Home
Categories
EXPLORE
True Crime
Comedy
Society & Culture
Business
Sports
History
Fiction
About Us
Contact Us
Copyright
© 2024 PodJoint
00:00 / 00:00
Sign in

or

Don't have an account?
Sign up
Forgot password
https://is1-ssl.mzstatic.com/image/thumb/Podcasts211/v4/78/02/24/78022460-df42-f8ab-233e-2d66ca143d0d/mza_16907224448453599970.jpg/600x600bb.jpg
FRANDly Chat
Bristows LLP
17 episodes
1 month ago
In this episode, James Boon and Sam Harvey discuss the UK IPO’s SEP consultation and the UPC’s Patent, Mediation and Arbitration Centre (PMAC). From pondering whether these measures might fill the vacuum left by the demise of the EU SEP regulation, to scrutinising some of the details in the proposals and speculating on how they might work in practice.
Show more...
Business
RSS
All content for FRANDly Chat is the property of Bristows LLP and is served directly from their servers with no modification, redirects, or rehosting. The podcast is not affiliated with or endorsed by Podjoint in any way.
In this episode, James Boon and Sam Harvey discuss the UK IPO’s SEP consultation and the UPC’s Patent, Mediation and Arbitration Centre (PMAC). From pondering whether these measures might fill the vacuum left by the demise of the EU SEP regulation, to scrutinising some of the details in the proposals and speculating on how they might work in practice.
Show more...
Business
Episodes (17/17)
FRANDly Chat
A SEP Consultation with your PMAC?
In this episode, James Boon and Sam Harvey discuss the UK IPO’s SEP consultation and the UPC’s Patent, Mediation and Arbitration Centre (PMAC). From pondering whether these measures might fill the vacuum left by the demise of the EU SEP regulation, to scrutinising some of the details in the proposals and speculating on how they might work in practice.
Show more...
1 month ago
30 minutes

FRANDly Chat
Optis v Apple: Recalibrating FRAND in the UK
In this episode, Richard Pinckney and Matthew Raynor unpack the Court of Appeal’s landmark decision in Optis v Apple, a judgment that reaffirms the UK’s approach to global FRAND licensing. They explore how the Court re-centred comparables analysis, revived the parties' valuation evidence, and addressed the tension between UK and US proceedings. How did the Court arrive at the $0.15 per unit royalty rate? Are top-down cross checks back in fashion? And what does this all mean for SEP liti...
Show more...
6 months ago
18 minutes

FRANDly Chat
UK FRAND declarations and patent pools – Tesla v Avanci in the Court of Appeal
Patent litigators Richard Pinckney and Sam Harvey consider the position of patent pools (or platforms) in UK SEP/FRAND licensing disputes following the Court of Appeal’s judgment in Tesla v Avanci which found that Tesla’s claim for a declaration of the FRAND terms to a licence to Avanci’s 5G Platform had no real prospect of success. Note: This episode was recorded prior to the Court of Appeal handing down its judgment in Optis v Apple. (Originally recorded on 24.05.25).
Show more...
6 months ago
23 minutes

FRANDly Chat
‘Interim’ FRAND licences – the Court of Appeal judgment in Lenovo v Ericsson
In this episode, James Boon joins Francion Brooks to discuss the latest Court of Appeal judgment in Lenovo v Ericsson granting a declaration that a willing licensor in the position of Ericsson would grant Lenovo an interim licence. Note: All information was correct at the time of recording.
Show more...
8 months ago
19 minutes

FRANDly Chat
FRAND in the UPC - Panasonic v Oppo
In this collaboration between our FRANDly Chat and You, me & the UPC podcasts, our experts, Naomi Hazenberg, Richard Pinckney and Francion Brooks, bring you a discussion on the first substantive FRAND decision of the UPC in Panasonic v Oppo. Find our other FRANDly Chat episodes here and our other You, me & the UPC episodes here. Note: All information was correct at the time of recording.
Show more...
10 months ago
24 minutes

FRANDly Chat
‘Interim’ FRAND licences
In this episode, James Boon and Matt Hunt talk through the recent wave of judgments related to ‘interim’ FRAND licences. Note: All information was correct at the time of recording.
Show more...
11 months ago
27 minutes

FRANDly Chat
IDC v Lenovo
Join James Boon and Nadine Bleach as they discuss the Court of Appeal's decision on the second UK FRAND determination in InterDigital v Lenovo [2024] EWCA Civ 743 and what it means for future UK FRAND litigation. Note: All information was correct at the time of recording.
Show more...
11 months ago
12 minutes

FRANDly Chat
Tesla v InterDigital & Avanci – jurisdiction in claims for ‘FRAND pool licences'
In this episode, our competition lawyer, Francion Brooks, is joined by patent litigator, Richard Pinckney, to discuss the recent judgment in Tesla v InterDigital & Avanci which raises interesting questions of jurisdiction related to FRAND licences to patent pools. Francion and Rich explore why Tesla’s claim failed in this case, and what might be done differently in future cases to avoid the same issues. Note: All information was correct at the time of recording.
Show more...
1 year ago
18 minutes

FRANDly Chat
A FRANDly catch up
Join Naomi Hazenberg, Nadine Bleach and Francion Brooks as they embark on a whistle-stop tour of FRAND developments in the UK and beyond in this continually evolving space. Recorded in late September 2024. Note: All information was correct at the time of recording.
Show more...
1 year ago
20 minutes

FRANDly Chat
A speedy guide to Optis v Apple
In this episode, Luke Maunder and his colleague Matt Hunt delve into the recent FRAND judgment of Mr Justice Marcus Smith. There is too much in the judgment to unpack in just one podcast. However, Matt and Luke aim to ensure that, by the end of this whirlwind tour, you should be able to hold your own when asked “So what do you think about the UK court’s approach in Optis v Apple?” Note: All information was correct at the time of recording.
Show more...
2 years ago
21 minutes

FRANDly Chat
InterDigital v Lenovo - Initial impressions
In this episode, Luke Maunder discusses the long-awaited FRAND judgment of Mr Justice Mellor with special guest star Dr Myles Jelf. Luke and Myles delve into the decision and set out the key information you need to know. Note: All information was correct at the time of recording.
Show more...
2 years ago
23 minutes

FRANDly Chat
Free-standing FRAND actions green lit
In this quick update, senior associates and IP specialists, Luke Maunder and Naomi Hazenberg discuss the recent decision in Kigen v Thales, which considers the jurisdiction of the court for a claim that included FRAND declarations that were free-standing and/or tied to declarations of invalidity and non-essentiality. Note: All information was correct at the time of recording.
Show more...
2 years ago
10 minutes

FRANDly Chat
FRAND injunctions and undertakings
Senior associates and IP specialists, Luke Maunder and Naomi Hazenberg discuss the development of the English FRAND injunction and the timing of when an undertaking to enter a FRAND licence is required. Note: All information was correct at the time of recording.
Show more...
2 years ago
21 minutes

FRANDly Chat
FRAND methodologies before the British Courts
Senior associates and IP specialists Luke Maunder and Naomi Hazenberg go back to the future to look at FRAND methodologies before the British Courts. They begin by looking at what was done in the seminal Unwired Planet case, before moving on to the detail of the unresolved issues including those that are up for consideration in the cases of InterDigital v Lenovo and Optis v Apple. For the true economics enthusiast, they also finish off with what other, as yet untested, methodologies might be ...
Show more...
2 years ago
17 minutes

FRANDly Chat
How have British Courts treated patent pools?
Senior associates and IP specialists, Luke Maunder and Naomi Hazenberg, look at how the British Courts have treated patent pools, before delving into some of the issues they present in litigation. They also cover suggestions that the principle of pool licensing could apply on the other side of the fence, looking at licensing negotiation groups and approaches that seek to achieve a similar objective. Note: All information was correct at the time of recording.
Show more...
3 years ago
13 minutes

FRANDly Chat
Disclosure & confidentiality: “If only we could have a little more transparency”
"If only we could have a little more transparency" is a refrain heard by every licensor, but commercial sensitivities and confidentiality obligations/concerns abound in the FRAND space. Senior associates and IP specialists, Luke Maunder and Naomi Hazenberg, look at how the British Courts have sought to balance the right to information on comparable licences (and associated information) with the need to protect confidentiality and prevent parties from gaining an unfair competitive advan...
Show more...
3 years ago
19 minutes

FRANDly Chat
Jurisdiction: Where are we now?
Senior associates and IP specialists Luke Maunder and Naomi Hazenberg briefly recap the history of jurisdiction challenges in the British Courts, including the relevant aspects of the decision by the UK Supreme Court in Conversant / Unwired Planet. They then look in detail at the latest decision of the Court of Appeal in Nokia v Oppo, when Oppo attempted to have the FRAND aspects stayed in favour of global determination in an alternative forum, the People's Republic of China. Note: All infor...
Show more...
3 years ago
16 minutes

FRANDly Chat
In this episode, James Boon and Sam Harvey discuss the UK IPO’s SEP consultation and the UPC’s Patent, Mediation and Arbitration Centre (PMAC). From pondering whether these measures might fill the vacuum left by the demise of the EU SEP regulation, to scrutinising some of the details in the proposals and speculating on how they might work in practice.