Back in April, I told you that I was embarking on a 25-week program in preparation for a Spartan Race Super 10k. I dubbed this plan "Project Hoplite" and it covers many aspects of physical success done in a progressive manner. My "why" boils down to a belief in the value of doing hard things. For my family, it's important that I'm seen as an example, particularly for my son to see an active dad who puts in hard work. I want my coworkers to respect my discipline and ability to put in serious effort. As for myself, I want to be as mentally and physically capable as possible, despite not being as young as I once was. For everyone else, I want to be perceived as physically capable (if not dangerous). That's a conversation for another day, though.



I've completed the first six-week block of training. This week is an "easy week" of reduced training load before going into the next six-week block. As promised, I wanted to give you an update on how training has gone so far and any lessons learned.





























A Short Review of the Training



The overall plan is 25 weeks long. It's comprised of several six-week blocks that progress from general strength and conditioning to sport-specific training for the obstacle course race. I officially started the plan on May 5th, 2025.



The first and second blocks look more or less the same. I believe consistency on your lifts is important to actually drive adaptation and see progress. Rather than going entirely on my own for the programming, I've been blending three different programs from different coaches.



My StrengthLog App's depiction of weekly work report



Strength Work



First is Tactical Barbell's "Fighter" template, a minimalist program based on barbells (duh, it's in the name). These workouts consist of flat bench presses, squats, weighted chin ups, and I've also added in weighted dips. These are the "A" workouts, and they're pure strength work.



Next is Geoff Neupert's "Giant X" program, which is a double kettlebell clean and press density system. Every session is 30 minutes, and the goal is completing as many times through the prescribed "ladder" as you can with good technique and a controlled heart rate within that time. A ladder is some varying number of repetitions done sequentially.



For example, a 2/3/5 ladder means you do two repetitions, take a short break,

This article contains affiliate links.



What does that mean?










In my Q1 update and retro, I mentioned that my team at work cajoled me into leading a them through a Spartan Race Super 10k at the end of October 2025. As part of the effort, I put together two physical training plans. One was for everyone else who signed up to do it with me. The other plan is for me specifically, based on what I have access to in the garage and enjoy doing. My plan runs for 25 weeks, starting on May 5th, 2025 and ends on the day of the race, October 25th.



To both keep myself accountable and share some thoughts on the training is going, I'm making a regular update to you. There's value in that experience and what lessons I'm learning along the way. Why is that? Well, 25 weeks would be the longest I've consistently run any single program. Usually I start changing things up every 8 to 16 weeks. Actually, in that regard, it would be 20 weeks because the last few leading up to the race do change things up a bit- I'll get to that in a minute.



Requirements for Success



I've never done a Spartan Race. The closest thing was a Tough Mudder 5k back in October 2023. I suspect the requirements are roughly the same, but given we're doing a 10k this time it will just take longer. I think obstacle course races present a nice all-around physical challenge in line with my thinking about tactical fitness. From that article years ago, one of the oldest on the site, I highlighted these qualities:




* Speed and Endurance – You need to be able to run, ruck, and sprint depending on the situation. You will continue doing this for hours to days if needed.



* Strength and Power – You need to be able to carry gear, drag or carry your buddy, pick yourself up over obstacles, or move things out of the way



* Flexibility and Mobility – You need to move over uneven terrain, without injury, drop into awkward or tight positions, and quickly get back out again to sprint to the next position



* Muscular Stamina – You’re going to have to exert muscular force again and again and again. Bad things don’t stop happening just because you’re tired. 




This list still seems extraordinarily relevant, especially for a Spartan Race.

























Now, in all honesty, I'm not trying to be competitive in this event. If it was just me doing it myself, I would probably be trying to get in the top 10% of my age bracket. But, in this case, there's a team of about six other people who signed up to do it with me- each have different levels of physical capability and training backgrounds. If they followed the plan that I wrote for them, they'd be very well prepared- but that's a big "if" and I'm aware that most people simply aren't like me and willing to commit up to an hour per day six times per week to training.



My plan, really, is to have fun and set a positive example to the group as a forty-something corporate mid-level manager.



That said, success in this race involves endurance to run the race,

This article contains affiliate links.



What does that mean?










At the end of 2024, I gave you an update on how I thought I did throughout the year across a few different areas. I also laid out a few goals for myself in 2025. You can can go back and read that update for yourself, but here were the main things I was looking to work on:



2025 Targets




* Compete in 4 to 6 competitions with pistol components



* 12% to 15% body fat percentage



* Earn radio general ticket and do three POTA activations



* Learn more gunsmithing skills



* Finish writing the book




So Let's Talk



First off, let's talk pistol shooting. My range sessions so far this year have all been pistol-focused. Be it testing different optics, as with the Shield AMS I reviewed a couple of months ago and the Shield RMSx I'm testing now (and quite enjoying). I've also participated in two of the Everyday Marksman postal matches. You can go back and look at the course of fire for the first one a few posts back, and the second one's write up will hit after the match concludes at the end of April.



In all, while my practice and shooting sessions aren't as frequent as I'd like, they are happening and I'm getting a good workout on my pistol shooting.

















I've also been spending a good bit of time with my Beretta 92A1, recently back from Allegheny Arms after an extended stay in the hands of their gunsmiths. The end result is just beautiful, and easily makes it my favorite pistol in the safe. As for my latest purchase, the Springfield Armory 1911 Operator AOS, I've been experimenting with different grips to find a preference, and installing parts as they come in (like a Stan Chen SI mag well).



I'm not counting the postal matches towards my target matches this year, so it's about time to get on that goal and go sign up.



Body Composition & Fitness



The goal at the start of the year was to drive down body fat percentage from ~18% to ~13%. I thought I would start the year off strong with a cut and make relatively short work of that. Unfortunately, I've had an unusually busy travel schedule for work and many social events that kept derailing me.

There's always value in pausing for a moment to think about your performance and evaluate where you stand. 2024 was an interesting year for many reasons. I hit several important personal milestones, but also fell behind in other areas. Along the way there were several unexpected challenges that added constraints to my time. Let's go through where I'm at on several aspects.




* Marksmanship & Firearms Skills



* Physical fitness



* Other Skills



* The Everyday Marksman



* Personal




I'll also give myself a grade on each category.



Marksmanship & Firearms Skills: Grade B



This year felt a bit unfocused. I entered 2024 without any particular shooting goals in mind, so I did the natural thing and started emphasizing gear and buying new guns. This started with the GHM9 project early in the year as an experiment with the PCC/SMG format. It's been interesting, and I'm glad to have gone down that path- but it ultimately felt a bit like I was doing something because I was bored.







A lot of it was the impulse to explore my own pontifications about marksmanship training zones. I've grown more and more focused on that 0-50 yard "critical zone" of skill. The PCC, as I've continued to find, is amazing for the job.



In July, I commented that I would begin the path to pistolero. The idea, again, was that 0-50 critical zone of skill. To support this, I bought a few more books focused on pistol shooting (which I have shamefully neglected), bought a 22 LR Mark IV pistol for additional inexpensive practice, attended an Appleseed Pistol Clinic, and set a baseline of competition performance by competing in a pistol match in December. Most of my range time in the second half of the year, sparse as it may have been, focused on pistol shooting as well.



To that end, I've also committed to "amping up" some of my existing pistols. My long-serving Beretta 92A1 is currently with Allegheny Arms & Gun Works in Pennsylvania getting the royal treatment, and I'm likely to send my 18 year old Springfield 1911 Loaded off to a gunsmith early next year to do their magic. The intention for both of these is to be my primary competition pistols in their respective divisions. This gives me the option to compete in Single Stack (1911), Carry Gun (CZ P07), Production (Beretta 92A1), Production Optics (CZ P10F), and Rimfire Optics (Mark IV)- or at least rough equivalents to these divisions. Yes, I know using four wildly different platforms with different operating mechanisms complicates training.



Oh well.



While I'm not unpracticed going into 2025, I would benefit from at least some form of regular practice sessions during the week. I'll figure that out soon.

I am not a political blog or podcast, so I typically stay well away from the topic. That said, I also realize that participating in and advocating for positive "gun culture" is an inherently political activity to begin with- so the topic of politics is not entirely avoidable. I first started drafting the idea of this post in the wake of the first assassination attempt on President Trump during the campaigns, then left it to rot. Interest picked up again after some more high profile shootings, and I convinced myself to keep sitting on it. Well, now that the election is over I think there's a clearer path for what's to come in the next several months and years.



To start off, I reiterate that this is not a political post. I'm not going to discuss the reasonings for who won and lost the election. Rather, I'm focusing on what's been happening in the gun control sphere over the last several years, where the momentum seems to be going, and what I expect to happen soon.



A Pinch of History



I've been involved in debating gun control in some capacity since about 2007. That's before I was even seriously into shooting, and at the time I considered myself someone who was interested in guns but not really an enthusiast. Still, I spent many hours going back and forth on various forums and social media of the time (which, at that time, was MySpace). Honing my arguments there, when I started getting much more serious around 2010-2011, it was just in time for the debate to dramatically pick up at the end of 2012 when Sandy Hook happened and we all thought there was going to be a dramatic push for more gun control in President Obama's second term. Frankly, I lost a lot of [casual] friends during that time when they realized I was on the other side of the issue from them and didn't just nod along in agreement and actively pointed out the flaws in their thinking.



I kept that momentum up for a few years. Through all of it, I saw the cycles of arguments that would gain popularity and then fall to the wayside (on both sides). I knew the core tenets of the Heller and McDonald SCOTUS decisions- and pointed out every time they were getting twisted by the other side.



The most common examples of that twisting, by the way, are muddying of the "dangerous and unusual" standard to instead be "dangerous or unusual" as well as "commonly owned for lawful purposes" getting twisted to "commonly used for self defense."



While my enthusiasm for the debate diminished over time, I still find myself sometimes wading into the fray over on Reddit. I'd say that I've got a really good track record there of winning debates in the eyes of the audience, even if the discussion usually ends with the other side hurling insults at me rather than arguing the points.



In any case, I just wanted you to know that I've been around for a while and have a long memory on this.



The [Coming] End of Hardware Restrictions



Since Heller and McDonald, we've also gotten the Bruen case through SCOTUS. My understanding is that Bruen didn't actually say anything new, but it put a serious exclamation point on the Heller opinion. A bit like SCOTUS saying, "Did I stutter?" It forcefully laid out the standard of review for how second amendment cases needed to be reviewed, and I think it was very clear about that even if lower courts in anti-gun districts still try quibbling over it.



In my view, they only quibble over Bruen being "vague" because they know that applying the standard as written to their pet laws would make their laws unconstitutional.



What I see happening now is a bit of a cultural divide where the traditional anti-2A courts like the 9th, 7th,

Way back in 2014, shortly after starting the first iteration of this site on a free Wordpress blog, I attended a two-day Project Appleseed event. It was a hot August weekend in the hills of Santa Barbara, California. While most people brought along Ruger 10/22s or something similar, I showed up with an iron sighted 20" AR (that eventually became my M16A5). While I came up a few points short of earning my Rifleman patch that weekend, I still think it was the best introduction to rifle marksmanship that anyone can do. The fact that the instruction intertwines with a good bit of Revolutionary War storytelling is a cherry on top.



Not long ago, I told you that my focus for the rest of this year and probably next year shifted to pistol shooting. With that, I've been working through dry fire and reviewing several books on the topic. One day, I discovered that the fine folks at Project Appleseed put together a pistol training course to coincide with the excellent rifle training I did ten years ago. Even better, I looked at the schedule and saw that there was a one-day pistol clinic scheduled for October 1st at the NRA Headquarters Range in Fairfax, Virginia. So I signed up back in July and started the wait.



The rest of this post walks you through the program and my experience with the pistol clinic. Enjoy!



Note: I borrowed photos of the actual event and instruction from the shoot boss, Bill. He posted them to the official Appleseed Forum and his Flickr account, so hopefully he doesn't mind me reposting them here as part of my report.



Project Appleseed



Just about every story within Project Appleseed revolves around the events of April 19, 1775: the battle of Lexington and Concord. This was, more or less, the official start of the American Revolution. Back in the late 1990's, Jack Dailey wrote a series of pieces for Shotgun News under the pseudonym "Fred." While the articles were partly an advertising bid for Jack's business, Freds M14 Stocks, they contained bits of history and a call to develop basic marksmanship skills.



Eventually, this spun off into a CMP-affiliated group known as the Revolutionary War Veterans Association, who went around the country teaching rifle clinics called Appleseeds. Like the namesake Johnny Appleseed, the goal was planting the seeds of patriotism and the tradition of marksmanship in participants.



Without going into detail, know that every Appleseed event involves telling the three strikes of the match. Each part of the story occurs during breaks in between blocks of marksmanship instruction. The three strikes story involves many real historical figures such as British General Thomas Gage, British Major John Pitcairn, Militia Captain John Parker, Militia Colonel James Barrett, and more colorful figures. The stories track the events of the day from the Lexington green to the North Bridge of Concord, then back to Meriams Corner and the retreat back to Boston.



By the end of the day, the British officers realized they had greatly underestimated the skills and fighting spirit of the colonists, and the Revolution was afoot.




<...

This article contains affiliate links.



What does that mean?










I have a confession to make, and it's rather embarrassing. I'm not all that great with pistols. That's not to say I'm a bad pistol shooter, but it definitely lags behind my other skills. As much as I enjoy marksmanship and shooting, my focus always trends back towards rifles. This was never more apparent to me than my first review assignment writing for a print magazine.



The assignment was a 1911. In particular, it was an Iver Johnson Eagle LR Special. One of the writing guidelines for the magazine was that a 5" pistol had to be shot for groups at 25 yards. Without going into details, let's just say that I had a hell of a time trying to use pistol sights for groups at 25 yards. It was such a challenge for me that I tend to decline reviews for pistols unless I can mount a dot to them. Even then, I'm simply not as stable with a pistol as I am with a rifle- regardless of the position.



In January 2022, I thought I was going to address this. I had a good interview with Josh Shaw (USPSA Grand Master and instructor for Green Ops Training), and I had in my mind that this was my time to become a pistolero. Well, that ended up not happening. Life and interests went elsewhere.



Back to the Training Zones



As a refresher, I recently talked about a Martial Marksman's training zones. I dubbed the space between 0 and 50 yards to be the "critical zone." In the grand scheme of capability, it's this space that a marksman must be absolutely capable. It is, by far, the zone where we are most likely to engage a threat in the real world, whether it's a home defense situation, concealed carry, or even Scenario-X.







You can cover this 0-50 zone with a variety of tools. Rifles are an obvious choice, especially at the back half of the zone and beyond. Shotguns also stand out as a particularly powerful tool. This zone was also a big driver for my own foray into the PCC/SMG format. The humble handgun seemed mundane in comparison.



But I have to be honest with myself...that line of thinking that pistols are "mundane" is my own bias at play. In fact, when you dig into it, pistols might even be more interesting.



The Case for Handguns



This is every bit a justification for myself as it might be for you, so bear with me. For at least a year, now, I've been planning and pining over a new semi-custom precision bolt action project chambered in .223 Remington. The goal of the project is a rifle that works well enough out to 600 yards that I could use it both for competition purposes as well as a trainer for larger calibers. .223 is certainly cheaper to shoot than large rounds, and a .223 bolt action has a huge fun factor to it.







However, I couldn't get around my current circumstances. The reality is that all of my local ranges only go out to 50 yards,

This article contains affiliate links.



What does that mean?










Recently, the American Pioneer Corps wrapped up their 5th annual Warfighter Challenge. I'm not actually a member of the American Pioneer Corps, and I should probably rectify that. Their mission is very much in line with my philosophy here at The Everyday Marksman, and I even think a lot of their founding members are local to me. But that's besides the point. What sparked this post had to do with the planning cycle for someone who might want to attend next year's Warfighter Challenge, or maybe one several years down the road.



So what do I mean by planning cycle? More importantly, how might we organize our training into different "seasons" that support success in such an event? So let's dig in.



Long-Term Thinking







One of the five principles of the Martial Marksman training philosophy is "Play the Long Game." There were two key points to this. One was that we should always prioritize mental and physical health. Sometimes that means holding back from pushing the edge in training in order to prevent injury and ensure we can train again the next day.



The other point had to do with the fact that we cannot improve all aspects of our capability at once. Rather, we need to focus on one or two areas at a time, then shift emphasis on to the next weak link.



This is not a new thing. In fact, the other day I was reading John Jesse's 1974 book, Wrestling Physical Conditioning Encyclopedia, and there was a small excerpt that resonated with me. It was a quote from Jesse Owens, who took home four gold medals during the 1934 Olympics. In it, he's discussing his first coach, Charles Riley.



He first told it to me when I was a rusty grammar school kid who'd just been convinced by him to come out for the track team and who wanted to quit because my legs looked like pieces of straw next to other guys'."I'll never make it this year, Mr. Riley." I said to him dejectedly."Who says we're trying to make it this year?" he answered. "You're training for four years from next Friday, Jesse."It was fine in high school when I started breaking records, except the time soon came when I couldn't improve on my past performances and even dropped down a bit. I was like the show business star who has nothing left for an encore, who's afraid of today because of yesterday's success."Where do I go from here?" I finally asked Mr. Riley."Keep training," he'd answer."For what?""Why, for four years from Friday, of course."I took his advice. Four years from Friday turned out to be the Olympics.



Where We go Wrong



The problem that so many of us run into is treating everything like a sprint. We tend to act as if success with anything is achievable if only we buckle down and work hard enough for six to eight weeks. The world is so full of these kinds of Couch-to-5k programs and bootcamps that we balk at the the mere idea that a particular capability needs practicing for six to twelve months before we move on to the ...

More than one time, John Simpson mentioned to me that you don't prepare for the test by practicing the test. It's a bit of a call out against shooters who think that the path to improvement is merely about faster times on their drill of preference. My observation is that a shooter's preferred "game" usually dictates what drills they care about. Bill Drills, classifiers, 1-5, dot torture, and many more track against defensive, competition, handgun, long gun, and other disciplines. These shooters then post their scores and compete against other enthusiasts to see who is the "best."



There's a rub, though. Being good at a particular drill does not automatically translate to being particularly good at all the related skills. It's merely a point-in-time indication to compare yourself against. Take the Bill Drill, for example. The entire drill consists of starting from the draw and firing six shots as quickly as possible at an IPSC target placed at 7 yards. It's a sort of "maximum effort" test.



I take issue with the idea that the drill teaches anything in particular. Six shots isn't enough to teach anything. Using strength lifting as an example, nearly everyone understands that you don't prepare for a one rep maximum test by only training at maximum weights for one rep at a time. I saw the same kind of thing in the military where some guys would "prepare" for their upcoming PT test by doing it once or twice every week leading up to the actual test.



You must identify and target weak points, build volume of practice addressing those weak points- often at weights far less than the maximum. With time and effort, your ability to display maximum strength improves.



Another Example



A significant portion of my day job involves developing technical certifications. Another huge part of it is developing the training programs teaching the knowledge and skills required to pass those certifications.



When we develop a certification exam, it's a all a process of compromises. We bring in a team of industry subject matter experts and have them work through a process of documenting the skills and knowledge required to be successful at the level of the test we're creating. This list usually ends up being dozens of items long, with each item having several sub components to it. We then go through another process to prioritize which items are more important than others. By the time we're done, we have a ranked order of skills and knowledge.



If the test is only 60 items long, but the team wrote 70 objectives, there isn't enough space to evaluate everything. Even at a 1:1 match, that would mean that there could only be one question per objective. One single metric is far from enough to comprehensively evaluate what someone knows. That usually means that we have to select the top 20 or so objectives deemed "most important." After that, we still probably won't evenly distribute the questions. The top five objectives might get 5 questions each, while the least important ones might get one or two. Keep in mind that the "least important" were still in the top 20 out of 60 to 70 objectives.



In the end, you end up with a certification that provides an objective standard to compare against, but it's far from a complete picture of someone's knowledge and capabilities.







Preparing for the Tests



Most people are lazy. When someone asks for help with passing the exam, they almost never want to know what skills and variations they should practice to improve- they want to know the questions ahead of time so they can study the answers.

I've been seeing a question going around forums and social media for the last week or two. The gist of it is, "What would you suggest as a solid basic armory for a serious new gun owner?" The context usually a friend or young man coming of age into the world of firearms ownership and training. I've found the answers to be both entertaining and enlightening. You see the obvious bias of the authors and their personal preferences for using firearms. Some people veer towards the outdoors and suggest hunting rifles and big bore revolvers for backwoods protection. Others went right towards the tactical realm.

So today is my personal answer to this question, and I'm couching it in terms of the Martial Marksman and Scenario-X. I'm not leaning purely on the tactical, though. Rather, my preferences for someone starting out is thinking in terms of versatility and reliability. Too many marksmen, including me at times, go needlessly deep into "optimization." By that, I mean we think of a possible situation and then work backwards to build a rifle or collection tailored to that situation.

But, as the Martial Marksman principles dictate, there is no such thing as optimum. We are, in fact, better served with a tool that does many things pretty well rather than a tool that does one thing exceptionally well at the expense of usefulness elsewhere. Sure, there's a time and a place for specialist tools once you've established your foundations- but this post is about actually building the foundation.

So let's dig in.

Amory Prioritization Tiers

Much like the "gearamid," I'm break my starter arsenal down into a series of levels. The most important and highest priority items being at the bottom, and the least important specialist items being at the top. This isn't to say there isn't a reason you might skip a level, but you should do so understanding that you're probably neglecting something important in the process.

Tier 1: The Martial Marksman

As far as I'm concerned, this is the starting point. If you're at all serious about defense of self, home, and community- then this is the core of it. A beginner's top priority falls along two things: a common and reliable semi-automatic pistol, and a common reliable semi-automatic rifle in an intermediate cartridge.

I have some important additions and caveats to go along with this, as well.

The Starter Pistol

I said that a beginner Martial Marksman should have a common and reliable semi-automatic pistol. That's not terribly specific. I know a lot of readers and listeners want something more specific and concrete. The thing is, I've found that handguns are a personal preference. Once you find one that you like, or even a particular family of them, it ends to become your default suggestion going forward. You can tell when other writers go down this path by only suggesting something like a Glock 19 or 17.

I think that's a mistake, though.

So here are guidelines for a Martial Marksman's first handgun:




* Proven track record of reliability

* Compact sized (i.e. about a 15 round capacity of 9mm)

* Currently for formerly issued to police departments, government agencies, or military units

* Comfortable to hold and shoot in your hands


Reliability is #1, here. This isn't your weekend match gun that only costs you the win if it goes down. You may very well stake your life or your family's life on this gun going bang every time you pull the trigger. Don't skip this point.

I'm going to ruffle some feathers today. In fact, I'm highlighting something I've been doing poorly for years. While I was putting together the hierarchy of physical fitness for the Martial Marksman, I realized there was a need to do the same thing for firearms training and marksmanship. We tend to focus on the things we're already good at, or at least the things we most enjoy. For me, that tends to be scoped precision rifles and relatively long distances. That's fine for a general interest, of course, since fun is allowed. However, if my focus was on cultivating the Martial Marksman skill set, the priorities would look very different.



So here's the challenge: can we establish a standard set of training priorities for the average person preparing for Scenario-X? I think we can.



Setting the Boundaries



First off, my goal is less about dictating what weapon to become proficient with than it is about establishing what distances you should focus on. In some cases, the distances involved naturally lend themselves to specific weapon types. Rather than force that on you, I'm stating the range bracket and letting you decide what weapon platform makes the most sense for you and your circumstances to meet the requirement.



Second, most marksmanship training standards focus on an angular standard like 4 MOA (minutes of angle). This works ok, honestly. It's rather convenient to tell someone to always train for a 4 MOA standard, and then adjust the size of the target based on the range they have access to. At 100 yards, that's a 4 inch target. At 50 yards, it's 2 inches, and 1 inch at 25. Or if you shoot at 200 yards, the target is 8". However, when you think about the context of a Martial Marksman, targets stay the same size regardless of the distance. This is something I picked up from John Simpson's latest book, and it's an important point to consider.







Example Time



Here's an example. Let's say the target is a circle eight inches in diameter. The target is always 8" regardless of the distance. At 200 yards, that target is about 4 MOA. However, at 50 yards, the target is still 8" and is now approximately 16 MOA. Your perception is that the target is now much larger even if it's the same size it always was. What does that mean in practice? It means that your priority should be hitting the target even faster, not necessarily "more accurately."



In the Martial Marksman's world, there are not bonus points for hitting the 1" x-ring if any hit on the 8" black would have done. Taking the extra time to hit the x-ring might mean losing to the opponent who sought to be just fast enough to hit you first. In the real world, that means coming in second place during a gun fight. For our purposes, the goal is hitting a target of set dimensions at a variety of distances with as much speed as possible.



Establishing the Target



Training principle #1 for the Martial Marksman is train for the target. So what is it that we're looking to hit? I've theorized on it before, and now it's time to make it official.



The target of a Martial Marksman is a 10" circle. For practice, you could go as low tech as a common 10" paper picnic plate, but I'll get a little more specific and say that the official training target is an Show more...