All content for Hormesis Podcast is the property of Sean Tanny, Alison Roth, Andrea Herrick, & Nicholas Sperling and is served directly from their servers
with no modification, redirects, or rehosting. The podcast is not affiliated with or endorsed by Podjoint in any way.
Andrea, Sean, Nick, and Alison presented an unofficial episode of the Hormesis Podcast at AAPM/COMP 2020 - here's how you access it!
Andrea and Sean discuss their experiences with ACR Site Reviews, the benefits of accreditation, and the role peer review plays in radiation oncology physics.
In this Micro Dose (mini ep) join Sean and Alison in discussing Sean's experience with the ABR part 3 exam. Have your own story, insight, or questions? Comment at https://www.reddit.com/r/HormesisPodcast/comments/doqglb/micro_dose_%CE%B2_abr_part_3/.
In this Episode, Andrea and Sean discuss the report from AAPM TG-218, “Tolerance limits and methodologies for IMRT measurement-based verification QA.” They review some of the TG Report, the report recommendations, and the background of IMRT QA. The hosts share their thoughts and experiences on the IMRT QA process and its impact on clinical outcomes.
In this episode, co-hosts Andrea and Nick talk about the implementation of medical physics 3.0, what it means for the medical physicist, why it is necessary and ways you can implement some of the ideas in your clinic. Join Andrea and Nick for a discussion about the necessity, purpose of this movement.
In this episode, co-hosts Sean and Alison discuss whether the number of residency spots is appropriate for the demand of medical physicists in today’s market. This episode was sparked by the recent AAPM newsletter article [1], a MEDPHYS ad for a residency that charges tuition (April 1, 2019), the document that started it all: the 2010 Career Model [2], and more [3-5].
