It’s alive! Janet and Rachel tackle the biggest film of the year, Guillermo del Toro’s Frankenstein. This sweeping, gothic epic stars Oscar Isaac as the ambitious Victor Frankenstein and Jacob Elordi as the intelligent, tragic Creature he abandons. Del Toro’s new vision digs deep into Mary Shelley’s themes of loneliness, parental failure, and who the real monster is. Does this beautiful, heartbreaking new version live up to the hype, or is it just stitched-together parts? We have thoughts. Join us as we decide if this is a masterpiece or a beautiful disaster, and ultimately answer the question: ”Should I Watch That?”

A breezy mystery with real charm: fun setup, likable leads, and a satisfying final reveal. Some mid-act detours drag, but the dual-city premise pays off. Verdict: Watch, especially if you like lighter, stylish whodunits with a travel-vibe.

A cozy, candy-corn flight through horror history. If you want a watchlist that balances classics with crowd-pleasers, this one’s a treat. Verdict: Watch—with lights down, sound up, and a bowl of (real) popcorn.

Slick, bingeable, and packed with “wait, what?” moments, but it leans on style over depth in places. If you enjoy relationship-centric mysteries and docu-drama polish, it delivers. Verdict: Watch, especially for fans of twisty true-crime told through a relationship lens.

Sober, well-researched, and more interested in context than shock. It moves slowly, but the restraint and clarity make it a strong entry for true-crime fans who value ethics over spectacle. Verdict: Watch, with the caveat that the subject matter is dark—queue it when you’re ready for a heavy, thoughtful docuseries.

A moody, slow-burn thriller with strong atmosphere and a couple of sharp turns. If you like character-driven mysteries and patient pacing, it’s worth queuing up; if you need constant action, you may bounce off the middle stretch. Our verdict: Watch for the performances and craft—just don’t expect a jump-a-minute ride.

A sharp, spoiler-light breakdown of a twisty betrayal thriller—what works, what strains belief, and whether the turns actually pay off—ending with a straight answer on whether it’s worth your time.

A sharp, high-tension review of Weapons: how the film builds dread, what the performances deliver, and whether its message lands beyond shock value—ending with a clear watch recommendation.

Janet and Rachel unpack Stalking Samantha, a tech-driven stalker thriller where anonymous DMs spiral into real-world danger. They weigh the tension built through phones and cameras, the plausibility of character choices and police response, and a divisive ending. Quick notes on stalking/harassment/home-invasion, then the final call: stream it, theater it, or skip it.

Janet and Rachel wade into the haze of Smoke (2025), a slow-burn neo-noir where secrets drift and nothing is quite what it seems. They break down how the film uses atmosphere—lighting, sound design, and that ever-present fog—to build tension, and whether the performances and script pay it off. Expect a frank chat on pacing (purposeful slow burn or just slow?), the credibility of the twists, and an ending that may divide audiences. They’ll also flag light content notes, share “if you liked X, you’ll likely enjoy this” comparisons, and give their trademark verdict: stream it, theater it, or skip it. By the end, you’ll know if this thriller truly smolders or just leaves a trace of smoke.

In this episode of Should I Watch That?, Janet and Rachel dive into the heartfelt drama Together (2025). The film explores the messy, complicated beauty of human connection—how love, grief, and resilience collide when two people are forced to confront their past and imagine a shared future. The hosts break down the movie’s emotional highs and lows, its performances, and whether the cinematic style matches the weight of its themes. Expect a mix of laughter, raw reactions, and thoughtful insights as they ask the all-important question: is Together a must-watch or a skip?

In this episode, Janet and Rachel turn their attention to the steamy thriller Hunting Wives (2025). The story unravels a tangled web of obsession, betrayal, and deadly secrets in the deep South, where appearances deceive and temptations lead to danger. The hosts explore whether the film delivers on its suspenseful premise, how well it balances its scandalous allure with genuine tension, and whether the twists keep you hooked until the end. With their trademark blend of humor and sharp analysis, Janet and Rachel help you decide: is Hunting Wives worth the chase?

Bring Her Back: A Must-See Resurrection or Dead on Arrival? They say you should be careful what you wish for. This week, we’re reviewing the new supernatural horror film Bring Her Back. Does it deliver spine-chilling terror, or should this movie have stayed buried? We’ve got your spoiler-free verdict right here.

The Woman In The Yard: Must-See Thriller or Backyard Bore? There’s a new woman in the yard... but is she who she says she is? This week, we’re digging into the new Blumhouse thriller starring Danielle Deadwyler, The Woman In The Yard. We’ll give you our spoiler-free verdict on whether this psychological horror is worth your time, or if you should just lock the door and stay inside.

Guilty pleasures? This week we're getting into some real Sinners. Janet and Rachel are breaking down the good, the bad, and the frankly blasphemous of the new movie that has everyone talking. Is the plot a miracle? 🙏 Are the characters saints? 😇 Is the ending worth the penance of watching? 😬 Press play to find out if this is your new cinematic religion or just another false idol!

<p>The ladies reveal <strong>Celebrity Crushes!</strong></p>

<p>The Ladies discuss The Accountant 2.</p><p>Should YOU Watch This?</p>

<p>The Ladies Discuss Another Simple Favor</p>

<p>The ladies Talk ... Companions.</p>

<p>The ladies talk about the TV show Sirens!</p>