Home
Categories
EXPLORE
True Crime
Comedy
Society & Culture
Business
Sports
TV & Film
Health & Fitness
About Us
Contact Us
Copyright
© 2024 PodJoint
00:00 / 00:00
Sign in

or

Don't have an account?
Sign up
Forgot password
https://is1-ssl.mzstatic.com/image/thumb/Podcasts221/v4/e9/2f/ca/e92fca36-a2db-495c-56fd-5a61c3cd0a01/mza_5686946159158759425.jpg/600x600bb.jpg
Supreme Betrayal: How the Supreme Court and Constitutional Law Have Failed America
Mark Tushnet, Louis Michael Seidman
31 episodes
1 day ago
Sitting in their marble palace, dressed in their black robes, Supreme Court Justices would like us to believe that they are wise and disinterested oracles dispensing words of truth and justice. Nothing could be further from the truth. Every episode week, Mark Tushnet and Mike Seidman, two renown constitutional law scholars, lift the curtain and show us how the men and women there who sit on the High Court have been manipulating us.
Show more...
News
History,
Government
RSS
All content for Supreme Betrayal: How the Supreme Court and Constitutional Law Have Failed America is the property of Mark Tushnet, Louis Michael Seidman and is served directly from their servers with no modification, redirects, or rehosting. The podcast is not affiliated with or endorsed by Podjoint in any way.
Sitting in their marble palace, dressed in their black robes, Supreme Court Justices would like us to believe that they are wise and disinterested oracles dispensing words of truth and justice. Nothing could be further from the truth. Every episode week, Mark Tushnet and Mike Seidman, two renown constitutional law scholars, lift the curtain and show us how the men and women there who sit on the High Court have been manipulating us.
Show more...
News
History,
Government
https://is1-ssl.mzstatic.com/image/thumb/Podcasts221/v4/e9/2f/ca/e92fca36-a2db-495c-56fd-5a61c3cd0a01/mza_5686946159158759425.jpg/600x600bb.jpg
Conversation with Richard Re
Supreme Betrayal: How the Supreme Court and Constitutional Law Have Failed America
53 minutes 30 seconds
1 week ago
Conversation with Richard Re
Our conversation with Richard Re focuses on his Foreword to the Harvard Law Review’s annual Supreme Court Review. The Foreword argues that the Roberts Court today is a conservative version of the Warren Court whose decisions are as supported today or perhaps even better supported today by a political majority as were the Warren Court’s decisions. We suggest that his argument is a domesticated version of the more politically engaged analysis of Supreme Court decisions offered by people associated with Critical Legal Studies—and that the domestication can’t conceal the fundamentally political nature of the Court’s decisions (today or during the Warren Court era). Re in turn disagrees!
Supreme Betrayal: How the Supreme Court and Constitutional Law Have Failed America
Sitting in their marble palace, dressed in their black robes, Supreme Court Justices would like us to believe that they are wise and disinterested oracles dispensing words of truth and justice. Nothing could be further from the truth. Every episode week, Mark Tushnet and Mike Seidman, two renown constitutional law scholars, lift the curtain and show us how the men and women there who sit on the High Court have been manipulating us.