In this episode, I talk with Stijn Jansen, Chief Product Officer at VIKTOR, about automation for structural engineers and how advanced digital tools are changing the design process in the AEC industry. From building high-performance automation workflows to using AI and parametric design for structural optimization, this conversation explores how engineers can save time, increase precision, and empower creativity. Whether you manage projects or work deep in structural calculations, this episode offers actionable insights on how to embrace technology to improve your workflows without losing your unique engineering touch.
Here Are Some of the Questions I Ask Stijn Jansen:

How did your experience across aerospace, geotechnical, and structural design influence your approach to creating automation tools?
What are the major differences between aerospace and AEC disciplines when it comes to collaboration and automation?
What are the steps needed to build an effective automation workflow that balances speed and accuracy?
How does VIKTOR help engineers streamline their work and improve productivity through automation?
How can automation boost design iterations and support multidisciplinary collaboration in structural engineering?
How should engineers think about AI and automation to ensure they complement rather than replace human judgment?
What future trends in automation and AI are you most excited about in structural engineering and AEC?
What advice do you have for engineers and AEC leaders looking to begin using automation in their projects?

Here Are Some of the Key Points Discussed About Automation for Structural Engineers to Improve Design Workflows


Experience in multiple disciplines reveals how design challenges always involve trade-offs between systems, materials, or configurations. By understanding both commonalities and unique project traits, engineers can create smarter automation tools that support more informed decisions.
Aerospace relies heavily on standardized processes and repeatable products, but AEC is defined by unique, project-specific requirements and teams. The fragmented and parallel design nature within AEC drives the need for better integration and standardized automation workflows.
Building automation begins with extracting logic and decision-making rules from engineers' minds into explicit, repeatable systems. By focusing on business value and prioritizing repetitive, high-impact processes, engineers can invest smartly and see immediate productivity gains.
VIKTOR is a web-based platform that lets engineers create custom tools that integrate geometry, analysis, and data, reducing manual input and increasing accuracy. It offers visualizations, data connections, and intuitive interfaces that make automation accessible and insightful.
Automation makes it easy to test multiple design options quickly, saving time while supporting structural engineering creativity. Engineers gain the freedom to optimize across disciplines, meet deadlines, and deliver smarter outcomes to clients and collaborators.
Engineers can use AI to rapidly generate deterministic design logic without giving up control over calculations. By acting as time-saving assistants and not decision-makers, AI tools help engineers speed up their work while preserving safety, accuracy, and creativity.
The future of automation includes intelligent agents that use validated tools to solve problems on demand. Engineers will be able to scale their impact and meet growing demand using AI-powered platforms that enhance decision-making with speed and consistency.
Start small with automation by identifying valuable tasks that can benefit from time-saving tools and investing a little time to experiment. Taking calculated risks now builds future-ready teams and opens the door t...

In this episode, we talk with Kate Stillwell, PE, SE, MBA, president of parametric insurance at Neptune Flood about parametric insurance in structural engineering and how it empowers communities with faster, more accessible recovery after disasters. We explore her journey from engineering to entrepreneurship and the innovative models driving resilience.
Engineering Quotes:



Here Are Some of the Questions We Ask Kate Stillwell, PE, SE, MBA:

When you moved into parametric insurance, how did you aim to help building owners better understand hazards, resilience, and coverage?
How does parametric insurance work, and in what ways does it make recovery more affordable and accessible for communities after disasters?
In what ways has your background in structural engineering influenced the work you do in the insurance industry today?
What challenges did you face when launching Jumpstart in a new insurance industry, and how did you overcome them?
Looking back across your ventures, what practices have you found most valuable to repeat, and what lessons would you approach differently?
From your involvement with the U.S. Resiliency Council and the Global Earthquake Model, what insights can structural engineers gain from startups and collaborative resilience efforts?
How do committees like those connected to FEMA support resilience in engineering, and why should structural engineers consider getting involved in them?
What role have mentors played in your career, and what should engineers look for when seeking mentors of their own?
What final piece of advice would you give to structural engineers who want to step into leadership, drive innovation, or start their own companies?

Here Are Some of the Key Points Discussed About How Parametric Insurance Transforms Structural Engineering Resilience:


Insurance and resilience connect financial incentives with stronger, more resilient buildings. By linking safety to economic protection, it encourages owners to go beyond minimum code requirements.
Parametric insurance provides a lump sum payout triggered by measurable events like earthquake magnitude. It delivers fast, flexible funds that individuals and communities can use immediately for recovery.
Structural engineering expertise brings credibility and opens doors in the insurance sector. This technical foundation aligns financial products with positive social impact.
Breaking into a new industry requires persistence in building relationships and trust. Creative engagement and visibility help secure partnerships and bring insurance innovation forward.
Collaboration across multiple disciplines consistently proves valuable in advancing resilience. Pacing ambition carefully reduces financial and personal strain while supporting long-term progress.
Committee participation provides opportunities to learn from diverse industries and shape ideas that strengthen community resilience. Rating systems and global data platforms show how engineering knowledge can serve society more broadly.
Committees align engineering expertise with public sector initiatives that strengthen disaster preparedness. Participation allows engineers to collaborate, influence decisions, and extend their impact beyond single projects.
Mentors expand vision by connecting engineering work to economic and social systems. Engineers gain the most from mentors who challenge thinking and reinforce values that guide career growth.
Defining and articulating a North Star gives engineers clarity of purpose. Organizing efforts around this vision strengthens resilience in leadership and innovation.

More Details in This Episode…
About Kate Stillwell, PE, SE, MBA:
Kate is a past president of SEAONC and an insurtech entrepreneur.

In this episode, we talk with Daniel McCaulley, P.E., founder and principal of Ultimus Engineering, LLC, about building a niche in aquatics structural engineering and why communication is just as critical as technical skill. We explore how pool design presents unique structural challenges, how soft skills turn clients into long-term partners, and why asking for more opportunities drives engineering leadership and career growth.
Engineering Quotes:





Here Are Some of the Questions We Ask Daniel:

What ultimately pushed you to take the leap and start your own aquatics structural engineering firm?
How did you carve out your niche in aquatics structural engineering, and what does that pool design work involve?
Beyond soil movement, what other challenges in pool and aquatics structural engineering might civil engineers often overlook?
What role do communication skills play in building client trust, and what practices help turn those relationships into long-term partnerships in aquatics engineering?
For engineers who are new to networking or uncomfortable with public speaking, what practical steps can they take to strengthen their personal brand and improve those communication skills?
What is one final piece of advice you would give to engineers who want to take on more engineering leadership responsibility and deliver greater value in their aquatics structural engineering roles?

Here Are Some of the Key Points Discussed About Mastering Aquatics Structural Engineering: From Design Challenges to Client Trust:


The uncertainty of the COVID-19 pandemic creates a turning point to pursue independence and new challenges. With guidance from mentors and a clear runway, the decision leads to building an aquatics structural engineering firm that thrives on communication and competition.
A mentorship connection opens the door to pool design work when a contractor needs faster turnaround. By cutting project lead times significantly, the firm grows into a niche that combines structural design of watertight vessels with plumbing, mechanical systems, and geotechnical requirements in aquatics structural engineering.
Empty pools act like boats under hydrostatic pressure, so aquatics structural engineering designs must address buoyancy forces with thicker shells, footings, or piers. Additional challenges include thermal gradients, deep-water pressures, and specialized detailing that goes beyond typical building design.
Strong communication transforms technical delivery into lasting client trust. Engineers who listen carefully, ask meaningful questions, and adapt their language to different stakeholders create relationships that generate repeat work in aquatics structural engineering.
Joining a Toastmasters club provides structured practice that builds confidence in public speaking and leadership. Engineers who connect their personal passions to their work develop a relatable brand that strengthens conversations and professional presence in structural engineering environments.
Engineers should not hesitate to ask for opportunities to expand their role. Lifelong learning and proactive involvement in new aquatics structural engineering projects position them to grow as leaders and deliver stronger value to clients and teams.

More Details in This Episode…
About Daniel McCaulley, P.E.:
Daniel McCaulley is the founder of Ultimus Engineering, a national design firm specializing in structural, MEP, and aquatics engineering. A licensed professional engineer with over a decade of experience, Daniel holds master’s degrees in both mechanical engineering and business administration. He has led engineering efforts on construction projects exceeding $80 million and brings deep technical insight to every phase of the project lifecycle.

In this episode, we talk with Joshua Tarbutton, PhD, PE, founder and chairman of Bravo Team Engineering Design & Fabrication, about custom engineering solutions that push beyond off-the-shelf tools to deliver innovative automation systems and advanced manufacturing solutions. We discuss how bold engineering innovation, scalable R&D workflows, and high-performance engineering teams turn uncertainty into opportunity.
Engineering Quotes:





Here Are Some of the Questions We Ask Joshua Tarbutton, PhD, PE:

What does Bravo Team do, and how do you approach solving engineering problems when no off-the-shelf solution exists for custom engineering solutions?
How do you balance bold innovation with the practical challenges of time and budget in custom R&D workflows?
Why is custom problem-solving such a valuable and engaging environment for engineers compared to standard design work?
Looking at automation systems, which approaches are proving effective, which are falling short, and what developments do you see on the horizon?
What strategies are most effective for building high-performance engineering teams that can solve complex, real-world problems?
When projects hit roadblocks, what practices help you and your team keep custom engineering R&D efforts moving forward under pressure?
How do you manage communication with clients to align expectations, especially when budgets or scopes shift in custom design projects?
What final piece of advice would you give engineers and leaders who want to guide more innovative and resilient engineering teams?

Here Are Some of the Key Points Discussed About How Custom Engineering Solutions Transform Research and Development Workflows:


Bravo Team acts as an innovation partner that helps companies solve open-ended design challenges when standard parts or systems are not available. The team delivers custom engineering solutions in machine design, automation, and hardware-focused product development so clients can move forward with confidence.
Balancing innovation with project limits requires trust, disciplined design methods, and clear communication with clients. The team uses benchmarking, global research, and time-boxed testing to keep custom engineering workflows aligned with budgets and schedules.
Custom engineering challenges push creativity and technical ability, allowing engineers to address problems that have never been solved. The process demands resilience but provides significant satisfaction when solutions succeed.
Automation systems continue to advance through easier programming, wireless integration, and more accessible controls for plant operators. Legacy equipment and workforce skill gaps remain barriers, but the industry is steadily moving toward streamlined and standardized systems.
Strong teams form when roles are clearly defined, hiring is intentional, and tools like the Entrepreneurial Operating System (EOS) and Working Genius are applied. Creating psychologically safe engineering environments where people support one another ensures teams thrive in uncertain design spaces.
Progress is maintained by defining hypotheses, taking the next actionable step, and drawing on professional networks for expertise. Teams stay aligned by recognizing uncertainty, communicating openly, and ensuring clients understand the costs and risks of custom-built engineering solutions.
Each project begins with detailed scoping and clear kickoff meetings to establish alignment. Even when budgets tighten, integrity and long-term trust remain central, with open communication guiding adjustments in custom engineering projects.
Engineers should pursue excellence while seeking joy in their work, since passion creates energy that drives better solutions.

In this episode, we talk with Fabio Zaniboni, founder and CEO of BubblyNet and chief vision officer at Zaniboni Lighting, about AI in smart building design and redefining buildings as intelligent, adaptive systems with AI and smart technologies. We discuss innovations that are breaking down engineering silos, boosting efficiency, and advancing sustainability.
Engineering Quotes:





Here Are Some of the Questions We Ask Fabio Zaniboni:

How will technology and AI in smart building design influence the future of both the lighting industry and the wider building sector?
What potential do AI driven HVAC systems have for achieving significant energy savings through occupancy based efficiency adjustments?
How could embedded accelerometers and other sensors provide structural engineers with valuable real-time data during earthquakes?
How is AI in smart building design or advanced software being used in ways comparable to the complex modeling tools structural engineers rely on?
What are some common misconceptions about wireless versus wired building control systems, and how does mesh technology address those concerns?
How can smart building technologies and data collection help building owners meet ambitious carbon reduction targets like New York City’s Local Law 97?
What is one final piece of advice you offer structural engineers seeking to innovate in building design and operations?

Here Are Some of the Key Points Discussed About How AI in Smart Building Design Is Helping Engineers Build Adaptive Data-Driven Structures:


Technology and AI in smart building design break down traditional silos in engineering by linking data from multiple disciplines to create smarter, more adaptive buildings. As computing power increases and electronics become smaller, the industry gains the ability to embed sensors almost anywhere, transforming how buildings function.
AI driven HVAC systems deliver significant energy savings by predicting occupancy patterns and adjusting temperature and load in advance. By integrating motion sensors, people counting technology, and building thermal data, these systems optimize comfort while reducing equipment size and energy use.
Embedded accelerometers and vibration sensors provide valuable real-time data during seismic events, showing exactly how a structure responds under stress. This information validates design assumptions, improves safety measures, and guides the creation of stronger buildings in the future.
AI and advanced software dramatically speed up design related calculations, reducing tasks that once took hours to just seconds. These tools increase productivity and allow engineers to focus more on higher-level design and problem-solving.
A common misconception is that wired building control systems are more secure than wireless ones. Modern mesh wireless technology with advanced encryption offers strong security, constant updates, and flexibility that many wired systems cannot match.
Smart building technologies and data collection support carbon reduction goals by providing verified, real-time measurements of energy use and emissions. Automated controls driven by AI adjust building operations for maximum efficiency, making compliance with laws like New York City’s Local Law 97 measurable and achievable.
Engineers who want to innovate in building design benefit from experimenting with emerging technologies, even before they are fully mature. Early adopters play a critical role in advancing the industry and enabling better performing, more efficient structures.

More Details in This Episode…
About Fabio Zaniboni:
Fabio Zaniboni is a technology leader with over two decades of experience in sustainable innovation, digital transformation,

In this episode, we talk with Shawn Galloway, CEO of ProAct Safety, about how leadership drives construction safety culture across teams and why that can determine structural success or failure. We cover insights from major builds, how military values shape site safety leadership, and ways structural engineers lead safety—even remotely.
Engineering Quotes:





Here Are Some of the Questions We Ask Shawn Galloway:

On major projects like the Houston airport expansion, what’s your approach to setting construction safety culture priorities from day one?
In roles where structural engineers aren’t physically present on site, how can they still demonstrate strong safety ownership in engineering?
What strategies help engage large teams early in the planning process to ensure alignment of safety goals in construction?
How do you sustain a construction safety culture across all project phases, especially when teams and conditions change?
What can individuals at the field level do to influence leadership and elevate safety on a project?
Which safety challenges in construction are most common, and how can early design choices help mitigate them?
How has your military background influenced the way you approach site safety leadership in your work?
On large projects with multiple contractors and teams, how do you build true shared safety ownership in construction?
When budgets are tight, what’s the most effective way to show that investing in construction risk mitigation adds real value?

Here Are Some of the Key Points Discussed About How Structural Engineers Strengthen Construction Safety Culture:


Every successful safety effort begins by defining what success looks like beyond avoiding injuries. Teams set clear expectations, involve key stakeholders, and establish feedback loops to guide decisions from day one.
Structural engineers lead by consistently elevating safety in conversations, documentation, and decision-making. Being intentional about their role, even from a distance, helps align field conditions with design intent.
Engagement starts when people are invited to contribute their input and perspectives at the beginning. Involving those closest to the work leads to stronger alignment and more meaningful ownership.
Sustaining a construction safety culture requires consistent messaging, visible leadership, and clear expectations at every stage. Communication and accountability remain steady even when team members rotate or site conditions shift.
Field professionals lead by example and build trust through consistent, informed actions. Asking thoughtful questions and forming strong relationships helps bring attention to safety from the ground up.
Common challenges include poor communication, incorrect assumptions, and errors in load paths or materials. Proactive safety planning and coordination reduce risk before construction begins.
Military experience reinforces the value of discipline, preparedness, and accountability across teams. It shapes a mindset where safety and mission success both depend on shared responsibility and clarity.
Shared ownership happens when each contractor feels connected to the overall goal and understands why safety matters. Giving people a voice and space to contribute creates stronger alignment and commitment.
Strong safety performance signals healthy leadership and reliable project delivery. Demonstrating how safety links to schedule, quality, and cost helps decision-makers see it as essential rather than optional.

More Details in This Episode…
About Shawn Galloway:
Shawn is the CEO of the global consultancy ProAct Safety and has over 20 years of experience in safety systems, strategy, culture, leadership,

In this episode, I talk with Dr. Fawad Ahmed Najam, lecturer at the University of British Columbia, about how open educational resources and digital learning tools, including AI in education, are transforming structural engineering education and preparing future engineers to design with purpose and build safer communities.
Engineering Quotes:



Here Are Some of the Questions We Ask Fawad:

What role can open educational tools play in improving access to structural engineering education in underserved parts of the world?
In which ways is engineering software changing how students learn and engage with digital learning tools?
Why is it important for educators to ensure students understand the theory behind the engineering software they use?
Which types of equations or methods are commonly used in structural engineering software programs?
Where do you see AI in education, automation, and digital tools making the biggest impact on the future of structural engineering education?
What approaches can educators use to help students ask the right questions when using AI tools?
Can AI in education truly improve both classroom learning and the engineering profession, and if so, how should it be used?
Which strategies have proven effective in keeping students engaged with complex topics like earthquake engineering and structural dynamics?
What makes complicated engineering topics easier for students to understand and stay interested in?
Why do foundational mechanics courses remain critical in today’s evolving structural engineering curriculum?
Are any of the structural simulations or interactive games your students develop available publicly for others to explore and learn from?
What final piece of advice would you give to students or young professionals who want to grow and make a difference in structural engineering?

Here Are Some of the Key Points Discussed About How AI in Education Is Transforming Structural Engineering Learning and Careers:


Open educational resources provide global access to structural engineering education, especially where traditional textbooks and mentorship are unavailable. By sharing digital learning tools online, educators help students reach academic and professional goals.
Structural engineering software introduces visual and interactive ways to learn, fostering intuition about structural behavior. This modern style bridges theory and practical application.
Educators use engineering software experimentally to reinforce theory through cause and effect modeling, encouraging critical thinking and deeper comprehension.
These programs rely on methods like finite element analysis, stiffness matrices, and load calculations. Understanding engineering software logic helps students interpret results and identify inconsistencies.
AI in education enhances collaboration, personalized learning, and real-time engagement. While speeding up classroom and design processes, it still demands human judgment for meaningful decisions.
Students learn to ask the right questions about AI tools through curiosity, guidance, and mentorship. This skill turns AI into a supportive resource rather than a replacement.
AI in education improves structural engineering education by accelerating research, enabling instant feedback, and personalizing learning pathways. Engineers must still understand context and structural behavior for reliable outcomes.
Engagement increases when students predict structural response and test it through simulations or structural engineering software. Discovery-based learning maintains interest and retention.
Students create videos, blogs, or digital tools to explain concepts, deepening their grasp. Making knowledge tangible inspires creativity and lasting...

In this episode, we talk with Adedeji Disu, Ph.D., Aff.M.ASCE., Senior Geotechnical Engineer at ABNA Corporation, about the power of geo-structural engineering, what it is, why it’s critical to the future of infrastructure, and how he’s mentoring the next generation of engineers to go beyond the technical, think bigger, act with purpose, and lead with impact.
Engineering Quotes:





Here Are Some of the Questions We Asked Adedeji:

Can you explain what geo-structural engineering is and why it’s important in today’s infrastructure projects?
What are some common misconceptions engineers have about how soil behaves and how it affects the structure above it?
Can you share a geo-structural challenge you’ve faced that helped you grow as both an engineer and a mentor?
How do you help young engineers go beyond just doing calculations and start thinking about the bigger picture in their designs?
How do you encourage engineers to be curious, communicate well across teams, and think beyond their own discipline?
What final piece of advice would you give to engineers who want to become confident and effective technical mentors in their field?

Here Are Some of the Key Points Discussed About Geo-Structural Engineering Explained for Modern Infrastructure Challenges:


Geo-structural engineering brings together geotechnical and structural knowledge to ensure that buildings and foundations work effectively with the ground beneath them. It plays a critical role in creating safe and resilient infrastructure that responds to changing soil conditions and environmental demands.
Many engineers believe that soil behaves like concrete or steel, with consistent properties, but soil is highly variable and unpredictable. Structural failures are often linked to soil movement, moisture changes, or settlement rather than flaws in the building itself.
On a tall building project, going deeper with piles than originally planned ensured long-term stability despite added costs. By standing firm on quality and safety, the engineer gained valuable experience that strengthens confidence in high-stakes decisions.
Young engineers are encouraged to understand both why a design is needed and how it will be constructed in the field. Real impact comes from connecting calculations to the actual process of building safely and efficiently.
Engineers build stronger teams by showing respect for other disciplines and asking thoughtful questions. Patience, open communication, and a willingness to learn help them gain perspective and contribute more meaningfully.
Engineers who spend time in the field develop deeper insight into how their designs perform in real conditions. That understanding helps them guide others more effectively and contribute with both technical skill and practical judgment.

More Details in This Episode…
About Adedeji Disu, Ph.D., Aff.M.ASCE.
Dr. Disu is a seasoned geo-structural engineer, educator, and researcher with over 15 years of demonstrated expertise in the design and analysis of deep foundations. He holds a Ph.D. in geotechnical engineering from Southern Illinois University Carbondale, with research interests spanning geopolymer-stabilized soils, dynamic soil-structure interaction, and deep foundation systems.

An advocate for precision in technical communication and construction management, Dr. Disu possesses a keen attention to detail. His scholarly contributions include numerous peer-reviewed publications in leading international journals, such as those of the American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE) and Springer. He also serves as a reviewer for the journal of Geotechnical and Geo-environmental Engineering and the journal of Rock Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering.

Dr.

In this episode, we talk with Dr. Zahraa Saiyed, P.E., CEO of Scyma Consulting LLC, about how structural engineers are stepping up to lead disaster risk reduction engineering by rethinking building codes, engaging communities, and making resilience a shared responsibility.
Engineering Quotes:





Here Are Some of the Questions We Asked Dr. Zahraa:

How does disaster risk reduction engineering influence the way engineers design buildings, and how can they consider social vulnerability in high-risk areas?
Can you share an example of a project in a marginalized community and explain how you made sure it was both equitable and resilient?
What role do changes in building codes play in helping vulnerable communities become more resilient?
If someone wants to get involved and make a difference, whether they're an engineer, architect, or not in the industry, what’s a good way to start?
What options do people have if they’re living in unsafe buildings and don’t have the resources to fix them?
Do you have other examples of how inequality shows up in disaster resilience that people might not notice?
What final piece of advice would you give to engineers who want to use their skills to help create more resilient and equitable communities?

Here Are Some of the Key Points Discussed About Empowering Communities through Disaster Risk Reduction Engineering:


Disaster risk reduction engineering shifts design goals toward buildings that people can safely return to after an event. Engineers who understand community needs help ensure vulnerable residents are not left behind.
The Lima Safe Schools project combines seismic safety with community support by addressing issues like gang violence and bullying. Engineers work with educators, psychologists, and residents to create spaces that feel safe and stay strong.
Building codes help set safety standards but often ignore older buildings where vulnerable people live. Engineers who advocate for equitable code updates make a bigger difference in protecting entire communities.
Getting involved starts with raising awareness and building relationships at the community level. People who speak up and share what they know help shape safer and more informed neighborhoods.
Many renters and low-income residents have no control over the safety of their homes. Engineers can support these communities by communicating risks clearly and advocating for resources on their behalf.
People with time and money frequently participate in planning and safety programs, while others cannot. This gap leaves many at higher risk without the support they need to prepare or recover.
Engineers who listen to local priorities and expand their role beyond design have a greater impact. Their work helps create lasting safety for communities that are often overlooked.

More Details in This Episode…
About Dr. Zahraa Saiyed, P.E., Associate AIA, LEED AP BD+C, M. ASCE
Zahraa Saiyed, P.E., Associate AIA, LEED AP, M.EERI, 2011, is a multidisciplinary disaster risk reduction, public policy, and risk governance consultant with background and training as an architect, building scientist, structural engineer, and educator. She is a co-founder and principal of Scyma Consulting, located in the Bay Area; a research affiliate with MIT’s Urban Risk Lab; and a senior disaster risk reduction consultant for the World Bank, where she works on earthquake engineering, wildfire management, mental health, and community engagement. Zahraa has co-chaired the EERI Public Policy and Advocacy Committee since 2018. In this role, she has contributed to the advancement of seismic safety policies at all governmental levels, advocated on behalf of EERI, and facilitated the creation of regional public policy committees.

In this episode, we talk with Erin K. Rosenthal, P.E., president of PMA Engineering, about how adaptive reuse in structural engineering and engineering mentorship are driving sustainable change, transforming historic spaces into modern communities without starting from scratch.

***The video version of this episode can be viewed here.***
Engineering Quotes:





Here Are Some of the Questions We Asked Erin:

Why is Kansas City such an important center for the AEC industry, and how does that impact the work you do?
How does PMA mentor early-career engineers, and what skills or mindsets do you focus on to help them succeed?
What do you think the future looks like for adaptive reuse in structural engineering and urban development?
What are the biggest engineering challenges you typically face when working on older, historic buildings?
What made The Kansas City Star Building, Penway Point, and Thomas Corrigan Building unique projects, and how did your team tackle those challenges?
What final piece of advice would you give to structural engineers who want to grow their careers in adaptive reuse in structural engineering and sustainable design?

Here Are Some of the Key Points Discussed About Driving Sustainable Design Through Adaptive Reuse in Structural Engineering:


Kansas City hosts over 1,200 AEC firms and ranks first globally in sports architecture and infrastructure, creating powerful momentum for innovation. Its strong sense of community encourages knowledge-sharing and collaboration across firms of all sizes.
PMA supports growth by exposing early-career engineers to all project types, materials, and real-world interactions like meetings and site visits. Engineers are matched with mentors, encouraged to ask questions, and given the space to discover their own engineering style.
Adaptive reuse in structural engineering continues to grow as cities look to revitalize neighborhoods, reduce carbon footprints, and preserve architectural history. It allows communities to meet modern needs while maintaining the identity and integrity of long-standing structures.
Working with older buildings involves navigating unknown conditions, undocumented changes, and outdated materials that require creative problem-solving. Engineers must stay flexible, collaborate closely, and rely on fundamentals like statics and material science.
Each project presented distinct conditions such as multi-directional reinforcement, significant elevation shifts, and rare materials like terracotta and marble. The team combined research, testing, and technology to analyze the structures and deliver effective solutions.
In adaptive reuse in structural engineering, engineers should take time to understand the existing structure and avoid defaulting to the easiest solution. Success comes from asking questions, working across disciplines, and staying committed to problem-solving with integrity and curiosity.

More Details in This Episode…
About Erin K. Rosenthal, P.E.
Erin Rosenthal, P.E., is the president and co-owner of PMA Engineering, a leading structural engineering firm based in the Kansas City metropolitan area. A licensed professional engineer in both Kansas and Missouri, Erin brings nearly two decades of experience in structural design, project management, and leadership.

Since joining PMA in 2006, she has led the design and coordination of a wide range of projects, from multifamily residential and healthcare buildings to commercial retail centers and historical renovations. Erin is known for her ability to manage complex teams and deliver high-quality results while fostering a collaborative and positive work environment.

She holds both bachelor’s and master’s degrees in architectural engineering...

In this episode, I talk with Nehemiah Mabry, Ph.D., P.E., CEO and Founder of STEMedia Incorporated, about how storytelling and technical insight transform structural forensics and engineering failure analysis into powerful lessons that educate the public, build confidence, and spark curiosity among future engineers.

***The video version of this episode can be viewed here.***
Engineering Quotes:



Here Are Some of the Questions We Asked Nehemiah:

How did you get involved with STEMedia, and how did that experience connect with your work in structural forensics and forensic engineering?
What was it like transitioning from aerospace engineering to bridge design and other civil structures, and can you share a specific example of how the work differs?
How has your experience in structural forensics been so far, and what are some interesting challenges you’ve faced in that field?
Why do you think structural failures and engineering failure analysis capture the interest of both engineers and the public?
How do you usually respond to questions about building safety after a collapse or disaster without putting the engineering profession in a negative light?
Do forensic investigations typically take a long time, like the Florida condominium case, and what factors affect the timeline?
What can everyday engineers do to help promote engineering communication and engineering outreach online instead of leaving that responsibility to media or other industries?
What final piece of advice would you give to engineers who want to make a bigger impact and share their knowledge beyond just doing design work?

Here Are Some of the Key Points Discussed About How Structural Forensics Resonates with Both Engineers and the Public Through Storytelling:


STEMedia begins as a creative outlet alongside technical work in bridge design and grows into a platform that highlights the value of STEM careers. The combination of hands-on engineering and content creation strengthens the ability to connect technical knowledge with real-world inspiration.
Aerospace engineering focuses on structures that must fly and respond to complex forces, while civil structures center on stability and long-term durability. In aerospace, extensive testing is common, but in bridge design, every structure is built full-scale with no trial run.
Structural forensics involves investigating failures and uncovering the technical story behind what went wrong. Each project presents unique challenges, such as identifying damage from age, weather, or unexpected events through careful analysis and observation.
Engineering failure analysis sparks interest because it reveals what happens when systems break down, creating powerful moments of learning. These investigations serve as both cautionary tales and educational insights that appeal to curiosity and safety awareness.
Focusing on the science behind the failure helps shift the conversation from blame to understanding. By explaining the physical forces and technical reasons involved, the discussion becomes informative rather than accusatory.
Many investigations take significant time due to limited access to records or incomplete data. Determining causes such as material degradation or environmental impact requires careful review and technical expertise.
Engineers can share everyday experiences and project highlights in simple, relatable ways that make their work more visible. Even small moments posted online can shift public perception and inspire future generations.
Making a meaningful impact involves creating something that lasts beyond the work itself, whether in infrastructure or in others. Sharing knowledge and encouraging growth in others extends the influence of engineering far beyond the drafting table.

In this episode, we talk with Bob Brown, author and co-founder of SpatialVision LLC, about the top structural and foundation repair-related issues behind home renovation failures. From poor assessments and overloaded framing to water management problems.

***The video version of this episode can be viewed here.***
Engineering Quotes:





Here Are Some of the Questions We Asked Bob:

What are some common mistakes people make when assessing a structure before a home renovation, and can you share a real-life example where poor foundation inspection or evaluation led to serious delays or damage?
How do the existing foundation and soil conditions affect a project’s success, and what can a structural engineer do to help ensure lasting solutions?
What risks come with adding weight to a structure, and how can engineers ensure the foundation and framing can support it effectively?
What kind of damage can water and poor drainage cause to a home’s foundation, and how can homeowners prevent it through proper water management?
What renovation shortcuts can weaken a structure, and how can structural engineers ensure safety and building code compliance aren’t compromised?
What are the biggest mistakes you see realtors or homeowners make when addressing foundation repair needs?
What are some common myths about foundation repair that you often have to correct or clarify?
How can engineers better connect with homeowners, realtors, and contractors to support structural evaluations and renovations?
What final piece of advice would you give to structural engineers to help them avoid common foundation repair mistakes and ensure successful renovation outcomes?

Here Are Some of the Key Points Discussed About Foundation Repair Tips You Need to Know for Safer Home Renovations:


Homeowners frequently trust sales reps instead of engineers, leading to evaluations based on selling, not safety. One poor assessment results in wasted time and money and unresolved structural issues. This reinforces the need for a structural engineer in foundation repair.
The condition of the foundation and soil directly impacts renovation success. Structural engineers work with geotechnical experts to assess risks and design safe, lasting solutions. Understanding soil conditions is critical for effective foundation repair.
Adding extra weight like a second story can overload existing foundations if not properly evaluated. Engineers ensure the structure and soil can support changes before any construction begins. A structural engineer's input is essential in these scenarios.
Water intrusion and poor drainage cause shifting, cracking, and long-term damage to homes. Homeowners prevent this by using drainage systems suited to their region’s soil and climate. Water management is a key aspect of foundation repair.
Shortcuts during renovations, like relying on lifetime warranties, often hide deeper structural problems. Engineers ensure repairs follow building codes and actually solve the root cause. Foundation repair must be based on objective assessment, not marketing promises.
Many people confuse soil heave with settlement and apply the wrong fix, making the issue worse. Engineers identify the true cause to avoid misdiagnosis and costly errors. Soil conditions must be correctly interpreted in any foundation inspection.
Cracks don’t always mean a foundation needs repair, and most insurance excludes soil-related damage. Objective, data-backed assessments from engineers cut through the misinformation. A structural evaluation is vital before assuming major repairs are needed.
Engineers improve renovation outcomes by building visibility through online platforms and offering residential forensics.

In this episode, we talk with Domingo (Dom) Diaz, registered architect, AIA, and president of Diaz Architect & Associates, P.C., about facade restoration best practices and how building owners can stay ahead by prioritizing safety, avoiding costly violations, and making proactive maintenance a smart long-term strategy.

***The video version of this episode can be viewed here.***
Engineering Quotes:





Here Are Some of the Questions We Asked Dom:

Why are facade and parapet inspections so important, and what makes them critical for building safety and maintenance?
What structural issues commonly affect parapets and facades, and how do weather and design elements like flashing and relieving angles contribute?
How do parapet conditions impact compliance with NYC’s Local Law 11 facade compliance guide (FISP), and what should structural engineers be aware of when working on these projects?
What should building owners know about the upcoming Sub-Cycle 10A deadline in 2025, and how can they prepare using proactive maintenance for commercial buildings?
What’s the best way for owners to proactively plan for facade maintenance and reduce the risk of expensive emergency repairs?
How does your restoration approach differ when working on historic buildings versus modern ones, and what are the unique historic building facade maintenance challenges?
What’s the best way for engineers and architects to collaborate effectively during facade and parapet restoration projects, especially when aesthetics and code compliance are both important?
What changes or trends are you seeing in NYC’s building codes and facade inspection requirements that engineers and architects should be aware of?
What questions do property owners usually ask at the start of facade restoration projects?
What final piece of advice would you give to engineers, architects, or building owners about facade restoration best practices and inspections?

Here Are Some of the Key Points Discussed About Helpful Facade Restoration Best Practices for Safer Buildings:


Facade restoration best practices involve conducting regular facade and parapet inspections to identify deterioration before it becomes dangerous. Signs of facade and parapet failure should be addressed early to maintain safety.
Parapets and facades often suffer from cracking, displacement, and corrosion, especially in colder climates where freeze-thaw cycles occur. Poor flashing details, improperly installed relieving angles, and aging connections further contribute to failures that compromise the building envelope.
Compliance with Local Law 11 depends on recognizing hidden vulnerabilities in parapet design. Engineers must account for older construction methods, lack of redundancy, and the layered nature of parapets to meet code requirements and ensure public safety.
Owners should begin planning now by evaluating the condition of their facades through both destructive and non-destructive testing. Allowing flexibility in repair plans helps address unforeseen issues and meet compliance requirements without costly delays.
Preventative maintenance for commercial buildings is critical. Proactive maintenance, such as sealing joints and inspecting parapets regularly, prevents small issues from escalating. This avoids expensive emergency repairs and extends the life of building components.
When it comes to historic building facade maintenance, a more careful approach is needed that prioritizes preservation while meeting modern code standards. Decisions often involve balancing repair versus replacement and selecting materials that maintain the appearance while improving performance.
Collaboration improves when teams anticipate hidden conditions and agree on flexible repair scopes...

In this episode, we talk with Jeff Brandeis, founder & CEO of Engaging Webinars, about the biggest Zoom mistakes for engineers that cost professionals clients, and the simple strategies to fix them, captivate audiences, and convert prospects into paying clients.

***The video version of this episode can be viewed here.***
Engineering Quotes:





Here Are Some of the Questions We Asked Jeff:

What are the biggest Zoom mistakes for engineers when explaining complex technical concepts, and how can they make them easier to understand?
What key elements make a webinar effective and help guide the audience toward practical takeaways?
Can you tell us more about your Engaging Webinars program and how it helps engineers fix their Zoom mistakes?
How can engineers use storytelling to avoid Zoom mistakes, make technical presentations more interesting, and connect better with non-technical audiences?
What are some of the best ways engineers can use webinars to show their expertise, avoid Zoom mistakes, attract new clients, and make a lasting impact?
How does understanding audience psychology help engineers avoid Zoom mistakes and improve webinar engagement and presentation effectiveness?
What final piece of advice would you give engineers who want to improve their online presence, presentation skills, and client communication while avoiding Zoom mistakes for engineers?

Here Are Some of the Key Points Discussed About How to Fix Zoom Mistakes for Engineers and Improve Presentations:


Engineers often struggle to keep virtual audiences engaged when presenting technical content. By using clear visuals, simplifying language, and encouraging interaction, they help others stay focused and absorb complex information more easily while avoiding Zoom mistakes for engineers.
A strong webinar feels like a two-way conversation, not a lecture. When presenters use structure, visuals, and audience interaction, they create a memorable experience that leads to real learning and action.
The engaging webinar approach transforms presentations into dynamic, classroom-style sessions. With tools like live drawing and seamless transitions, it helps engineers connect emotionally and visually with their audience, reducing Zoom mistakes for engineers.
Storytelling helps engineers relate technical concepts to real-life challenges their audience understands. When the focus shifts to the audience’s needs and experiences, engagement rises, and the message sticks, minimizing Zoom mistakes for engineers.
Engineers build credibility by keeping webinars focused and responsive. Respecting time, managing questions with techniques like “parking,” and offering thoughtful follow-up all contribute to a professional, high-impact experience.
Engineers who understand what their audience cares about present with greater clarity and purpose. By making the content relevant and meaningful, they keep attention high and inspire action, preventing Zoom mistakes for engineers.
Confidence grows with action, and a simple “5-4-3-2-1” countdown helps overcome hesitation. Engineers who take that first step build lasting communication skills that strengthen both career and personal impact.

More Details in This Episode…
About Jeff Brandeis
Jeff Brandeis is the CEO of Engaging Webinars, where he helps professionals transform their online presentations into compelling, interactive experiences that drive audience engagement and boost sales. With a background in financial strategy and sales leadership, Jeff has spent his career refining presentation techniques that captivate audiences and inspire action.

Drawing from his experience as a VP of Sales and VP of Solution Design, Jeff recognized the need for more dynamic and results-driven ...

In this episode, we talk with Natalie Tse, SE, LEED AP, client relations and business development specialist at Tipping, about today’s top workforce challenges in structural engineering and how firms can take meaningful action through DEI strategies to attract and retain top talent.

***The video version of this episode can be viewed here.***
Engineering Quotes:





Here Are Some of the Questions We Asked Natalie:

How can structural engineers show their value to clients, especially as sustainability and resilience become more important in the industry?
How should firms prepare to offer sustainability and resilience services going forward?
What are the biggest workforce challenges engineers face today, and what can firms do to improve things like pay, equity, and career growth?
How can new engineers make a difference at work, even if they don’t have leadership responsibilities yet?
What does it mean to be a visionary and resilient leader in structural engineering today?
What soft skills are most significant for engineers to develop as they grow into leadership roles?
What final piece of advice would you give to structural engineers who want to lead with purpose and resilience in their careers?

Here Are Some of the Key Points Discussed About Top Structural Engineering Workforce Challenges and How to Solve Them:


Structural engineers show their value by moving beyond calculations and recognizing patterns throughout a project’s lifecycle. By listening closely and understanding client goals, they align their solutions with long-term impact, especially in areas like sustainability and resilience.
Firms prepare to offer sustainability and resilience services by encouraging engineers to stay informed, make smart material choices, and build strong industry relationships. These actions help shape client expectations and demonstrate leadership in sustainable design practices.
Engineers face workforce challenges such as burnout, lack of advancement, and inequity. Firms improve outcomes by supporting autonomy, promoting continuous learning, and creating a culture where purpose and progress are part of everyday work.
New engineers make a difference by contributing to an environment where everyone feels safe to share ideas. Their voice matters, and by speaking up and engaging with their team, they build trust and help improve collaboration.
A visionary and resilient leader anticipates change, values inclusion, and supports others through thoughtful communication and meaningful work. They recognize the impact of team well-being and create space for innovation to thrive.
Trust and emotional intelligence are essential soft skills for engineers in leadership. They strengthen team dynamics by listening well, showing empathy, and creating clear and respectful communication channels.
Engineers build strong careers by developing both technical knowledge and meaningful relationships. Those who stay curious, seek guidance, and understand their ability to influence others grow into confident and impactful leaders.

More Details in This Episode…
About Natalie Tse, SE, LEED AP
Natalie Y.L. Tse is a California licensed structural engineer specializing in seismic evaluation and seismic strengthening of existing buildings. She joined Tipping in 2017 with a broad range of design experience in the educational, commercial/retail, residential, science, and technology sectors. Her portfolio includes the design, assessment, and seismic retrofit of 30+ school campuses, a mission-critical laboratory and office building, and a new mass timber-framed cathedral over a concrete post-tensioned podium.

Natalie firmly believes that one of the most essential components of a successful project is effectiv...

In this episode, we talk with Alexander Daddow, PE, CDT, senior strengthening solutions engineer at Simpson Strong-Tie, about how composite strengthening systems are revolutionizing structural engineering by enhancing durability, sustainability, and the way we reinforce structures for the future.

***The video version of this episode can be viewed here.***
Engineering Quotes:





Here Are Some of the Questions We Asked Alexander:

How did realizing you didn’t want to be at a desk all day shape your career path?
Can you explain composite strengthening systems and their role in engineering?
What are the biggest misconceptions engineers have about composite strengthening solutions?
What types of structures and projects typically use composite strengthening systems?
What has been your most challenging or rewarding project, and what did you learn from it?
What do you see as the future of composite strengthening and retrofitting in engineering?
What advice would you give to young engineers looking to explore career paths beyond traditional roles?

Here Are Some of the Key Points Discussed About Composite Strengthening Systems Unlocking A New Era Of Structural Engineering:


Recognizing that a traditional desk job doesn’t align with personal strengths and preferences leads to exploring roles that allow for more interaction and fieldwork. Finding a position that balances technical expertise with engagement in real-world applications creates a more fulfilling career.
Composite strengthening systems, such as FRP and FRCM, enhance structural integrity by bonding high-strength materials to existing concrete, masonry, or steel. These systems provide lightweight, effective reinforcement when properly installed with surface preparation and anchoring, making them valuable for retrofitting and repair.
Many assume composite strengthening systems function as simple adhesive fixes, but their effectiveness depends on proper installation, testing, and engineering expertise. While these solutions enhance structural performance, they are not a universal remedy and require careful evaluation for each application.
Composite strengthening systems apply to various structures, including historical buildings, infrastructure repairs, and seismic retrofits. Their ability to increase strength without significant weight or architectural modification makes them ideal for preserving existing structures while improving performance.
Managing structural projects with multiple stakeholders requires extensive collaboration, clear communication, and strategic planning. Effective coordination among engineers, contractors, and regulatory agencies ensures high-quality results and minimizes potential obstacles.
Advancements in composite strengthening continue to improve retrofitting techniques, with frameworks like ASC 41 providing essential guidelines for evaluating and reinforcing existing buildings. Industry collaboration, study sessions, and expert guidance help engineers apply these evolving solutions effectively.
Paying attention to personal interests, embracing challenges, and remaining open to new opportunities leads to a more rewarding career. Engineers who actively seek roles that align with their strengths and values find greater success and long-term satisfaction.

More Details in This Episode…
About Alexander Daddow, PE, CDT
Alex Daddow is a registered professional engineer in California, Colorado, Idaho, Montana, Nevada, Utah, Alaska, Washington, Oregon and Wyoming. He graduated from Cal Poly San Luis Obispo with a degree in architectural engineering. Before joining Simpson Strong-Tie in 2019, Alex was a consulting engineer working on podium structures, custom housing, bridges, historic retrofits, schools,

In this episode, we talk with Andy Richardson, PE, SE, principal engineer of 29E6 and host of ENHANCE AEC, about structural engineering career development, overcoming burnout, achieving excellence in structural engineering, and using the 6E framework to guide engineers toward a sustainable and fulfilling career.

***The video version of this episode can be viewed here.***
Engineering Quotes:



Here Are Some of the Questions We Asked Andy:

Considering the high-stress nature of structural engineering, how have you managed burnout throughout your career?
How do you maintain high standards in our industry while balancing various challenges?
Can you explain how your six E framework influences your approach to structural engineering and improves engineers' work?
Your firm handles a wide range of projects; what are the benefits and challenges of not specializing in one specific area?
Given the diverse challenges in projects like coastal and seismic work, what considerations should structural engineers keep in mind?
Can you provide an example of a project where you had to balance efficiency, safety, and code compliance?
What habits or resources have you found beneficial in keeping your knowledge up to date, given the vital importance of continuous learning in engineering?
Could you share some insights from your experiences hosting Enhance AEC-E and the lessons learned from speaking with various AEC professionals?
What final piece of advice would you give to someone starting out or transitioning into the structural engineering profession?

Here Are Some of the Key Points Discussed About Structural Engineering Career Development Tips That Will Make You Thrive:


Aligning one's career with personal interests and strengths is crucial in managing burnout effectively in structural engineering. Personal growth and gradual changes enhance career satisfaction and trajectory.
Maintaining high standards in structural engineering is achieved through robust quality assurance processes that ensure consistency and quality, crucial for successful project management.
The six E's framework focuses on deeper values and purposes, transforming routine tasks into meaningful contributions, and sustaining motivation and passion within the profession.
Handling a diverse range of projects offers benefits such as economic resilience and enhanced professional development by exposing engineers to a variety of challenges, though it necessitates adaptability and versatile skills.
Engineers must adhere to specific building codes and safety standards crucial for success in variable environments like coastal and seismic areas, leveraging ongoing education and modern tools to stay updated.
In a notable project, engineers implemented stringent verification processes, using concrete weights to simulate real-world forces, ensuring the project met all safety and code compliance standards while maintaining efficiency.
Continuous learning is vital through active involvement in professional associations, which provide networking and educational opportunities to keep engineers current and effective in their fields.
Hosting Enhance AEC-E highlights the importance of sharing knowledge within large online communities, enriching the audience and fostering collective growth and learning opportunities across the industry.
Newcomers to structural engineering should actively communicate with mentors and leaders, ask questions, and engage in continuous learning to become proficient in their craft and adapt to the evolving demands of the field.

More Details in This Episode…
About Andy Richardson, PE, SE
Andy Richardson is a seasoned structural engineer with over 26 years of experience in the industry,

In this episode, we talk with Reyhaneh Navabzadeh, Ph.D., A.M. ASCE, engineer at Structural Integrity Associates, about how the earthquake engineering evolution transcends traditional practices to tackle critical challenges with innovative strategies for safer, more resilient structures.

***The video version of this episode can be viewed here.***
Engineering Quotes:





Here Are Some of the Questions We Asked Reyhaneh:

How do earthquake engineering and traditional structural engineering differ in terms of design considerations and analytical approaches?
How has earthquake engineering evolved globally, and what strategies can regions with different seismic risks implement to improve their resilience?
What are the major challenges earthquake engineers face today, and how do these challenges impact the design and construction of structures designed to resist seismic activity?
Can you discuss the recent advancements in materials, technologies, and research that are shaping structural and earthquake engineering practices?
Do you need to sign up to receive earthquake alerts, or is it automatically available on devices like smartphones?
How can regions with limited resources effectively implement earthquake-resistant systems?
What are the essential skills or areas of knowledge that engineers should develop to excel in earthquake engineering?
What final piece of advice would you give to engineers looking to specialize in earthquake engineering or incorporate seismic design principles into their work?

Here Are Some of the Key Points Discussed About The Ultimate Earthquake Engineering Evolution That Is Reshaping Structures:


The earthquake engineering evolution goes beyond traditional structural engineering by incorporating specialized knowledge such as seismology and soil-structure interactions to ensure structures withstand seismic forces. This discipline integrates detailed seismic load considerations, requiring mastery of both general and specialized analytical approaches.
Global earthquake engineering standards have significantly evolved, adopting advanced methods like performance-based design and utilizing smart materials. Regions enhance resilience by implementing tailored strategies based on micro-zonation studies that assess local seismic risks and by investing in education and infrastructure.
Earthquake engineers face the challenge of adapting increasingly complex code books to design safe structures in rapidly urbanizing areas with high seismic risks. These challenges necessitate innovative solutions and adaptations in building designs to meet the stringent requirements of updated seismic codes.
Recent advancements in earthquake engineering include the adoption of smart materials like shape memory alloys and systems such as base isolation. These innovations improve the resilience of structures by enhancing their structural integrity and adaptive capabilities, crucial for mitigating the impacts of earthquakes.
Earthquake alert systems such as My Shake and Shake Alert provide essential early warnings and are becoming integral for residents in seismic regions. These apps may require a sign-up or automatic activation, depending on device settings and regional implementation strategies.
Regions with limited resources can enhance earthquake resilience by prioritizing efficiency in design, using cost-effective and locally available materials, and adopting policies and training specific to seismic criteria. This approach helps maximize functionality while minimizing unnecessary expenses.
Engineers should focus on understanding seismic risks through micro-zonation and adapting global standards to local conditions. Continuous education and the ability to implement advanced structural designs,

In this episode, we speak with David Fanella, Ph.D., S.E., P.E., F.ACI, F.ASCE, F.SEI, vice president of engineering at the Concrete Reinforcing Steel Institute, about designing cost-effective steel-reinforced concrete buildings, the role of constructability in project success, especially in seismic construction, and how managing tolerances can streamline construction and reduce costs.

***The video version of this episode can be viewed here.***
Engineering Quotes:



Here Are Some of the Questions We Asked David:

How can we effectively implement economical and efficient designs for reinforced steel concrete structures during the design and planning phases?
What advice or resources can you recommend for newer engineers to learn more about constructability issues, especially those who primarily work in offices?
How do constructability mistakes in seismic construction impact structures in high seismic regions, potentially causing a domino effect on the economy?
What are the most common inefficiencies in concrete design, and how can they be avoided?
How do engineers, architects, and contractors collaborate to enhance cost efficiency in complex projects?
With your extensive career in different disciplines, what have you enjoyed and learned, and what were the pros and cons of working at small versus large firms and teaching?
What final piece of advice would you give to both students and working engineers on how to progress effectively in their careers?

Here Are Some of the Key Points Discussed About Unparalleled Ways to Improve Seismic Construction With Tested Concrete Designs:


Effective implementation of economical and efficient designs centers on constructability, encompassing economical formwork, appropriate fitting of reinforcing steel, and maintaining proper concrete flow to prevent defects such as segregation or honeycombing. Adherence to these principles throughout any project ensures success.
Newer engineers benefit from engaging with detailed design guides, like the ACI 318 provisions, which illuminate various aspects of typical buildings and aid in understanding project integration. Participation in real-world projects and access to resources focused on practical design and construction aspects significantly enhance their comprehension and skill application.
In high seismic regions, mistakes in seismic construction can intensify structural failures during earthquakes due to inadequate reinforcement and non-compliance with flexural, stiffness, and ductility requirements. Such errors in seismic construction result in substantial economic losses, elevated repair costs, and extended downtime for essential infrastructure.
Common inefficiencies in concrete design, such as inadequate detailing and overlooking tolerances, can cause construction delays and increase costs. Engineers mitigate these issues by ensuring detailed plans that account for tolerances and possible site adjustments, alongside employing adaptable design solutions like adjustable dowels to effectively manage onsite uncertainties.
Engineers, architects, and contractors improve cost efficiency through early collaboration, sharing expertise, and aligning project goals and materials from the beginning. This proactive approach facilitates the early resolution of potential issues, optimizes resource use, and ensures team alignment on project objectives and execution strategies.
A career engaging in both new and existing building designs presents dynamic challenges and diverse learning opportunities. Working at smaller firms typically offers broader responsibilities and closer client interactions, whereas larger firms provide resources for more significant, high-profile projects. Teaching enhances practical engineering work by allowing for an in-depth exploration ...

In this episode, I talk with Sudarshan Kasera, P.E., PMP, senior project engineer at Crown Castle, about the fast-changing telecommunications industry, exploring how 5G reshapes structural requirements, the complexities of tower modifications, and the pivotal role engineers play in driving innovation.

***The video version of this episode can be viewed here.***
Engineering Quotes:



Here Are Some of the Questions We Asked Sudarshan:

What types of telecommunication towers do you work with, and what structural challenges do they present?
How have technological advancements influenced your design and analysis approach, especially with stricter structural requirements?
What are the key industry codes and standards for designing telecommunication towers?
What structural analysis tools do you use for telecommunication towers, and how have they evolved?
Can you describe your process for designing or retrofitting a telecommunication tower, including an example project?
What is it like to collaborate with different disciplines in the construction of a telecom tower?
What final piece of advice would you give to structural engineers looking to enter or excel in the telecommunications industry?

Here Are Some of the Key Points Discussed About Mind-Blowing Innovations in the Telecommunications World:


Various telecommunication towers, including monopoles, cell supporting towers, guide towers, and concealed structures such as monopine and flagpole towers, present unique challenges. These challenges include ensuring stability under high wind loads and seismic conditions, managing the tension in guy wires, and dealing with the unique loading profiles of concealed towers.
The shift to 4G and 5G technologies increases the size and weight of equipment on towers, raising structural demands and the complexity of design and analysis. This advancement leads to a focus on retrofitting existing structures and integrating innovative analysis techniques such as finite element modeling and nonlinear analysis.
The key industry code, TIA222, set by the Telecommunications Industry Association, covers wind, seismic, and ice loading, as well as structural capacity and foundation design. Additionally, telecommunication towers must comply with the International Building Code and other relevant local and state codes.
Tools like TNX Tower, known for user-friendly tower analysis and design, along with RISA 3D and StaadPro for modeling complex or heavily reinforced parts of towers, are utilized. These tools, along with Mathcad and Excel for calculations, have evolved to better handle the complexities of modern telecom tower designs.
The design process involves a detailed analysis of existing structures to understand capacity and identify overstressed components. For example, a project near the ocean might require assessing corrosion and rust on a tower, then reinforcing or replacing affected parts to ensure stability and compliance with current codes, illustrating the iterative nature of this process.
Collaboration in telecom tower projects typically involves coordination with electrical and mechanical engineers for loading data and with general contractors for construction aspects. This ensures all design aspects are integrated and feasible for construction, addressing any material or constructability issues as they arise.
Engineers are encouraged to build a strong foundation in structural engineering fundamentals, familiarize themselves with specific industry codes like TIA222, embrace new technologies, and continuously adapt to new challenges. Innovation, problem-solving, and ongoing learning are crucial for navigating the unique challenges of the telecommunications sector.

More Details in This Episode…
About Sudarshan Kasera,