George Knapp Alleges Lockheed Martin Held 'Unusual Material'.mp3
Waymo is sending its self-driving cars into the heart of New York City, not to launch a robotaxi service yet, but to start mapping the chaos. In this episode, we break down why Alphabet’s AV division is quietly testing in Manhattan, what this move says about its long-term strategy, and how NYC’s strict rules could shape the future of autonomous vehicles. We dig into the permit details, regulatory hurdles, and why this data grab matters even without driverless rides on the table.
Can SpaceX Starship launch to Mars in 2026?
Ghislaine Maxwell Recalls The First Time She Met Elon Musk
Opening Remarks & Political Stakes
Musk begins with remarks about protecting Wisconsin’s Supreme Court race, warning of political gerrymandering, and emphasizing the importance of the U.S. House majority. He links judicial decisions to major political outcomes.Government Waste & Fraud (DOGE Initiative)
He launches the "Department of Government Efficiency" (DOGE), aimed at reducing waste and fraud in federal spending. Musk suggests up to 80% of waste and 20% fraud across the government and promises transparency.
Get-Out-The-Vote Efforts & Incentives
Musk announces a “block captain program” offering $20 for those who take a photo with a sign of Judge Schimel and encourage neighbors to vote, aiming to increase awareness for the upcoming judicial and voter ID measures. He highlights betting market odds showing a low chance of success without such efforts.AI & Truth
Musk discusses bias in AI and his vision for "Grok" to be a truth-seeking AI, pushing back against media and ideological biases.Education, Personal Finance & Public Services
Musk envisions personalized AI tutors to support student learning and criticizes excessive administrative costs in education. He also discusses the Federal Reserve and national debt, warning of rising interest payments exceeding defense budgets.Corruption and Immigration Truancy
Musk and Antonio Gracias expose systemic issues in Social Security and federal benefits—reporting millions of non-citizens receiving benefits fraudulently, including 1.3 million on Medicaid. They discuss human trafficking routes, voting irregularities, and the exploitation of loopholes in asylum and ID processes.Ethics, Transparency & Small Government
Musk emphasizes principles for the DOGE initiative: truth, transparency, speed, and efficiency. He advocates for a minimal government structure similar to the early U.S. model.Closing Prayer & Reflection
The town hall concludes with an emotional prayer from a local pastor, seeking protection and justice for Musk and those pursuing reform efforts.
Tesla just revealed a new Optimus prototype, and this one runs on Grok, xAI’s in-house language model. In this episode, we break down the quiet debut hidden inside a recruitment video, the robot’s improved design, and why task automation — not flashy stunts — is the real milestone here. We also look at how Grok changes the way Optimus learns and adapts, what this means for Tesla’s factories, and how it fits into Elon Musk’s push to unify AI across robots, cars, and software.
Tesla just launched its robotaxi app to the public, marking the first time anyone can request a ride in one of its self-driving cars. The service is live in a few U.S. cities and looks a lot like Uber, but every ride still has a safety driver behind the wheel. In this episode, we walk through what the app actually offers, how Tesla is setting it up as a test run for something bigger, and why full autonomy still isn’t on the table. We look at how Tesla’s vision-only approach compares to rivals like Waymo, what regulators are saying, and how this pilot could shape Tesla’s future beyond car sales.
Tesla’s new six-seat Model Y L is already making waves in China. With deliveries underway and early demand spiking, this stretched, three-row SUV offers a roomier, more practical option without the Model X price tag. In this episode, we break down how Tesla reengineered the Model Y for the Chinese market, what makes the Model Y L different from earlier attempts at third-row seating, and why Gigafactory Shanghai is central to the rollout. We also look at what this move signals about Tesla’s strategy in China and whether the Model Y L could end up in other markets.
Elon Musk’s daughter says she doesn’t want the billionaire life. She lives with roommates in L.A., pays her own bills, and plans to go back to college. The internet has questions.
Vivian Jenna Wilson, 21, is defining herself outside her father’s shadow. In a new profile, she says she has zero interest in being “superrich.” She shares an apartment with three roommates in Los Angeles because it is cheaper, and she is working out a return to college focused on languages. That choice clashes with what most people assume about the family of the world’s richest man, which is why it grabbed headlines today. We look at the reporting, the quotes, and the subtext.
First, the facts. Vivian tells The Cut she manages her own finances, wants stability over status, and values independence. People summarized it simply: no desire to be super rich, roommates by choice, and plans for school. Livemint echoed the modest-life angle and her focus on education. We also touch on the strained family dynamics that have been public since her legal name and gender change in 2022. Then we zoom out. Fame without wealth. Growing up near extreme money. Why opting out resonates in 2025. We compare this to other children of celebrities choosing distance from legacy wealth and discuss how media incentives shape the narrative around Vivian.
Finally, we look forward. What happens if she models, studies abroad again, or leans into languages and gaming culture. The story is less about Musk and more about a young adult choosing agency. That is why it matters.
Do you think opting out of family money is empowering or unrealistic in 2025?
A Florida jury ordered Tesla to pay $243 million over a fatal 2018 crash tied to its Autopilot system. The case centered on a Model 3 that veered off the road, killing two teens, with jurors concluding Tesla knew about a defect and failed to fix it. We break down how the trial unfolded, why the jury awarded both compensatory and punitive damages, and what this means for Tesla’s future battles over Autopilot and Full Self-Driving.
In this episode, we unpack the stunning $243 million jury verdict against Tesla tied to a 2019 fatal crash in Key Largo. The case took a dramatic turn when a hacker—known online as @greentheonly—recovered key crash data inside a Miami Starbucks that Tesla claimed it couldn't find for years. That file became the centerpiece of a courtroom battle over Autopilot’s role in the death of Naibel Benavides Leon and the catastrophic injuries suffered by Dillon Angulo.
We explore how Tesla’s own systems automatically uploaded and then unlinked the data after the crash, and why the company said it didn’t intentionally suppress the evidence. You’ll hear how internal testimony revealed that someone at Tesla may have deleted the file from its servers and how a persistent legal team and one technical expert uncovered it anyway.
This episode also looks at the broader legal and financial fallout: pending lawsuits, investor backlash, and new questions about Tesla’s approach to data transparency and Autopilot safety. Plus, we break down what the annotated crash video revealed about the vehicle’s final moments—and why this case could shift how future Autopilot lawsuits are fought in court.
Topics Covered:
The 2019 crash and its aftermath
Tesla’s handling of Autopilot crash data
The hacker’s role in recovering the missing file
Legal strategy and courtroom evidence
Jury verdict and damages
Federal investigations into Autopilot
Investor lawsuits tied to Tesla’s autonomy claims
The road ahead for Tesla’s legal challenges
SpaceX Starship flight 10 Update
Elon Musk Speech At SpaceX Starship Launch #10
Schatz Warns That Codifying DOGE Cuts Will Boomerang Once Democrats Retake Power
Elon Musk just dropped one of the boldest moves in AI this year. His company xAI has fully open-sourced Grok 2.5, a massive language model that rivals GPT-4 in benchmarks. Unlike OpenAI, Anthropic, and Google, which keep their most advanced systems locked away, Musk released Grok under the Apache 2.0 license. That means anyone can download it, tweak it, and even use it for commercial projects with no strings attached.
In this episode, we break down what Grok 2.5 actually is, from its 314 billion parameter mixture-of-experts design to the smaller 25 billion parameter version for lighter deployments. We look at why Musk made this move now, how it ties into his ongoing feud with OpenAI, and what it means for developers who want strong models without corporate restrictions.
We’ll also unpack the strategic side: how open-sourcing Grok 2.5 helps xAI compete without Amazon- or Microsoft-level funding, how it leverages the X platform to grow faster, and why Musk thinks openness beats secrecy when it comes to AI. Whether you’re building apps, following AI politics, or just curious how Musk plans to fight Big Tech with code, this episode gives you the full story.
Elon Musk's xAI is working on a secretive project called MacroHard, designed to recreate Microsoft's core software products using AI alone. The internal effort uses Grok and other xAI models to simulate tools like Excel, Word, Windows, and GitHub, without relying on human-written code or Microsoft’s APIs. This article breaks down Musk’s strategy, how AI agents are being trained to function as full-stack developers, and why this could challenge Microsoft's dominance in enterprise software.
A federal lawsuit against Elon Musk’s X Corp has ended with a settlement that requires the company to pay $500 million in severance to thousands of former Twitter employees. The lawsuit, filed in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California, accused X of violating federal labor laws by refusing to provide severance pay after Musk’s acquisition of Twitter in October 2022. The company, now known simply as “X,” terminated over half of its workforce in the weeks after Musk completed his $44 billion purchase.
How did a deal that was supposed to redefine social media turn into a legal battle over unpaid severance? The question surfaces from the scale and speed of Twitter’s layoffs and the way those exits were handled. When Musk took control of Twitter, he slashed roughly 6,000 jobs across the company. Many of those employees said they were promised specific severance packages under the previous ownership. The lawsuit, led by former Twitter employee Courtney McMillian, alleged that Musk and his team chose to ignore those agreements and instead offered significantly reduced exit terms.
A SpaceX Super Heavy rocket will launch a Starship prototype on its tenth test flight, designated IFT-10 (Integrated Flight Test). Starship will perform a payload deployment test with 8 Starlink v3 simulators and a relight of a single Raptor engine while in space. Super Heavy will perform a water landing in the Gulf of Mexico. The booster/ship combination is designated as B15/S37, both of the Block 2 variant.
Two separate federal court rulings have struck legal and financial blows against Elon Musk and his business interests, raising questions about whether the world’s richest man is losing leverage in the court system he’s long relied on to defend his corporate strategies.
On Monday, a judge in Delaware formally invalidated Musk’s $56 billion Tesla compensation package, denying the company’s request to move its incorporation to Texas. That same day, a federal judge in California ruled against Musk’s attempt to dismiss a lawsuit accusing him of illegally firing employees at SpaceX who had circulated an internal letter criticizing his behavior.
The Delaware decision directly affects the most valuable CEO pay package ever created. Judge Kathaleen McCormick denied Tesla's motion to transfer its incorporation from Delaware to Texas, which the company had hoped would retroactively affirm shareholder approval of Musk’s compensation. She ruled that the original shareholder vote on Musk's 2018 pay package had not been fully informed due to undisclosed conflicts of interest among Tesla’s board members.
Tesla attempted to shift its corporate charter after McCormick voided the pay package in January, stating that Musk had undue influence over the supposedly independent directors who approved it. Monday’s ruling now cements her earlier opinion, keeping Tesla under Delaware jurisdiction and invalidating the proposed Texas move.
Tesla claimed that 77% of shareholders voted in favor of reincorporation to Texas. McCormick concluded that such votes did not repair the flawed process used to approve Musk’s compensation. She emphasized that the Texas vote did not constitute a ratification of the original pay package because shareholders still lacked full information at the time.
In California, Judge Maggie B. Corley rejected Musk’s request to throw out a wrongful termination lawsuit filed by eight former SpaceX employees. These workers claim they were fired after distributing a letter calling Musk’s online behavior damaging to the company’s culture. Musk’s lawyers argued that the letter itself disrupted SpaceX’s mission and violated internal policies.
Corley dismissed those arguments. She stated that the terminated employees had exercised protected rights under the National Labor Relations Act. She ruled that Musk’s defense failed to show that the firings were lawful or that the internal letter disrupted business operations to a degree that would justify dismissal.
The California ruling moves the case toward trial. It also affirms the position of the National Labor Relations Board, which has supported the fired workers’ claims since 2022. If SpaceX loses at trial, the company could face orders to reinstate the employees or pay damages.
The dual rulings came just hours apart. Neither involved criminal charges, but both potentially carry long-term consequences. Musk could lose tens of billions in stock options if the Tesla compensation package remains void. He also risks reputational harm and further scrutiny into labor practices at his companies.
The Delaware ruling may increase shareholder pressure on Tesla’s board to renegotiate Musk’s compensation. Several investors have raised concerns about the pay package's scale and the influence Musk holds over board members. The board has not signaled plans for a revised compensation deal.
The California decision draws attention to Musk’s management style and public conduct, which critics say can alienate workers and investors. The internal letter cited examples of Musk's tweets and online behavior as distractions that conflicted with SpaceX's workplace values.
Musk’s legal team has not yet announced plans to appeal either ruling. Tesla has not released a statement following the Delaware court’s decision, and SpaceX has declined to comment on the wrongful termination case.
Musk’s Lawsuit Against Media Matters Nears Dismissal in Texas
