All content for Unpacking Contract Law is the property of Timothy Dodsworth, Maggie Hemsworth & Severine Saintier and is served directly from their servers
with no modification, redirects, or rehosting. The podcast is not affiliated with or endorsed by Podjoint in any way.
Tim can't remember his name. Maggie brings her elephant to work and Severine puts them on enquiry. This discussion is anything but de minimis!
Tim waves his hands in the air. Maggie becomes the founding member of a fan club. Severine shuts the door on it all.
Check out our sponsor: https://www.reading.ac.uk/ready-to-study/study/subject-area/law-ug/mlaw
Maggie claims to be orthodox. Severine is persistent and Tim claims to be using reasonable endeavours. Was it all predictable or is there some force majeure at work?
Check out our sponsor: https://www.reading.ac.uk/ready-to-study/study/subject-area/law-ug/mlaw
Three semantic magicians turn liquidated damages into penalties, primary obligations into secondary and back again – or not!
Check out our new sponsor: https://www.reading.ac.uk/ready-to-study/study/subject-area/law-ug/mlaw
Who cares if the poms have got it wrong? Tim could be a tour guide round Gloucester docks, Severine would support the business – could Maggie foresee this?
Check out our sponsor: ncl.ac.uk
Tim is speechless. Severine is handed her favourite on a platter and apparently Maggie was younger in 1977. Are there more unfair terms than expected?
Check out our sponsor: ncl.ac.uk
We're all in the same room! What could possible go wrong when we have to interpret mathematical questions?
Listen to us discuss this case with our american colleagues from the 'Clauses and Controversies' Podcast - https://open.spotify.com/show/2knPFRNkU9iuPSiwtaqIb9?si=CtU0kCx-SUWACdlQ8j9RRw
Check out our sponsor: ncl.ac.uk
Tim threatens to burn it all down. Maggie is not fussy and yet Séverine does not pick up on it. Do they have capacity for more discussions?
Check out our sponsor: ncl.ac.uk/law/
Séverine finds every trace of good faith. Maggie finds it all beguiling and Tim just dumps unjust enrichment. Is it implied that they can’t agree?
Check out our sponsor: ncl.ac.uk/law/
It's the 2-year anniversary of Unpacking Contract Law! Maggie takes her portable palm tree with her. Tim lets policies compete. Severine allows some agreement - isn't that illegal?
Severine discovers a pedagogical tool kit. Maggie admits to being contrary and Tim gets into principles whilst juggling bystanders and promisees. Can they rectify things?
In this episode, Tim thinks Maggie is going to be a difficult customer for his straw business. Severine will finish her point at all cost. Yet we all agree that the court got it wrong: it is a 'battle of terms' rather than a 'battle of forms'.
