After revelations surfaced of his close ties and supportive messages to convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein, Lord Peter Mandelson was dismissed as the UK’s ambassador to the United States by Prime Minister Keir Starmer. However, despite being “removed with immediate effect,” reports indicate that the government has not yet formally severed his employment status. As a result, he remains on the payroll and is said to be eligible for compensation, possibly a six-figure package, pending legal or contractual settlement.

Separately, the advisory firm Global Counsel, which Mandelson co-founded, has moved to strip him of voting rights and dividends tied to his 21 % stake in the firm, effectively cutting off his financial benefits while it seeks to divest his holdings entirely. While public attention has focused on whether the state will continue paying him, significant steps have already been taken internally to limit his income streams from his private ventures.


to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com


source: 

Lord Mandelson is STILL being paid his six-figure salary despite being sacked as Britain's US Ambassador more than two weeks ago | Daily Mail Online

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.

The Epstein scandal exposed how deep corruption runs, but higher academia mostly slipped away untouched. Despite Epstein having offices at Harvard, donations to MIT, and close ties with professors, universities escaped the same scrutiny that crushed others. They played dumb, claimed ignorance, and hid behind words like “research” while pocketing predator money. Meanwhile, they still preach ethics and morality to the rest of us, acting like they’re society’s conscience while proving they’ll side with cash over principle every single time.

For working-class folks, the double standard is glaring. Ordinary people get hammered for the smallest mistakes, while billion-dollar institutions with political connections remain untouchable. Justice isn’t blind; it looks straight at the bank account before moving. The universities knew what they were doing, yet faced no real punishment. Until someone has the guts to drag academia into the same light as everyone else, it’s on us to keep the pressure on, to not forget, and to make sure their role in this rotten system never gets buried.


to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.

Billy Kipkorir Chemirmir was a Kenyan-American murderer and suspected serial killer linked to a string of deaths among elderly women in North Texas. Between 2016 and 2018, he is believed to have posed as a caregiver or maintenance worker to gain access to senior living communities, where he smothered victims—often with pillows—before stealing jewelry and valuables. Though investigators connected him to more than 20 suspicious deaths, he was formally indicted on 22 capital murder counts. Ultimately, he was convicted of two murders in Dallas County and sentenced to life in prison without parole.


In September 2023, while serving his sentence in the Coffield Unit in Texas, Chemirmir was killed by his cellmate. His crimes exposed systemic flaws in how elderly deaths were classified, as many of his victims’ deaths were initially written off as natural causes, delaying recognition of his pattern. The case sparked outrage and demands for reforms in oversight of senior housing facilities and postmortem investigations, highlighting the vulnerability of elderly populations to predatory violence.

to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.

Cary Stayner is a convicted American serial killer whose crimes shocked the nation in 1999. He was the older brother of Steven Stayner, whose childhood abduction and dramatic escape years later had already made the family infamous. While Steven was once portrayed as a tragic hero, Cary’s life spiraled into darkness. Working as a handyman near Yosemite National Park, Cary outwardly seemed quiet and unremarkable, but he harbored violent fantasies from a young age. His troubled background, compounded by his brother’s notoriety, set the stage for his eventual eruption into brutal violence that would stain his name and overshadow the legacy of his family.


The Yosemite Village murders refer to the killings of four women in and around Yosemite National Park in 1999. Cary Stayner first targeted three tourists—Carole Sund, her daughter Juli, and Juli’s friend Silvina Pelosso—whom he abducted, sexually assaulted, and murdered, before later killing Joie Armstrong, a Yosemite park naturalist. These crimes terrorized the community and drew massive media attention, not only because of their brutality but also because they occurred in such a famed natural landmark. Stayner was arrested and confessed, later being sentenced to death. The case became one of the most infamous examples of serial murder in California history, forever linking Yosemite with a dark chapter of violence and betrayal of trust.



to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

source:

https://www.outsideonline.com/adventure-travel/yosemite-horror/

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.

Bill Clinton’s relationship with the Fanjul brothers—sugar barons from Florida and one of the wealthiest and most politically connected families in America—has long been a matter of public scrutiny. The Fanjuls, Alfonso and José “Pepe” Fanjul, built a sugar empire worth billions, aided in large part by U.S. government subsidies and favorable trade policies. Clinton, during his presidency, was known to have cultivated ties with the brothers, reportedly even taking phone calls from Alfonso Fanjul while in the Oval Office. This relationship raised eyebrows because the Fanjuls were major political donors and lobbyists for the sugar industry, one of the most protected and subsidized sectors in the U.S. economy, despite persistent criticism about labor practices, environmental damage in the Everglades, and anticompetitive monopolistic power.





Steve Scully, a former telecommunications contractor who worked extensively on Little Saint James, claimed in the Netflix documentary Jeffrey Epstein: Filthy Rich that he saw Bill Clinton sitting alone with Epstein on the porch of the island’s main house. Scully, who said he had been to the island over a hundred times between 1999 and 2005, insisted there were no other guests present during that moment. His account added fuel to speculation about the former president’s connections to Epstein and the time he may have spent on the island.




to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.

In the case of State of Idaho v. Bryan C. Kohberger, the court issued a redacted order addressing the defense’s offer of proof regarding alternate perpetrators. Kohberger’s legal team sought to introduce evidence suggesting that individuals other than their client may have committed the November 2022 quadruple homicide in Moscow, Idaho. Under Idaho law, such evidence is only admissible if it is sufficiently reliable and relevant—meaning it must directly connect a third party to the crime, rather than merely raise speculation. The defense aimed to present social media posts, past statements, and other circumstantial materials pointing to potential third-party suspects, but the court evaluated whether this offer of proof met the legal threshold for admissibility at trial.

In its ruling, the court found that much of the defense’s proposed alternate perpetrator evidence was inadmissible due to its speculative nature. The judge determined that while the defense may pursue investigative leads, the materials presented did not provide a direct or reliable connection between any third party and the actual commission of the murders. The ruling emphasizes that mere suggestion or suspicion does not meet the standard required to shift focus from the accused to unnamed individuals. As a result, the court largely barred the defense from introducing alternate perpetrator theories unless they can later establish stronger, more direct evidence linking others to the crime. This decision is a significant pretrial blow to Kohberger’s defense strategy, which had hinged on creating reasonable doubt by implicating unidentified third parties.


to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com


source:

062625+REDACTED+Order+on+Defendants+Offer+of+Proof+RE+Alternate+Perpetrators.pdf

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.

Despite Bryan Kohberger’s guilty plea to the brutal murders of four University of Idaho students, a loud corner of the internet remains in absolute denial. These die-hard defenders—many of whom spent over a year spinning elaborate conspiracies—have refused to accept reality. Instead of acknowledging the confession, they’re now claiming he was coerced, framed, or railroaded into pleading guilty. Some insist it was a "tactical move" or a "ploy to expose the real killer," despite there being no legal precedent, factual basis, or courtroom indication supporting any of it. The DNA evidence, cell phone data, surveillance footage, and now his own words aren't enough for this fringe crowd that’s emotionally invested in his innocence.

What’s most baffling is the persistence of the "he’s still innocent" narrative, even as Kohberger’s own legal team has moved toward sentencing. For these online truthers, the guilty plea isn't a conclusion—it’s just another chapter in a fantasy where they get to play internet detective and cast doubt on grieving families and surviving victims. Many of them had built parasocial attachments to Kohberger, painting him as an intellectual, an underdog, even a victim of the justice system. Now that he’s confirmed what the evidence already screamed, their response isn’t to reflect or admit they were wrong—it’s to double down on delusion.


to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.

Kristi Goncalves, Kaylee’s distraught mother, shared harrowing new details in a Facebook post on July 3rd, describing how Bryan Kohberger didn’t simply stab her daughter—he beat her severely as she frantically fought for her life. Kristi revealed that Kohberger “beat her in the face and head while it was clear that she fought for her life,” extending the horror beyond the fatal stabbings and underscoring just how brutal and personal the attack was.


In her message defending their opposition to Kohberger’s plea deal, Kristi pleaded with critics to imagine their pain: “if your 21‑yr‑old daughter was sleeping in her bed and BK went into her house with the intention to kill her…and he did, by stabbing her MANY times, as well as beating her in the face and head…what would you want?” She made clear that while the state showed Kohberger “mercy by removing the death penalty,” Kaylee received none.


to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com



source:

Kaylee Goncalves' mom reveals Bryan Kohberger 'beat' her in the face before massacre | Daily Mail Online

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.

ChatGPT said:Several theories have emerged to explain why Bryan Kohberger might have murdered the four University of Idaho students, but none have been conclusively proven. One of the most prevalent theories is that Kohberger, a criminal justice Ph.D. student, was motivated by a twisted desire to commit the “perfect crime” and study the aftermath firsthand. His academic background and fascination with criminology fueled speculation that he was conducting some kind of real-world experiment in human behavior, violence, and law enforcement response. Some believe he saw the victims—particularly the popular and outgoing personalities of Kaylee Goncalves and Madison Mogen—as symbolic targets for his resentment, projecting his own social isolation and perceived failures onto them.

Another theory suggests the killings were more personal than academic. Reports indicate Kohberger may have followed the victims on social media and potentially visited the area multiple times before the murders. This raises the possibility of a growing obsession, perhaps unreciprocated or unnoticed by the victims, that spiraled into rage. The brutality of the crime—four people stabbed in their sleep—suggests a level of emotional intensity that points to more than detached curiosity. Whether it was resentment, rejection, a need for control, or some pathological fixation, the act appears deeply premeditated and full of personal symbolism. Yet with Kohberger offering no clear motive, and the public still left with unanswered questions, speculation continues to fill the vacuum where truth remains tightly sealed.


to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com



source:

Why did Bryan Kohberger kill? Experts weigh in on mysterious killings




Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.

Newly surfaced Bloomberg-obtained emails show that Jeffrey Epstein maintained close contact with several Harvard professors after his 2006 indictment for soliciting prostitution. Faculty like Stephen Kosslyn, Howard Gardner, and Mark Tramo corresponded with him about dinners, research funding, and even offered encouragement after his guilty plea. Kosslyn arranged meetings with Harvard scholars, Gardner sent him book lists and advice, and Tramo wrote messages of solidarity. Emails also revealed discussions about Epstein funding projects like a “pleasure genome initiative” and Harvard’s Personal Genome Project.

The revelations underscore how deeply Epstein was embedded in Harvard’s academic network. He had already donated at least $9.1 million to Harvard programs and cultivated personal ties with influential figures, including former deans and prominent professors. The emails show professors turning to him as a financial “patron,” while others like Alan Dershowitz defended his character in messages. Though many now claim ignorance of his crimes, the correspondence paints a damning picture of how Epstein’s money and influence bought him legitimacy inside one of the world’s most prestigious universities.


to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com



source:


Jeffrey Epstein’s Emails Reveal Close Correspondence With Harvard Professors, Bloomberg Reports | News | The Harvard Crimson

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.

The fight over the Epstein files has erupted into a raw political brawl that exposes Washington’s deep fractures. Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene lit the fuse with a fiery post claiming she’s “not suicidal” and warning that “foreign governments or powerful people” might silence her for pushing to release Epstein’s secrets. Sen. Ted Cruz quickly branded her “crazy,” accusing her of antisemitic undertones, while Greene hit back, calling his charge “disgusting” and painting him as beholden to donors. Their feud became a sideshow to the larger push in Congress, where survivors and lawmakers alike are demanding the full, unredacted release of documents that could reveal just how deep Epstein’s network ran.

Meanwhile, Rep. Robert Garcia joined survivor Annie Farmer in Long Beach to call out the DOJ’s “sham” 33,000-page dump of mostly recycled records. Together with bipartisan sponsors of the Epstein Files Transparency Act, they are pushing a discharge petition to force a floor vote requiring full disclosure of all unclassified files. Democrats are united, but Republicans remain divided, torn between protecting power and exposing it. For survivors like Farmer, this isn’t politics—it’s about justice, closure, and breaking decades of silence. And for the public, the battle has become a test of whether Washington will finally confront the truth or bury it once more under redactions, excuses, and self-preservation.


to  contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.

Prosecutors are urging a New York federal judge to sentence Sean “Diddy” Combs to at least 11 years and three months (135 months) in prison following his conviction on two counts of transporting individuals for prostitution under the Mann Act. They contend that Combs has shown no remorse, calling him “unrepentant,” and stress the lasting damage suffered by his victims, including Cassie Ventura, who described ongoing trauma and fears for her safety. Prosecutors are also seeking a $500,000 fine and are pressing the judge to reject Combs’s request for a sentence equal to time served.

The sentencing hearing is set for Friday in Manhattan before U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian. While prosecutors are pushing for over a decade in prison, Combs’s defense team has asked for a far lighter sentence — no more than 14 months — pointing to the conditions he’s already endured behind bars and claiming he has made progress toward rehabilitation. Combs has requested to wear civilian clothes in court and plans to personally address the judge, signaling a direct appeal for leniency. The final decision rests with the judge, who has the discretion to follow or depart from either side’s recommendations.


to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com


source:

Prosecutors want Sean ‘Diddy’ Combs to get 11 years in prison

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.

The U.S. Supreme Court is currently weighing whether to hear an appeal from Ghislaine Maxwell, the longtime associate of Jeffrey Epstein who is serving a 20-year federal sentence for sex trafficking and related crimes. Maxwell’s legal team argues that her trial was tainted by juror misconduct—specifically pointing to one juror, Scotty David, who failed to disclose his own history as a survivor of sexual abuse during jury selection. Her lawyers claim this omission undermined her right to a fair trial and should warrant either a retrial or a reduced sentence. The Supreme Court has not yet decided whether it will take up the case, but even the possibility has reignited public scrutiny of the Epstein network and the broader failures that allowed it to exist.


to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com


source:

Supreme Court meets to discuss Ghislaine Maxwell appeal and other pending cases

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.

Trump’s big play about “ordering” the release of the Amelia Earhart files feels less like leadership and more like trolling the American people. Nobody in 2025 is lying awake at night desperate to know what happened to Earhart, yet here he is, selling it like a major breakthrough while the real files that matter—the Epstein files—stay buried under lock and key. It’s the same old distraction tactic: dangle something shiny and harmless in one hand while hiding the real truth in the other. And the worst part is, he acts like we’re supposed to thank him for it, as if this stunt actually addresses the corruption, cover-ups, and rot everyone can see clear as day.

It’s the political equivalent of that line from Pawn Stars, when Rick looks someone in the eye and says, “Best I can do is…” Except here, it’s Trump saying: “Best I can do is Earhart files, fully unredacted.” Meanwhile, the Epstein files—the ones with names, connections, and accountability—are treated like they’re untouchable. It’s not that he can’t release them; it’s that he won’t. And that tells you everything you need to know about where the priorities really are.


to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.

Ian Maxwell asserted that Andrew had “no option” but to settle the case against Roberts, arguing that the allegations would have caused “immense pain” to the Queen and that Andrew needed to “fold his tent” and do the “best he could” by the Crown. According to Maxwell, the settlement was in part driven by concerns over the monarchy’s reputation and the personal embarrassment and stress the scandal was bringing to the royal family. He also suggested that social pressures — including the #MeToo movement and evolving societal norms about believing victims — made a trial even more perilous.

Maxwell’s remarks drew attention to the optics of a royal figure choosing to settle rather than contest the accusations in court. He framed the move as less about guilt or innocence and more about damage control, portraying Andrew’s decision as one made under duress from public, familial, and institutional pressures.



to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.

Jeffrey Epstein, Glenn Dubin, and Les Wexner’s collective ties to Harvard University expose a deeply unsettling nexus of wealth, influence, and compromised morality within one of the world’s most prestigious academic institutions. Epstein, despite his 2008 conviction, donated millions to Harvard, including $6.5 million to the Program for Evolutionary Dynamics, securing not only access to the university’s intellectual elite but also legitimacy that helped launder his reputation. Glenn Dubin, a hedge fund billionaire and close Epstein associate, reinforced these connections through philanthropy and elite social networks, while his wife, Eva Andersson-Dubin, had an even more personal history with Epstein, further entwining Harvard’s image with the scandal. Les Wexner, Epstein’s most significant benefactor and a longtime Harvard donor himself, indirectly strengthened Epstein’s foothold within the institution, with his fortune and backing lending weight to Epstein’s cultivated status as a man of ideas and influence. Together, these men leveraged Harvard’s prestige as both a shield and a stage, providing Epstein with credibility in academic and scientific circles that should have been out of reach for a registered sex offender.

Harvard’s willingness to accept and defend these relationships, even after Epstein’s criminal record was public, reflects not only institutional greed but also a failure of ethical leadership. While Harvard has since tried to distance itself, the revelations that Epstein maintained an office on campus, retained connections with professors, and used his donations to secure influence long after his conviction speak to a systemic rot. Wexner’s fortune, Dubin’s networks, and Epstein’s money intersected at Harvard in ways that revealed how elite institutions often prioritize financial gain over moral responsibility. Rather than protecting its integrity or safeguarding its reputation, Harvard enabled Epstein’s rehabilitation, offering him cover while he cultivated ties with powerful men like Dubin and Wexner. In doing so, the university not only failed its own values but also became an unwitting accomplice in sustaining the ecosystem that allowed Epstein to thrive.


to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.

Ehud Barak’s ties to Jeffrey Epstein represent one of the most controversial chapters in the former Israeli prime minister’s career, casting a shadow that has persisted for years. Barak was photographed entering Epstein’s Manhattan townhouse and was linked to Epstein socially and financially, including through investments in Epstein-related ventures. Though Barak has insisted that his relationship with Epstein was purely professional and that he was unaware of Epstein’s criminal activities, the optics are damning. His repeated presence at Epstein’s properties, along with the fact that he continued associating with Epstein even after Epstein’s 2008 conviction for soliciting sex from a minor, has fueled deep skepticism about the nature of their connection. Critics argue that such proximity to a convicted sex offender reflects either profound naivety or willful disregard, either of which damages Barak’s credibility.

The defense Barak has offered—that he only sought Epstein for networking and business opportunities—rings hollow for many observers, especially given the well-documented patterns of high-profile figures rationalizing their ties to Epstein under the guise of “philanthropy” or “investment.” Barak’s acknowledgment that he stayed overnight at one of Epstein’s residences only compounds suspicion, leaving open troubling questions about what he knew and when. Even if Barak never participated in or witnessed criminal acts, his willingness to engage with Epstein after his status as a sex offender was public knowledge has led many to view the relationship as reckless at best, complicit at worst. For a former head of state, the threshold for ethical conduct is much higher, and his association with Epstein remains an indelible blemish on his legacy.



to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.

According to a source who is familiar with the investigation, Bryan Kohberger was stalking his victim(s) for weeks before the actual murders. He also was very, very careful about leaving traces of his DNA whenever he was out in public in Pennsylvania, even going so far as to wear gloves while going out to cover his tracks. The source also says that Kohberger is not stupid and has taken steps to cover his tracks.



Let's check it out!

(commercial at 6:38)

to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com



source:


Idaho suspect stalked victims for WEEKS and wore GLOVES | Daily Mail Online

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.

From the archives: 12-30-22




We are learning more about the man who is suspected to have been involved in the murder of the four idaho college students in the early morning hours of Novemember 13th. From him being a graduate student at WSU to a chilling post he made on Reddit roughly 7 months ago, here's what we currently know.



(commercial at 6:13)

to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com



source:

Bryan Kohberger: 5 Fast Facts You Need to Know | Heavy.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.

In a world that is full of absurdities and even more absurd people, we shouldn't be shocked when we run across someone like Brittney J. Hislope who is professing her love for the accused murderer all over the internet.


In this episode, we take a look at some of the things she's been saying and who she is.


(commercial at 7:13)

to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com



source:

Kentucky mom says Bryan Kohberger is her 'divine masculine' and claims she sent him letters and dolled up pics | Fox News

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.