In 2025, the United States announced a new federal budget that earmarked $185 billion for immigration enforcement.That figure is larger than the combined annual military spending of the United Kingdom and France.At first glance, it seems like a domestic matter — about border patrols, detention facilities, and the enforcement of immigration law.But when examined closely, this budget reveals much more than policy. It signals a deeper transformation of governance — not just in the U.S., but globally.This level of spending doesn’t come from a single leader’s ideology. It reflects a broader, trans-administrative shift — one driven by the interests of a vast security-industrial network.This network includes defense contractors, surveillance technology firms, data analytics companies, and the government agencies that purchase their services.We’re no longer just talking about physical borders.Today, borders are becoming digital infrastructures — lined with sensors, drones, facial recognition systems, and AI-based threat detection.And these systems are not dismantled when a new government comes to power.They become embedded. Permanent.What we are witnessing is not merely border control — but the creation of a control society.One where movement is categorized, risk is predicted, and people are sorted not by law but by algorithms.And this isn’t happening only in America.The European Union operates similar technologies through platforms like EUROSUR, ( European Border Surveillance System ) which enables real-time tracking of people on the move.Private firms increasingly influence public migration policy — by designing the tools through which borders are managed.So what does this tell us?That migration has become more than a humanitarian or labor issue.It has become a vector of security logic — a way to justify permanent infrastructure, constant surveillance, and the normalization of exception.Political theorist Colin Crouch once wrote about “post-democracy” — a system in which democratic institutions still exist, but decisions are made elsewhere, by powerful elites and unelected interests.This immigration budget is an example of that shift.While public debate focuses on elected leaders, the systems being built behind the scenes are quietly reshaping how governance works.Governments partner with corporations in opaque ways, creating data regimes that categorize individuals long before they reach a border.And once this infrastructure is in place, it is very difficult to undo.Contracts are signed. Technologies are installed. Institutions are built around them.What begins as a response to a temporary crisis quickly becomes a permanent operating system.So yes — $185 billion is a large number.But it’s not just about money. It’s about continuity.It represents a future where control is decentralized, but intensified.Where states manage not only territory, but behavior, desire, and movement.And the ultimate question is this:Who will inherit this system — and how will they use it?<a href="https://esenermiserturk.com.tr/anali%CC%87zler/f/trump%E2%80%99s-185-machine" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">https://esenermiserturk.com.tr/anali%CC%87zler/f/trump%E2%80%99s-185-machine</a>
Show more...