Why God Of The Gaps Is A Bad Objection
While finishing our discussion on why methodological naturalism should be rejected, we deal with another bad objection to Christians having a place in the science world. The charge of believing in a "God of the gaps" is levied at Christians to scoff at their history in science. We take a look at it and offer up "nuh huh" and "you do it too"!
TIMELINE:
00:00 - Introduction
03:01 - The 2 Reasons To Reject Methodological Naturalism
03:49 - Science Already Allows For Intelligence As An Explanation
06:52 - Human Sciences Allow Intelligence As An Explanation
07:46 - Distortion Of Natural Science To Keep Out Intelligence
13:43 - Responding To The Bad God Of The Gaps Objection
15:54 - Objection 1 - God Is Not Limited To Gaps
17:41 - Objection 2 - Not Offering Evidence In Ignorance But Positive Explanation
21:43 - Objection 3 - There Are Gaps That Need Explanation
23:16 - Two Ways God Acts Intelligently That Gives Us Explanations
26:33 - Empirical Vs. Historical Science Doesn't Count Out Intelligent Explanations
29:26 - Intelligence Design Differs From Creation Science
31:26 - Conclusion
BOOK LINKS:
Scientism and Secularism - Learning to Respond to a Dangerous Ideology by
J.P. Moreland
Kindle
Paperback
Audible (FREE With Membership)
Logos
J.P. Moreland Website
All episodes, short clips, & blog -
https://www.cavetothecross.com