In this episode, we talk with Shawn Galloway, CEO of ProAct Safety, about how leadership drives construction safety culture across teams and why that can determine structural success or failure. We cover insights from major builds, how military values shape site safety leadership, and ways structural engineers lead safety—even remotely.
Engineering Quotes:





Here Are Some of the Questions We Ask Shawn Galloway:

On major projects like the Houston airport expansion, what’s your approach to setting construction safety culture priorities from day one?
In roles where structural engineers aren’t physically present on site, how can they still demonstrate strong safety ownership in engineering?
What strategies help engage large teams early in the planning process to ensure alignment of safety goals in construction?
How do you sustain a construction safety culture across all project phases, especially when teams and conditions change?
What can individuals at the field level do to influence leadership and elevate safety on a project?
Which safety challenges in construction are most common, and how can early design choices help mitigate them?
How has your military background influenced the way you approach site safety leadership in your work?
On large projects with multiple contractors and teams, how do you build true shared safety ownership in construction?
When budgets are tight, what’s the most effective way to show that investing in construction risk mitigation adds real value?

Here Are Some of the Key Points Discussed About How Structural Engineers Strengthen Construction Safety Culture:


Every successful safety effort begins by defining what success looks like beyond avoiding injuries. Teams set clear expectations, involve key stakeholders, and establish feedback loops to guide decisions from day one.
Structural engineers lead by consistently elevating safety in conversations, documentation, and decision-making. Being intentional about their role, even from a distance, helps align field conditions with design intent.
Engagement starts when people are invited to contribute their input and perspectives at the beginning. Involving those closest to the work leads to stronger alignment and more meaningful ownership.
Sustaining a construction safety culture requires consistent messaging, visible leadership, and clear expectations at every stage. Communication and accountability remain steady even when team members rotate or site conditions shift.
Field professionals lead by example and build trust through consistent, informed actions. Asking thoughtful questions and forming strong relationships helps bring attention to safety from the ground up.
Common challenges include poor communication, incorrect assumptions, and errors in load paths or materials. Proactive safety planning and coordination reduce risk before construction begins.
Military experience reinforces the value of discipline, preparedness, and accountability across teams. It shapes a mindset where safety and mission success both depend on shared responsibility and clarity.
Shared ownership happens when each contractor feels connected to the overall goal and understands why safety matters. Giving people a voice and space to contribute creates stronger alignment and commitment.
Strong safety performance signals healthy leadership and reliable project delivery. Demonstrating how safety links to schedule, quality, and cost helps decision-makers see it as essential rather than optional.

More Details in This Episode…
About Shawn Galloway:
Shawn is the CEO of the global consultancy ProAct Safety and has over 20 years of experience in safety systems, strategy, culture, leadership,

In this episode, I talk with Dr. Fawad Ahmed Najam, lecturer at the University of British Columbia, about how open educational resources and digital learning tools, including AI in education, are transforming structural engineering education and preparing future engineers to design with purpose and build safer communities.
Engineering Quotes:



Here Are Some of the Questions We Ask Fawad:

What role can open educational tools play in improving access to structural engineering education in underserved parts of the world?
In which ways is engineering software changing how students learn and engage with digital learning tools?
Why is it important for educators to ensure students understand the theory behind the engineering software they use?
Which types of equations or methods are commonly used in structural engineering software programs?
Where do you see AI in education, automation, and digital tools making the biggest impact on the future of structural engineering education?
What approaches can educators use to help students ask the right questions when using AI tools?
Can AI in education truly improve both classroom learning and the engineering profession, and if so, how should it be used?
Which strategies have proven effective in keeping students engaged with complex topics like earthquake engineering and structural dynamics?
What makes complicated engineering topics easier for students to understand and stay interested in?
Why do foundational mechanics courses remain critical in today’s evolving structural engineering curriculum?
Are any of the structural simulations or interactive games your students develop available publicly for others to explore and learn from?
What final piece of advice would you give to students or young professionals who want to grow and make a difference in structural engineering?

Here Are Some of the Key Points Discussed About How AI in Education Is Transforming Structural Engineering Learning and Careers:


Open educational resources provide global access to structural engineering education, especially where traditional textbooks and mentorship are unavailable. By sharing digital learning tools online, educators help students reach academic and professional goals.
Structural engineering software introduces visual and interactive ways to learn, fostering intuition about structural behavior. This modern style bridges theory and practical application.
Educators use engineering software experimentally to reinforce theory through cause and effect modeling, encouraging critical thinking and deeper comprehension.
These programs rely on methods like finite element analysis, stiffness matrices, and load calculations. Understanding engineering software logic helps students interpret results and identify inconsistencies.
AI in education enhances collaboration, personalized learning, and real-time engagement. While speeding up classroom and design processes, it still demands human judgment for meaningful decisions.
Students learn to ask the right questions about AI tools through curiosity, guidance, and mentorship. This skill turns AI into a supportive resource rather than a replacement.
AI in education improves structural engineering education by accelerating research, enabling instant feedback, and personalizing learning pathways. Engineers must still understand context and structural behavior for reliable outcomes.
Engagement increases when students predict structural response and test it through simulations or structural engineering software. Discovery-based learning maintains interest and retention.
Students create videos, blogs, or digital tools to explain concepts, deepening their grasp. Making knowledge tangible inspires creativity and lasting...

In this episode, we talk with Adedeji Disu, Ph.D., Aff.M.ASCE., Senior Geotechnical Engineer at ABNA Corporation, about the power of geo-structural engineering, what it is, why it’s critical to the future of infrastructure, and how he’s mentoring the next generation of engineers to go beyond the technical, think bigger, act with purpose, and lead with impact.
Engineering Quotes:





Here Are Some of the Questions We Asked Adedeji:

Can you explain what geo-structural engineering is and why it’s important in today’s infrastructure projects?
What are some common misconceptions engineers have about how soil behaves and how it affects the structure above it?
Can you share a geo-structural challenge you’ve faced that helped you grow as both an engineer and a mentor?
How do you help young engineers go beyond just doing calculations and start thinking about the bigger picture in their designs?
How do you encourage engineers to be curious, communicate well across teams, and think beyond their own discipline?
What final piece of advice would you give to engineers who want to become confident and effective technical mentors in their field?

Here Are Some of the Key Points Discussed About Geo-Structural Engineering Explained for Modern Infrastructure Challenges:


Geo-structural engineering brings together geotechnical and structural knowledge to ensure that buildings and foundations work effectively with the ground beneath them. It plays a critical role in creating safe and resilient infrastructure that responds to changing soil conditions and environmental demands.
Many engineers believe that soil behaves like concrete or steel, with consistent properties, but soil is highly variable and unpredictable. Structural failures are often linked to soil movement, moisture changes, or settlement rather than flaws in the building itself.
On a tall building project, going deeper with piles than originally planned ensured long-term stability despite added costs. By standing firm on quality and safety, the engineer gained valuable experience that strengthens confidence in high-stakes decisions.
Young engineers are encouraged to understand both why a design is needed and how it will be constructed in the field. Real impact comes from connecting calculations to the actual process of building safely and efficiently.
Engineers build stronger teams by showing respect for other disciplines and asking thoughtful questions. Patience, open communication, and a willingness to learn help them gain perspective and contribute more meaningfully.
Engineers who spend time in the field develop deeper insight into how their designs perform in real conditions. That understanding helps them guide others more effectively and contribute with both technical skill and practical judgment.

More Details in This Episode…
About Adedeji Disu, Ph.D., Aff.M.ASCE.
Dr. Disu is a seasoned geo-structural engineer, educator, and researcher with over 15 years of demonstrated expertise in the design and analysis of deep foundations. He holds a Ph.D. in geotechnical engineering from Southern Illinois University Carbondale, with research interests spanning geopolymer-stabilized soils, dynamic soil-structure interaction, and deep foundation systems.

An advocate for precision in technical communication and construction management, Dr. Disu possesses a keen attention to detail. His scholarly contributions include numerous peer-reviewed publications in leading international journals, such as those of the American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE) and Springer. He also serves as a reviewer for the journal of Geotechnical and Geo-environmental Engineering and the journal of Rock Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering.

Dr.

In this episode, we talk with Dr. Zahraa Saiyed, P.E., CEO of Scyma Consulting LLC, about how structural engineers are stepping up to lead disaster risk reduction engineering by rethinking building codes, engaging communities, and making resilience a shared responsibility.
Engineering Quotes:





Here Are Some of the Questions We Asked Dr. Zahraa:

How does disaster risk reduction engineering influence the way engineers design buildings, and how can they consider social vulnerability in high-risk areas?
Can you share an example of a project in a marginalized community and explain how you made sure it was both equitable and resilient?
What role do changes in building codes play in helping vulnerable communities become more resilient?
If someone wants to get involved and make a difference, whether they're an engineer, architect, or not in the industry, what’s a good way to start?
What options do people have if they’re living in unsafe buildings and don’t have the resources to fix them?
Do you have other examples of how inequality shows up in disaster resilience that people might not notice?
What final piece of advice would you give to engineers who want to use their skills to help create more resilient and equitable communities?

Here Are Some of the Key Points Discussed About Empowering Communities through Disaster Risk Reduction Engineering:


Disaster risk reduction engineering shifts design goals toward buildings that people can safely return to after an event. Engineers who understand community needs help ensure vulnerable residents are not left behind.
The Lima Safe Schools project combines seismic safety with community support by addressing issues like gang violence and bullying. Engineers work with educators, psychologists, and residents to create spaces that feel safe and stay strong.
Building codes help set safety standards but often ignore older buildings where vulnerable people live. Engineers who advocate for equitable code updates make a bigger difference in protecting entire communities.
Getting involved starts with raising awareness and building relationships at the community level. People who speak up and share what they know help shape safer and more informed neighborhoods.
Many renters and low-income residents have no control over the safety of their homes. Engineers can support these communities by communicating risks clearly and advocating for resources on their behalf.
People with time and money frequently participate in planning and safety programs, while others cannot. This gap leaves many at higher risk without the support they need to prepare or recover.
Engineers who listen to local priorities and expand their role beyond design have a greater impact. Their work helps create lasting safety for communities that are often overlooked.

More Details in This Episode…
About Dr. Zahraa Saiyed, P.E., Associate AIA, LEED AP BD+C, M. ASCE
Zahraa Saiyed, P.E., Associate AIA, LEED AP, M.EERI, 2011, is a multidisciplinary disaster risk reduction, public policy, and risk governance consultant with background and training as an architect, building scientist, structural engineer, and educator. She is a co-founder and principal of Scyma Consulting, located in the Bay Area; a research affiliate with MIT’s Urban Risk Lab; and a senior disaster risk reduction consultant for the World Bank, where she works on earthquake engineering, wildfire management, mental health, and community engagement. Zahraa has co-chaired the EERI Public Policy and Advocacy Committee since 2018. In this role, she has contributed to the advancement of seismic safety policies at all governmental levels, advocated on behalf of EERI, and facilitated the creation of regional public policy committees.

In this episode, we talk with Erin K. Rosenthal, P.E., president of PMA Engineering, about how adaptive reuse in structural engineering and engineering mentorship are driving sustainable change, transforming historic spaces into modern communities without starting from scratch.

***The video version of this episode can be viewed here.***
Engineering Quotes:





Here Are Some of the Questions We Asked Erin:

Why is Kansas City such an important center for the AEC industry, and how does that impact the work you do?
How does PMA mentor early-career engineers, and what skills or mindsets do you focus on to help them succeed?
What do you think the future looks like for adaptive reuse in structural engineering and urban development?
What are the biggest engineering challenges you typically face when working on older, historic buildings?
What made The Kansas City Star Building, Penway Point, and Thomas Corrigan Building unique projects, and how did your team tackle those challenges?
What final piece of advice would you give to structural engineers who want to grow their careers in adaptive reuse in structural engineering and sustainable design?

Here Are Some of the Key Points Discussed About Driving Sustainable Design Through Adaptive Reuse in Structural Engineering:


Kansas City hosts over 1,200 AEC firms and ranks first globally in sports architecture and infrastructure, creating powerful momentum for innovation. Its strong sense of community encourages knowledge-sharing and collaboration across firms of all sizes.
PMA supports growth by exposing early-career engineers to all project types, materials, and real-world interactions like meetings and site visits. Engineers are matched with mentors, encouraged to ask questions, and given the space to discover their own engineering style.
Adaptive reuse in structural engineering continues to grow as cities look to revitalize neighborhoods, reduce carbon footprints, and preserve architectural history. It allows communities to meet modern needs while maintaining the identity and integrity of long-standing structures.
Working with older buildings involves navigating unknown conditions, undocumented changes, and outdated materials that require creative problem-solving. Engineers must stay flexible, collaborate closely, and rely on fundamentals like statics and material science.
Each project presented distinct conditions such as multi-directional reinforcement, significant elevation shifts, and rare materials like terracotta and marble. The team combined research, testing, and technology to analyze the structures and deliver effective solutions.
In adaptive reuse in structural engineering, engineers should take time to understand the existing structure and avoid defaulting to the easiest solution. Success comes from asking questions, working across disciplines, and staying committed to problem-solving with integrity and curiosity.

More Details in This Episode…
About Erin K. Rosenthal, P.E.
Erin Rosenthal, P.E., is the president and co-owner of PMA Engineering, a leading structural engineering firm based in the Kansas City metropolitan area. A licensed professional engineer in both Kansas and Missouri, Erin brings nearly two decades of experience in structural design, project management, and leadership.

Since joining PMA in 2006, she has led the design and coordination of a wide range of projects, from multifamily residential and healthcare buildings to commercial retail centers and historical renovations. Erin is known for her ability to manage complex teams and deliver high-quality results while fostering a collaborative and positive work environment.

She holds both bachelor’s and master’s degrees in architectural engineering...

In this episode, I talk with Nehemiah Mabry, Ph.D., P.E., CEO and Founder of STEMedia Incorporated, about how storytelling and technical insight transform structural forensics and engineering failure analysis into powerful lessons that educate the public, build confidence, and spark curiosity among future engineers.

***The video version of this episode can be viewed here.***
Engineering Quotes:



Here Are Some of the Questions We Asked Nehemiah:

How did you get involved with STEMedia, and how did that experience connect with your work in structural forensics and forensic engineering?
What was it like transitioning from aerospace engineering to bridge design and other civil structures, and can you share a specific example of how the work differs?
How has your experience in structural forensics been so far, and what are some interesting challenges you’ve faced in that field?
Why do you think structural failures and engineering failure analysis capture the interest of both engineers and the public?
How do you usually respond to questions about building safety after a collapse or disaster without putting the engineering profession in a negative light?
Do forensic investigations typically take a long time, like the Florida condominium case, and what factors affect the timeline?
What can everyday engineers do to help promote engineering communication and engineering outreach online instead of leaving that responsibility to media or other industries?
What final piece of advice would you give to engineers who want to make a bigger impact and share their knowledge beyond just doing design work?

Here Are Some of the Key Points Discussed About How Structural Forensics Resonates with Both Engineers and the Public Through Storytelling:


STEMedia begins as a creative outlet alongside technical work in bridge design and grows into a platform that highlights the value of STEM careers. The combination of hands-on engineering and content creation strengthens the ability to connect technical knowledge with real-world inspiration.
Aerospace engineering focuses on structures that must fly and respond to complex forces, while civil structures center on stability and long-term durability. In aerospace, extensive testing is common, but in bridge design, every structure is built full-scale with no trial run.
Structural forensics involves investigating failures and uncovering the technical story behind what went wrong. Each project presents unique challenges, such as identifying damage from age, weather, or unexpected events through careful analysis and observation.
Engineering failure analysis sparks interest because it reveals what happens when systems break down, creating powerful moments of learning. These investigations serve as both cautionary tales and educational insights that appeal to curiosity and safety awareness.
Focusing on the science behind the failure helps shift the conversation from blame to understanding. By explaining the physical forces and technical reasons involved, the discussion becomes informative rather than accusatory.
Many investigations take significant time due to limited access to records or incomplete data. Determining causes such as material degradation or environmental impact requires careful review and technical expertise.
Engineers can share everyday experiences and project highlights in simple, relatable ways that make their work more visible. Even small moments posted online can shift public perception and inspire future generations.
Making a meaningful impact involves creating something that lasts beyond the work itself, whether in infrastructure or in others. Sharing knowledge and encouraging growth in others extends the influence of engineering far beyond the drafting table.

In this episode, we talk with Bob Brown, author and co-founder of SpatialVision LLC, about the top structural and foundation repair-related issues behind home renovation failures. From poor assessments and overloaded framing to water management problems.

***The video version of this episode can be viewed here.***
Engineering Quotes:





Here Are Some of the Questions We Asked Bob:

What are some common mistakes people make when assessing a structure before a home renovation, and can you share a real-life example where poor foundation inspection or evaluation led to serious delays or damage?
How do the existing foundation and soil conditions affect a project’s success, and what can a structural engineer do to help ensure lasting solutions?
What risks come with adding weight to a structure, and how can engineers ensure the foundation and framing can support it effectively?
What kind of damage can water and poor drainage cause to a home’s foundation, and how can homeowners prevent it through proper water management?
What renovation shortcuts can weaken a structure, and how can structural engineers ensure safety and building code compliance aren’t compromised?
What are the biggest mistakes you see realtors or homeowners make when addressing foundation repair needs?
What are some common myths about foundation repair that you often have to correct or clarify?
How can engineers better connect with homeowners, realtors, and contractors to support structural evaluations and renovations?
What final piece of advice would you give to structural engineers to help them avoid common foundation repair mistakes and ensure successful renovation outcomes?

Here Are Some of the Key Points Discussed About Foundation Repair Tips You Need to Know for Safer Home Renovations:


Homeowners frequently trust sales reps instead of engineers, leading to evaluations based on selling, not safety. One poor assessment results in wasted time and money and unresolved structural issues. This reinforces the need for a structural engineer in foundation repair.
The condition of the foundation and soil directly impacts renovation success. Structural engineers work with geotechnical experts to assess risks and design safe, lasting solutions. Understanding soil conditions is critical for effective foundation repair.
Adding extra weight like a second story can overload existing foundations if not properly evaluated. Engineers ensure the structure and soil can support changes before any construction begins. A structural engineer's input is essential in these scenarios.
Water intrusion and poor drainage cause shifting, cracking, and long-term damage to homes. Homeowners prevent this by using drainage systems suited to their region’s soil and climate. Water management is a key aspect of foundation repair.
Shortcuts during renovations, like relying on lifetime warranties, often hide deeper structural problems. Engineers ensure repairs follow building codes and actually solve the root cause. Foundation repair must be based on objective assessment, not marketing promises.
Many people confuse soil heave with settlement and apply the wrong fix, making the issue worse. Engineers identify the true cause to avoid misdiagnosis and costly errors. Soil conditions must be correctly interpreted in any foundation inspection.
Cracks don’t always mean a foundation needs repair, and most insurance excludes soil-related damage. Objective, data-backed assessments from engineers cut through the misinformation. A structural evaluation is vital before assuming major repairs are needed.
Engineers improve renovation outcomes by building visibility through online platforms and offering residential forensics.

In this episode, we talk with Domingo (Dom) Diaz, registered architect, AIA, and president of Diaz Architect & Associates, P.C., about facade restoration best practices and how building owners can stay ahead by prioritizing safety, avoiding costly violations, and making proactive maintenance a smart long-term strategy.

***The video version of this episode can be viewed here.***
Engineering Quotes:





Here Are Some of the Questions We Asked Dom:

Why are facade and parapet inspections so important, and what makes them critical for building safety and maintenance?
What structural issues commonly affect parapets and facades, and how do weather and design elements like flashing and relieving angles contribute?
How do parapet conditions impact compliance with NYC’s Local Law 11 facade compliance guide (FISP), and what should structural engineers be aware of when working on these projects?
What should building owners know about the upcoming Sub-Cycle 10A deadline in 2025, and how can they prepare using proactive maintenance for commercial buildings?
What’s the best way for owners to proactively plan for facade maintenance and reduce the risk of expensive emergency repairs?
How does your restoration approach differ when working on historic buildings versus modern ones, and what are the unique historic building facade maintenance challenges?
What’s the best way for engineers and architects to collaborate effectively during facade and parapet restoration projects, especially when aesthetics and code compliance are both important?
What changes or trends are you seeing in NYC’s building codes and facade inspection requirements that engineers and architects should be aware of?
What questions do property owners usually ask at the start of facade restoration projects?
What final piece of advice would you give to engineers, architects, or building owners about facade restoration best practices and inspections?

Here Are Some of the Key Points Discussed About Helpful Facade Restoration Best Practices for Safer Buildings:


Facade restoration best practices involve conducting regular facade and parapet inspections to identify deterioration before it becomes dangerous. Signs of facade and parapet failure should be addressed early to maintain safety.
Parapets and facades often suffer from cracking, displacement, and corrosion, especially in colder climates where freeze-thaw cycles occur. Poor flashing details, improperly installed relieving angles, and aging connections further contribute to failures that compromise the building envelope.
Compliance with Local Law 11 depends on recognizing hidden vulnerabilities in parapet design. Engineers must account for older construction methods, lack of redundancy, and the layered nature of parapets to meet code requirements and ensure public safety.
Owners should begin planning now by evaluating the condition of their facades through both destructive and non-destructive testing. Allowing flexibility in repair plans helps address unforeseen issues and meet compliance requirements without costly delays.
Preventative maintenance for commercial buildings is critical. Proactive maintenance, such as sealing joints and inspecting parapets regularly, prevents small issues from escalating. This avoids expensive emergency repairs and extends the life of building components.
When it comes to historic building facade maintenance, a more careful approach is needed that prioritizes preservation while meeting modern code standards. Decisions often involve balancing repair versus replacement and selecting materials that maintain the appearance while improving performance.
Collaboration improves when teams anticipate hidden conditions and agree on flexible repair scopes...

In this episode, we talk with Jeff Brandeis, founder & CEO of Engaging Webinars, about the biggest Zoom mistakes for engineers that cost professionals clients, and the simple strategies to fix them, captivate audiences, and convert prospects into paying clients.

***The video version of this episode can be viewed here.***
Engineering Quotes:





Here Are Some of the Questions We Asked Jeff:

What are the biggest Zoom mistakes for engineers when explaining complex technical concepts, and how can they make them easier to understand?
What key elements make a webinar effective and help guide the audience toward practical takeaways?
Can you tell us more about your Engaging Webinars program and how it helps engineers fix their Zoom mistakes?
How can engineers use storytelling to avoid Zoom mistakes, make technical presentations more interesting, and connect better with non-technical audiences?
What are some of the best ways engineers can use webinars to show their expertise, avoid Zoom mistakes, attract new clients, and make a lasting impact?
How does understanding audience psychology help engineers avoid Zoom mistakes and improve webinar engagement and presentation effectiveness?
What final piece of advice would you give engineers who want to improve their online presence, presentation skills, and client communication while avoiding Zoom mistakes for engineers?

Here Are Some of the Key Points Discussed About How to Fix Zoom Mistakes for Engineers and Improve Presentations:


Engineers often struggle to keep virtual audiences engaged when presenting technical content. By using clear visuals, simplifying language, and encouraging interaction, they help others stay focused and absorb complex information more easily while avoiding Zoom mistakes for engineers.
A strong webinar feels like a two-way conversation, not a lecture. When presenters use structure, visuals, and audience interaction, they create a memorable experience that leads to real learning and action.
The engaging webinar approach transforms presentations into dynamic, classroom-style sessions. With tools like live drawing and seamless transitions, it helps engineers connect emotionally and visually with their audience, reducing Zoom mistakes for engineers.
Storytelling helps engineers relate technical concepts to real-life challenges their audience understands. When the focus shifts to the audience’s needs and experiences, engagement rises, and the message sticks, minimizing Zoom mistakes for engineers.
Engineers build credibility by keeping webinars focused and responsive. Respecting time, managing questions with techniques like “parking,” and offering thoughtful follow-up all contribute to a professional, high-impact experience.
Engineers who understand what their audience cares about present with greater clarity and purpose. By making the content relevant and meaningful, they keep attention high and inspire action, preventing Zoom mistakes for engineers.
Confidence grows with action, and a simple “5-4-3-2-1” countdown helps overcome hesitation. Engineers who take that first step build lasting communication skills that strengthen both career and personal impact.

More Details in This Episode…
About Jeff Brandeis
Jeff Brandeis is the CEO of Engaging Webinars, where he helps professionals transform their online presentations into compelling, interactive experiences that drive audience engagement and boost sales. With a background in financial strategy and sales leadership, Jeff has spent his career refining presentation techniques that captivate audiences and inspire action.

Drawing from his experience as a VP of Sales and VP of Solution Design, Jeff recognized the need for more dynamic and results-driven ...

In this episode, we talk with Natalie Tse, SE, LEED AP, client relations and business development specialist at Tipping, about today’s top workforce challenges in structural engineering and how firms can take meaningful action through DEI strategies to attract and retain top talent.

***The video version of this episode can be viewed here.***
Engineering Quotes:





Here Are Some of the Questions We Asked Natalie:

How can structural engineers show their value to clients, especially as sustainability and resilience become more important in the industry?
How should firms prepare to offer sustainability and resilience services going forward?
What are the biggest workforce challenges engineers face today, and what can firms do to improve things like pay, equity, and career growth?
How can new engineers make a difference at work, even if they don’t have leadership responsibilities yet?
What does it mean to be a visionary and resilient leader in structural engineering today?
What soft skills are most significant for engineers to develop as they grow into leadership roles?
What final piece of advice would you give to structural engineers who want to lead with purpose and resilience in their careers?

Here Are Some of the Key Points Discussed About Top Structural Engineering Workforce Challenges and How to Solve Them:


Structural engineers show their value by moving beyond calculations and recognizing patterns throughout a project’s lifecycle. By listening closely and understanding client goals, they align their solutions with long-term impact, especially in areas like sustainability and resilience.
Firms prepare to offer sustainability and resilience services by encouraging engineers to stay informed, make smart material choices, and build strong industry relationships. These actions help shape client expectations and demonstrate leadership in sustainable design practices.
Engineers face workforce challenges such as burnout, lack of advancement, and inequity. Firms improve outcomes by supporting autonomy, promoting continuous learning, and creating a culture where purpose and progress are part of everyday work.
New engineers make a difference by contributing to an environment where everyone feels safe to share ideas. Their voice matters, and by speaking up and engaging with their team, they build trust and help improve collaboration.
A visionary and resilient leader anticipates change, values inclusion, and supports others through thoughtful communication and meaningful work. They recognize the impact of team well-being and create space for innovation to thrive.
Trust and emotional intelligence are essential soft skills for engineers in leadership. They strengthen team dynamics by listening well, showing empathy, and creating clear and respectful communication channels.
Engineers build strong careers by developing both technical knowledge and meaningful relationships. Those who stay curious, seek guidance, and understand their ability to influence others grow into confident and impactful leaders.

More Details in This Episode…
About Natalie Tse, SE, LEED AP
Natalie Y.L. Tse is a California licensed structural engineer specializing in seismic evaluation and seismic strengthening of existing buildings. She joined Tipping in 2017 with a broad range of design experience in the educational, commercial/retail, residential, science, and technology sectors. Her portfolio includes the design, assessment, and seismic retrofit of 30+ school campuses, a mission-critical laboratory and office building, and a new mass timber-framed cathedral over a concrete post-tensioned podium.

Natalie firmly believes that one of the most essential components of a successful project is effectiv...

In this episode, we talk with Alexander Daddow, PE, CDT, senior strengthening solutions engineer at Simpson Strong-Tie, about how composite strengthening systems are revolutionizing structural engineering by enhancing durability, sustainability, and the way we reinforce structures for the future.

***The video version of this episode can be viewed here.***
Engineering Quotes:





Here Are Some of the Questions We Asked Alexander:

How did realizing you didn’t want to be at a desk all day shape your career path?
Can you explain composite strengthening systems and their role in engineering?
What are the biggest misconceptions engineers have about composite strengthening solutions?
What types of structures and projects typically use composite strengthening systems?
What has been your most challenging or rewarding project, and what did you learn from it?
What do you see as the future of composite strengthening and retrofitting in engineering?
What advice would you give to young engineers looking to explore career paths beyond traditional roles?

Here Are Some of the Key Points Discussed About Composite Strengthening Systems Unlocking A New Era Of Structural Engineering:


Recognizing that a traditional desk job doesn’t align with personal strengths and preferences leads to exploring roles that allow for more interaction and fieldwork. Finding a position that balances technical expertise with engagement in real-world applications creates a more fulfilling career.
Composite strengthening systems, such as FRP and FRCM, enhance structural integrity by bonding high-strength materials to existing concrete, masonry, or steel. These systems provide lightweight, effective reinforcement when properly installed with surface preparation and anchoring, making them valuable for retrofitting and repair.
Many assume composite strengthening systems function as simple adhesive fixes, but their effectiveness depends on proper installation, testing, and engineering expertise. While these solutions enhance structural performance, they are not a universal remedy and require careful evaluation for each application.
Composite strengthening systems apply to various structures, including historical buildings, infrastructure repairs, and seismic retrofits. Their ability to increase strength without significant weight or architectural modification makes them ideal for preserving existing structures while improving performance.
Managing structural projects with multiple stakeholders requires extensive collaboration, clear communication, and strategic planning. Effective coordination among engineers, contractors, and regulatory agencies ensures high-quality results and minimizes potential obstacles.
Advancements in composite strengthening continue to improve retrofitting techniques, with frameworks like ASC 41 providing essential guidelines for evaluating and reinforcing existing buildings. Industry collaboration, study sessions, and expert guidance help engineers apply these evolving solutions effectively.
Paying attention to personal interests, embracing challenges, and remaining open to new opportunities leads to a more rewarding career. Engineers who actively seek roles that align with their strengths and values find greater success and long-term satisfaction.

More Details in This Episode…
About Alexander Daddow, PE, CDT
Alex Daddow is a registered professional engineer in California, Colorado, Idaho, Montana, Nevada, Utah, Alaska, Washington, Oregon and Wyoming. He graduated from Cal Poly San Luis Obispo with a degree in architectural engineering. Before joining Simpson Strong-Tie in 2019, Alex was a consulting engineer working on podium structures, custom housing, bridges, historic retrofits, schools,

In this episode, we talk with Andy Richardson, PE, SE, principal engineer of 29E6 and host of ENHANCE AEC, about structural engineering career development, overcoming burnout, achieving excellence in structural engineering, and using the 6E framework to guide engineers toward a sustainable and fulfilling career.

***The video version of this episode can be viewed here.***
Engineering Quotes:



Here Are Some of the Questions We Asked Andy:

Considering the high-stress nature of structural engineering, how have you managed burnout throughout your career?
How do you maintain high standards in our industry while balancing various challenges?
Can you explain how your six E framework influences your approach to structural engineering and improves engineers' work?
Your firm handles a wide range of projects; what are the benefits and challenges of not specializing in one specific area?
Given the diverse challenges in projects like coastal and seismic work, what considerations should structural engineers keep in mind?
Can you provide an example of a project where you had to balance efficiency, safety, and code compliance?
What habits or resources have you found beneficial in keeping your knowledge up to date, given the vital importance of continuous learning in engineering?
Could you share some insights from your experiences hosting Enhance AEC-E and the lessons learned from speaking with various AEC professionals?
What final piece of advice would you give to someone starting out or transitioning into the structural engineering profession?

Here Are Some of the Key Points Discussed About Structural Engineering Career Development Tips That Will Make You Thrive:


Aligning one's career with personal interests and strengths is crucial in managing burnout effectively in structural engineering. Personal growth and gradual changes enhance career satisfaction and trajectory.
Maintaining high standards in structural engineering is achieved through robust quality assurance processes that ensure consistency and quality, crucial for successful project management.
The six E's framework focuses on deeper values and purposes, transforming routine tasks into meaningful contributions, and sustaining motivation and passion within the profession.
Handling a diverse range of projects offers benefits such as economic resilience and enhanced professional development by exposing engineers to a variety of challenges, though it necessitates adaptability and versatile skills.
Engineers must adhere to specific building codes and safety standards crucial for success in variable environments like coastal and seismic areas, leveraging ongoing education and modern tools to stay updated.
In a notable project, engineers implemented stringent verification processes, using concrete weights to simulate real-world forces, ensuring the project met all safety and code compliance standards while maintaining efficiency.
Continuous learning is vital through active involvement in professional associations, which provide networking and educational opportunities to keep engineers current and effective in their fields.
Hosting Enhance AEC-E highlights the importance of sharing knowledge within large online communities, enriching the audience and fostering collective growth and learning opportunities across the industry.
Newcomers to structural engineering should actively communicate with mentors and leaders, ask questions, and engage in continuous learning to become proficient in their craft and adapt to the evolving demands of the field.

More Details in This Episode…
About Andy Richardson, PE, SE
Andy Richardson is a seasoned structural engineer with over 26 years of experience in the industry,

In this episode, we talk with Reyhaneh Navabzadeh, Ph.D., A.M. ASCE, engineer at Structural Integrity Associates, about how the earthquake engineering evolution transcends traditional practices to tackle critical challenges with innovative strategies for safer, more resilient structures.

***The video version of this episode can be viewed here.***
Engineering Quotes:





Here Are Some of the Questions We Asked Reyhaneh:

How do earthquake engineering and traditional structural engineering differ in terms of design considerations and analytical approaches?
How has earthquake engineering evolved globally, and what strategies can regions with different seismic risks implement to improve their resilience?
What are the major challenges earthquake engineers face today, and how do these challenges impact the design and construction of structures designed to resist seismic activity?
Can you discuss the recent advancements in materials, technologies, and research that are shaping structural and earthquake engineering practices?
Do you need to sign up to receive earthquake alerts, or is it automatically available on devices like smartphones?
How can regions with limited resources effectively implement earthquake-resistant systems?
What are the essential skills or areas of knowledge that engineers should develop to excel in earthquake engineering?
What final piece of advice would you give to engineers looking to specialize in earthquake engineering or incorporate seismic design principles into their work?

Here Are Some of the Key Points Discussed About The Ultimate Earthquake Engineering Evolution That Is Reshaping Structures:


The earthquake engineering evolution goes beyond traditional structural engineering by incorporating specialized knowledge such as seismology and soil-structure interactions to ensure structures withstand seismic forces. This discipline integrates detailed seismic load considerations, requiring mastery of both general and specialized analytical approaches.
Global earthquake engineering standards have significantly evolved, adopting advanced methods like performance-based design and utilizing smart materials. Regions enhance resilience by implementing tailored strategies based on micro-zonation studies that assess local seismic risks and by investing in education and infrastructure.
Earthquake engineers face the challenge of adapting increasingly complex code books to design safe structures in rapidly urbanizing areas with high seismic risks. These challenges necessitate innovative solutions and adaptations in building designs to meet the stringent requirements of updated seismic codes.
Recent advancements in earthquake engineering include the adoption of smart materials like shape memory alloys and systems such as base isolation. These innovations improve the resilience of structures by enhancing their structural integrity and adaptive capabilities, crucial for mitigating the impacts of earthquakes.
Earthquake alert systems such as My Shake and Shake Alert provide essential early warnings and are becoming integral for residents in seismic regions. These apps may require a sign-up or automatic activation, depending on device settings and regional implementation strategies.
Regions with limited resources can enhance earthquake resilience by prioritizing efficiency in design, using cost-effective and locally available materials, and adopting policies and training specific to seismic criteria. This approach helps maximize functionality while minimizing unnecessary expenses.
Engineers should focus on understanding seismic risks through micro-zonation and adapting global standards to local conditions. Continuous education and the ability to implement advanced structural designs,

In this episode, we speak with David Fanella, Ph.D., S.E., P.E., F.ACI, F.ASCE, F.SEI, vice president of engineering at the Concrete Reinforcing Steel Institute, about designing cost-effective steel-reinforced concrete buildings, the role of constructability in project success, especially in seismic construction, and how managing tolerances can streamline construction and reduce costs.

***The video version of this episode can be viewed here.***
Engineering Quotes:



Here Are Some of the Questions We Asked David:

How can we effectively implement economical and efficient designs for reinforced steel concrete structures during the design and planning phases?
What advice or resources can you recommend for newer engineers to learn more about constructability issues, especially those who primarily work in offices?
How do constructability mistakes in seismic construction impact structures in high seismic regions, potentially causing a domino effect on the economy?
What are the most common inefficiencies in concrete design, and how can they be avoided?
How do engineers, architects, and contractors collaborate to enhance cost efficiency in complex projects?
With your extensive career in different disciplines, what have you enjoyed and learned, and what were the pros and cons of working at small versus large firms and teaching?
What final piece of advice would you give to both students and working engineers on how to progress effectively in their careers?

Here Are Some of the Key Points Discussed About Unparalleled Ways to Improve Seismic Construction With Tested Concrete Designs:


Effective implementation of economical and efficient designs centers on constructability, encompassing economical formwork, appropriate fitting of reinforcing steel, and maintaining proper concrete flow to prevent defects such as segregation or honeycombing. Adherence to these principles throughout any project ensures success.
Newer engineers benefit from engaging with detailed design guides, like the ACI 318 provisions, which illuminate various aspects of typical buildings and aid in understanding project integration. Participation in real-world projects and access to resources focused on practical design and construction aspects significantly enhance their comprehension and skill application.
In high seismic regions, mistakes in seismic construction can intensify structural failures during earthquakes due to inadequate reinforcement and non-compliance with flexural, stiffness, and ductility requirements. Such errors in seismic construction result in substantial economic losses, elevated repair costs, and extended downtime for essential infrastructure.
Common inefficiencies in concrete design, such as inadequate detailing and overlooking tolerances, can cause construction delays and increase costs. Engineers mitigate these issues by ensuring detailed plans that account for tolerances and possible site adjustments, alongside employing adaptable design solutions like adjustable dowels to effectively manage onsite uncertainties.
Engineers, architects, and contractors improve cost efficiency through early collaboration, sharing expertise, and aligning project goals and materials from the beginning. This proactive approach facilitates the early resolution of potential issues, optimizes resource use, and ensures team alignment on project objectives and execution strategies.
A career engaging in both new and existing building designs presents dynamic challenges and diverse learning opportunities. Working at smaller firms typically offers broader responsibilities and closer client interactions, whereas larger firms provide resources for more significant, high-profile projects. Teaching enhances practical engineering work by allowing for an in-depth exploration ...

In this episode, I talk with Sudarshan Kasera, P.E., PMP, senior project engineer at Crown Castle, about the fast-changing telecommunications industry, exploring how 5G reshapes structural requirements, the complexities of tower modifications, and the pivotal role engineers play in driving innovation.

***The video version of this episode can be viewed here.***
Engineering Quotes:



Here Are Some of the Questions We Asked Sudarshan:

What types of telecommunication towers do you work with, and what structural challenges do they present?
How have technological advancements influenced your design and analysis approach, especially with stricter structural requirements?
What are the key industry codes and standards for designing telecommunication towers?
What structural analysis tools do you use for telecommunication towers, and how have they evolved?
Can you describe your process for designing or retrofitting a telecommunication tower, including an example project?
What is it like to collaborate with different disciplines in the construction of a telecom tower?
What final piece of advice would you give to structural engineers looking to enter or excel in the telecommunications industry?

Here Are Some of the Key Points Discussed About Mind-Blowing Innovations in the Telecommunications World:


Various telecommunication towers, including monopoles, cell supporting towers, guide towers, and concealed structures such as monopine and flagpole towers, present unique challenges. These challenges include ensuring stability under high wind loads and seismic conditions, managing the tension in guy wires, and dealing with the unique loading profiles of concealed towers.
The shift to 4G and 5G technologies increases the size and weight of equipment on towers, raising structural demands and the complexity of design and analysis. This advancement leads to a focus on retrofitting existing structures and integrating innovative analysis techniques such as finite element modeling and nonlinear analysis.
The key industry code, TIA222, set by the Telecommunications Industry Association, covers wind, seismic, and ice loading, as well as structural capacity and foundation design. Additionally, telecommunication towers must comply with the International Building Code and other relevant local and state codes.
Tools like TNX Tower, known for user-friendly tower analysis and design, along with RISA 3D and StaadPro for modeling complex or heavily reinforced parts of towers, are utilized. These tools, along with Mathcad and Excel for calculations, have evolved to better handle the complexities of modern telecom tower designs.
The design process involves a detailed analysis of existing structures to understand capacity and identify overstressed components. For example, a project near the ocean might require assessing corrosion and rust on a tower, then reinforcing or replacing affected parts to ensure stability and compliance with current codes, illustrating the iterative nature of this process.
Collaboration in telecom tower projects typically involves coordination with electrical and mechanical engineers for loading data and with general contractors for construction aspects. This ensures all design aspects are integrated and feasible for construction, addressing any material or constructability issues as they arise.
Engineers are encouraged to build a strong foundation in structural engineering fundamentals, familiarize themselves with specific industry codes like TIA222, embrace new technologies, and continuously adapt to new challenges. Innovation, problem-solving, and ongoing learning are crucial for navigating the unique challenges of the telecommunications sector.

More Details in This Episode…
About Sudarshan Kasera,

In this episode, we talk with Francesco D'Alessio, MBA, the chief commercial officer at Largo Inc., about the science behind vanadium, its unique properties, its essential role in structural engineering, and its transformative impact on advanced material technologies.

***The video version of this episode can be viewed here.***
Engineering Quotes:





Here Are Some of the Questions We Asked Francesco:

How does Vanadium enhance structural engineering, especially in steel reinforcement and similar applications?
How do changes in market trends or rebar standards affect material choices in the industry?
What strategies can an engineer use to manage risks associated with Vanadium supply shortages?
How does Largo maintain high-quality standards in its Vanadium production?
Is Largo a vertically integrated producer of Vanadium, and how does this benefit the industry?
Is the mining of Vanadium keeping up with its growing demand?
How does Vanadium support sustainability and net-zero goals in the architecture, engineering, and construction (AEC) industry?
What final piece of advice do you have for structural engineers leveraging advanced materials to innovate and improve the resilience and sustainability of their designs?

Here Are Some of the Key Points Discussed About How Vanadium Drives Remarkable Advances in the World of Engineering:


Vanadium enhances the strength, durability, and resilience of steel, making it ideal for structural engineering applications such as steel reinforcement. Its ability to improve performance with minimal additions makes it a critical component in modern, high-performance infrastructure.
Evolving market trends and rebar standards, particularly in regions like China, drive a global shift toward higher-quality and environmentally friendly steels. This increased demand highlights the importance of vanadium in meeting new requirements and ensuring compliance with updated standards.
Engineers manage risks by understanding the complexities of vanadium supply chains, including its production concentration in a few key countries. Clear communication with suppliers, thorough risk assessments, and staying informed about supply-demand dynamics are essential strategies to maintain material availability.
Largo achieves high-quality standards through complete control of its value chain, from mining to final distribution. This ensures consistent quality, supply stability, and customized solutions for demanding applications such as aerospace and energy storage.
Largo, as a vertically integrated producer of vanadium, controls the entire production process. This approach benefits the industry by ensuring reliable supply, consistent quality, and the ability to meet specific customer needs in high-grade applications.
Mining struggles to match the growing demand for vanadium, as new operations require years to develop and launch. This increasing gap emphasizes the need for strategic investment and long-term planning to secure a stable supply.
Vanadium supports sustainability by enabling the production of stronger steels, reducing the material needed for construction. Its use in vanadium flow batteries provides a fully recyclable, long-term energy storage solution, advancing net-zero goals and circular economy practices.
Structural engineers benefit from collaborating with suppliers, researchers, and peers to gain insights into the applications and advantages of advanced materials like vanadium. Participating in research and maintaining clear communication enable innovative solutions that improve sustainability and resilience in projects.

More Details in This Episode…
About Francesco D'Alessio, MBA
Mr. D'Alessio has over 17 years of experience in metals sa...

In this episode, we talk with Shane Brown, PE, SE, a senior engineer at Parametrix, about the essential skills and material choices needed to balance safety, aesthetics, and cost in bridge design. He shares key insights on building resilient structures that stand the test of time.

***The video version of this episode can be viewed here.***
Engineering Quotes:





Here Are Some of the Questions We Ask Shane :

What do you think is the most underrated skill an engineer needs to succeed in bridge design?
Can you describe a bridge project you worked on and the challenges you faced?
How do you select the type of bridge to design, and what factors do you consider in the process?
Can you share a memorable experience where teamwork was crucial to solving a major challenge?
How does Parametrix’s employee-owned model impact project management and client service?
Can you share an example of a tough decision you made to balance safety, cost, and aesthetics in bridge design?
What advice would you give to structural engineers who want to specialize in bridge design and make a lasting impact in the field?

Here Are Some of the Key Points Discussed About the Essential Skills to Secure Better Bridge Designs:


Understanding how bridges are built is a critical but often overlooked skill for structural engineers. Real-world experience, such as visiting construction sites, allows engineers to design practical solutions that can be efficiently constructed.
In a recent project, the team designs a system-to-system interchange to connect two highways, allowing free-flowing traffic. The project involves braided ramps and flyover bridges, with challenges such as maintaining clearance, coordinating with the roadway team, staying within right-of-way limits, and protecting wetlands, all of which are addressed through collaborative efforts.
Designing a bridge requires careful consideration of factors like geography, soil conditions, traffic demands, and environmental impacts. Coordinating with roadway design teams and ensuring clearances are met is essential to creating a safe, functional, and sustainable structure.
Establishing a clear work plan as a team upfront ensures everyone understands their role, deadlines, and responsibilities. Collaborative planning keeps the project organized, engages the team, and leads to a successful outcome without sacrificing quality.
Engineers who stay with Parametrix long-term often highlight a positive work culture and strong mentorship opportunities. This type of environment builds ownership, accountability, and a commitment to delivering exceptional client service.
Safety is always the top priority in structural engineering, and it is never compromised, regardless of project constraints. While cost and aesthetics can influence decisions, safety remains the foundation of every design.
Understanding how bridges are built and gaining hands-on experience is essential for structural engineers. Real-world learning and mentorship provide the foundation for designing practical, impactful, and efficient bridge solutions.

More Details in This Episode…
About Shane Brown, P.E., S.E.
Shane Brown, PE, SE, is a senior structural engineer with 25 years of experience, specializing in the design and evaluation of bridges and retaining walls. His expertise spans the analysis and design of single- and multi-span bridges using materials such as cast-in-place concrete, precast/prestressed concrete, post-tensioned concrete, built-up steel, rolled steel, and timber.

Since joining the Bridge & Structures group at Parametrix in 2007, Shane has made impactful contributions to high-profile projects, including pedestrian bridges, complex retaining walls,

In this episode, I talk with Graciela Patino, senior vice-president at WSP, about the concept of shore power and its essential role in minimizing the environmental impact of cruise ships while advancing sustainable maritime practices.

***The video version of this episode can be viewed here.***
Engineering Quotes:



Here Are Some of the Questions We Asked Graciela:

What are some of the key challenges involved in designing electrical and control systems for movable bridges?
How does working on rehabilitation projects for movable bridges differ from designing new ones?
Could you explain how shore power works and why it plays a vital role in environmental sustainability?
How has your experience with movable bridges contributed to your work on shore power projects?
What are the biggest engineering challenges the industry faces when implementing shore power systems at ports?
What skills or experience do engineers need to succeed in large-scale sustainable projects like shore power?
What final piece of advice would you give to students starting out in electrical engineering or sustainable technology projects?

Here Are Some of the Key Points Discussed About Shore Power and Its Environmental Benefits:


Designing electrical and control systems for movable bridges requires precise coordination among multiple disciplines to achieve safety and functionality. Fixed physical spaces and the integration of modern technology, like programmable logic controllers, increase the complexity of these projects.
Rehabilitation projects for movable bridges present greater challenges than designing new ones because they involve adapting existing infrastructure to incorporate modern technology and meet safety standards. Engineers navigate fixed spaces and coordinate updates across all disciplines to ensure functionality and compliance.
Shore power connects docked ships to utility power, reducing reliance on onboard generators and cutting greenhouse gas emissions significantly. This cleaner, cost-effective energy solution improves environmental sustainability by minimizing air pollution in ports.
Experience with movable bridges provides valuable insights into coordinating across disciplines and addressing spatial and operational constraints. These skills directly apply to shore power projects, where careful planning is essential to accommodate moving ships and complex infrastructure.
Key challenges in shore power implementation include working within tight physical spaces, managing structural loads of existing infrastructure, and ensuring compatibility with various ship types. Collaborative efforts among disciplines and suppliers play a critical role in overcoming these obstacles.
Engineers require strong technical expertise, interdisciplinary coordination skills, and adaptability to evolving technologies. Emphasizing collaboration and learning from experienced industry professionals is essential for success in large-scale projects.
Students benefit from building their careers step by step, mastering technical skills before pursuing management roles. This incremental approach establishes a solid foundation in both technical and collaborative aspects, supporting long-term success in their field.

More Details in This Episode…
About Graciela Patino
Graciela Patino, senior vice-president at WSP and an electrical engineer, is a graduate of the University of Florida, Florida, where she earned a Bachelor of Science degree in electrical engineering. She has more than 29 years of experience that includes design for power distribution, instrumentation and controls, and motor drive systems. Graciela has worked in the movable bridge industry for 24 years, designing and commissioning electrical and control systems for movable ...

In this episode, I talk with Jake Kennington, P.E., SE, senior engineer at Reaveley Engineers and the owner and coach at Human Engineer Coach, about how principles like stability and resilience can transform both your career and life. Discover why “engineering yourself first” is the ultimate blueprint for success!

***The video version of this episode can be viewed here.***
Engineering Quotes:



Here Are Some of the Questions We Asked Jake:

Why do you think engineers often prioritize professional work over personal growth, and what risks come with that?
How did “engineering yourself first” become a key focus for you, and how does it relate to building a strong and resilient career, similar to principles in structural engineering?
How do you connect the structural engineering concept of “strong column, weak beam” to personal development?
Can you explain the idea of “owning the morning” and how starting the day with personal time can positively impact your overall day?
Why do you encourage engineers to journal, and how does writing help improve self-awareness?
How do you motivate engineers to explore creative outlets outside of work, and is this something you incorporate into your coaching?
How does self-discipline play a role in building a strong personal foundation, and how can engineers develop this skill?
What final piece of advice would you give to structural engineers or young professionals aiming to build a strong foundation for long-term success in their careers?

Here Are Some of the Key Points Discussed About Why Engineering Yourself First Is the Key to Achieving Success:


Engineers often prioritize urgent tasks because they are tangible and measurable, but this approach may lead to neglecting personal growth and long-term well-being. By distinguishing between urgency and importance, they can create a more balanced and rewarding approach to both work and life, reducing burnout and building resilience.
Personal development alongside professional growth allows engineers to achieve balance and avoid burnout. Just as structural engineering relies on strong foundational elements, personal resilience is built through self-discipline, creativity, and self-awareness, which support long-term career and life success.
In structural engineering, stability depends on strong foundational elements, and the same principle applies to life. Strengthening personal foundations with self-discipline, creativity, and self-awareness enables individuals to sustain their careers, families, and overall well-being, ensuring a stable and resilient future.
Starting the day with intentional personal time ensures that essential priorities, such as mental, emotional, and physical health, receive attention before daily demands take over. This practice sets a positive tone, eliminates distractions, and establishes a strong foundation for a productive and balanced day.
Journaling captures meaningful moments and refines thoughts, making them easier to reflect on and preserve. This simple yet effective practice organizes the mind, builds mindfulness, and ensures experiences are remembered rather than forgotten over time.
Exploring creative projects outside of work equips individuals with new skills and perspectives that enhance their personal and professional lives. By stepping beyond the routine, engineers strengthen adaptability, problem-solving abilities, and connections, contributing to long-term success.
Self-discipline forms the foundation of integrity, requiring individuals to honor commitments made to themselves. Embracing the effort needed to achieve goals allows engineers to develop habits that drive long-term success and fulfillment.
Building a strong foundation becomes more achievable with the guidance of a mentor ...

In this episode, I talk with James Fisher, Ph.D., P.E., Dist.M.ASCE, consulting engineer at SJI and vice president of CSD Structural Engineers, about the core principles of structural engineering—showing how simple designs, precision, and collaboration can cut costs, meet deadlines, and deliver lasting quality.

***The video version of this episode can be viewed here.***
Engineering Quotes:



Here Are Some of the Questions We Asked James:

What have been the most rewarding parts of your involvement in organizations like the Steel Joyce Institute and the American Institute of Steel Construction?
Why is it important to focus on constructability early in the design process, and how does it help avoid costly mistakes?
As a professor, did you emphasize constructability, or was it a focus you developed more in your industry work, and can you share examples of how it helps prevent costly mistakes?
What do you mean by creating 'Flintstone designs,' and how does keeping designs simple and robust make structures better?
How can engineers decide when to stick with proven methods and when to try new ideas?
Why is paying attention to detail so important in design, and how can small mistakes lead to bigger problems?
How can engineers use technology effectively while still relying on their own judgment and critical thinking?
What trends or challenges do you see in structural engineering, and what advice would you give to young engineers starting out?

Here Are Some of the Key Points Discussed About Why Simple Designs Lead to Better Engineering Outcomes:


Engaging with organizations like the Steel Joyce Institute and the American Institute of Steel Construction encourages collaboration and knowledge sharing among industry leaders. This involvement not only influences building codes but also strengthens the engineering community by cultivating professional relationships and lifelong friendships.
Focusing on constructability early ensures designs remain practical and straightforward, reducing issues during construction. While minimizing material weight may seem cost-effective, it often leads to higher labor costs for detailing, fabrication, and assembly, making constructability a priority for streamlining processes and preventing costly errors.
In industry work, constructability becomes a critical focus, as practical applications demand simplified designs to avoid unnecessary complexity. Clear and precise plans reduce construction errors, save time, and lower labor costs on-site, demonstrating the importance of constructability.
The "Flintstone philosophy" emphasizes keeping designs simple and robust, making structures easier to build and less prone to errors. This approach prioritizes practical solutions that address real-world construction challenges, resulting in more effective and resilient structures.
Balancing efficiency and simplicity requires engineers to focus on the big picture and avoid unnecessary innovations. Proven methods offer reliability, while new ideas should be explored only when they provide clear advantages and are grounded in sound principles to ensure successful project outcomes.
Attention to detail is essential, as small design errors can cascade into larger issues during construction, leading to costly corrections. Clear, practical designs help engineers prevent such problems and maintain the integrity of their projects.
Technology serves as a tool to enhance and refine designs, but it cannot replace human judgment. Engineers must apply their experience, foundational principles, and critical thinking to validate outputs from design tools, ensuring results are both practical and safe.
Emerging trends like AI and advanced technologies challenge engineers to use these tools correctly and respo...