Q: How can God know the future? How can God make everything? Summary How can God know the future? Dr. E unpacks this question by pointing to Scripture’s prophetic precision. From Isaiah’s writings—700 years before Christ—to Jeremiah’s prophecy of Israel’s exile and return, the Bible repeatedly reveals God’s perfect foreknowledge. Archaeological discoveries, such as the Assyrian carvings of Israel’s captivity and the Pontius Pilate stone, confirm what Scripture already declared true. Dr. E reminds us: the Bible doesn’t need to be proven—it proves the evidence around it. God knows the future because He wrote it. The conversation then turns to creation itself—how God made everything ex nihilo (“out of nothing”). While humanity can invent and build using existing materials, only God can bring something into being by His word alone. From forming Adam from the dust to speaking the cosmos into existence, creation reveals God’s unmatched power and sovereignty. In a world that marvels at human innovation, Dr. E points us back to the Creator who authored time, matter, and life itself. Takeaways Biblical prophecy demonstrates God’s complete foreknowledge. Archaeological evidence supports, not disproves, Scripture. God’s promises—like Israel’s return from exile—always come true. Humanity can create from something, but only God creates from nothing. God’s sovereignty extends over all time, space, and creation. The Bible’s truth continually aligns with world history. If you’ve been wondering whether faith and evidence can align, this is one you won’t want to miss. Find more episodes of Ask Dr. E here. If you've got a question for Dr. Easley, call or text us your question at 615-281-9694 or email at question@michaelincontext.com.

Q: How did God create Himself? Where did God come from? How can God see everyone at the same time? Summary In this episode, Dr. E and Hanna dive into two main questions: Where did God come from? and How can God see everyone at the same time? Dr. E explains that Scripture reveals God as eternal—He has always existed and always will. Passages like Psalm 90 and Isaiah 40 affirm God’s existence “from everlasting to everlasting,” reminding us that He alone is the Creator and sustainer of all things. From the vastness of galaxies seen through the James Webb Telescope to the microscopic precision of an atom, creation itself bears God’s fingerprints. They also explore God’s omniscience and omnipresence—His ability to see and know everything at once. Using Psalm 139 and 2 Chronicles 16:9, Dr. E unpacks how God’s eyes roam the earth to strengthen those whose hearts belong to Him. Unlike Satan, who prowls step by step, God perceives all at once and intimately knows every detail of our lives. He doesn’t just see humanity collectively—He sees you personally. This eternal, all-knowing God is not distant but deeply present, caring, and actively engaged with those who are fully His. Takeaways God has always existed—He has no beginning and no end. Scripture, not speculation, defines our understanding of God’s eternality. Creation—from galaxies to atoms—reveals God’s creative power and design. God is omnipresent, omniscient, and omnipotent—everywhere, all-knowing, all-powerful. Psalm 139 reminds us that God knows our thoughts, actions, and words before we do. God’s all-seeing nature isn’t distant; it’s personal, intimate, and loving. Find more episodes of Ask Dr. E here. If you've got a question for Dr. Easley, call or text us your question at 615-281-9694 or email at question@michaelincontext.com.

Q: Dr. E, my question concerns prayer. Does God ever tell us not to pray for someone or something? What does this say about the power or purpose of prayer? Jeremiah 7:16 God states do not pray for those people, when he found that Judah was not inclined to repent. In the New Testament, John 17:9 Jesus did not pray for the world, but those you have given me. Summary In this episode. Dr. E unpacks a fascinating question rooted in Scripture: when God told the prophet Jeremiah not to pray for Judah, what did He mean—and what does that teach us about prayer today? Dr. Easley explains that Jeremiah’s command was a specific prophetic instruction tied to judgment, not a model for believers today. In contrast, we’re repeatedly told to “pray without ceasing” and to bring everything before the Lord. Prayer, he reminds us, isn’t a formula or a way to change God’s mind—it’s an alignment of our hearts with His will. “The litmus test for prayer,” Dr. Easley says, “is whether the answer would glorify God.” It’s not outcome-based but obedience-based. Drawing on examples from Jeremiah, Jonah, and Jesus’ high priestly prayer in John 17, Dr. Easley helps us see prayer not as a spiritual wish list, but as humble communication with our Creator—rooted in trust, surrender, and reverence. Takeaways Prayer isn’t about changing God’s mind—it’s about aligning our hearts with His will. God’s command to Jeremiah not to pray was a specific act of judgment, not a model for believers. The purpose of prayer is to glorify God, not to secure the results we want. Even Jesus prayed, “Not my will, but Yours be done,” modeling perfect submission. True peace comes when we bring our requests to God and trust His verdict. The best prayers we can pray are those shaped by Scripture and God’s revealed Word. Find more episodes of Ask Dr. E here. If you've got a question for Dr. Easley, call or text us your question at 615-281-9694 or email at question@michaelincontext.com.

Q: The death of John MacArthur.  I've heard Abner Chou in both a Sunday evening church service and seminary chapel, eulogize Mac Arthur and claim that "all heaven gave him a “standing ovation” when he died.” In Chou’s mind, MacArthur is elevated to the position of the apostle Paul. Is there any scriptural basis for this type of recognition of a man entering heaven?   The hero worship grates on me. I’m a widow; all men die. Some men fought for our country; others were martyred. This type of eulogy detracts from my Savior, the one who died for all of us.  Summary In this episode of Ask Dr. E, a listener raises a question following the passing of John MacArthur: is there biblical basis for imagining heaven giving a standing ovation when a well-known Christian leader arrives?  Dr. E explains that while it is appropriate to acknowledge the ministry impact of faithful men and women, Scripture makes it clear—Christ alone is the hero. Hero worship, even in subtle forms, distracts from the glory of God. Mature Christians know that heaven is not about applause for accomplishments but worship of the triune God. From church history, we can honor figures like D.L. Moody, Charles Spurgeon, and Billy Graham, but even their legacies fade with time. In contrast, God calls His people not to fame or recognition but to faithfulness. Dr. E reminds us that heaven is not about eulogizing human achievement but magnifying Christ. Our calling is simple: be faithful servants of Christ. Whether known by millions or by a few, believers are celebrated in the right way only when Christ is the focus. God does not ask us to be successful—He asks us to be faithful. Takeaways Hero worship in the church can easily distract from Christ as the true focus. Eulogies should highlight faith in Christ, not human accomplishment. Scripture shows that Christ does not share His glory or worship. God uses flawed people, but their legacies ultimately fade with time. True recognition in heaven is given to faithful servants of God. God calls His people to faithfulness, not worldly success. Find more episodes of Ask Dr. E here. If you've got a question for Dr. Easley, call or text us your question at 615-281-9694 or email at question@michaelincontext.com.

Q: Hi! I recently had a miscarriage and it has been a season that has brought up a lot of questions. I was wondering if you had any insight? If God knits each person together in their mother’s womb, as Psalm 139 describes, then where is God in miscarriage? And if God is the creator of life, why does miscarriage happen? Does He create a life, then immediately change his mind? Do babies who die before they are born go to Heaven?  Summary In this episode, Dr. E addresses a listener’s heartfelt question: Where is God in miscarriage? This painful reality raises deep theological concerns—if God creates life, why does miscarriage happen? Do babies who die before birth go to heaven? Dr. Easley draws on both Scripture and personal experience with infertility to help frame the conversation. Psalm 139 reminds us that God knows us intimately, even from conception, and yet we live in a fallen world where tragedy and loss are unavoidable.  Turning to Ecclesiastes, he explains that life under the sun is marked by brokenness, and not every “why” question will be answered this side of eternity. From David’s grief over his infant son in 2 Samuel 12, we see an example of trust: “I will go to him, but he will not return to me.” Ultimately, spiritual maturity means acknowledging our questions while leaning by faith into God’s sovereignty and goodness. Though miscarriage leaves parents with grief and unanswered questions, God’s Word assures us that He is near to the brokenhearted and offers peace that surpasses understanding. Takeaways Miscarriage raises difficult questions about God’s role in life and loss. Scripture teaches that God knows and forms every life from conception. We live as fallen people in a fallen world, where tragedy is inevitable. David’s response to his infant’s death shows trust in God despite grief. Maturity in faith means setting aside unanswered “why” questions. God is near to the brokenhearted and offers peace beyond understanding. Find more episodes of Ask Dr. E here. If you've got a question for Dr. Easley, call or text us your question at 615-281-9694 or email at question@michaelincontext.com.

Q: I have been taught the holiness, grace, and righteous wrath of the Lord my whole life. However I've begun to struggle deeply with the nature of God and His love. If God is sovereign and desires that all be saved, why does He not do so? Wouldn't that be the natural expression of His love? That not happening feels like a betrayal of what I've known His character to be. I know He can do whatever He desires, but I don't understand why He doesn't redeem all. Summary In this episode, Dr. E and Hanna tackle a challenging theological question: If God is sovereign and loving, why doesn’t He save everyone? At the heart of this question lies the tension between God’s perfect nature and humanity’s sinful condition. Scripture affirms that God desires none to perish (2 Peter 3:9), yet salvation requires faith in Christ. Universalism—the belief that everyone will ultimately be saved—fails to account for God’s holiness and justice. If God simply overlooked sin, He would no longer be just. Dr. E explains that our human perspective of fairness is shaped by sin, while God’s nature is defined by His Word—He is all-powerful, all-knowing, ever-present, loving, and just. Through Christ’s sacrifice, God offers the one and only remedy for sin. Just as one cure is effective for a disease while others fall short, only Christ’s saving work secures eternal life. Hanna reflects that many underestimate the seriousness of sin, which diminishes how good the gospel truly is. When we recognize the depth of our sinful condition, we see God’s love and mercy more clearly. Salvation is not earned but received by faith in Christ alone, who lived, died, and rose again. Takeaways God desires none to perish, but salvation requires faith in Christ. Universalism overlooks God’s holiness and justice. Our sense of fairness is distorted by sin. Scripture, not feelings, defines God’s character. Christ’s death and resurrection provide the only true cure for sin. Recognizing our sin magnifies the beauty of God’s love. Find more episodes of Ask Dr. E here. If you've got a question for Dr. Easley, call or text us your question at 615-281-9694 or email at question@michaelincontext.com.

Q: In the women’s ministry at my church, there is a woman who encourages many of the Bible study facilitators to attend an outside event/separate ministry to receive deliverance.  At first, I was intrigued, but then after prayer and research, started to have discernment about this. I’m looking for clarification on the topic.  My understanding is Jesus is the deliverer. Through daily practice of prayer on our own and with others, reading the Word, and tuning into the Holy Spirit- we will be sanctified and therefore delivered from (rejection, anger, addiction, etc).  This event is where people are praying over you individually but in a corporate setting and they are claiming to deliver you of evil spirits. That seems to be elevating people over God. This deliverance ministry does claim Jesus as Lord but this doesn't seem biblically sound. Can you clarify more on this topic? Summary In this episode, Dr. E addresses a listener’s concern about deliverance ministry that claims to free people from evil spirits through prayer and pronouncement. While Scripture records Jesus and the apostles casting out demons, Dr. E emphasizes that the New Testament never instructs believers or churches to continue these practices as an ongoing ministry. Instead, the biblical pattern for Christians is to stand firm in the faith, resist temptation, and live under the control of the Holy Spirit. Dr. E explains that a believer indwelt by the Holy Spirit cannot be possessed by demons, though Satan and his forces will harass and tempt us. The danger of deliverance ministries, he notes, is that they can elevate human leaders and rituals above Christ, and in doing so, diminish the sufficiency of Jesus’ finished work on the cross. True freedom does not come through formulaic prayers or rituals, but by walking faithfully with God through His Word, His Spirit, and His people. Ultimately, Dr. E encourages discernment. If something feels unbiblical, measure it against Scripture. Christ is enough, and believers can live in confidence that “greater is He who is in you than he who is in the world.” Takeaways Scripture records demonic encounters, but it never prescribes ongoing deliverance rituals for the church. A believer indwelt by the Holy Spirit cannot be possessed by demons. Temptation and harassment are real, but God calls us to stand firm and resist. Deliverance ministries risk undermining Christ’s finished work by adding extra steps. Discernment is vital—if something feels unbiblical, test it against God’s Word. True freedom comes through Christ’s sacrifice and walking with God’s Word, Spirit, and people. Links Mentioned Alisa Childers Youtube Channel Find more episodes of Ask Dr. E here. If you've got a question for Dr. Easley, call or text us your question at 615-281-9694 or email at question@michaelincontext.com.

Q: As a fellow believer who adopted a pair of siblings who were 5+ years of age, how best may we seek to reverse what seem to be ‘generational curses’? Summary In this episode, Dr. E tackles a difficult question from an adoptive parent wrestling with the idea of “generational curses” and the lingering effects of brokenness. Dr. Easley reminds us that while Scripture warns about the consequences of sin, it does not teach that children are doomed by their parents’ failures. Instead, each person is responsible before God for their own life and choices. At the same time, we can’t ignore the very real challenges that come with adoption: past trauma, struggles with attachment, and the weight parents feel to somehow “fix” their children. Through both biblical teaching and personal experience, Dr. Easley points listeners back to the steady hope of the gospel. Parents cannot control outcomes—but they can faithfully love, nurture, and pray, trusting the Lord to do what only He can do. Adoption mirrors our place in God’s family: welcomed, broken, yet deeply loved. This conversation is an honest encouragement for adoptive parents, foster families, and anyone walking through the complexity of raising children in a fallen world. Takeaways The Bible teaches consequences of sin can affect generations, but children are not guilty of their parents’ sins. Misapplications of “generational curses” are common in some ministries, but Scripture does not provide formulas for breaking them. Adoption is rooted in brokenness—children come from loss and often trauma that families must carefully navigate. Attachment theories can be helpful, but they are not ultimate; only God heals hearts and secures identity. Parents can disciple, love, and encourage, but they cannot control the spiritual outcomes of their children’s lives. Hope rests in Christ, who loves our children more than we do and continues His work even when the path is difficult. Find more episodes of Ask Dr. E here. If you've got a question for Dr. Easley, call or text us your question at 615-281-9694 or email at question@michaelincontext.com.

Q: What are your thoughts on Michael Tait, DC talk, how the industry should respond, and what CCM listeners should do as far as keeping music in rotation? Summary In this episode, Dr. E addresses a thoughtful question about contemporary Christian music (CCM) artists who fall into moral failure. Should believers continue listening to their music? Should the Christian music industry respond differently when artists face scandals? Dr. E and Hanna discuss how these questions are not new. From Amy Grant to Sandy Patty, the industry has long wrestled with balancing ministry and business. While some organizations once pulled music from the shelves, today financial interests often outweigh ethical concerns. At the heart of the issue is Paul’s instruction in 1 Thessalonians 5:21–22: “Examine everything carefully; hold fast to what is good; abstain from every form of evil.” Dr. E encourages believers to take this personally and seriously. If supporting a particular artist or listening to their music troubles your conscience, don’t do it. But at the same time, he reminds listeners that we live in a fallen world where every industry—including Christian music—will reflect sin. Takeaways Believers must examine carefully and hold fast to what is good (1 Thess. 5:21–22). If listening to certain music troubles your conscience, it’s wise to avoid it. The CCM industry is often driven by profit more than ethics. Moral failure among Christian leaders and artists is nothing new. God can still use flawed ministries to spread the gospel. Our trust must rest in Christ, not in celebrities or cultural figures. Find more episodes of Ask Dr. E here. If you've got a question for Dr. Easley, call or text us your question at 615-281-9694 or email at question@michaelincontext.com.

Q: I am sure you have asked and answered this before and here I am asking again. This may be several questions because I can't parse it to something simple due to its complexity and the rigidness that's felt within the church in regards to this (on either side). Can women be pastors? Can women be given the title of pastor? I did search and the title pastor is defined as a person leading a congregation or church so my thinking is no. However, what if the title is that of pastor of children's ministries etc? However that brought another question to mind - which is why give a woman the title of pastor and not as director? There are two groups of people - some say yes and use scripture and some say no and use Scripture.  Paul in Corinth with Pricilla, Phoebe and a few others are all part of the thinking that women can be in authority and leadership. The argument from the yes side is that scripture is being taken out of context and that 1 Timothy 1 is a prime example of how women can be in authority (there is also question of who actually wrote Timothy 1) Acts 18 is also used as a stance that women can teach/be in authority over men. Maybe part of the issue here is the definitions of what Pricilla was doing in Acts 18 vs what a pastor really does. But Phoebe was considered a deacon so that would assume she had some leadership capabilities.  The flip side to the stance that women can't be is how are we to mother/teach our sons? Are women allowed to be teachers? You can see the slippery slope down I am sure. So, could you please do a deep dive into this? I am struggling as I am running into this more and more within churches. One church we were attending came out and said women could be deacons and then another called a woman a pastor but they also had director roles - which made it more confusing as a person attending an event. Summary In this episode, Dr. E draws from both Old and New Testament passages to help listeners navigate the often-confused conversation about women in ministry by distinguishing between the office of elder and the gift of pastor-teacher. He explains that the New Testament uses terms like presbuteros (elder) and episkopos (overseer) interchangeably to describe a church office reserved for men, while the role of pastor-teacher is given as a spiritual gift, not an office. Women are clearly permitted to pray and prophesy in the church (1 Corinthians 11), yet Paul prohibits them from teaching or exercising authority over men (1 Timothy 2). Dr. E also explores how churches use titles like “director,” “minister,” or “pastor,” and why clarity in terminology is essential. He highlights examples like Phoebe in Romans 16 and Timothy’s upbringing under his mother and grandmother to show the important role women play in ministry, even if not as elders. Men and women share equal value before God, yet Scripture outlines distinct roles within the church for the sake of order and faithfulness. Takeaways: Scripture affirms equal value of men and women while assigning distinct church roles. Elders/overseers are reserved for qualified men according to the New Testament. The gift of pastor-teacher is not the same as the office of elder. Women are permitted to pray and prophesy but not to teach with authority over men. Phoebe and other women in Romans 16 show the vital role of female ministry. Clarity in church titles like “pastor” or “director” avoids unnecessary confusion. Links Mentioned Can Women Baptize People in The Church? Can Women Be Deacons? What Does The Bible Say About Women Leading in The Church? Council of Biblical Manhood and Womanhood Find more episodes of Ask Dr. E here. If you've got a question for Dr. Easley, call or text us your question at 615-281-9694 or email at question@michaelincontext.com.

Q: I recently finished a Bible study on Revelation and have a lingering question. Revelation states that after Satan is permanently cast into the lake of fire and after the final judgement, God will create a new heavens and a new earth. In the new heavens and new earth there will be no more tears, mourning, etc because sin is no longer present and the heirs of Christ are transformed to be like Him. Because God remains in control, Satan must ask permission or be allowed to wreak havoc, evil, and pain on earth. Since (If) Satan still has access to God and the souls of the heirs of Christ that have died physically are in God's presence, is there mourning in heaven for the souls, angels, and God until the new heavens and new earth? Summary In this episode, Dr. E addresses a listener’s question about whether there is mourning in heaven before the creation of the new heavens and new earth. Drawing from Revelation 20, Dr. E explains the premillennial view: Christ will reign for a literal thousand years before Satan is released to deceive the nations. Even in a perfect environment, humanity’s sinful nature will persist, revealing mankind’s deep depravity and God’s sovereign plan. While Satan is the tempter and deceiver, he does not force people to sin, and not every hardship should be attributed to him. In heaven, believers will have shed their sin nature and be fully transformed in Christ’s presence. The overwhelming glory and holiness of Jesus will eclipse earthly concerns, leaving no room for fear, worry, or grief. Dr. E emphasizes that while we may speculate about prophetic details, Scripture assures us that God’s justice will be complete and His people fully redeemed. In light of eternity’s reality, our greatest focus should be on faithful living now, knowing that the presence of Christ will surpass every sorrow we have ever known. Takeaways: In the premillennial view, Christ will reign on earth for a literal thousand years before Satan’s final rebellion. Even in perfect conditions, humanity’s sin nature leads to rebellion against God. Satan tempts and deceives but cannot force people to sin. Not every hardship is directly caused by Satan—life happens in a fallen world. In heaven, believers will be fully transformed, free from sin and grief. The presence of Christ will overshadow all earthly concerns and sorrows. Find more episodes of Ask Dr. E here. If you've got a question for Dr. Easley, call or text us your question at 615-281-9694 or email at question@michaelincontext.com.

Q: Do you have a book, sermon, or other resource to help Christians to maintain their faith as they go through chronic suffering? My daughter has a debilitating disease that she got in her early 20’s and it has progressively got worse in 3+ years. She says she can’t forgive God for not healing her and even if he healed her now she asks why he didn’t heal her before. She’s so angry with God she’s giving up on a relationship with Him and ready to completely walk away from any faith. Please help.  Summary In this episode, Dr. E offers wisdom to a father whose daughter is wrestling with debilitating illness, anger at God, and a fading faith. Dr. E shares that while he’s never asked God “why,” he’s often asked Him “how” — how to live well through pain, how to endure with grace, and how to resist bitterness. Drawing from his own chronic suffering journey, Dr. E unpacks the difference between entitlement and surrender, encouraging listeners to reframe suffering in light of God's sovereignty. He offers gentle but clear guidance: some “why” questions may never be answered this side of heaven, and continuing to ask them may only deepen bitterness. Instead, he urges us to ask “how” — how can I respond faithfully today? Recommended resources like A Place of Healing by Joni Eareckson Tada and How Long, O Lord? by D.A. Carson offer paths to healing and spiritual perspective. Ultimately, Dr. E reminds us that we can't carry others’ faith, but we can lead, love, and trust that God is still writing the story — even in the pain. Takeaways Asking “how do I live?” leads to faithfulness; asking “why did this happen?” can lead to bitterness. Chronic suffering may never come with clear answers — but God offers sustaining grace. We cannot force someone else’s faith, but we can lead them gently through love. Surrendering our sense of entitlement is key to enduring trials with spiritual maturity. There are some “why” questions in life that will never be answered — and that’s okay. Links Mentioned A Place of Healing by Joni Eareckson Tada Pain And Providence by Joni Eareckson Tada Beyond Suffering Bible by Joni Eareckson Tada How Long, O Lord by D.A. Carson Find more episodes of Ask Dr. E here. If you've got a question for Dr. Easley, call or text us your question at 615-281-9694 or email at question@michaelincontext.com.

Q: "Jesus loves me, this I know, for the Bible tells me so." Can you help me see where in the Bible it teaches that Jesus specifically loves us? I see good verses on the love of God the father and a lot on the obedience of Jesus' sacrifice. But where does the Bible say or support the notion that Jesus has specific love for us as opposed to a general obedience out of love for the Father?  Summary: In this episode, Dr. E tackles a heartfelt question: Does Jesus specifically love us, or is His love simply obedience to the Father? Through careful Scripture study—from Deuteronomy and John to Romans—Dr. E explains that Jesus’ love is deeply personal and rooted in God’s faithful promises, not our worthiness or numbers. He emphasizes that Jesus and the Father share one love, and Jesus calls us to abide in that love by keeping His commandments, which leads to true joy and fullness in our lives. To illustrate the depth of God’s love, Dr. E reflects on the unique and powerful love parents feel for their firstborn children as a glimpse of God’s love for us as His image bearers. This conversation encourages believers to rest confidently in Jesus’ specific and abiding love, and to let that love shape how we love others daily. Takeaways: Jesus loves us personally, not just generally out of obedience to the Father. God’s love for His people is based on His faithful promises, not their merit. Jesus commands us to abide in His love by keeping His commandments. The joy of Jesus’ love is made full in those who remain connected to Him. Parental love gives us a small glimpse of how deeply God loves His image bearers. Find more episodes of Ask Dr. E here. If you've got a question for Dr. Easley, call or text us your question at 615-281-9694 or email at question@michaelincontext.com.

Q: In lots of your sermons and interviews I hear you say that it is God’s will for us (as Christians) to go to Israel. Why is that? Also, could you explain replacement theology and what you believe instead? Does God still have a plan for His people through end times? Might be too many questions but with how much the world has been against Israel and Jews in general. I have struggled through these things lately in God’s word to try and push back the world's beliefs. Thank you for all you do! Summary In this episode, Dr. E addresses a listener’s questions about Israel, replacement theology, and God’s ongoing plan for His chosen people. Many Christians wonder: Why should believers visit Israel? Does the modern church replace Israel in God’s redemptive story? And does God still have a unique plan for the Jewish people today? Dr. E explains how walking the land of Israel transforms a believer’s understanding of Scripture—turning the “black-and-white text” into “holographic color.” He also contrasts biblical teaching with replacement theology, which claims the church has superseded Israel. Drawing from passages like Romans 9–11 and Deuteronomy 30, Dr. E highlights God’s steadfast love and His covenant promises to Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob—promises that cannot simply be erased. Ultimately, this conversation invites Christians to approach Scripture with humility, honoring God’s faithfulness to Israel while anticipating the future fulfillment of His plan in the new heavens, new earth, and new Jerusalem. Takeaways Visiting Israel transforms how believers read and understand the Bible. Replacement theology claims the church has superseded Israel in God’s plan. Scripture consistently affirms God’s covenant promises to Abraham and his descendants. Romans 9–11 and Deuteronomy 30 are essential to understanding God’s plan for Israel. God’s steadfast love reflects His loyalty to His chosen people. Christians should let Scripture, not trends in theology, guide their understanding of Israel. Links Mentioned: The Moody Handbook of Theology by Paul Enns Find more episodes of Ask Dr. E here. If you've got a question for Dr. Easley, call or text us your question at 615-281-9694 or email at question@michaelincontext.com.

Q:I watched your YT session on "If Christians should use AI".   I have a dilemma currently with music. I only listen to Faith/Christian music and recently have found some new music that I am very much enjoying.  I always do research on the band/music/song to ensure it is morally within the context of Scripture and the message is directed about Jesus. However, I found out that this new Christian/Faith music that I was listening to was AI created.  The publisher of the music on social media has openly admitted that the songs are AI created.  The messages in the songs are (in my belief) to be strong Christian messages.  I do have some reservations with AI creating songs like this.  I am not sure if I am over-reacting to this, but it scares me somewhat. One day we may not know what AI created and passed as someone's work.  Would it be wrong to let AI help us create something that we feel are unable to express?  It seems that we are cheating in some way by using AI. Summary: In this episode, Dr. E tackles a question about whether or not it's wrong to let AI help us creatively. AI isn’t inherently evil. It’s a tool—like electricity or a microwave. It can help us find information, speed up tasks, and even assist in medicine. But when it starts replacing our thinking, our creativity, or our worship, we need to pause. MIT research shows that relying on AI can actually reduce how our brains function. That’s not just a tech issue. That’s a spiritual issue. We’re image-bearers of a creative God. We’re meant to struggle, to think, to wrestle with truth and beauty. Taking shortcuts with something as sacred as worship or prayer robs us of the growth God intended. AI might be efficient, but it’s not inspired.  Takeaways: AI is a tool, not a substitute for the God-given work of creativity and discipleship. Outsourcing creative labor to AI can undermine spiritual formation. AI-generated messages, even with good theology, lack the soul of human wrestling. MIT studies show AI use diminishes brain activity and engagement over time. Christians should be cautious about “cheating” their way through expressions of faith. We are image-bearers of a Creator—designed to think, feel, and create, not copy. Links Mentioned: Should Christians Use AI?  The Kerby Anderson interview Michael mentions will come out on 8/5. We'll update this with the link once it's live but you can subscribe here to keep an eye out.  Kerby Anderson on AI use John Piper ChatGPT Prayer  Find more episodes of Ask Dr. E here. If you've got a question for Dr. Easley, call or text us your question at 615-281-9694 or email at question@michaelincontext.com.

Q: Hi Dr. E, Based on Revelation 12:9, when was Satan cast out of heaven? Could you give me Scriptures for your reasoning? Thanks so much! Summary In this episode, Dr. E unpacks Revelation 12:9 and explores what Scripture reveals about Satan’s fall, his defeat, and final judgment. From his rebellion and role in Eden to his defeat at the cross and expulsion during the tribulation, Dr. E outlines the key stages of Satan’s downfall. He addresses the complex theological implications of evil still being active even as believers are with God in heaven. Dr. E also explains the shifting scholarly interpretations of Isaiah and Ezekiel, passages long associated with Satan but increasingly seen as addressing earthly kings. He affirms that while some details remain mysterious, the overarching truth is clear: Satan is a defeated enemy, and God is sovereign over all. The question of whether there is mourning in heaven today is ultimately tied to the hope of final restoration. While sorrow may exist in a limited or temporary sense, heaven is defined by God’s presence—and His plan leads to a future where mourning is forever removed. Takeaways Satan's defeat was pronounced in Eden and finalized at the cross. Revelation 12 places Satan’s final expulsion during the tribulation. Solid theological resources help us navigate complex doctrines. God's sovereignty and ultimate victory are never in doubt. Theology should lead to faithful living, not just curiosity. Links Mentioned: The Moody Handbook of Theology by Paul Enns Find more episodes of Ask Dr. E here. If you've got a question for Dr. Easley, call or text us your question at 615-281-9694 or email at question@michaelincontext.com.

Q: Over the past few episodes or so, I believe I heard that “the Trinity” is not found in the Bible.  This inspired some study, and now I’m wondering why we call God, Jesus, and the Holy Spirit the Trinity at all?  It seems that, before the Council of Nicaea in 325 AD, early Christians had differing ways of describing them, usually referring to them as separate, but not necessarily as a 3-in-1.  As a child, I tried to think of the Trinity like an apple with the outer part, inner part, and the seeds being separate but one, and that being like God.  But that was still incredibly confusing.  Is that confusion necessary, if it’s not actually described that way in the Bible?  What if we went back to the early Christian way of understanding, that the relationship between them is not fully defined?  More mysterious, but maybe more precise that way?  Thanks for your thoughts! Summary: Dr. E addresses a listener’s question regarding the Trinity. Dr. E affirms that while the term “Trinity” doesn’t appear in Scripture, the truth of the Trinity is clearly taught throughout. He explains that God exists as three united persons—Father, Son, and Holy Spirit—without separate existence, forming one divine essence. Using passages like Matthew 3:16–17, 1 Corinthians 12:4–7, and others, Dr. Easley shows how Scripture reveals each person of the Godhead functioning distinctly yet in perfect unity. He cautions against modalism and stresses the importance of clarity over mystery. The early church wrestled with how to define the Trinity, but Scripture drives us toward this essential doctrine for understanding salvation: the Father sends the Son, the Son accomplishes redemption, and the Spirit indwells believers. While mysterious, the Trinity is vital—foundational to Christianity and unmistakably present in the biblical narrative. In short, we don’t believe in three gods—we believe in one God, three persons, co-equal and co-eternal. Takeaways: The word “Trinity” isn’t in Scripture, but the doctrine is clearly taught. God exists as three distinct persons—Father, Son, and Holy Spirit—in one divine essence. Analogies like water or apples oversimplify and often misrepresent the Trinity. Scripture presents the Father sending the Son, the Son sending the Spirit, and the Spirit indwelling believers. The Trinity is essential for understanding salvation and God’s relational nature. We worship one God in three persons—not three gods, and not one God acting in different modes. Links Mentioned: The Moody Handbook of Theology by Paul Enns Find more episodes of Ask Dr. E here. If you've got a question for Dr. Easley, call or text us your question at 615-281-9694 or email at question@michaelincontext.com.

Q: I go to a Christian college and many students, including some of my friends, are converting to Catholicism. Here are my questions: What are your insights on how to engage with them when they are talking about it? I am concerned they are leaning more towards works rather than trusting in the finished work of Jesus. What are things that I can do as a friend veer towards judgement? I am trying to show love to them but also pointing out their bad theology. They are also very focused on Mary being the Saint. How would you respond to that? Are there books you recommend to help me understand the differences between Catholics and Evangelicals? Summary: In this episode, Dr. E and Hanna explore how to engage Catholics with grace by discussing the theological differences between Catholicism and Evangelicalism, especially regarding faith, works, and the role of tradition. They stress the importance of understanding both faiths’ core beliefs and encourage believers to approach conversations with kindness and patience. The conversation also underscores the significance of prayer and the desire for greater depth in spiritual practices. Takeaways: Salvation by grace alone, through faith, is non-negotiable in evangelical theology. Catholicism often elevates tradition and ritual above Scripture. Worship of Mary and the saints lacks biblical support. Protestantism emphasizes the sufficiency of Christ’s finished work on the cross. Many Catholics don’t fully understand their own church's doctrine. Engage friends with love, prayer, and Scripture—not argument. Links Mentioned: Chris Castaldo on inContext Find more episodes of Ask Dr. E here. If you've got a question for Dr. Easley, call or text us your question at 615-281-9694 or email at question@michaelincontext.com.

Q: I’m studying Revelation chapter 20 with BSF right now. I’ve never understood something about the final judgement. How do we reconcile verses such as Matthew 16:27 referencing the rewards individual believers will receive during the final judgment with teachings found in Galatians about freedom from the law (behavior and sins condemnation) and concepts such as every good and perfect gift comes from the father of lights. I think I’ve heard in church, about rewards and extra jewels in your crown, but I’m not certain where that is in the Bible. It is a little confusing to consider freedom through Christ and also a reward system that doesn’t equally reward if we can’t add or take away anything from the work of Christ on the cross. Summary In this episode , Dr. E and Hanna tackle a nuanced question about Revelation 20 and the concept of eternal rewards. Drawing from multiple New Testament passages, Dr. E outlines seven distinct judgments found in Scripture, explaining the Judgment Seat of Christ as a moment for believers' works—not their salvation—to be evaluated. He unpacks how rewards in heaven are not based on merit, but are gracious gifts from God, rooted in faithfulness and obedience. The conversation explores the meaning of crowns, such as the crown of righteousness and the unfading crown of glory, and how believers will ultimately cast these rewards before Christ’s throne. They also reflect on the earthly mindset that struggles with the idea of disparity in heaven and offer reassurance that envy and pride will be absent in eternity. This episode encourages believers to live faithfully now, knowing that our lives carry eternal significance beyond what we can see. Takeaways Eternal rewards are not about merit but about faithfulness and obedience to God. Scripture describes multiple types of judgment, including the judgment seat for believers. Crowns of righteousness and glory are symbols of God’s gracious recognition. Rewards will be cast at Christ’s feet—there’s no room for pride or envy in eternity. Modern culture often downplays eternal life, but Jesus emphasized it repeatedly. Living with an eternal perspective reshapes how we view our work, suffering, and purpose. Links Mentioned: Why Should We Care About Eternal Rewards? Find more episodes of Ask Dr. E here. If you've got a question for Dr. Easley, call or text us your question at 615-281-9694 or email at question@michaelincontext.com.

Q: Knowing division in the church displeases the Lord, what are your thoughts about the “sharp disagreement” between Paul and Barnabas. How should it have been handled? Summary: In this episode Dr. E and Hanna address a question about the sharp disagreement between Paul and Barnabas recorded in Acts 15. They discuss how they should have handled their conflict, assuming that division in the church displeases the Lord. Dr. Easley begins by reminding believers that the Bible is not always prescriptive; sometimes it simply describes what happened. The disagreement centered on John Mark, who had deserted their mission earlier, causing tension. Paul was firm and cautious, while Barnabas, the “son of encouragement,” took a more compassionate approach. This resulted in them parting ways, but God used that division for good, expanding the missionary work as they went different directions. Dr. E emphasizes that believers are sinful, prone to conflict, and that sometimes peace isn’t fully possible. He encourages humility and prayer, trusting God to work through even broken situations. Finally, he urges believers to keep the church’s mission—evangelism and discipleship—at the forefront, rather than getting caught up in internal disputes. Ultimately, God can bring good even from sharp disagreements. Takeaways: The Bible sometimes describes conflicts without giving a “how-to” fix. Paul and Barnabas parted ways over John Mark’s earlier desertion. Barnabas showed compassion; Paul took a firmer stance. God used their disagreement to expand the missionary effort. Peace isn’t always possible, but believers should pursue it so far as it depends on you. The church’s mission of evangelism and discipleship should always be the priority over internal disputes. Find more episodes of Ask Dr. E here. If you've got a question for Dr. Easley, call or text us your question at 615-281-9694 or email at question@michaelincontext.com.