking Big Tech" series by Copenhagen Legal Tech Lab, is not just a conversation but an invitation to reimagine the future of tech policy. Thanks to UWA Tech & Policy Lab, University of WA, and the University of Copenhagen for facilitating this enlightening discussion. A big thanks again to UWA Tech & Policy Lab Directors Julia Powles and Jacqueline Alderson for their leadership of the Lab’s research program and for making this season possible.
Supported by the Carlsberg Foundation and Independent Research Fund Denmark.
🌐 Are we ready for the Metaverse? The latest episode of the Copenhagen Legal/Tech Lab Podcast delves deep into the heart of virtual reality's future.
In episode 5 of Season 3, we're joined by Noelle Martin, a legal activist and researcher from the UWA Tech & Policy Lab. She sheds light on the potential societal and legal implications of the Metaverse. How will our identities be protected? What about privacy and online safety in a world where the lines between digital and physical blur?
🤔 Noelle and host Alexandra Andhov engage in a thought-provoking discussion about the challenges of regulating this emerging virtual world. From deepfakes to virtual crimes, the conversation uncovers the myriad issues we must navigate as we edge closer to a 3D digital universe.
🔍 Learn how the Metaverse could redefine human interaction, privacy, and legal boundaries. This episode is not just a conversation but a wake-up call to policymakers and the public alike.
Thanks to UWA Tech & Policy Lab, University of WA, and the University of Copenhagen for facilitating this enlightening discussion. A special mention to our supporters, Carlsberg Foundation and Independent Research Fund Denmark.
#Metaverse #VirtualReality #LegalTech #OnlineSafety #TechPolicy #DigitalIdentity #CopenhagenLegalTechLab
How can the digital replication of humans transform medicine and biomechanics, and where do we draw the line on personal data use?
Join us for a thought-provoking discussion on the transformative power of digital twins in medicine and biomechanics, exploring both its groundbreaking potential and the delicate balance it demands between innovation and ethical considerations.
In this episode, we welcome Professor Jacqueline Alderson, Tech Director of the UWA Tech and Policy Lab, to delve into the intricate realm of digital twins and their far-reaching implications. Together, we unravel how these virtual replicas of humans are revolutionizing surgical planning, enabling personalized treatment strategies, and deepening our understanding of human movement.
While the advancements brought about by digital twins are undoubtedly remarkable, they also raise significant ethical and privacy concerns. We dissect these concerns, examining how we can strike a harmonious equilibrium between the benefits of advanced data use and the protection of individual rights.
Join Professor Alderson and Copenhagen Legal/Tech Lab Director Alexandra Andhov at the University of Copenhagen, Faculty of Law, as they navigate the complex ethical landscape of digital twins, prompting a critical conversation about the future of this technology and its societal impact.
This episode is generously supported by the Carlsberg Foundation and Independent Research Fund Denmark.
How is athlete data shaping the future of sports performance? Are wearables more than just accessories? Join our esteemed guests Julia Powles and Jacqueline Alderson as they unravel the complexities of athlete data collection, exploring promises of performance enhancements and the intricate web of data management.
From promises of performance enhancements to the murky world of data management, we explore the blurred lines between technological advancement and the core fundamentals of elite sports. Are we truly optimizing athletes, or are we caught in a web of data obsession?
Alexandra Andhov guides the conversation, raising crucial questions about the informed consent of athletes, the genuine impact of collected data, and the ethical considerations surrounding the ever-expanding realm of sports tech.
Join us in this episode, where we navigate through the intersection of technology, data, and athletic excellence.
Julia Powles and Jacqueline Alderson are in discussion in this episode with Copenhagen Legal/Tech Lab Director Alexandra Andhov at the University of Copenhagen, Faculty of Law.
A big thanks again to UWA Tech & Policy Lab Directors Julia Powles and Jacqueline Alderson for their leadership of the Lab’s research program and for making this season possible, and a shoutout to our supporters, Carlsberg Foundation and Independent Research Fund Denmark.
#TechLaw #BigTech #RethinkingBigTech #Podcast #SportTech #AthleteData #TechEthics #DataManagement #AthleticPerformance
What happens when tech innovations lead to real-world crimes? When the stakes are at their highest, can government agencies be relied on to bring Big Tech to account?
In our second episode of Season 3 of the Copenhagen Legal/Tech Lab Podcast, we explore a fascinating case study of Big Tech accountability with PhD Candidate Helen Stamp of the UWA Tech & Policy Lab at the University of Western Australia Law School.
Join us as Helen discusses her detailed research into the police investigation that followed the fatal collision between an Uber autonomous vehicle and pedestrian Elaine Herzberg in Arizona in 2018.
Learn more about how Uber shaped this investigation and how, despite Uber’s “non-existent safety culture” and deeply flawed vehicle programming, all criminal responsibility fell to the person nominally behind the wheel – the so-called “vehicle operator”.
As we revisit the world’s most infamous autonomous vehicle tragedy, we probe two essential questions: how did Uber evade criminal liability, and should it have?
Helen Stamp is in discussion in this episode with Copenhagen Legal/Tech Lab Director Alexandra Andhov at the University of Copenhagen, Faculty of Law.
A big thanks again to UWA Tech & Policy Lab Directors Julia Powles and Jacqueline Alderson for their leadership of the Lab’s research program and for making this season possible, and a shoutout to our supporters, Carlsberg Foundation and Independent Research Fund Denmark.
#TechLaw #BigTech #RethinkingBigTech #Podcast #TechPolicy #Uber #Herzberg #TechCulpability
Have you ever wondered how Google, Uber, Amazon and Facebook get away with so much, with so little consequence? Or, as our guest this week calls it, “the paradox of Big Tech's small liabilities”?
In our first full episode of Season 3 of the Copenhagen Legal/Tech Lab Podcast, we dive deep into the world of Big Tech culpability with Associate Professor Julia Powles, Director of the UWA Tech & Policy Lab at the University of Western Australia Law School.
🌐 Join us in exploring Associate Professor Powles’ work on the challenges of holding the tech giants to account as she discusses her latest work, ‘The Corporate Culpability of Big Tech’, in Professor Elise Bant’s powerful new edited collection, “The Culpable Corporate Mind” (Bloomsbury, 2023).
🔍 Learn more about the limited ways in which technology firms have traditionally been scrutinised, and how Bant’s model of ‘systems intentionality’ unlocks a richly expansive pathway for bringing these companies to justice.
👉 Tune in now and join the conversation!
What would change if the systematic recklessness of Big Tech was put on trial? How would it reorder the tech ecosystem, if the liabilities of Big Tech matched its true impacts? Share your thoughts in the comments below! 🗣️
Host for this episode: Dr. Alexandra Andhov, Founder and Director of the Copenhagen Legal/Tech Lab at the University of Copenhagen, Faculty of Law.
A big thanks again to our guest for this episode, Associate Professor Julia Powles, and a shoutout to our supporters: Carlsberg Foundation, Independent Research Fund Denmark.
Are you ready to rethink Big Tech?
Join us for the third season of the Copenhagen Legal/Tech Lab Podcast, where we explore the critical intersection of technology, law, and policy.
In collaboration with the UWA Tech & Policy Lab at UWA Law School, The University of Western Australia, this season presents a compelling series of interviews featuring prominent UWA scholars, researchers, and experts who diligently examine the profound challenges presented by Big Tech companies in our everyday lives. Our overarching objective this season is to delve deeper into the intricate world of Big Tech, shedding light on its far-reaching impact, affecting not only individuals but society as a whole.
Here's what you can expect, learning from the three research streams of Julia Powles, Co-Founder and Director of the UWA Tech & Policy Lab:
📌 Big Tech Culpability: We delve into the "reckless disregard" of the tech giants. How do they get away with so much, with so little consequence?
📌 Curbing Human Monitoring: Uncover the challenges surrounding the sensing and digitisation of human bodies and movement. What does it mean for identity and opportunity?
📌 Challenging Inevitability: We confront technological determinism and explore why and how we allow tech giants to shape our future.
Host for this episode: Alexandra Andhov, Founder and Director of the Copenhagen Legal/Tech Lab.
A big shoutout to our supporters: Carlsberg Foundation, Danmarks Frie Forskningsfond (Independent Research Fund Denmark).
This is a deep-dive episode on Legal Tech.
In the final episode of our second season, Jarek Owczarek shares insights on the future of legal tech and contract management. The episode explores the potential of automation, AI, and turning contracts into data to streamline processes. It highlights the importance of understanding client needs, providing a good user experience, and building a strong legal tech company.
Host:
Guest:
This is a 101 episode on Legal Tech.
In this podcast episode, we shed light on the multifaceted nature of legal tech and why it's become a crucial aspect of the legal field. Discover how technology is revolutionizing the way we create, describe, disseminate, and apply the law.
Host:
Guest:
This is a deep-dive episode on DLT&Blockchain.
In this deep-dive episode, our focus is on blockchain and crypto assets, exploring their impact on people, technology, and business.
Host:
Guest:
This is a 101 episode on DLT & Blockchain.
In this new podcast episode, we explore the world of #blockchain, focusing on the potential of revolutionising global transactions, making them faster and more cost-effective.
Host:
Guest:
This is a deep-dive episode on Artificial Intelligence.
In this deep-dive episode, discuss how AI can be used to improve legal research, and how it can help us get an overview of large amounts of information. We also touch on AI being used in the judiciary system and discuss whether or not it's a good idea.
Host:
Guest: