I debate Daniel the Quran-only Muslim on the Biblical necessity of blood in the atonement of our sins. Michael Lofton from the Reason & Theology podcast was kind enough to be the moderator again.RSM Blog (with my slides) = https://realseekerministries.wordpress.com/2025/11/14/debate-is-blood-biblically-necessary-for-atonement-w-dale-glover-vs-daniel-the-muslim/

Daniel (the Muslim) felt unsatisfied with our debate on Daniel 2 & 7 and asked if I could come on his show to do a follow up discussion on several issues that weren't fully covered during the debate proper itself.RSM Blog (with free sources) = https://realseekerministries.wordpress.com/2025/11/08/jesus-or-muhammed-debating-the-fulfillment-of-the-prophecies-in-daniel-2-7/

We're back! Dale vs. Daniel the Quran-only Muslim and this time we are debating the prophecies in Daniel 2 and 7 of the Bible; are these predicting the spiritual kingdom of Jesus Christ (as per Christianity) or Muhammed and Islamic Empire?May God's truth prevail :)RSM Blog = https://realseekerministries.wordpress.com/2025/11/08/jesus-or-muhammed-debating-the-fulfillment-of-the-prophecies-in-daniel-2-7/

The Atheist YouTubers Paulogia and the Rabyd Atheist are in cahoots and at it again folks! In this charged climate of skeptical quote twisting and devilish distortions of the truth to suit Atheistic agendas, I'm joined by an unbiased Atheist with Christian leanings, Prof. Tavo San Abri, to assess Paulogia's "Minimal Witnesses Hypothesis"- a theory I'm told by virtually all online Atheists, is the best natural theory on the net. Yet this hypothesis utterly fails to accomplish its stated purpose of providing a possible account for all 6 of Gary's Minimal Facts (among other "established historical facts").Unfortunately, Paulogia's "Minimal Witnesses" hypothesis doesn't provide what it promises; namely, a possible account for the known facts, unlike other natural hypotheses such as James Fodor's hypothesis which does. Heck, even I as a Christian, could put my skeptical hat on and come up with a better theory than Paulogia did after years of supposed research on his end!Beyond that, Paulogia's theory is woefully inadequate on a factual level and highly implausible and improbable to be true in reality and hence why I've invited Prof. Tavo San Abri here to help me further expose the theory's many deficiencies- enjoy :)See Tavo's original devastating take down video of Paulogia's "Minimal Witnesses" hypothesis here =    • The evidence against@Paulogia's minimal wi...  RSM Blog = https://realseekerministries.wordpress.com/2025/11/01/evaluating-paulogias-minimal-witnesses-hypothesis-again-w-prof-tavo-san-abri/

Alright, as promised, I wanted to post up my follow up review of my debate with Jake the Muslim Metaphysician on the logical and metaphysical coherence of the Trinity Monotheism model as first discovered by Dr. William Lane Craig. The debate went great and I really appreciated the 4 arguments presented by Jake and thus I wanted to do my best to give them a deeper look beyond what we did in the debate itself as well as go over the Pro-Trinitarian argument I provided from actualized selfless love.Enjoy :)RSM Blog (with free scholarly sources) = https://realseekerministries.wordpress.com/2025/10/26/is-trinity-monotheism-logically-metaphysically-coherent-jake-brancatella-vs-dale-glover-bonus-debate-review/

I was a guest on the Reason and Theology Podcast to debate Jake Brancatella (aka. The Muslim Metaphysician) on the topic of whether Dr. Craig's "Trinity Monotheism" philosophical model is a logically and metaphysically coherent concept.I argue the affirmative case and Jake provides 4 arguments against the Trinity's coherence on this front.** Note: That I am preparing a debate review to go over some of the most important topics raised in this debate and to provide a follow up assessment. **Enjoy :)RSM Blog (with free scholarly sources) = https://realseekerministries.wordpress.com/2025/10/26/is-trinity-monotheism-logically-metaphysically-coherent-jake-brancatella-vs-dale-glover-bonus-debate-review/

Christian neuroscientist, Dr. Trevor Lohman, rejoins me to discuss the topic of consciousness through the lens of the data from neuroscience with Atheist and skeptical physicalist Darren Lute (from the Skeptics and Seekers podcast).This promises to be a respectful yet very insightful convo- make sure to tune in :)

RSM Blog = https://realseekerministries.wordpress.com/2025/10/23/discussing-the-neuroscience-of-consciousness-with-dr-trevor-lohman-the-atheist-darren-lute/

Attention Atheists and Shroud skeptics! The evidence is in, it is now time that every rational unbeliever become Shroud Pilled. That is the name of a new book giving a neutral and fully objective survey of the Shroud evidence for and against its authenticity by Dr. Trevor Lohman, a self described Shroud Agnostic who leans toward the Pro-Shroud side- see his book now available for purchase on Amazon starting today, October 18th 2025 :)Trevor Lohman is a clinical neuroscience researcher specializing in the relationship between the cardiovascular system and neurological health. Since childhood, he has been fascinated with science and technology. With the wisdom that only age can bring, he now sees the immense value in studying history, philosophy, and theology too. He currently lives in Los Angeles with his wife and two children and enjoys trying to find the intersection between science and belief with his work.Amazon Link to His Shroud Pilled book = https://www.amazon.com/Shroud-Pilled-...Also see his other book, "God's Eye View, which proves God exists based on his extensive knowledge in neuroscience = https://www.amazon.com/Gods-Eye-View-...RSM Blog (with free scholarly sources) = https://realseekerministries.wordpress.com/2025/10/18/shroud-pilled-with-neuroscientist-dr-trevor-lohman/

I'm joined by returning guest, historian Dr. Cheryl White, to talk philosophy and the Shroud in her new upcoming book (to be released by the end of November from Westbow Press). The Shroud represents an enigma or mystery which warrants the conclusion it serves as a sign to us. In this episode we go over the logic of such a conclusion vs. a mere fallacious appeal to God-of-the-gaps type reasoning.Enjoy the show Shroud fans :)Cheryl White's New Website = https://shroudstudiesproject.org/RSM Blog (with free sources) = https://realseekerministries.wordpress.com/2025/10/16/the-shroud-in-the-third-millennium-confronting-the-limits-of-human-knowledge-dr-cheryl-white/

Allan Ruhl returns to the show to follow up on a comment from a skeptic on his first show's claim that Christians were persecuted by Jews mostly during the first 1000 years of its history and that the typical Jewish claim that Christians have persecuted and oppressed the Jews for 2000 years is made up nonsense based on nothing but anti-Christian bias!Enjoy :)RSM Blog = https://realseekerministries.wordpress.com/2025/09/03/addressing-jewish-myths-about-christianity-w-historian-allan-ruhl/

In the previous debate on God's existence between Phil Bair and Juan from Modern Atheism, the side topic of animal pain and suffering came up. I removed that section of the debate (10 mins or less total) at the request of both of the debaters to focus in on the main topic of debate.

However, Omar was passionate about the subject and wanted to discuss it further with me- here is the conversation we had!

**Note: There was a technical glitch with Zoom right in the beginning and so I didn't get the very introduction (first 2-3 mins or so) of the show and that part is left off. Again, all of the substantive parts are left in and only my customary 2-3 min introduction is missing of the show. My apologies **

RSM Blog (with free scholarly sources) = https://realseekerministries.wordpress.com/2025/10/07/debate-does-god-exist-with-phil-bair-christian-vs-juan-modern-atheism/

Phil Bair returns to debate the existence of God with a newcomer to the channel, Juan from the Modern Atheism channel. They debate over the Problem of suffering, the Argument for God from Evil, the Argument from God from Human Personhood and the Argument for God from rational knowledge. Former Hindu now leaning toward Christian Theism, Omar Fakhoury, joins me as a co-host for this one and throws in his two cents in towards the end.RSM Blog = https://realseekerministries.wordpress.com/2025/10/07/debate-does-god-exist-with-phil-bair-christian-vs-juan-modern-atheism/

My friend and Resurrection scholar, Dr. Gary Habermas, returns to the show to various objections and criticisms regarding his recently published Vol. 3 on the Resurrection as raised by skeptical scholars and popularizers alike.Gary provides clear and sound answers to these skeptics in full accordance with 1 Peter 3:15 and I believe tackles them in such a way as to leave no doubt regarding his immense knowledge and sound scholarship on this front- Vol. 3 on the various Scholarly Perspectives is an amazing resource for Resurrection research regardless of what the skeptical naysayers may try to say to the contrary!RSM Blog = https://realseekerministries.wordpress.com/2025/05/16/the-ultimate-resurrection-panel-celebrating-the-legacy-of-gary-habermas/

Gary's Volume 3 Book = https://www.amazon.com/Scholarly-Perspectives-3-Resurrection/dp/1087778646

Co-author and fellow Christian Olivier Bonnassies joins me to talk about his European best selling book coming out on Oct 14th in North America providing the latest scientific evidence for the existence of God from a total of 12 different scientific disciplines. This one is a must watch as Olivier and his co-author interviewed over 100 Nobel Prize winners in researching for the book and even the famous Christian mathematician, Dr. John Lennox, has highly recommended the book!P.S.- For Shroud fans, I ask him toward the end about his take on the Shroud of Turin, stay tuned for his expert opinion.RSM Blog = https://realseekerministries.wordpress.com/2025/10/02/god-the-science-the-evidence-book-with-olivier-bonnassies/

Book Website (Available on Oct 14th) = https://www.godthesciencetheevidence.com/book/

Here's Harry's take on the Biblical book of Acts.RSM Blog = https://realseekerministries.wordpress.com/2025/01/09/harry-stark-shows-2025/

Mike visits Real Seekers to continue our conversation from our last debate on the Shroud of Turin. In this show, we discuss Mike's underlying problematic assumption that miracles are absurd or impossible to occur and I think we manage to make some headway in getting Mike to be more open minded to miracles a bit!

RSM Blog = https://realseekerministries.wordpress.com/2025/09/26/debating-the-rationality-of-miracles-w-the-atheist-mike-from-the-evil-christianity-channel/

Harry Stark lays out the superiority of the case for Jesus Christ's historicity compared to other ancient figures from history.

RSM Blog = https://realseekerministries.wordpress.com/2025/01/09/harry-stark-shows-2025/

OK this is another debate between myself on the Christian side and a Muslim named Daniel. We had a very cordial, respectful and substantive debate on the topic of "Is Muhammed a True Prophet or Not?". I took up the negative side answering No, Muhammed is NOT a true prophet and Daniel took up the affirmative. Interestingly, Daniel is a Quran-only Muslims and hence appealing to the Hadith traditions is totally irrelevant for him and as such the only sources he considers to be inspired and authoritative are the Torah, Prophets, Gospels (and the Johannine epistles too apparently) and the Quran. We restricted ourselves to debating Muhammed's prophethood on the basis of 4-6 criteria that Daniel claims represent the Biblical test for prophethood.Enjoy :)

RSM Blog = https://realseekerministries.wordpress.com/2025/09/24/debate-is-muhammad-a-true-prophet-dale-glover-the-christian-vs-daniel-the-muslim/

This was not an episode I had planned on doing and indeed it was not one I had any desire to do, but I have to expose the newly discovered truth about Hugh Farey as a purposeful liar! I recently did a great show with Modern Atheism in which we discussed the Shroud, many skeptics on there seemed to be in good faith and I appreciated their inputs very much. However, there were also a few rotten eggs and true to form, Hugh Farey showed up to egg them on so to speak by posting his usual insulting, condescending and/or belittling posts about me in front of his fellow skeptical underlings who just blindly and mindlessly believe anything and everything he says. This is just business as usual in dealing with Hugh Farey online, but shockingly, something new happened this time... Hugh Farey seems to have exposed himself as a direct, willful and purposeful liar who will say anything to defend the cause of Shroud skepticism, even at the expense of God's truth!For years, I denied this was the case, I refused to listen to those who tried to warn me and hence, in the light of his recent denial of the one piece of evidence I used to believe proved he was honest regardless of any impact on the Shroud skeptical agenda; it appears I was wrong and so I apologize to those who warned me, I was wrong to defend Hugh as a good faith and honest to a fault opponent. It appears to me now that he does have the nefarious intentions and motivations that you ascribed to him all this time.I will never make that mistake again and as such, I needed to reveal the truth as I now see it to my audience and also warn them to have their guard up against anything and everything they might hear from Hugh Farey the "Ultimately Lying Shroud skeptic"- do not, I repeat do not, believe anything he says unless and until it has been independently verified first!!!RSM Blog = https://realseekerministries.wordpress.com/2025/09/19/debating-the-historical-and-shroud-evidence-for-jesus-resurrection-w-juan-of-modern-atheism/

This was the 2nd of 5 debates I got lined up in the past two weeks. In this episode I go up against Juan from the Modern Atheism channel and had a great talk discussing the historical evidence for the Resurrection and addressing his issues with miracles, contradictions in the Gospels and of course we get to the Shroud of Turin in the end.A very civil and respectful conversation- love it :)RSM Blog (with my slides) = https://realseekerministries.wordpress.com/2025/09/19/debating-the-historical-and-shroud-evidence-for-jesus-resurrection-w-juan-of-modern-atheism/