Through utilizing the techniques of qualitative research and design along with the social sciences we can provide an impericaly backed attestation as to the reasons why certain socialized philosophies in society arise and determine the impact they have had on culture development and beuracratic design. The ability to recognize different archetypes that helped guide the communal phenomena into wide spread acceptance whilst understanding the effects it has had upon society are of vital importance not just for academic purposes, but also for social advancement. An example of an archetype that represents socialized ideology is the ancient Greek mythology, the belief of such deity's as zues and Hermes is the main force that guided the Greek powers in there beuracratic development, The curious thing however is that certain aspects of this archetype are in truth not the precursor for the social development which occurred at the time. instead it seems logically coherent to assert that some hierarchical compositions of early civilizations ie/ characteristics of the religious and mythic beliefs of the time aren't necessarily antecedents of social advancement or culture development indeed it seems to be the case that the development of the mythology is instead the mapping of the true archetype which in this instance would be socio or bio evolution. It follows that the mapping of the true archetype is then the driving force behind early civilizations development. This most likely occurred as the result of an unconscious decision to conceptualize the prexisting cultural norms. I am particularly interested in trying to deduce wether certain newage ideologies are similar to the example I've provided, in hopes of understanding more deeply that which is objective and that which is a part of our naive nature.

Argumentsforreason.com