What if the man the media branded as the “face of racism” actually hates racists? In this explosive interview, Tommy Robinson sets the record straight — and exposes what the BBC already knows but refuses to admit. For more raw and unfiltered conversations that challenge the official narrative, subscribe here: https://www.youtube.com/@hereticsclips/videos Robinson has long been one of Britain’s most controversial figures. For years, the press painted him as a dangerous extremist, a bogeyman to be feared. But is that image based on truth — or on a carefully constructed smear campaign? In this conversation, filmed at his hidden location abroad, Robinson breaks down who he really is, what he really believes, and why the establishment is so desperate to silence him. Far from embracing racism, Robinson declares in no uncertain terms: he despises racists. So why does the media continue to ignore this? Could it be that acknowledging it would unravel the story they’ve been selling for years? And if the BBC knows this truth, why do they continue to push the same tired narrative? There has been a growing reappraisal of Robinson in recent years, with public intellectuals like Douglas Murray and Jordan Peterson praising aspects of his work and courage. Once dismissed as a fringe agitator, he’s now being seen by some as a truth-teller exposing what others are too afraid to say — on topics like immigration, radical Islam, and political correctness. This is Robinson as you’ve never seen him before: candid, reflective, and unflinching. Whether you agree with him or not, his words raise urgent questions about free speech, censorship, and the role of the media in modern Britain. Why does the establishment work so hard to silence dissent? What truths are being buried in the name of “tolerance”? And can Britain really call itself free if voices like Robinson’s are demonised rather than debated? 👉 Watch the full podcast here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eiBsZErTk7Y&t=4s 👉 Subscribe to Heretics Clips for more fearless interviews that strip away the spin and reveal what’s really going on. #TommyRobinson #BBC #Immigration #Islam #AntiWoke #HereticsClips

Subscribe to Heretics Clips for raw, unfiltered conversations with icons who actually say what they think. In this episode, Robbie Williams tells Andrew Gold why he can’t write another “Angels”—and what happens to an artist when a single song becomes a shadow you can’t step out of. Watch to hear the pressure, the fear, the craft, and the truth behind the hit that defined a generation. Subscribe here: https://www.youtube.com/@hereticsclips/videos Why does creative lightning strike once—and why is it so hard to summon again on command? Robbie pulls back the curtain on the alchemy of songwriting: the accident, the obsession, and the timing you can’t fake. He talks candidly about chasing that same transcendence and the uncomfortable reality that audiences expect miracles on schedule. Is the next classic one honest verse away—or is trying to top a masterpiece the surest way to kill it? Robbie opens up about the strange bargain of fame: how adoration and ridicule arrive in the same breath, why he still doomscrolls the comments, and how that noise creeps into the studio. He speaks about anxiety, ADHD, and the creative rituals that keep him writing when the stakes feel impossibly high. You’ll hear the difference between making a hit and making something true—and why he’s choosing truth. We revisit the early days—Take That, the breakout, the solo leap—then sit with the artist he is now: older, funnier, sharper, and more self-aware. He unpacks ego, faith, and the nagging inner voice asking, “Was ‘Angels’ the peak—or just one chapter?” Expect stories, jokes, and moments of naked honesty that only Robbie can deliver. If you’ve ever wondered how stars live with their greatest work—or how creative people keep going after the world crowns one song “the one”—this is the conversation you’ll replay. Part confession, part craft masterclass, and completely Heretical. 🎧 Watch the full interview and tell us what “Angels” means to you. #RobbieWilliams #Angels #HereticsPodcast #HereticsClips #AndrewGold #Songwriting #MusicIndustry #ADHD #MentalHealth #Fame #CelebrityCulture #BritishPop #TakeThat

Subscribe to Heretics Clips for fearless, unfiltered conversations that dig beneath the headlines: 👉 https://www.youtube.com/@hereticsclips/videos What does it really take to get kicked off Big Brother in 2025? In this explosive Heretics interview, George Gilbert — the contestant ejected from the show after a viral controversy — finally tells his side of the story. Accused of making a “controversial comment” that crossed the line, George explains exactly what was said, how the producers handled it, and why he believes the show has become a reflection of a society terrified of open conversation. George pulls no punches. He reveals what life inside the house was truly like — the constant surveillance, the performative politics, and the feeling that one wrong sentence could end your career. But is that fair? Andrew Gold presses him on every angle: what was actually said, what he meant by it, and whether he regrets it. Was this a genuine mistake, or another case of cancel culture spiralling out of control? We dive into the bigger questions: • Has Big Brother become a moral court instead of a social experiment? • Do producers engineer outrage for ratings, then disown the fallout? • Is free speech still possible in entertainment — or has everything become a trap for public shaming? • And what does this say about Britain’s wider culture of offence and fear in 2025? This is not a rant — it’s a raw, revealing look at what happens when reality TV collides with modern outrage. George opens up about the pressure, the aftermath, and what happens when the country you entertained suddenly turns against you. 💬 Tell us in the comments: Was Big Brother right to remove George, or has censorship gone too far? Hit Subscribe for more fearless Heretics conversations with people who challenge the mainstream — and keep being a heretic. Watch the full podcast here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kb5u1XrInaw #GeorgeGilbert #BigBrother #HereticsPodcast #AndrewGold #CancelCulture #FreedomOfSpeech #RealityTV #MediaControversy #FreeExpression #HereticsClips #Censorship #OutrageCulture #Debate #ControversialInterview

👉 Subscribe now to Heretics Clips for bold, unfiltered conversations that challenge everything you think you know about morality, justice, and power. https://www.youtube.com/@hereticsclips/videos What does it feel like to watch someone die — legally? In this gripping episode, human rights lawyer Clive Stafford-Smith takes us inside the haunting world of death row. Having defended some of the most notorious prisoners in America, Clive has witnessed the unthinkable: the execution of a man he believed was innocent. 💥 In this conversation: The horrifying reality of witnessing an execution in the electric chair. What it’s like to look into the eyes of a condemned man moments before death. How Clive copes with the psychological toll of trying — and failing — to save lives. Why he believes the death penalty is not just unjust, but evil. The moral cost of a justice system that kills in the name of law and order. Clive Stafford-Smith isn’t just any lawyer. He’s one of the most fearless human rights defenders alive today — the founder of Reprieve and a man who has spent his life fighting state-sanctioned killing. But in this raw, emotional conversation, he opens up about the times he lost. About the men he couldn’t save. About the nightmares that never go away. This isn’t a polite debate — it’s a confrontation with death, conscience, and the very idea of justice. Clive and I clash on everything from faith to punishment to whether some crimes ever deserve mercy. But through that tension comes something rare: an honest look at what it means to be human in a system built to destroy. ⚖️ What would you do if you had to defend someone everyone else called a monster? 💭 And could you live with yourself if the state killed them anyway? 👇 Let me know in the comments what you would have asked Clive. And if you believe in fearless, uncomfortable truth — subscribe to Heretics Clips for more conversations that dig where others stay silent. 🎧 Watch the full podcast here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=f0CQVL46Wj0&t=26s #CliveStaffordSmith #DeathPenalty #Execution #HereticsPodcast #HumanRights #ElectricChair #CapitalPunishment #JusticeSystem #WrongfulConviction

Subscribe to Heretics Clips for fearless, good-faith interviews that others won’t touch: https://www.youtube.com/@hereticsclips/videos What really happened behind the headlines of Haut de la Garenne and other historic UK abuse scandals? In this gripping Heretics conversation, former Scotland Yard detective and whistleblower Jon Wedger sits down with Andrew Gold to share his first-hand perspective on how sensitive cases are opened, built—and, in his view, too often quietly stalled. Focusing strictly on Wedger’s testimony, this episode explores the contested history surrounding high-profile allegations (including those linked in the public domain to former Prime Minister Ted Heath), and the cultural forces Jon says make accountability so hard. Inside the interview, Jon explains: 👉 How investigations move from tip-off to intel to evidence, and where he believes process breaks down 👉 Why jurisdictional gaps, siloed teams and reputational risk can derail momentum 👉 The warning signs professionals and the public should recognise—online and offline 👉 What whistleblowers, he says, face inside institutions: reassignments, reputational smears, and pressure to “stand down” 👉 Practical fixes: independent oversight, better data-sharing, victim-first safeguarding, and real protections for officers who raise concerns Andrew’s calm, forensic style keeps the conversation on facts, procedure and paper trails, not sensationalism. Wedger walks through casework mechanics, reflects on months where he says he identified scores of suspects, and outlines reforms he believes would actually help victims while restoring trust in policing and media. Whether you agree with his conclusions or challenge them, you’ll hear a rare, practitioner-level look at how complex investigations unfold—and why some lines of inquiry, he argues, simply fade without explanation. This may be one of the most urgent and uncomfortable Heretics episodes yet: precise, procedural and relentlessly focused on safeguarding and accountability. If you care about institutional integrity, historical truth, and protecting the vulnerable, this conversation will test assumptions and raise difficult—but necessary—questions. Editorial note: All claims discussed are presented as Jon Wedger’s allegations and opinions for public-interest discussion. Viewers are encouraged to examine available evidence and make up their own minds. Watch the full podcast here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WFSBxf4YWrA&t=3091s #JonWedger #Heretics #AndrewGold #HautDeLaGarenne #TedHeath #UKPolicing #Whistleblower #Safeguarding #InvestigativeJournalism #BritishEstablishment #HistoricalAllegations #Accountability #CSE

🔥 Something is seriously wrong with Britain. In this explosive Heretics interview, Charlie Downes of Restore Britain (Rupert Lowe's movement) warns that what’s coming will be WORSE than a civil war. From mass immigration and identity politics to grooming gangs, tribalism, and the collapse of English identity – is the UK sleepwalking into disaster? In this conversation, Charlie Downes and Andrew Gold explore whether Britain can survive the cultural rot, political corruption, and social fragmentation that threaten to tear the country apart. Is Nigel Farage the answer? Can Reform UK or Restore Britain offer a way out? Or are we already on a path towards inevitable violence and breakdown? If you care about free speech, immigration, English identity, or the future of Britain – this is a must-watch. 💬 What do you think – is Britain heading for collapse, civil conflict, or renewal? Drop your thoughts below. Watch the full podcast here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WpByhkLiG48 #civilwar #hereticspodcast #andrewgold

MET Police Tried to Turn Me Into an Undercover "ASSET" – Tommy Robinson What happens when the police secretly try to recruit you as an undercover asset? In this explosive interview, Tommy Robinson reveals how the MET Police attempted to manipulate him, why he refused, and what it says about the state of free speech and policing in Britain today. For more raw, unfiltered interviews that challenge the mainstream narrative, subscribe here: https://www.youtube.com/@hereticsclips/videos For decades, Tommy Robinson has been one of the most controversial figures in Britain. To some, he was painted as the face of racism. To others, he has been a whistleblower exposing uncomfortable truths about immigration, Islamism, and the failures of the political establishment. But now, with praise from intellectual heavyweights like Douglas Murray and Jordan Peterson, Robinson is undergoing a remarkable reappraisal. In this rare, face-to-face conversation — filmed at his hidden location abroad — Robinson lays out his side of the story in a way you’ve never heard before. Why did the MET Police really want him as an “asset”? What secrets did they hope he would reveal? And what does it say about the desperation of the authorities when they turn to one of their fiercest critics for help? The interview doesn’t shy away from controversy. Robinson speaks openly about immigration, radical Islam, policing, and censorship, drawing on his personal experiences at the centre of Britain’s culture wars. Whether you agree with him or not, his account forces you to confront questions the media avoids: Is Britain sacrificing truth for political correctness? How deep does the state’s surveillance and manipulation go? And can free speech survive in an era where dissenting voices are targeted rather than debated? 👉 Watch the full podcast here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eiBsZErTk7Y&t=4s 👉 Subscribe to Heretics Clips and hit the bell for more fearless conversations that push past the spin and expose what’s really going on. #TommyRobinson #METPolice #Immigration #Islam #AntiWoke #HereticsClips

Subscribe to Heretics Clips for fearless, evidence-led interviews that challenge the gatekeepers: https://www.youtube.com/@hereticsclips/videos Is Wikipedia a neutral encyclopedia—or an information chokepoint where inconvenient stories vanish? In this explosive Heretics conversation, journalist and author Ashley Rindsberg joins Andrew Gold to examine what he argues was a coordinated effort to downplay or delete coverage of Iryna Zarutska’s murder on Wikipedia. Rindsberg lifts the lid on how editorial “consensus” is manufactured, how reliable-sources lists can be used to sideline reporting, and why these behind-the-scenes battles matter far beyond one page. Inside the interview, Ashley breaks down the mechanics of narrative control he sees at work: 👉 Talk-page pile-ons and speedy reverts that make contested facts look “settled.” 👉 Deletionism and notability debates that can bury emerging stories before they’re widely reported. 👉 Source deprecation/whitelisting that privileges some outlets while blacklisting others—shaping what counts as “truth.” 👉 How Wikipedia bias can cascade into Google, classrooms, and even AI training data, hard-coding a slanted version of events into the information ecosystem. Andrew’s calm, forensic questioning keeps the focus on receipts, process, and accountability: diffs, noticeboard threads, policy loopholes, and the incentives surrounding a billion-dollar world of PR laundering and paid editing. Rindsberg argues that once an editorial line hardens on Wikipedia, it propagates everywhere—from search snippets to knowledge panels—creating a reputational reality that is extremely difficult to challenge. Whether you see Wikipedia as a public good in need of reform or a captured system, this conversation gives you practical tools to verify before you believe: reading talk pages, comparing page histories, checking for templated warnings, and triangulating sources beyond the encyclopedia. If you’ve ever trusted a Wikipedia summary—or wondered why a story you know is missing—this episode will change how you read the web. Editorial note: The discussion presents Ashley Rindsberg’s analysis and opinions for public-interest debate. Watch the full podcast here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YFrfxjb_Iw0&t=1949s #AshleyRindsberg #Wikipedia #IrynaZarutska #Censorship #Heretics #AndrewGold #MediaBias #ReliableSources #Deletionism #InformationIntegrity #SearchBias #AITrainingData #FreeSpeech #Disinformation

Subscribe to Heretics Clips now for explosive interviews that pull no punches: https://www.youtube.com/@hereticsclips/videos Why are autistic girls increasingly vulnerable to being drawn into trans activist groups? In this revealing Heretics interview, psychotherapist and Genspect founder Stella O’Malley explains the psychological, social, and cultural factors behind this growing phenomenon. Stella is internationally known for her work challenging aspects of modern gender ideology. As someone who wanted to be a boy when she was young — and is now deeply relieved she didn’t receive puberty blockers or cross-sex hormones — she brings both personal insight and professional expertise to this controversial subject. In this eye-opening conversation, you’ll discover: Why autistic girls are especially susceptible to targeted messaging from trans activist groups. How traits like literal thinking, social isolation, and intense identity searching can make them vulnerable. The tactics used to recruit and affirm these girls before proper psychological assessment is done. Why Stella believes gender-affirming care often ignores deeper mental health issues. The long-term risks of medicalising teenage distress with irreversible interventions. How online communities and social media algorithms fuel rapid-onset gender dysphoria. Stella also discusses her work with Michael Shellenberger and Mia Hughes on the WPATH Files — leaked documents that, she argues, expose a lack of safeguarding and medical accountability in the trans healthcare industry. With her organisation Genspect, Stella advocates for exploratory therapy and a cautious, evidence-based approach — especially for neurodiverse youth who may be struggling with anxiety, depression, or trauma unrelated to gender. This is a frank, challenging, and deeply human conversation that pulls back the curtain on one of the most heated debates of our time. Whether you agree with Stella or not, her perspective on the intersection of autism, adolescence, and gender politics will give you plenty to think about. ➡️ Watch the full interview now and join the discussion in the comments: How should society safeguard autistic girls from ideological targeting? 🎥 Full podcast here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F2LQBdLSkyQ #gender #antiwoke #heretics #StellaOMalley #Genspect #WPATHFiles #autism #transgenderdebate

🔔 Subscribe to Heretics Clips for fearless conversations that challenge the mainstream: https://www.youtube.com/@hereticsclips/videos Why is the UK media so afraid of Tommy Robinson — and why is a Polish MEP the one brave enough to say it out loud? In this explosive interview on Heretics, Dominik Tarczyński joins Andrew Gold to expose what he calls Britain’s cultural decay, cowardice, and collapse under the weight of political correctness. Tarczyński, one of Europe’s most outspoken politicians, explains why Poland rejected illegal migration, how “tolerance” is being weaponised by woke institutions, and why silencing figures like Tommy Robinson only fuels public anger. From European identity and radical Islam to the media’s moral hypocrisy, he doesn’t hold back — calling out the BBC, Westminster elites, and the UK press for creating what he calls “a nation scared of the truth.” 🔥 What really happens when someone dares to speak against mass immigration? 🔥 Why does Tarczyński believe Poland’s policies could save the West? 🔥 And what’s his message to British leaders who label him “far-right”? This conversation dives deep into the war for Western identity, the crisis of free speech, and what Europe’s future might look like if current trends continue. Whether you agree or disagree with him, Dominik Tarczyński is a voice that demands to be heard — and this episode will leave you questioning what freedom really means in modern Britain. 🎙️ About Dominik Tarczyński A Member of the European Parliament for Poland’s ruling Law and Justice Party, Tarczyński is known globally for his fiery defence of national sovereignty and his viral declaration that Poland would not accept “even one illegal migrant.” His speeches at the European Parliament have made headlines worldwide for their unapologetic stance against woke ideology, censorship, and globalism. 💡 If you’re tired of media spin and censorship, subscribe to Heretics for unfiltered interviews with the world’s most controversial voices. Watch the full podcast here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=A9phrhrz3gY&t=2385s #DominikTarczynski #TommyRobinson #HereticsPodcast #FreeSpeech #ImmigrationCrisis #AndrewGold #Poland #WokeCulture #UKPolitics

In this explosive interview, Andrew Gold sits down with businessman and politician Rupert Lowe to discuss why he believes Rachel Reeves is bankrupting the country. From reckless economic policies to Britain’s mounting debt crisis, Rupert pulls no punches in exposing what he sees as the dangerous consequences of Reeves’ leadership. If you want more unfiltered conversations like this, make sure you subscribe here: https://www.youtube.com/@hereticsclips/videos Is Rachel Reeves the right person to steer Britain through one of its most turbulent economic periods? Or is she pushing the UK closer to long-term decline? Rupert Lowe argues Reeves is part of a political class that has consistently failed ordinary citizens while protecting the interests of Westminster insiders. Andrew and Rupert go beyond the headlines to ask the uncomfortable questions: Who is really pulling the strings behind Britain’s economic policies? Why are working families paying the price for political incompetence? And can the UK economy survive leaders who prioritise ideology over practical solutions? This is a fiery, controversial conversation that gets to the heart of Britain’s economic and political crisis. Whether you agree or disagree with Rupert Lowe, his perspective on Rachel Reeves and the future of the UK will challenge you to think differently about where the country is heading. 👉 Don’t miss out on more interviews that cut through the noise. Subscribe now to Heretics Clips for bold conversations that expose what the mainstream won’t. #hereticspodcast #rupertlowe #reform #rachelreeves #ukeconomy #andrewgold

Subscribe to Heretics Clips now for explosive interviews that pull no punches: https://www.youtube.com/@hereticsclips/videos How does a teenager living in 1970s Yorkshire, under the shadow of one of Britain’s most infamous serial killers, become a lifelong radical feminist? In this gripping Heretics interview, journalist, author, and activist Julie Bindel reveals how the Yorkshire Ripper murders changed the course of her life — and shaped her commitment to fighting for women’s rights. Bindel, who has spent decades campaigning against male violence, recalls growing up during the Peter Sutcliffe killing spree, when fear gripped communities and women were told to change their behaviour rather than expect protection from the authorities. She explains how the police’s treatment of the victims — and the media’s indifference to women’s safety — lit a fire that turned her into a radical feminist determined to challenge a culture that excuses misogyny. In this candid conversation, you’ll discover: What it was like to live in the epicentre of the Yorkshire Ripper investigation. How victim-blaming shaped public perception of the murders. Why Bindel believes the police failed women during the case. How these events pushed her into a lifetime of activism. The connections she draws between 1970s misogyny and today’s gender politics. Why male violence against women remains her core campaigning focus. Andrew Gold digs into Bindel’s journey from a working-class teenager in Leeds to a leading radical feminist voice. Together, they explore how this early experience of systemic failure still informs her work today — from challenging dangerous offenders being placed in women’s prisons to fighting for sex-based rights in the face of modern ideological battles. Bindel’s story is more than just a personal memoir — it’s a powerful indictment of a justice system that too often sidelines women’s safety. She argues that the lessons from the Yorkshire Ripper era are still painfully relevant, and that ignoring them risks repeating history. Whether you agree with her politics or not, Julie Bindel’s testimony is a raw, urgent reminder of why feminism exists in the first place. ➡️ Watch the full interview now and join the conversation: Do you think society has learned from the Yorkshire Ripper murders — or are women still being failed today? 🎥 Full podcast here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WntY0N6ndxY&t=1241s #JulieBindel #Heretics #YorkshireRipper #RadicalFeminism #WomensRights #MaleViolence #FeministActivism #PeterSutcliffe #SexBasedRights

👉 Start by subscribing now to Heretics Clips for fearless conversations the mainstream won’t touch: https://www.youtube.com/@hereticsclips/videos 🔥 Few political figures divide opinion like Margaret Thatcher. Hated by some, revered by others, she remains one of Britain’s most transformative leaders. In this gripping interview, broadcaster, writer, and comedian Mark Dolan makes the provocative case that Thatcher — often branded as “anti-working class” — actually empowered working people, giving them ownership, aspiration, and a renewed sense of nationhood. 👉 Watch the full podcast here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wtF-Us3rLGM Mark Dolan, best known for Balls of Steel on Channel 4 and now a sharp voice on GB News, dismantles decades of lazy caricatures about the “Iron Lady.” Instead, he shines a light on how Thatcher’s policies of home ownership, privatisation, and economic liberalisation broke down class barriers and gave millions the chance to control their own destinies. This isn’t the version of Thatcher you’ve been told about in university lecture halls or by the progressive media. This is Thatcher as the unlikely champion of the ordinary Briton, a woman who stood against union dominance, challenged the establishment, and put power back into the hands of individuals rather than elites. In this wide-ranging discussion, Dolan explores: Why Thatcher’s vision of nationhood resonates today more than ever. How her critics often ignore the working-class families who thrived under her leadership. The cultural legacy of Thatcherism — and why it still drives so much of Britain’s political debate. Why the left continues to demonise her, decades after she left office. This is more than just history. It’s about what Thatcher’s Britain means for us now, in an age of globalisation, identity politics, and declining trust in institutions. Dolan asks the big question: Is there anyone today with the courage, conviction, and clarity to do what Thatcher did? 👉 Stay to the end, where Dolan reveals what modern leaders can learn from Thatcher’s boldness — and why he believes her message of individual responsibility and empowerment is the antidote to today’s culture of dependency and division. #MargaretThatcher #MarkDolan #Nationhood #WorkingClass #IronLady #GBNews #AntiWoke #HereticsClips

Subscribe to Heretics Clips for fearless, in-depth interviews that others won’t touch: https://www.youtube.com/@hereticsclips/videos What happens when a decorated detective says the system is protecting the very people it should expose? Former Scotland Yard officer and whistleblower Jon Wedger sits down with Andrew Gold for a raw, unflinching conversation about alleged child-abuse networks operating “in plain sight” across the UK — and why, in Wedger’s view, elements of the establishment would rather punish whistleblowers than confront predators. In this gripping interview, Wedger explains how frontline investigators build cases, the institutional blocks he says he hit, and why speaking out cost him dearly. He describes patterns he claims to have seen again and again: multiple agencies failing to join the dots, media reluctance to follow leads, and the chilling intimidation that greets anyone who gets too close to the truth. 👉 How, according to Wedger, do offenders exploit jurisdictional gaps and under-resourced teams? 👉 Why does he believe certain cases trigger elite interference and silence? 👉 What practical fixes — from evidence handling to victim support — could actually work? Staying tightly focused on Jon’s testimony, Andrew probes the methods, the paper trails, and the moments that convinced Wedger the problem isn’t just criminal — it’s cultural. Wedger recounts months where he says he identified scores of suspects, only to watch progress stall. He explains how whistleblowers can be isolated, how careerism and fear of reputational damage warp decision-making, and why he believes one figure deserves the label “Britain’s most vile politician.” (Allegations discussed are presented as Wedger’s claims; viewers can judge the evidence for themselves.) This is one of the most urgent and unsettling episodes of Heretics to date — a rare insider’s account that asks hard questions about safeguarding, accountability, and courage. If you care about protecting the vulnerable, you won’t want to miss this. Watch the full podcast here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WFSBxf4YWrA&t=3091s #JonWedger #Heretics #AndrewGold #UKPolicing #Whistleblower #Safeguarding #ChildProtection #InvestigativeJournalism #BritishEstablishment #Accountability #GroomingGangs #London #TrueCrimePodcast

👉 Subscribe now to Heretics Clips for bold, uncompromising conversations you won’t see on mainstream media — because some truths are too urgent to sanitize. Don’t miss this: https://www.youtube.com/@hereticsclips/videos “NO One Deserves to Be in PRISON (What About Ian Watkins?)” In this electrifying episode, human rights lawyer Clive Stafford-Smith, who has defended the most reviled defendants in the world, goes toe-to-toe with me over one of the darkest names in modern crime: Ian Watkins, former frontman of Lostprophets and convicted child sex offender. Watkins, reportedly murdered in prison, brings into sharp relief the tension between justice, vengeance, and what it even means to deserve punishment. 💥 What we explore in this episode: The stakes of saying nobody deserves prison — even him. The murder of Watkins behind bars: What it reveals about prison justice, vigilante rage, or systemic failure. When cruelty meets law: Should society ever break the rules to punish evil? Inside executions, death row, and the moral liability of state-sanctioned killing. The cost of defending the indefensible: Clive’s philosophy in his own words. How identity, privilege, and power shape who we condemn — and who survives. We dive into a murky intersection: the criminal monster, the hidden system, and the moral framework trying to contain it all. Clive and I clash head-on over whether certain actions place someone beyond redemption — and whether our criminal justice system is built to heal, destroy, or control. This is not a sanitized discussion. But it must happen. Because if even the worst among us is uprooted from humanity, we risk turning justice into something worse than the crimes it punishes. 👇 Your turn to engage: Tell me: How would you argue this? Do monsters forfeit all rights — or do we fail when we pretend they do? 🎧 Watch the full episode here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=f0CQVL46Wj0&t=26s #IanWatkins #CliveStaffordSmith #HereticsPodcast #DeathPenalty #JusticeSystem #PrisonMurder #CriminalJustice #Lostprophets #HumanRights

Subscribe to Heretics Clips now for explosive interviews that pull no punches: https://www.youtube.com/@hereticsclips/videos How did Ghislaine Maxwell gain extraordinary access to Buckingham Palace — and why was she treated like a VIP? In this explosive Heretics interview, Paul Page, a former Royal Protection Officer, lifts the lid on what he witnessed while providing security for members of the British Royal Family, including Prince Andrew. Page spent years inside the Royal Protection Command, guarding some of the most powerful people in the country. Here, he reveals how Maxwell — later convicted for her role in the Jeffrey Epstein scandal — appeared to have a “golden ticket” that allowed her to come and go from the palace with ease. His insider account offers a rare glimpse into a world the public rarely sees. In this revealing conversation, you’ll discover: How often Ghislaine Maxwell visited Buckingham Palace — and in whose company. Why her access stood out compared to other guests. The nature of Maxwell’s relationship with Prince Andrew at the time. Why Page describes the Duke as the most erratic and unpleasant royal to work with. The strict protocols around palace security — and how some people seemed exempt. What this says about the culture inside the royal household during that era. Andrew Gold pushes Page on whether Maxwell’s privileged access was simply social, or if it points to deeper issues within palace circles. The discussion delves into the intersection of power, privilege, and accountability, and the consequences of allowing certain figures unfiltered proximity to royalty. Page’s testimony is part insider memoir, part cautionary tale — a reminder that behind the palace gates, not everything is as polished as the official image suggests. Whether you see this as a matter of poor judgment, systemic failure, or something more troubling, this interview sheds light on a chapter of royal history that will continue to raise questions. ➡️ Watch the full interview now and share your thoughts in the comments: Why did Ghislaine Maxwell have such open access to Buckingham Palace? 🎥 Full podcast here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7X4_RF74dac #GhislaineMaxwell #PrinceAndrew #RoyalFamily #Heretics #BuckinghamPalace #RoyalSecurity #PaulPage #RoyalSecrets #AndrewGold

👉 Subscribe to Heretics Clips for more fearless conversations: https://www.youtube.com/@hereticsclips/videos In this explosive episode of Heretics, Andrew Gold sits down with Dominik Tarczyński, the Polish MEP who went viral for declaring that Poland would not accept “even one illegal migrant.” Tarczyński isn’t backing down — and in this unapologetic interview, he explains why ZERO illegal migrants isn’t just moral, but logical. Known for his fiery speeches and brutal honesty, Tarczyński breaks down why he believes Britain and Western Europe have lost their identity, how unchecked migration has eroded cultural cohesion, and why he insists Poland’s tough stance on borders is a model for the future. 🔥 Expect fireworks as Tarczyński takes on: The media’s portrayal of Poland’s immigration policy — and why he calls it “propaganda.” What the UK can learn from Eastern Europe’s defense of faith, culture, and sovereignty. The hidden costs of mass migration that politicians refuse to admit. Why he believes Europe’s liberal elite are destroying the very civilisation they claim to protect. Tarczyński also opens up about his encounters with Tommy Robinson, the backlash from Brussels, and what he calls the “weaponisation” of words like racist and far-right to shut down debate. Whether you agree with him or not, his conviction and clarity will force you to confront uncomfortable questions about borders, freedom, and the future of Europe. As the conversation deepens, Tarczyński explains why he sees Poland as Europe’s last line of defense — a nation standing against cultural relativism and political weakness. He warns that countries like Sweden and France have already fallen, and that Britain’s identity crisis is next unless citizens reclaim control. 🎙️ About Dominik Tarczyński Dominik Tarczyński is a Member of the European Parliament representing Poland’s Law and Justice Party (PiS). A former journalist and vocal defender of Christian values, he has become one of Europe’s most controversial and influential figures — praised for his patriotism, condemned for his bluntness, but impossible to ignore. If you’re tired of filtered debate and want to hear conversations mainstream media won’t touch, subscribe to Heretics Clips for more raw, unfiltered interviews with the world’s most provocative thinkers. Watch the full podcast here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=A9phrhrz3gY&t=2385s #DominikTarczynski #HereticsPodcast #ImmigrationCrisis #Europe #AndrewGold #Poland #Borders #Migration #Refugees #Islamism #IdentityPolitics #FreeSpeech #Britain #EU #Conservatism #UKPolitics

What if one forgotten law changed the course of history — and we ignored its lesson? In this explosive interview, Matthew Syed – bestselling author, Times columnist, BBC broadcaster and former Olympian – joins Andrew Gold on Heretics to uncover the shocking truth about cousin marriage, tribalism, immigration, and the hidden ban that built Britain. From the 6th-century ban on cousin marriage that forced people to look beyond their tribe, to today’s siloed communities in places like Rochdale and Bradford, Syed argues that ignoring these lessons has left Britain vulnerable. We dive into immigration policy, Labour’s failures, the rise of cultural relativism, and why banning cousin marriage may be the only answer left. But that’s just the start. Together, we explore whether we’re heading for World War 3, how Protestantism shaped modern success, the dangers of AI that could wipe out humanity, and what the Fermi Paradox reveals about our future. This is one of the most important, uncomfortable, and eye-opening conversations you’ll hear in 2025. Watch the full podcast here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Wh76SEzw4qY

Subscribe to Heretics Clips here: https://www.youtube.com/@hereticsclips/videos Emily Maitlis has long been hailed as one of Britain’s leading broadcasters — but is she really the fearless truth-teller her fans believe, or a fully paid-up member of the liberal elite? In this eye-opening interview, Andrew Gold sits down with Rupert Lowe to expose what’s really going on behind the polished façade of the UK’s media establishment. Rupert Lowe, former businessman, politician and outspoken voice within Reform UK, argues that Maitlis represents a media class that is deeply embedded within the political establishment. Far from being impartial, Rupert claims she embodies the liberal consensus that has dominated Britain for decades — a consensus that has shut down debate, ignored the concerns of ordinary people, and protected the interests of elites. 🔥 Inside this explosive conversation you’ll discover: Why Rupert Lowe believes Emily Maitlis is part of the liberal elite. How the media frames political narratives to protect establishment interests. Why free speech in Britain is under greater threat than most realise. The cosy ties between broadcasters, politicians, and unelected insiders. How figures like Nigel Farage have been treated by media gatekeepers. Andrew Gold presses Rupert on whether Maitlis is simply a liberal journalist with strong views, or whether she is actively shaping public opinion on behalf of an establishment agenda. Could it be that Britain’s biggest broadcasters are more interested in protecting their own worldview than holding power to account? From the decline of London to questions of immigration, free speech, and the failures of Britain’s political class, Rupert Lowe doesn’t pull any punches. He lifts the lid on how the liberal elite — embodied by Emily Maitlis — has influenced debates, silenced dissenting voices, and contributed to Britain’s growing crisis of trust in politics and media. Is Emily Maitlis really the fearless journalist she claims to be, or does Rupert Lowe’s critique reveal a much deeper problem at the heart of British broadcasting? 👉 Don’t forget to subscribe to Heretics Clips for more fearless conversations that challenge the mainstream narrative. Hit the bell so you never miss an episode. #hereticspodcast #rupertlowe #emilymaitlis #liberalelite #reformuk #ukpolitics

Subscribe to Heretics Clips for fearless, good-faith interviews that challenge the gatekeepers: https://www.youtube.com/@hereticsclips/videos Is Wikipedia a neutral encyclopedia—or a battleground where activist editors shape what the world “knows”? In this explosive conversation, journalist and author Ashley Rindsberg reveals how, in his view, radical-left aligned editors targeted Charlie Kirk’s Wikipedia page, using process, policy, and “consensus” to frame reputation rather than report facts. If you’ve ever trusted a Google result that begins with a Wikipedia box, this interview will make you think twice. Rindsberg breaks down the playbook he says is used to tilt pages: selective sourcing, coordinated talk-page pile-ons, cherry-picked “reliable” outlets, and the quiet blacklisting of perspectives that don’t fit a preferred narrative. He explains how a tiny group of high-status editors can gatekeep a biography, how COI (conflict-of-interest) edits are laundered to look “neutral,” and why attempts to correct bias are quickly reverted under the banner of “No Original Research” or “Undue Weight.” 👉 How do a handful of editors steer a living biography like Charlie Kirk’s—and shut down dissent in minutes? 👉 Why does Wikipedia’s dominance in Google and AI training data supercharge any built-in bias? 👉 What simple checks can readers use to spot manipulation—fast? 👉 Where do “arbitration,” “reliable sources,” and administrator power really come from? With Andrew Gold’s calm, forensic questioning, Rindsberg walks through receipts: talk-page patterns, sourcing swaps, and the incentives of a billion-dollar paid-editing/PR ecosystem circling the platform. He argues that when Wikipedia tilts, search engines and AI ingest the slant—turning encyclopedic bias into a culture-wide narrative. The result? A reputational machine that can punish political opponents, shield favourites, and make the “first draft of history” look final. Whether you admire Charlie Kirk or disagree with him, this episode is about something bigger: who gets to define reality online—and how citizens can push back with transparency, documentation, and media literacy. If you care about information integrity, don’t miss this. Editorial note: The discussion presents Ashley Rindsberg’s analysis and opinions for public-interest debate. Watch the full podcast here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YFrfxjb_Iw0&t=1949s #AshleyRindsberg #Wikipedia #CharlieKirk #MediaManipulation #InformationWarfare #Heretics #AndrewGold #SearchBias #COIEditing #FreeSpeech #BigTech #AITrainingData #Censorship #Disinformation