In this episode of Stewart Squared, Stewart Alsop III talks with his father, Stewart Alsop II, about Sam Altman’s $25 billion plan to build OpenAI data centers in Patagonia and how it connects to a broader U.S.–Argentina currency swap and the shifting landscape of AI geopolitics. Together, they unpack what this means for energy demand, chip supply, and U.S. influence abroad, drawing parallels to past tech overbuilds like the 1990s dark fiber boom. The conversation moves from the logistics of powering massive AI infrastructure to the rise of robotics and “physical AI,” including Stewart II’s hands-on look at the Unitree robot and his investment in Chef Robotics. For listeners interested in deeper coverage of these stories, check out Stewart Alsop III’s AI Whispers report mentioned in the show.

Check out this GPT we trained on the conversation

Timestamps

00:00 – Stewart Alsop III opens with news of Sam Altman’s $25B OpenAI data center plan in Patagonia, tied to a U.S.–Argentina $20B currency swap and Trump’s backing of Milei.
05:00 – They unpack Argentina’s political turmoil, corruption scandals, and the U.S. effort to counter China’s influence over lithium and rare earths.
10:00 – Discussion turns to AI infrastructure logistics, how data centers need massive power, and Altman’s ties to U.S. energy interests, including solar, nuclear, and SMR reactors.
15:00 – Stewart II compares this boom to the 1990s dark fiber overbuild, warning of overcapacity and shifting ownership in infrastructure cycles.
20:00 – They analyze OpenAI’s 800M users, inference costs, and Sora’s energy demand, considering how infrastructure strain shapes AI access.
25:00 – The talk shifts to Unitree robots, physical AI, and Stewart II’s investment in Chef Robotics, linking automation to industrial change.
30:00 – Closing with reflections on distributed systems, uptime, Google’s architecture, and the evolution from AltaVista to TikTok as symbols of scalable intelligence.

Key Insights

1. AI expansion is reshaping geopolitics. Stewart Alsop III and Stewart Alsop II frame Sam Altman’s $25 billion OpenAI data center project in Patagonia as more than a business move—it’s a geopolitical play. By pairing it with a U.S.–Argentina $20 billion currency swap, the initiative strengthens U.S. influence in South America while countering China’s earlier economic foothold through currency deals and lithium investments.
2. Energy is the new frontier for AI infrastructure. The conversation underscores that AI growth isn’t limited by hardware alone but by power. Data centers require enormous, stable energy supplies, and Altman’s reported interest in solar, battery storage, and small modular nuclear reactors (SMRs) reflects how energy independence has become central to national AI strategies.
3. Overbuilding echoes the dot-com era. Stewart II draws parallels to the 1990s dark fiber boom, when telecom firms massively overbuilt capacity that sat unused for years. The hosts suggest today’s $400-billion-plus data center race—by OpenAI, Microsoft, Oracle, and others—may follow a similar arc, where hype precedes utility and ownership eventually shifts to new players.
4. Chip scarcity defines the AI arms race. They emphasize how Nvidia’s limited GPU supply and OpenAI’s deal with AMD to secure more chips illustrate the bottlenecks in AI scalability. Control over advanced semiconductors now carries the same strategic weight as oil once did.
5. Inference cost and access inequality. With OpenAI serving roughly 800 million users but only 20 million paid, the discussion highlights how computational costs shape user experience. Free users get constrained performance because inference—running models at scale—consumes vast, expensive compute power.
6. Physical AI remains in its infancy. Stewart II’s firsthand experience with the Unitree robot shows how humanoid robotics are still more experimental than autonomous. Yet, his investment in Chef Robotics signals that real commercial progress is happening in less glamorous, industrial automation.
7. Distributed systems are the hidden backbone of AI. The pair close by tracing the lineage from Google’s early distributed architecture to today’s global platforms like TikTok and Instagram. These systems represent decades of evolution toward high-availability computing—proof that scaling intelligence depends as much on resilient infrastructure as on smarter models.

In this episode of Stewart Squared, Stewart Alsop III sits down with his father, Stewart Alsop II, for a rich, cross-generational conversation about China’s technological ambitions and the shifting balance of global power in semiconductors, AI, and manufacturing. Together, they unpack how China achieved seven-nanometer chips without EUV, the dominance of TSMC and its partnership with Apple, the rise of Nvidia and the GPU revolution, and how decades of offshoring reshaped the U.S. industrial landscape. The conversation weaves through topics like robotics, ARM architecture, battery innovation, and the intertwined futures of hardware and software, offering a blend of history, strategy, and insight from two distinct perspectives shaped by time and technology.

Check out this GPT we trained on the conversation

Timestamps

00:00 Stewart III opens with China’s semiconductor advances—7 nm chips without EUV—and its strategy to dominate manufacturing and robotics.
05:00 Stewart II explains TSMC’s two-nanometer lead, Apple’s tight partnership, and how GPUs differ from CPUs in AI.
10:00 The pair explore China’s robotics boom, humanoid robots, and demographic pressures alongside open-source AI and industrial scaling.
15:00 They shift to China’s political economy—local subsidies, Xi Jinping’s control, and the fragile balance of power in global manufacturing.
20:00 A deep dive into GPUs, TPUs, and ARM architecture; why Nvidia dominates and Intel missed the AI transition.
25:00 The conversation turns to TSMC’s origins, unions, and the offshoring of U.S. manufacturing.
30:00 They connect rare earths, EVs, and battery innovation to China’s industrial ecosystem.
35:00 Discussion of Ion Storage Systems and solid-state battery breakthroughs.
40:00 Reflections on TSMC’s fabs, Taiwan’s rise, and Stewart II’s early coverage of semiconductors.
45:00 They close with Raspberry Pi, embedded systems, and how hardware and software co-evolve.

Key Insights

1. China’s Strategic Technological Ascent – The episode opens with Stewart Alsop III outlining China’s rapid progress in semiconductors and robotics, noting its ability to manufacture seven-nanometer chips without EUV lithography. Stewart Alsop II contextualizes this as impressive but technologically behind TSMC’s two-nanometer standard. Together, they frame China’s innovation strategy as one built on scaling, reverse-engineering, and mastering production at the intersection of AI, automation, and manufacturing.
2. TSMC and Apple as the Core of the Semiconductor Ecosystem – Stewart II explains how Apple’s deep partnership with TSMC created an unbreakable bond between U.S. innovation and Taiwan’s fabrication prowess. TSMC’s role as the world’s premier chipmaker places it at the center of global supply chains and geopolitical tension. China’s SMIC, by contrast, lags in both process sophistication and accumulated expertise.
3. The GPU Revolution and Nvidia’s Moat – The Alsops trace how GPUs evolved from graphics engines to AI accelerators. Stewart II describes how Nvidia’s architectural foresight—optimizing GPUs for parallel data processing—made it indispensable for AI model training. Nvidia’s dominance stems not from revenue but from its early, irreplicable integration of software and silicon.
4. The Decline of Intel and the Shifting Silicon Hierarchy – Once synonymous with computing power, Intel failed to transition beyond CPUs into mobile or AI hardware. Stewart II recalls its early arrogance and missed opportunities, contrasting it with the rise of ARM architecture and specialized chips like Google’s TPUs and Amazon’s custom processors.
5. Global Manufacturing and the Legacy of Offshoring – The discussion traces how unions, cost pressures, and the search for efficiency pushed U.S. companies to move production to Asia. TSMC’s rise and China’s manufacturing dominance were unintended outcomes of decades of U.S. corporate strategy. Trump’s reshoring rhetoric, they agree, reacts to this long-term structural shift rather than reversing it.
6. China’s Localized Capitalism – Stewart II emphasizes that China’s industrial success depends not just on central planning but powerful local governments competing through subsidies. This decentralized competition creates both strength and instability, as overcapacity and internal price wars undermine growth.
7. From Chips to Embedded Systems and Beyond – The episode ends on a generational hand-off: Stewart III’s fascination with Raspberry Pi and live coding meets Stewart II’s reflections on the layers of hardware, firmware, and software that defined his career. Their exchange becomes a metaphor for how technology knowledge evolves—stacked, like the chips themselves, from one era’s expertise to the next.

In this episode, Stewart Alsop III speaks with his father, Stewart Alsop II, about Hong Kong’s transformation since the 1997 handover and what it reveals about power, identity, and control in the information age. Together, they trace the shifting relationship between surveillance and sovereignty, explore how technology and data have become new instruments of hard power, and question what autonomy means in a world increasingly defined by networks and algorithms.

Check out this GPT we trained on the conversation

Timestamps

00:00 The Alsops open with reflections on Hong Kong’s post-handover identity and what sovereignty means in an era of shifting global power.
05:00 They trace how information has become hard power, comparing today’s data empires to Cold War intelligence networks.
10:00 Discussion turns to the surveillance state, censorship, and how both China and the West weaponize transparency.
15:00 Stewart II recalls the Beltway Bandits and RAND Corporation days, linking them to the new tech-industrial complex.
20:00 The two explore AI alliances like OpenAI and Oracle, and the risks of corporate control over digital sovereignty.
25:00 A debate unfolds around decentralization and whether blockchain or open networks can resist central authority.
30:00 They consider how capitalism, governance, and propaganda intertwine in the information economy.
35:00 The episode closes with reflections on autonomy, freedom, and what it means to stay human amid algorithmic rule.

Key Insights

1. Information has replaced territory as the new frontier of power. The Alsops argue that control over data, algorithms, and narrative now matters more than borders or armies. They frame Hong Kong’s post-handover story as a lens for understanding how information has become both a weapon and a resource, shaping global hierarchies through who owns, processes, and protects it.
2. Sovereignty is increasingly digital. Where sovereignty once meant control of land and people, it now extends to networks and code. Stewart Alsop II recalls the Cold War’s geopolitical logic, while Stewart Alsop III contrasts it with today’s world where national power depends on cloud infrastructure, encryption standards, and data flows.
3. Surveillance is a shared language of governance. Both East and West are seen as practicing versions of the surveillance state—China through social control, the U.S. through corporate data collection. The conversation suggests that privacy is not only eroding but being redefined as a privilege rather than a right.
4. Technology companies have become the new Beltway Bandits. The elder Alsop connects his experience with RAND and Washington contractors to modern tech giants like Oracle and OpenAI. What used to be military-industrial has evolved into a tech-intelligence complex where innovation and influence are deeply entangled.
5. Decentralization remains an unfulfilled promise. While blockchain and open networks are often hailed as tools of resistance, the Alsops note that true decentralization is rare; power tends to recentralize around those who control computation and capital.
6. Identity and autonomy are being rewritten by algorithms. The father-son dialogue touches on how social media and AI reshape individual agency, subtly dictating what people see, believe, and desire. Autonomy, once a political ideal, has become a question of code design and data ownership.
7. Freedom in the information age requires vigilance and balance. The episode ends on a reflective note: maintaining freedom is no longer just about political institutions but about the ethics of technology itself. The Alsops suggest that reclaiming human judgment—amid the noise of automation and surveillance—is the most important act of sovereignty left.

In this episode, Stewart Alsop II, Stewart Alsop III, Brent Bushnell, and a brief appearance by Nolan Bushnell come together for a thoughtful exchange about the evolution of immersive entertainment, mixed reality, and playful learning. The conversation touches on creativity through technology, the merging of physical and digital worlds, and the Bushnell family’s legacy of innovation across art, engineering, and entrepreneurship.

Check out this GPT we trained on the conversation

Timestamps

00:00 – Stewart Alsop II and Stewart Alsop III open the conversation with Brent Bushnell, setting the stage around creativity, play, and immersive experiences.
05:00 – Brent shares how 2 Bit Circus began as a playground for invention, merging art and engineering into hands-on storytelling.
10:00 – Discussion turns to Dream Park and the vision for mixed-reality spaces that blend digital wonder with real-world connection.
15:00 – The group reflects on the Bushnell legacy, with Nolan Bushnell briefly joining to speak about the spirit of curiosity and risk-taking in innovation.
20:00 – Brent and the Alsops explore democratization of fabrication and how accessible tools empower new creators.
25:00 – They consider education through play, where learning becomes experiential and technology acts as a creative partner.
30:00 – Closing thoughts emphasize community, imagination, and the future of interactive entertainment as a shared human experience.

Key Insights

1. Play as a foundation for creativity – Brent Bushnell emphasizes that play isn’t just entertainment; it’s a vital pathway to discovery. He describes how curiosity-driven environments, like those at 2 Bit Circus, help people reconnect with the instinct to explore and experiment without fear of failure.
2. Immersive entertainment as human connection – The conversation highlights how mixed-reality experiences can draw people closer together, blurring the lines between audience and performer. Brent sees this not as escapism but as a way to make interaction itself an art form.
3. The merging of art and engineering – Brent and the Alsops reflect on how innovation flourishes where technical precision meets creative imagination. This intersection—what Brent calls the “maker mindset”—turns technology into a storytelling medium rather than a barrier to emotion.
4. Legacy and learning from Nolan Bushnell – Nolan’s brief appearance reinforces the family’s tradition of bold experimentation. His reflections remind listeners that innovation requires both mischief and persistence, and that failure, properly embraced, becomes a teacher.
5. Democratization of fabrication – Brent discusses how access to affordable tools and rapid prototyping empowers anyone to build something meaningful. This shift mirrors the open spirit of the early computing era, inviting more people into the act of creation.
6. Education through experience – The group explores how learning can be transformed when it feels like play. Brent imagines classrooms where technology amplifies curiosity, blending entertainment and education to inspire lifelong engagement.
7. The evolving nature of community spaces – The episode closes with a reflection on the social power of interactive venues. For Brent, the future of entertainment lies in shared, tangible experiences that remind people that innovation, at its best, is a collective act of wonder.

In this episode of Stewart Squared, Stewart Alsop sits down with his father, Stewart Alsop II, for a wide-ranging conversation that moves from OpenAI’s massive semiconductor and Oracle deals, to the nature of money and the gold standard, to shifting dynamics in U.S.–China relations and modern warfare technologies like drones and cyber tools. They also trace the history of networking and video games—from LAN parties and Atari with Nolan Bushnell to immersive experiences like 2-Bit Circus and Meow Wolf—before circling back to how AI and robotics are beginning to reshape both business and reality itself.

Check out this GPT we trained on the conversation

Timestamps

00:00 OpenAI’s $10B Broadcom inference chips deal and the $60B Oracle agreement raise questions about money, stock surges, and financial credibility.
05:00 The concept of “funny money,” Oracle’s cash reserves, quantitative easing, and the gold standard highlight how value and trust shape economies.
10:00 Gold, fiat currency, and banks like JP Morgan tie into larger concerns about trust in institutions, from Epstein to government credibility.
15:00 U.S.–China relations surface with Xi Jinping’s control, economic fraying, and the rise of a new Cold War alongside military innovation.
20:00 Drones in Ukraine, Israel, and Iran show shifting warfare, leading to thoughts on biological weapons, genocide accusations, and changing battlefields.
25:00 Broadcom’s roots in networking, Ethernet, LAN parties, and the rise of the internet illustrate the path to SaaS and global connectivity.
30:00 Atari, Nolan Bushnell, Chuck E. Cheese, Nintendo, PlayStation, and Xbox frame the evolution of gaming from cartridges to immersive experiences.
35:00 Immersive worlds like Meow Wolf and 2-Bit Circus tie into the idea of reality disturbance and AI’s role in reshaping digital and physical life.
40:00 AI, multimodality, robotics, Unitree’s IPO, and China’s economic system show competition, monopolies, and involution spirals.
45:00 IPO regulations, Hong Kong’s role, Chinese subsidies, and shifting global markets close with the Great Firewall hack and surveillance systems.

Key Insights

1. The episode opens with OpenAI’s massive semiconductor push, including a $10 billion deal with Broadcom for inference chips and a $60 billion agreement with Oracle. These announcements triggered huge stock surges but also raised skepticism about how much of the money is “real” versus headline figures designed to impress investors. The Stewarts frame this as a story about business credibility, financial imagination, and the blurred line between commitments and speculation.
2. Money itself becomes a central theme. From quantitative easing in 2008 to the abandonment of the gold standard in 1971, the conversation highlights that all money is “made up,” a shared trust system that can inflate or collapse. This sparks questions about fiat currency, the role of gold as a store of value, and whether today’s trillion-dollar deals mirror earlier cycles of financial storytelling.
3. The U.S.–China relationship emerges as a new Cold War. Xi Jinping’s centralized control has propelled China’s economic rise but now risks overregulation and excessive competition. Meanwhile, the U.S. response has been to fuel entrepreneurship in defense technologies, leading to a flood of startups chasing military funding. Both powers appear locked in a long-term contest, each capable of surviving independently while worrying about the other’s strengths.
4. Modern warfare is shifting rapidly, with drones as a central tool. Ukraine’s drone strikes on Russian bombers, Israel’s targeted operations inside Iran, and debates over biological warfare illustrate how the battlefield now mixes precision targeting with the threat of indiscriminate devastation. This marks a move away from the older notion of “honor in war” and underscores the erosion of distinctions between combatants and civilians.
5. Technology history provides perspective, from Broadcom’s early role in networking and LAN parties to the rise of the internet and SaaS. These stepping stones enabled today’s hyperconnected world and help explain how companies like Broadcom can resurface as key players in the AI era.
6. The evolution of gaming is traced through Atari, Nolan Bushnell, and Chuck E. Cheese, through Nintendo, PlayStation, and Xbox, and into mobile gaming with Zynga. Consoles once defined the industry, but immersive experiences like Meow Wolf and 2-Bit Circus now show how games blur into physical, communal, and artistic environments.
7. Finally, the episode circles back to AI as a force of “reality disturbance.” Large language models are becoming multimodal, robots are gaining touch and sensory capabilities, and companies like Unitree Robotics show China’s intense push into automation. The Stewarts note the risk of involutionary spirals—too much competition cannibalizing itself—but also see AI as an inevitable layer that every business must integrate, whether as infrastructure, interface, or imagination.

In this episode of Stewart Squared, Stewart Alsop III sits down with Stewart Alsop II to talk about Cloudflare, its role as the “network administrator” of the internet, and how its business model connects to the larger shifts happening with AI, content, and regulation. The conversation moves through Cloudflare’s core services—CDN, DDoS protection, DNS, zero trust security, and more—before branching into AI’s impact on the open web, lawsuits over training data, Anthropic’s billion-dollar book settlement, and Google’s changing monopoly status. Along the way, they compare today’s uncertainty around AI to the early commercialization of the internet in the 1990s, touch on Al Gore’s “information superhighway,” the rise of special-interest magazines, and how advertising once worked as content.

Check out this GPT we trained on the conversation

Timestamps

00:00 Stewart Alsop introduces Cloudflare and Stratechery, with Stewart Alsop II framing the idea of network administrators versus database administrators.
05:00 Discussion turns to Cloudflare’s distributed network, AI crawlers paying to scrape, and parallels with Apple’s App Store tolls.
10:00 Cloudflare’s core functions are outlined: CDN, DDoS protection, web application firewall, DNS, zero trust security, SSL/TLS, and load balancing.
15:00 The focus shifts to Perplexity, AI scraping practices, lawsuits against OpenAI, and Anthropic’s $3,000 per book settlement.
20:00 Google’s monopoly case, PageRank, and whether AI chat is true competition for search come into question.
25:00 They recall the 1990s internet commercialization, ARPANET roots, TCP/IP, and Al Gore’s role in the “information superhighway.”
30:00 The talk explores niche magazines, ads as content, early internet communities, and conferences as proto-networks.
35:00 Spam is compared to door-to-door sales and Tupperware parties, showing how unwanted commercial attention evolves.
40:00 Science fiction predictions like Dick Tracy’s watch, real-time translation, and the future of the internet’s business model.
45:00 The episode closes with reflections on space exploration, SpaceX, Starship, and how the internet may face its own existential shift.

Key Insights

1. A central theme of the conversation is Cloudflare’s positioning as the “network administrator” of the internet, contrasting with the role of “database administrators.” Stewart Alsop II highlights how this mindset—focusing on distributed connectivity rather than centralized data—has shaped Cloudflare’s growth into a foundational layer of the web, handling massive portions of global traffic and AI queries.
2. Cloudflare’s business model is rooted in offering free protection and performance services, including CDN, DDoS mitigation, DNS, web application firewalls, and zero trust security. Over time, this freemium model has scaled into large enterprise contracts, echoing how companies like GitHub monetize advanced features while keeping entry-level services widely accessible.
3. The discussion emphasizes Cloudflare’s novel approach to AI crawlers: charging for access to content instead of allowing free scraping. This mirrors Apple’s App Store toll model, raising questions about whether such control could eventually be seen as monopolistic if Cloudflare becomes the default gateway for AI training data.
4. Broader AI tensions surface in the critique of Perplexity’s scraping methods and in the legal battles over copyrighted content. Anthropic’s billion-dollar settlement to compensate authors shows how companies are willing to spend heavily to avoid legal precedents that might restrict data access, signaling how unsettled the rules of AI training remain.
5. Google’s position is examined in light of DOJ scrutiny and the shifting competitive landscape. The conversation contrasts search’s reliance on PageRank and links with AI chat’s direct answers, suggesting that Google’s architecture is optimized for one model of information retrieval while AI points toward another, potentially disruptive future.
6. Historical parallels add depth: the commercialization of the internet in the 1990s, Al Gore’s support of the “information superhighway,” and the role of niche magazines and ads-as-content. These examples highlight how new communication technologies have always disrupted business models, with AI and the internet facing a similar inflection point now.
7. The episode closes by looking forward, drawing on science fiction’s role in shaping expectations—from Dick Tracy’s smartwatch to real-time language translation. Yet unlike sci-fi’s optimistic visions, the internet’s future feels uncertain, with questions around monetization, spam, trust, and even the existential sustainability of the current web business model.

In this episode of Stewart Squared, Stewart Alsop III sits down with Stewart Alsop II to explore the financial and technical foundations shaping today’s AI and cloud economy, from the staggering scale of CapEx and depreciation schedules to the sustainability of investments by Microsoft, Meta, OpenAI, and Anthropic. The conversation traces historical precedents like the fiber boom, Google’s rise, and the pivot from Justin.tv to Twitch, leading into a discussion of venture capital shifts, IPO trends, and the enduring importance of the “rule of 40.” They also examine Cloudflare’s emerging role in the open internet economy, the rise of agents and Amazon’s use of reinforcement learning gems, and pressing security challenges around AI scraping, ITAR data, and national infrastructure.

Check out this GPT we trained on the conversation

Timestamps

00:05 Stewart Alsop introduces the theme of CapEx and depreciation, setting the stage with numbers on massive 2025 infrastructure spending.
00:10 Stewart Alsop II explains depreciation schedules, cash vs GAAP accounting, and how fast AI infrastructure like Nvidia chips and server farms lose value.
00:15 The discussion shifts to Microsoft’s Azure strategy, OpenAI’s spending, and comparisons to the 1999 fiber boom where dark fiber overbuilds reshaped the internet.
00:20 Meta’s dual front in VR/AR and AI is questioned for sustainability, as acquisitions and billion-dollar hiring sprees raise risks.
00:25 Historical precedents emerge: Google’s speed in search, Facebook’s real-time newsfeed infrastructure, and the rise of Twitch from Justin TV through Emmett Shear’s pivot.
00:30 Venture capital lessons are highlighted, from early struggles to explosive growth, with reflections on Series A–C shifts, ZIRP, growth equity vs private equity, and the rule of 40.
00:35 Tesla vs Rivian valuations anchor a risk discussion, then focus moves to Cloudflare, intermediaries, AI web crawling, and pay-by-crawl monetization.
00:40 The episode closes with agents, RLGems, universal verifiers, Amazon and Apple’s data advantages, security concerns with ITAR breaches, and the future of an open internet.

Key Insights

1. Depreciation shapes the economics of AI infrastructure.
Stewart Alsop II explains how massive CapEx spending—such as $392 billion in 2025—must be matched against depreciation schedules, which spread the cost of assets like Nvidia chips and server farms over years. The challenge is that AI hardware becomes obsolete much faster than traditional assets, making the schedule a judgment call that influences sustainability.

2. Microsoft’s position differs from AI-first labs.
Unlike OpenAI or Anthropic, Microsoft already had Azure and enterprise infrastructure in place, so their incremental AI spending built on existing investments. This makes their approach more sustainable and less risky than startups burning cash to compete.

3. Meta faces a “two-front war.”
Meta’s massive CapEx is split between VR/AR hardware bets and AI infrastructure, stretching resources and raising questions about whether its cash flows from social media can continue to fund both without weakening the core business.

4. Historical precedents highlight today’s risks.
The fiber boom of the late 1990s, Google’s breakthrough with fast search, and the pivot from Justin.tv to Twitch show how infrastructure-heavy investments can collapse or succeed depending on timing, user demand, and business model clarity.

5. Venture capital dynamics have shifted.
Seed rounds remain risky and contrarian, but later rounds resemble private equity with safer bets and higher valuations. The “rule of 40” has become a standard measure for balancing growth and profitability when evaluating public companies.

6. Cloudflare positions itself as a gatekeeper.
With 80% of AI companies crawling the web through its network, Cloudflare’s pay-by-crawl model could redefine how publishers monetize access to their content, creating a new intermediary in the AI-driven internet economy.

7. Agents and security are the next frontier.
Amazon’s RLGems and universal verifiers illustrate the push to give AI agents personalization and autonomy, but this shift also heightens security risks. Breaches like ITAR data leaks underscore that the AI-driven world may be even more insecure than today’s internet.

In this episode of Stewart Squared, Stewart Alsop III and Stewart Alsop II explore the mechanics of the preference stack in venture investing, the difference between economic and voting rights, why Delaware dominates incorporation, and how governance plays out through independent directors and board structures. The conversation ranges from startup financing and information asymmetry to the U.S. government’s new equity stake in Intel under the CHIPS Act, the precedent of the GM bailout, and the Defense Department’s secure enclave program. They trace the lineage from ARPA to DARPA, contrast research versus development, and examine how primes lost ground to companies like Anduril and Palantir, whose virtual border security and autonomous systems reflect lessons from Ukraine’s battlefield innovation. The discussion closes on how AI and autonomy may reshape great power competition with China and Russia.

Check out this GPT we trained on the conversation

Timestamps

00:00 Stewart Alsop and Stewart Alsop II open by contrasting hype with durable principles in venture capital, setting up the idea of the preference stack.
05:00 They define preferences, economic rights versus voting rights, and why most startups incorporate in Delaware with bylaws shaping governance.
10:00 The discussion shifts to information asymmetry, insider trading, and Trump’s move for the government to buy 10% of Intel, raising questions of nationalization.
15:00 They trace precedents from the GM bailout, explain the CHIPS Act grants, Intel’s secure enclave program, and rumors of chip vulnerabilities.
20:00 Apple’s security updates, government use of secure devices, and Ukraine’s use of fiber-tethered drones illustrate the link between defense innovation and autonomy.
25:00 They revisit ARPA to DARPA, the role of Xerox PARC and IBM in research versus development, and how primes consolidated into a few big contractors.
30:00 Startups like Anduril and Palantir, backed by Peter Thiel, rise as Ukraine’s war shows drones and autonomy challenging exquisite systems.
35:00 The talk broadens to Trump’s personal investments, bonds, and using office for gain, before returning to global conflict and proxy wars.
40:00 Great power competition with China frames the future of war; AI, autonomous vehicles, and virtual border security become central to command and control.
45:00 They close with Anduril’s early contracts in virtual border security, international sales, and how AI shifts defense and governance models.

Key Insights

1. The preference stack is central to understanding venture finance. Each new funding round can create senior preferences that give later investors priority in recovering their money. Founders often underestimate how these layers accumulate, and by the time a company reaches Series C or beyond, preferences can make exit outcomes far more favorable to investors than to the team.
2. Economic rights and voting rights are distinct, and this split shapes governance. Economic rights determine who gets paid and in what order, while voting rights determine who directs the company. Most governance authority sits with the board, where independent directors and a lead independent director (LID) are intended to balance management and shareholder interests.
3. Incorporation choices matter. Delaware dominates because of its business courts and clear governance rules, protecting both investors and shareholders. Alternative states like Nevada and Texas are discussed, with Musk, Andreessen Horowitz, and Dropbox using them for different reasons. Still, Delaware remains the norm.
4. The U.S. government’s equity stake in Intel marks a rare and significant move. Historically, the government avoided ownership, except during crises like the GM bailout. By converting CHIPS Act grants into a 9.9% equity position, the government now acts as an investor, though without direct governance rights, setting a new precedent for public-private industrial policy.
5. Secure enclaves and vulnerabilities highlight the tension between privacy, national security, and trust in hardware. While conspiracy theories about universal back doors in CPUs are dismissed, the reality of constant patching, Apple’s security posture, and defense demand for trusted systems show how critical secure chips are for both consumers and the military.
6. The Ukraine war demonstrates that small, cheap, and rapidly iterated systems like drones can rival or even surpass expensive “exquisite systems” built by primes. Fiber-tethered drones and battlefield improvisation show how autonomy and adaptability redefine effectiveness in conflict.
7. The future of defense innovation is shifting to startups like Anduril and Palantir, funded by venture capital, that apply AI and autonomy to military needs. From virtual border security to autonomous vehicles, these firms challenge primes and reshape how nations prepare for great power competition with China and Russia, where AI-driven command and control may prove decisive.

In this episode of Crazy Wisdom, I, Stewart Alsop III, talk with my father, Stewart Alsop II, about the surprising reception of ChatGPT, the role of AI as a modern chaos agent, and the ways disruptive forces echo both in technology and politics. Our conversation weaves through corporate rivalries, the scaling challenges that shape giants of industry, and the geopolitical pressures facing nations like Argentina and Brazil under the IMF. We also draw on history—from Rome and the Iroquois to the early internet and the Telecommunications Act—to explore cycles of rise and decline, before turning to the personal dimension of how we form emotional attachments to AI and the need for cognitive armor in adapting to new technology.

Check out this GPT we trained on the conversation

Timestamps

00:00 The Alsops begin with the underwhelming reception of ChatGPT, noting how expectations clashed with everyday use.
00:05 They frame AI as a chaos agent, comparing its disruptive role to Trump in politics and how systems respond to disruption.
00:10 Corporate rivalries take center stage, exploring scaling challenges and the fragility of tech giants.
00:15 Attention shifts to Argentina, Brazil, and Iceland as examples of nations wrestling with IMF pressure and global finance.
00:20 They draw historical parallels to Rome and the Iroquois, examining federalism, cooperation, and inevitable cycles of decline.
00:25 The internet of the 1990s comes up, with the Telecommunications Act and Section 230 shaping today’s digital landscape.
00:30 The conversation turns personal, discussing emotional attachment to AI, the idea of cognitive armor, and the need for resilience in technology adoption.

Key Insights

1. Stewart Alsop begins by pointing out how the arrival of ChatGPT was both overwhelming and underwhelming at the same time. People expected a science fiction breakthrough, but the reality was a tool that seemed limited until you really worked with it. That mismatch between expectation and practice is central to understanding how humans adapt to new technologies.
2. A strong metaphor runs through the conversation: AI as a chaos agent, much like Trump in politics. Both disrupt predictable systems and expose fragility in the structures we rely on. Stewart emphasizes that chaos is not always destructive—it can be generative, forcing reorganization and adaptation in unexpected ways.
3. When discussing corporate rivalries, the guest and Stewart trace how scaling is both the dream and the downfall of big companies. Success creates its own inertia, and this mirrors how technology itself often outpaces the organizations that try to contain it. The conversation highlights that size brings vulnerability as much as it brings power.
4. Geopolitics is explored through Argentina, Iceland, Brazil, China, and Russia in relation to the IMF. These cases serve as reminders that nations, like companies, exist in webs of dependency and negotiation. Financial institutions can both stabilize and destabilize, much like algorithms can both structure and unsettle our digital lives.
5. Stewart draws historical parallels to Rome and the Iroquois, noting that both federal systems and empires rise through cooperation but eventually strain under the weight of their own success. The insight is that cycles of rise and decline are built into human organization, no matter how advanced the tools or governance.
6. The internet of the 1990s surfaces as a key precedent, where the Telecommunications Act and Section 230 created the framework for today’s platforms. This legislative scaffolding made the early internet a chaotic but fertile ground, and Stewart suggests AI is at a similar moment of possibility and risk.
7. The discussion closes on the deeply personal dimension of technology, with Stewart Alsop III and his father reflecting on the emotional pull of AI. They emphasize the idea of “cognitive armor” as a way to protect ourselves from over-identifying with machines, recognizing that while AI mirrors human thought, it does not replace human judgment. For them, the challenge of technology adoption lies not just in mastering the tool, but in learning how to remain grounded and human while living alongside it.

In this episode of Stewart Squared, Stewart Alsop sits down with his father, Stewart Alsop II, for a wide-ranging conversation on the frustrations of modern UI/UX, Microsoft’s struggles with spam and AI adoption, Google’s approach to knowledge management, and the broader lessons of technological hype cycles from fiber optics to GPT-5. Together they explore how big companies evolve from serving programmers to serving enterprises, touch on the role of regulatory capture in shaping user experiences, and recall stories of early email, Hotmail, AOL, and long-distance calls in the 1960s. Along the way, they connect today’s debates on monopolies, Bitcoin, and satellite internet with personal anecdotes from their family history and reporting trips to Moscow.

Check out this GPT we trained on the conversation

Timestamps

00:00 UI/UX frustration, Microsoft spam vs Gmail; scam email triggers rant on filtering and usability.
05:00 Admin controls, external IT friction; Google Drive knowledge management and closed-by-default files.
10:00 Bitter lesson, compute at scale; GPT-5 hype, model consolidation, tokens and cost signals.
15:00 Consumer UI simplicity vs programmer leverage; Bitcoin early-adopter edge; Coinbase code alerts.
20:00 Regulatory capture thesis—Microsoft, Coinbase, Palantir; too big to fail, users sidelined, startup opening.
25:00 Monopoly talk: Netflix, Apple App Store; success metrics and venture-scale outcomes.
30:00 Microsoft arc: programmers → enterprise; MS Basic, MS-DOS/Seattle DOS, IBM; latency woes on the call.
35:00 Starlink Mini portability, power limits; satellite iPhone messaging; T-Mobile, Globalstar arrangements.
40:00 Email history: AOL, CompuServe, Hotmail/Yahoo; Gmail scale; Outlook/Office 365 vs Edge/Safari.
45:00 NEA standardizing on Windows, regrets; Riverside recording hiccups; early Gmail usernames, scale effects.
50:00 1963 operator calls, injury story; Moscow reporting trips; Khrushchev–Nixon Kitchen Debate context.

Key Insights

1. Stewart Alsop and Stewart Alsop II opened with frustrations around UI/UX and how even industry leaders like Microsoft fail to implement effective AI for basic tasks like spam filtering. Gmail adapts instantly to user feedback, while Microsoft’s Exchange requires convoluted admin settings, leaving everyday users powerless.
2. Their discussion shifted to Google’s knowledge management problems, highlighting how file access defaults in Google Drive create needless barriers. Both observed that corporate bureaucracy shapes user experience more than technology itself, reflecting how large firms prioritize control over usability.
3. The “bitter lesson” by Richard Sutton framed the conversation on AI. The Stewarts compared today’s trillion-dollar GPU investments to the fiber optic overbuilding of the 1990s—misguided methods that still laid crucial foundations. They questioned whether GPT-5’s consolidation into one model was a sign of efficiency or hype masking economic strain.
4. A key theme was programmer leverage. They noted that programmers who mastered Bitcoin early became “post-economic,” while non-programmers remained locked out. This reinforced their point that tech often empowers a small, technically literate class while excluding ordinary users.
5. They critiqued regulatory capture, suggesting Microsoft, Coinbase, and Palantir thrive not by delighting users but by embedding themselves with governments. Once companies become too big to fail, their true customers shift from individuals to institutions, and user needs fade from priority.
6. The episode revisited Microsoft’s history, from buying Seattle DOS to serving programmers and then enterprises. They argued that companies inevitably drift away from their original users, though some, like Microsoft through its OpenAI partnership, manage to stay relevant despite this drift.
7. Finally, they wove in communications history—from AOL and Hotmail to Gmail’s dominance, and even back to 1960s operator calls when family news was relayed across continents with constant dropped connections. These stories framed the present as just one phase in a longer evolution of technology mediating human connection.

In this episode of Stewart Squared, both Stewarts have a wide-ranging conversation that jumps from Claude and Anthropic’s aggressive move against OpenAI employees to the deep history of corporations stretching back to Rome and the East India Company, the mechanics of preferred versus common shares in venture capital, and the recent Figma IPO. Along the way, they contrast speculation and perception in tech markets with hard fundamentals, debate the trajectories of Meta, Apple, and Microsoft in the age of AI, and explore how accounting principles shape both businesses and governments. The discussion widens into geopolitics, from China’s centralized economic power to Israel’s struggle with soft power in the information age, before circling back to the personal lessons Stewart Alsop II learned entering venture capital in the late 1990s.

Check out this GPT we trained on the conversation

Timestamps

00:00 Claude and Anthropic cut off OpenAI employees, sparking a debate on passive vs active aggression, leading into Roman corporations and the East India Company.
05:00 Investors and management are separated through preferred vs common shares, with venture capital structuring conflicts across series rounds.
10:00 Figma’s IPO and Adobe’s blocked acquisition illustrate up rounds, preferences, and investor dynamics when companies succeed or falter.
15:00 Meta’s trajectory from social networks to Oculus, Ray-Bans, and AI labs shows Zuckerberg’s drive to stay relevant, paralleling Microsoft’s rebound under Satya Nadella.
20:00 Public markets, meme stocks, and Apple stock missteps highlight the contrast between speculation, Warren Buffett’s patience, and looming crash fears.
25:00 AI as chaos agent reshapes big tech relevance, with OpenAI’s billion-a-month revenue and Anthropic’s rise pressing Apple, Microsoft, and Meta.
30:00 Gross margins, operating costs, and GAAP reveal how accounting frames strategy, with capitalism vs socialism compared to U.S. government’s one-sided bookkeeping.
35:00 National interest and corporations shift into geopolitics: China’s central planning, Israel’s hard vs soft power struggle, and information age influence.
40:00 Lessons from entering VC in 1997, from missing Amazon and Netflix to early TiVo, reveal timing, firm politics, and venture capital’s internal power struggles.
45:00 Bureaucracies, Trump’s deep state capture, and Curtis Yarvin’s neo-feudal patchwork theory open a discussion on Bukele, Milei, and political reordering.
50:00 Democrats’ weakness, Kamala Harris’s 107 Days, and Project 2025 frame America’s polarization as Trump consolidates MAGA power with no clear opposition.

Key Insights

1. The conversation opens with Claude and Anthropic’s “active aggressive” move to shut off OpenAI employees from using their models, a small drama that sparks a larger reflection on how corporate power plays—whether in Silicon Valley or in Rome—reveal deeper tensions between insiders, outsiders, and the shifting lines of control. Stewart Alsop ties this to the Roman Societas Publicum and the East India Company, early examples of corporations as instruments of state survival and expansion.
2. A major thread is the distinction between investors and management, embodied in the structure of preferred versus common shares. Preferred shareholders gain first rights on exit, creating layered dynamics of power across funding rounds. This preference stack, while protective for early backers, also fosters conflict in down rounds where later investors may hold the leverage.
3. Figma’s successful IPO becomes the case study for how these mechanisms play out when a company is thriving. Blocked by regulators from being acquired by Adobe, Figma proved the strength of building independently. Its up-round IPO ensured all investors, early and late, came out ahead—showcasing the ideal trajectory where preferences resolve smoothly and common shareholders still benefit.
4. The Stewarts contrast perception and reality in markets. Social media companies thrived for two decades largely on speculative momentum, while Meta’s pivot into VR, AR, and AI shows the perpetual need to stay relevant. Zuckerberg’s obsession with avoiding irrelevance mirrors Microsoft’s revival under Satya Nadella, highlighting how tech giants survive through reinvention rather than stability.
5. Investing wisdom emerges in the contrast between venture capital and public markets. Stewart Alsop II admits losing money on Apple stock despite its meteoric rise, underscoring the unpredictability of timing in public equities. Venture capital, by contrast, thrives on entering early—before markets recognize value—while Buffett’s model of patient, long-term ownership represents another, equally elusive, discipline.
6. Accounting principles anchor much of the discussion. Gross margin, operating costs, and GAAP rules determine not just how businesses report health but also how they think strategically. By contrast, the U.S. government’s lack of double-entry bookkeeping shows how politics bends economic logic, treating capital expenditures as simple expenses without long-term allocation.
7. The dialogue crescendos with geopolitics and domestic politics. China is cast as bending capitalism into a tool of centralized control, while Israel demonstrates the limits of hard power when soft power erodes in the information age. Back in the U.S., Trump’s reshaping of the “deep state,” Curtis Yarvin’s neo-feudal visions, and Kamala Harris’s 107 Days underscore the fragility of American democracy, with a weakened Democratic Party unable to counterbalance MAGA dominance.

In this episode, Stewart Alsop III talks with Stewart Alsop II about Cloudflare’s role in modern internet infrastructure, from its origins with Project Honeypot to its massive global network powering HTTPS, reverse proxies, DNS integration, and zero-trust systems. The conversation weaves through the evolution of enterprise networking since the Cisco-dominated 1990s, the growth of server farms and AI clusters, the history of dark fiber and undersea cables, and how Web 2.0, social media, crypto mining, and today’s generative AI have shaped bandwidth demand. They explore Cloudflare’s new pay-to-scrape policy, the business dynamics with Google, the rise of high-quality data labeling through companies like Surge AI, and the importance of metadata and privacy in a surveillance-heavy world.

Check out this GPT we trained on the conversation

Timestamps
00:00 Cloudflare origins, Project Honeypot, Google TPUs, context windows, Claude, bots paying to scrape
 05:00 Early internet infrastructure, Cisco dominance, proprietary enterprise systems, rise of server farms
 10:00 Server capacity limits, nanosecond communication, cooling and power issues, AI compute demand
 15:00 AI metro areas map, superstar hubs in Silicon Valley, Texas data center project, NVIDIA role
 20:00 Dark fiber history, optical components, trench building, undersea cables, global networking
 25:00 Web 2.0 growth, social media real-time feeds, crypto mining inefficiency, scaling to AI
 30:00 World’s largest data centers, Northern Virginia hub, CIA AWS air-gapped cloud, government secrecy
 35:00 Cloudflare market share, AWS, Akamai, content delivery networks, token serving vs video streaming
 40:00 Generative AI bandwidth demands, Google search shift, Cloudflare monetizing scraping
 45:00 Surge AI and high-quality data labeling, Scale AI critique, metadata importance, privacy concerns
 50:00 International capital networks, Middle East investment, Israel’s cybersecurity, Iron Dome, IP issues

Key Insights

1. Cloudflare has evolved from its origins in Project Honeypot into a critical piece of internet infrastructure, now integrated into a significant portion of the world’s servers, providing HTTPS, DNS integration, zero-trust frameworks, reverse proxy services, and developer tools like Cloudflare Workers.
2. The internet’s physical backbone shifted from proprietary enterprise systems dominated by Cisco in the 1990s to globally distributed server farms. This change was driven by demand for more bandwidth, the use of high-speed fiber connections, and the need to cool and power increasingly compute-heavy systems for applications like AI.
3. The concept of “superstar” AI hubs—concentrated in places like Silicon Valley—highlights how certain regions dominate advanced computing due to proximity to key players such as NVIDIA, research talent, and data center infrastructure, with Texas emerging as a new mega-hub.
4. The unused “dark fiber” laid during the telecom boom was later bought cheaply and repurposed, enabling the growth of Web 2.0, social media, and streaming. This terrestrial network, along with undersea cables, now underpins global connectivity for modern internet and AI workloads.
5. Cloudflare’s new policy requiring payment for web scraping signals a shift in how infrastructure companies may monetize AI-related traffic, especially as large language models consume significant bandwidth to serve tokens in near real time—potentially rivaling video streaming in scale.
6. Data quality is a growing competitive differentiator for AI training. Companies like Surge AI claim to outperform “body shop” models like Scale AI by emphasizing high-quality human-in-the-loop labeling, highlighting how metadata and accuracy directly influence model performance.
7. The discussion touches on broader geopolitical and security contexts—such as air-gapped government networks, Middle Eastern sovereign wealth investments, Israel’s cybersecurity capabilities, and intellectual property debates—showing how technological infrastructure, policy, and global power dynamics intersect.

In this episode of Stewart Squared, host Stewart Alsop talks with Vince Kadlubek, founder and Chief Vision Officer of Meow Wolf, about the evolution of immersive art, post-capitalist creativity, and the future of human imagination. They explore how Meow Wolf emerged from a decentralized art collective using recycled materials into a boundary-pushing, experience-driven company with hundreds of creatives on staff. Topics include the tension between business and creativity, alternate reality as a medium, the legacy of the 1960s counterculture, AI's impact on art, and building meaningful physical experiences in a media-saturated world.

Check out this GPT we trained on the conversation

Timestamps

00:00 Vince Kadlubek recounts Meow Wolf’s DIY beginnings, building installations from trash and relying on community collaboration.
 05:00 Naming Meow Wolf, early exhibits like The Due Return, and the emerging need for structure as creative tensions grew.
10:00 The shift from informal collective to formal company, navigating decentralization vs. hierarchy, and defining creative autonomy.
15:00 From analog installation to digital ambition—Vince explains integrating tech, apps, and early ideas of alternate reality.
20:00 Worldbuilding as an immersive art form, Disneyland vs. traditional art, and resisting the art world’s elitism.
25:00 Vince argues Meow Wolf’s rise aligns with the Experience Economy and post-industrial shifts in value.
30:00 Counterculture roots, solarpunk vs. cyberpunk futures, and imagination as humanity’s evolutionary path.
35:00 Embracing paradigm shifts like psychedelic transitions—letting go, trusting transformation.
40:00 Media as psychedelic infrastructure, co-created realities, and real-time synchronization challenges.
45:00 AI, slop content, and why human novelty becomes even more valuable in a flood of generative output.
50:00 Retail as experience, Meow Wolf’s influence on restaurants, and stories that make spaces feel alive.
55:00 Personal stories of strategic vision, patience, and evolving Meow Wolf into a global cultural force.

Key Insights

1. Imagination is accelerating toward full immersion. Vince Kadlubek argues that human culture is on a trajectory toward living entirely within the realm of imagination. He traces a historical arc from primitive survival to the post-industrial present, suggesting that our destiny is to exist within self-generated, imaginal dimensions where creativity, not physicality, defines reality.
2. Creative tension is not a problem to solve—it’s where the value is. Meow Wolf’s evolution from anarchic art collective to structured company was marked by intense conflicts over roles, vision, and direction. Rather than eliminating that friction, Vince views it as essential. The creative/business tension generates the very energy that powers novel, decentralized models of collaboration.
3. Worldbuilding is the next dominant art form. Vince places immersive environments—whether theme parks or installations—at the center of artistic evolution. Unlike traditional art forms, worldbuilding incorporates all mediums and invites the audience inside. Meow Wolf becomes a case study in treating reality itself as an editable medium.
4. Alternate realities must be co-created. The future of immersive media, according to Vince, lies in bottom-up systems where audiences don’t just consume but shape the universe itself. Drawing from ARGs and real-time games, he emphasizes participatory infrastructure as the foundation for cultural relevance.
5. Human novelty is the antidote to AI slop. With generative AI oversupplying mediocre content, Vince sees the value of art shifting toward what AI can’t do. Physical installations, tactile experiences, and deeply personal storytelling will only grow more precious as digital noise increases.
6. Psychedelic frameworks help us navigate paradigm shifts. Vince compares cultural evolution to a psychedelic trip—terrifying at the edge, beautiful when surrendered to. The future is disorienting, but like a psychedelic state, it requires trust, release, and presence to move through it effectively.
7. Experience is the new economy. Building on Pine and Gilmore’s Experience Economy, Vince sees Meow Wolf and ventures like Escondido as examples of retail and entertainment merging into fully immersive, emotionally rich environments where the story, vibe, and human connection are central to value.

Welcome to Stewart Squared podcast with the two Stewart Alsops. In this episode, the conversation orbits around the mechanics and ethics of digital walled gardens, from YouTube’s curated algorithms to Meta’s domination of social platforms like Threads and Instagram. The Stewarts reflect on relevance in tech, the decline of platforms like Quora, the ascent of Substack, and the meaning of audience ownership in a fractured media landscape. They explore marketing not as manipulation but as a hunt for shared value, and weigh the implications of spam, AI's blind spots, and even political messaging strategies.

Check out this GPT we trained on the conversation

Timestamps

00:00 — The Stewarts kick off with the challenge of visibility on YouTube and the mechanics behind algorithmic promotion and walled gardens.
05:00 — Discussion turns to how platforms like Facebook and YouTube suppress outlinks and shape behavior through censorship and user tracking.
10:00 — The Stewarts reflect on relevance and platform decay, contrasting the early value of Quora with its decline, and mentioning Substack’s quality audience.
15:00 — They examine creator economics, Substack’s success, and Medium’s struggle, linking this to media independence and monetization.
20:00 — Stewart Alsop proposes rebranding the marketing funnel as a treasure hunt, and the conversation shifts to email ownership and the organic vs. algorithmic divide.
25:00 — Focus moves to political marketing, television vs. social media, and how figures like Trump and AOC capture attention in different ways.
30:00 — They debate comedy as commentary, with references to John Oliver, Tim Dillon, and media adaptation for Gen Z.
35:00 — Technical glitches lead to reflections on technological failure, AI limitations, and the unreliability of platforms like Riverside.

Key Insights

1. Walled gardens have evolved from closed systems to algorithmically enforced ecosystems. Platforms like Facebook and YouTube no longer block external links outright but diminish their visibility, incentivizing creators to remain within the ecosystem and discouraging discovery beyond the walls.
2. Relevance, not just reach, defines a platform's influence. The conversation underscores that staying relevant—having cultural and intellectual weight—matters more than raw user metrics. Platforms like Quora and Medium became irrelevant not because of numbers but because they lost the attention of valuable contributors.
3. Substack's success lies in empowering creators with ownership. Unlike social media platforms that act as intermediaries, Substack allows writers to maintain control over their audience via email lists, representing a shift toward sustainable, direct creator economies.
4. The attention economy is shaped by who participates and why. Stewart Alsop notes how the quality of engagement on platforms like Quora diminished as the user base shifted. It’s not just about numbers, but about the intellectual and creative caliber of the audience and contributors.
5. Marketing is most powerful when it becomes a form of truth-seeking. Describing it as a “treasure hunt,” the episode reframes marketing from funnel-based conversion tactics to the search for authentic connection—finding the people who genuinely care and resonate with the message.
6. AI, for all its promise, still stumbles on basic functions. Frustrations with email spam and time zone confusion reveal the disconnect between AI’s perceived intelligence and its actual utility, raising broader questions about how technological competence is defined.
7. The generational exchange brings a layered understanding of media and culture. The podcast’s value lies in the dynamic between a millennial and a baby boomer navigating old and new paradigms—offering both context and critique, rather than conclusions.

Welcome to Stewart Squared podcast with the two Stewart Alsops. In this episode, they navigate a sprawling conversation that begins with the unruly complexity of the modern browser and spirals into deeper territory—from Google’s jealous leap into the browser wars with Chrome, to the philosophical implications of Neuralink and the idea of owning one’s own data and mind. Stewart Alsop interviews his co-host Stewart on themes like the architecture of the internet, the anti-fragility of figures like Musk and Trump, and the evolving coordination costs of technology in both business and AI. Along the way, they touch on acquisitions, database architecture, real-time systems, and the specter of machine self-coordination.

Check out this GPT we trained on the conversation

Timestamps

00:00 – Browser frustration leads into a discussion of browser complexity, operating systems, and why web environments remain chaotic.
05:00 – History of Chrome’s development, Google’s envy of Microsoft, and their early efforts to own user tools.
10:00 – Reflections on anti-fragility, using Musk and Trump as examples; intro to Neuralink and Musk’s emotional reactivity.
15:00 – Concerns about brain-computer interfaces and the ethical risks of having someone like Musk in control; the role of data collection in brain mapping.
20:00 – Importance of enterprise databases, real-time data, and how companies like United Airlines manage coordination better than others.
25:00 – Technical talk on vectorized databases, chunking, and Postgres SQL; Stewart Alsop shares his efforts to embed podcast transcripts.
30:00 – Discussion of relational database history, RDBMS, and how Salesforce and other CRM tools evolved to integrate siloed data.
35:00 – Breakdown of Facebook’s architecture, Messenger, WhatsApp, and why real-time systems break down under bloated coordination.
40:00 – Exploration of coordination costs, AI’s role in reducing them, and the philosophical implications of machine autonomy.

Key Insights

1. Browser complexity reflects broader system tensions: The episode opens with a frustrating technical hiccup that segues into a deeper conversation about how modern computing environments—especially browsers—remain unruly due to inconsistent standards and fragmented development environments. This mirrors larger challenges in managing open systems versus tightly controlled ecosystems like Apple’s.
2. Google’s empire-building was driven by competitive envy: Chrome’s inception is framed not as visionary but as reactive—Google’s way of competing with Microsoft’s hold over user environments via Explorer and Windows. Their acquisition strategy, including YouTube and Orcutt, reflects a relentless effort to own every layer of digital experience, often by replication rather than innovation.
3. Musk exemplifies both genius and fragility: Neuralink prompts a critical look at Elon Musk—praised for technical brilliance and bold ambitions, but critiqued for emotional reactivity and lack of emotional intelligence. His vision of brain-computer interfaces raises ethical alarms when tied to someone perceived as having low empathy.
4. Anti-fragility as a political and psychological frame: Nassim Taleb’s concept of anti-fragility becomes a lens through which Stewart Alsop views public figures like Trump and Musk—those who seem to gain strength through opposition. It also sparks reflection on cultural differences in social resilience, especially between U.S. and Latin American societies.
5. The power of data architecture is political: The idea that building a database—whether of brains or enterprise processes—means wielding enormous influence. Stewart argues that control over structured, real-time data flows is key to both tech product success and organizational accountability, especially in AI compliance contexts.
6. Startups thrive on focus, big companies collapse under coordination: A recurring theme is the difference between small, nimble teams with a single mission and sprawling organizations burdened by coordination costs. The “mythical man-month” is invoked to show how adding people often slows progress when architecture is weak.
7. AI changes, but doesn’t erase, human complexity: Despite AI’s potential to reduce coordination costs, the conversation ends with caution. Machines managing themselves without human input evokes Terminator fears. The need for aligned, human-centered design remains vital, even in the face of immense computational power.

Welcome to Stewart Squared podcast with the two Stewart Alsops. In this episode, they explore the OpenAI–Microsoft partnership through the lens of historic “stupid agreements” in tech, starting with Software Arts and VisiCorp’s flawed VisiCalc deal. The conversation traces the evolution of tech bubbles from the early software industry to today’s AI hype, questioning whether artificial general intelligence (AGI) is a real milestone or just a moving target. They discuss DARPA’s shifting role from Cold War-era innovation to grantmaking and debate whether private companies like Elon Musk’s ventures or Anduril are now the true engines of R&D. The episode also examines drone warfare’s impact on modern conflicts, Israel’s Iron Dome under pressure, and whether drones are redefining the roles of missiles and artillery. Alongside these threads, they touch on social media’s possible collapse under the weight of AI companions and how military tech spillovers have historically fueled civilian innovation.

Check out this GPT we trained on the conversation

Timestamps

00:00 – Opening with the OpenAI–Microsoft partnership, comparing it to the VisiCalc deal between Software Arts and VisiCorp as an early example of “stupid agreements” in tech.
05:00 – Exploring AGI as a moving target, historical shifts in AI definitions, and Zuckerberg’s push for a superintelligence lab with Jan LeCun and Alexander Wang in the spotlight.
10:00 – Early tech bubbles from 1979–1983, the rise of software distribution models, and parallels to modern AI and social media ecosystems.
15:00 – The decline of DARPA’s direct innovation role, outsourcing research to academia and private R&D, and the rise of venture capital replacing the “D” in R&D.
20:00 – Elon Musk’s Neuralink and SpaceX as examples of private moonshots, with reflections on China’s industrial strategy and Anduril’s challenge to defense giants.
25:00 – Drone warfare’s transformative role in Ukraine and Israel, Iron Dome’s performance under Iranian missile barrages, and hypersonic missile threats.
30:00 – Predictions about the death of social media, the rise of AI companions replacing human interaction, and concerns over dependency on chatbots.

Key Insights

1. The episode opens by framing the OpenAI–Microsoft partnership as part of a long lineage of “stupid agreements” in tech history, comparing it to the 1979 deal between Software Arts and VisiCorp over VisiCalc. That deal, which offered unusually high royalties to the developer, illustrates how early software companies lacked models for fair agreements, much like today’s AI partnerships are navigating uncharted territory without clear definitions of AGI or its implications.
2. AGI itself is questioned as a concept, with the Stewarts noting it has always been a moving target. What was considered “intelligent” decades ago—like natural language processing or chatbot interactions—no longer qualifies, and they suggest AGI may never arrive in the way science fiction imagines. Instead, the focus has shifted to “superintelligence” as a rebranded goal, driven as much by marketing and competition as by real technical progress.
3. The discussion highlights how DARPA’s role has diminished since its Cold War peak, transitioning from direct research leadership to a grant-disbursing organization. Today, the best researchers are often lured away by private firms offering massive pay packages, leading to concerns that the U.S. government has lost the capacity for “moonshot” innovation and now depends on companies like SpaceX, Neuralink, and Anduril to carry the torch.
4. The Stewarts examine the rise of Anduril and similar startups as existential threats to legacy defense contractors like Lockheed Martin and Northrop Grumman. These incumbents are described as slow-moving monopolies that rely on cost-plus contracts, while newcomers promise faster, cheaper, and more modern systems to meet evolving military needs.
5. Drones emerge as a central theme in discussing the changing nature of warfare. Rather than replacing missiles outright, drones are creating new tactical possibilities, from Ukraine’s improvised attacks on Russian bombers to Israel’s use of drones to preempt missile launches. This shift suggests a future where drones and missiles coexist but with differentiated roles.
6. The episode also critiques the societal impact of AI, noting growing reports of “ChatGPT psychosis,” where users form unhealthy dependencies on chatbots. This feeds into a broader prediction about the “death of social media,” as AI companions may one day supplant human relationships online, raising ethical and psychological concerns.
7. Finally, they reflect on the cyclical nature of technology bubbles—from semiconductors and personal computing to social media and AI—arguing that hype cycles are inevitable but also essential for driving experimentation, investment, and eventual breakthroughs, even if most fail to deliver on their promises.

Welcome to Stewart Squared podcast with the two Stewart Alsops, where they explore the evolution of software from 1.0’s “magical incantations” to 3.0’s natural language interfaces, discuss operating systems and their hardware roots, and unpack the significance of vertical integration exemplified by Apple’s silicon and software unification. This episode touches on large language models as cognitive prosthetics and the intimate, sometimes emotional, relationships people are forming with them, while also questioning their potential as operating systems for an “Internet-as-a-computer” paradigm. Alongside reflections on curiosity versus intelligence and the risks of Skynet-like scenarios, the Alsops weave in insights from Andrej Karpathy and Stephen Wolfram.

Check out this GPT we trained on the conversation

Timestamps

00:00 Software 1.0 to 3.0 evolution, natural language as programming, operating systems history with Apple II and early hardware tinkering
05:00 Open versus closed systems, Apple’s vertical integration, hardware limitations, early networking with Ethernet and modems
10:00 Distributed computing, Internet as a computer, LLMs as potential operating systems, differences between real-time systems and batch processing
15:00 Cognitive prosthetics, LLMs enabling new forms of software creation, emotional relationships with AI, sycophancy and “glazing” effects
20:00 Skynet fears, military applications of AI, robotics as physical extensions of AI, IoT devices and infrastructure vulnerability
25:00 Device Authority, over-the-air updates, challenges of retrofitting legacy hardware, enterprise resistance to innovation, IT culture dynamics
30:00 Curiosity versus intelligence, human adaptability, LLMs lack of intrinsic curiosity, future of AI-human collaboration, ending reflections on staying engaged with technology

Key Insights

1. The transition from software 1.0 to 3.0 marks a profound shift in how humans interact with machines, moving from cryptic programming languages to natural language interfaces that let anyone issue commands without technical expertise. This evolution democratizes programming but also raises questions about how much control we’re surrendering to systems we no longer fully understand.
2. Operating systems once served as the invisible backbone of personal computing, managing resources and hardware interactions in machines like the Apple II. Today, as computing shifts into distributed networks and cloud systems, the concept of an OS is becoming more abstract, raising the possibility that LLMs could function as an “Internet-wide operating system” in the future.
3. Vertical integration, as exemplified by Apple’s control over both hardware (Apple Silicon) and software (macOS), creates performance and efficiency advantages that competitors like Microsoft struggle to match. However, it also limits user freedom and reinforces a “walled garden” model that frustrates programmers who crave open systems.
4. Large language models are increasingly viewed as cognitive prosthetics—tools that augment human thinking, accelerate research, and enable non-programmers to build software. Yet their growing intimacy with users sparks debates about the emotional bonds people are forming with AI and whether these relationships fulfill or erode our social and emotional needs.
5. The Skynet metaphor highlights fears that AI could one day control critical infrastructure, but for now, the more immediate issue may be subtle—how LLMs shape human cognition, amplify sycophancy (“glazing”), and replace real human interactions with simulated ones that feel authentic but lack depth.
6. Curiosity, not raw intelligence, emerges as the defining trait for effectively engaging with new technologies. Unlike AI, which lacks intrinsic curiosity, humans have the ability to wonder and explore, positioning us as perpetual learners even in an age of rapid technological advancement.
7. The integration of IoT devices into legacy systems, as seen with companies like Device Authority, underscores both the promise and complexity of connecting the physical world to the Internet. Real-time updates and over-the-air security patches hint at a future where all devices are online, but this also amplifies vulnerabilities in critical infrastructure if AI systems gain too much autonomous control.

Welcome to Stewart Squared podcast with the two Stewart Alsops. In this episode, they explore why consultants often fail in the tech world, how leadership skills are (or aren’t) taught in business schools, and the historical tension between technical and non-technical CEOs. They trace the evolution of Silicon Valley’s culture, from the idealistic hackers of the PC revolution to Amazon’s strategic rise with AWS and its CIA contract, and discuss whether institutional knowledge should be centralized or decentralized inside corporations. The conversation ranges from the origins of corporations and supply chain mastery at Apple, to predictions with LLMs, IoT security challenges, and even why Google struggles to innovate beyond its search monopoly. Show notes include a recommendation to read Apple in China for deeper insight into Apple’s role in training millions of Chinese factory workers.

Check out this GPT we trained on the conversation

Timestamps

00:00 – Opening with Stewart Alsop III teasing topics like why consultants fail in tech and the theory that post-founder CEOs rarely succeed, leading into the history of McKinsey and the Big Five consulting firms.

05:00 – Critique of MBA programs for focusing on analysis over leadership, discussion of Stanford GSB and Harvard HBS networks, and whether leadership can be taught.

10:00 – Exploration of technical vs non-technical CEOs in Silicon Valley, examples like Steve Jobs, Larry Ellison, and the early PC industry’s bias against consultants.

15:00 – Deep dive into Amazon Web Services, Andy Jassy’s startup-first strategy, and AWS’s CIA cloud contract, plus Oracle’s legal battles over DoD’s JEDI contract.

20:00 – Debate on AI prediction limits, the MIT SEAL framework for updating LLM weights, and real-time adaptability in AI models.

25:00 – Examination of corporations as knowledge bodies, historical roots in Dutch East India Company, and the tension between centralized vs decentralized knowledge.

30:00 – Focus on institutional memory, Apple’s supply chain with Tim Cook, United Airlines’ IT transformation, and IoT security risks.

35:00 – Insights on device authentication, Device Authority’s IoT security approach, and vulnerabilities like Stuxnet.

Key Insights

1. Consultants often fail in tech leadership because they lack deep domain expertise and tend to focus on analytical frameworks over practical execution. The Alsops argue that consultants are great at creating presentations and identifying what companies should have done but struggle to navigate the messy realities of running large, complex organizations—highlighted by the Webvan example where a consultant-turned-CEO helped drive the company into bankruptcy.
2. Business schools train analysts, not leaders, equipping graduates with skills in spreadsheets, case studies, and presentations rather than fostering the hands-on leadership required in startups and tech firms. While MBAs can be valuable for networking and strategy roles, they often fall short in preparing executives to scale companies or inspire teams in rapidly changing environments.
3. Technical and non-technical CEOs shape companies differently, with early Silicon Valley favoring technical founders like Gates and Wozniak. However, leaders like Steve Jobs and Larry Ellison thrived without deep technical skills by surrounding themselves with strong technical co-founders, showing that vision and communication can sometimes outweigh engineering chops in the CEO role.
4. Amazon’s AWS strategy illustrates effective knowledge transfer and scaling, starting with a focus on startups and evolving to win contracts like the CIA’s cloud infrastructure. Andy Jassy’s ability to scale AWS from an internal tool to a dominant cloud service underscores how decentralized initiatives can later become centralized strengths when aligned with leadership vision.
5. The SEAL framework represents a breakthrough for LLMs, enabling models to update their weights post-deployment for real-time learning. This adaptation could blur the line between static and dynamic AI systems and marks an early step toward meta-learning, raising both exciting possibilities and existential concerns about machine autonomy.
6. Institutional knowledge must balance centralization and decentralization. Centralized databases simplify operations, as seen in United Airlines’ customer system, but decentralized human knowledge prevents organizations from collapsing when key people leave. Apple’s reliance on Tim Cook as its operational brain is cited as both a strength and a cautionary tale about knowledge bottlenecks.
7. IoT security remains a critical and under-addressed challenge, with billions of devices running outdated software and exposing organizations to risk. Companies like Device Authority are working on real-time device identification and updates, but widespread implementation lags, creating vulnerabilities that even nation-state hackers have exploited, as in the Stuxnet incident.

Welcome to Stewart Squared podcast with the two Stewart Alsops. In this wide-ranging conversation, the Stewarts kick off with a personal dive into the early days of Internet telephony via Netscape and InSoft, but quickly spiral into the present, grappling with the geopolitical consequences of space-based surveillance, the moral bankruptcy of Trump’s crypto antics, and the disturbing creep of domestic surveillance powers enabled by legal shifts like the Patriot Act and recent Supreme Court decisions. They challenge the legitimacy of the “information age,” weigh the ethical decay of digital privacy, and question whether secrets still even exist in a world of ubiquitous data exhaust. There’s a nostalgic look back at the Internet’s libertarian roots and a skeptical examination of Silicon Valley’s AI singularity fantasies.

Check out this GPT we trained on the conversation

Timestamps

00:00 – The Stewarts open with a discussion about Dan Harple, InSoft, and early VoIP innovations that shaped the collaborative Internet.
05:00 – Reflections on Internet fuzziness, recording tech like Riverside, and technical limitations tied to real-time protocols.
10:00 – Elon Musk’s disregard for users, contrasts with Steve Jobs’ proxy-customer mindset, and Musk's link to Dogecoin and meme coins.
15:00 – Trump’s exploitation of crypto, his meme coin grift, and the strategic chaos of his economic and political volatility.
20:00 – Low Earth orbit satellites, surveillance capabilities from Planet Labs and Starlink, and their implications for military intelligence.
25:00 – The U.S. surveillance state's evolution, with concerns over the Supreme Court's stance on personal data access.
30:00 – Facebook’s shift from dopamine to precise micro-targeting, the power of digital exhaust, and the illusion of privacy.
35:00 – Decline of the open web, rise of mobile walled gardens, AI’s role in the singularity debate, and tech overload.
40:00 – Conservation tech, fish genetics, hatchery ethics, and sustainable trout farming.
45:00 – Sushi quality, fish farming economics, and Argentine immigration policy linked to investment and potential farm ventures.

Key Insights

1. From VoIP to Surveillance Infrastructure: The episode highlighted how early innovations like Voice over Internet Protocol (VoIP) and real-time collaboration tools, pioneered by figures like Dan Harple, laid the groundwork for today’s surveillance capabilities. Originally developed for open communication, these technologies now serve as key components in data collection and monitoring systems.
2. Musk vs. Trump – Competing Archetypes of Tech Power: The discussion contrasted Elon Musk’s technocratic ambition with Donald Trump’s transactional politics. While Musk is portrayed as indifferent to individuals but driven by achievement, Trump’s embrace of meme coins and political spectacle reflects a more cynical, extractive use of technology for personal gain.
3. Low Earth Orbit and the New Geopolitics: With companies like Starlink and Planet Labs dominating satellite deployment, space has become a platform for near-constant Earth surveillance. The episode underscored how these technologies reshape global power dynamics, enabling both transparency and escalation in geopolitical conflicts.
4. The Quiet Collapse of Privacy Norms: Once a bipartisan value, data privacy has eroded under legal and technological pressures. The episode referenced a recent Supreme Court decision as a symbol of this shift, where previously protected personal information is now more accessible to both state and commercial actors.
5. Facebook and the Commodification of Attention: The podcast explored how Facebook transitioned from building user engagement through dopamine-driven interaction to enabling hyper-targeted advertising. This commodification of “digital exhaust” allows even small businesses to exploit personal data, narrowing the gap between mass surveillance and marketing.
6. The Decline of the Open Web: The once-promised free and open Internet has given way to walled gardens dominated by mobile apps and corporate platforms. The episode positioned this shift as a betrayal of 1990s digital idealism, reducing user agency and consolidating power in the hands of a few tech giants.
7. The Singularity as a Sci-Fi Distraction: The notion of merging with machines to prevent AI apocalypse was critiqued as a fantasy peddled by Silicon Valley elites. Instead, the real danger lies in how humans are already misusing AI to consolidate control, erode privacy, and perpetuate inequality.

Welcome to Stewart Squared podcast with the two Stewart Alsops. This episode navigates the arc of the Internet’s transformation from the promise of an open network to the reign of closed platforms, tracing roots from AOL to mobile Facebook. The Stewarts debate algorithmic influence on user agency, reflect on early computing culture through anecdotes about VisiCalc and orthogonality, and critique the rise of AI devices like the Limitless pendant—linking it to Sam Altman's tangled investment trail and speculative visions of screenless tech. Their dialogue touches on Silicon Valley's philosophical shift—from engineering pragmatism to fantastical thinking—and asks whether companies like Google and Apple have the institutional structures to evolve meaningfully in the AI era.

Check out this GPT we trained on the conversation

Timestamps

00:00 – Discussion opens on the walled garden concept, contrasting early open Internet ideals with Facebook and AOL's closed models.
05:00 – Shift to Facebook mobile and how the app's design deepened platform control, suppressing outbound links via algorithmic downgrading.
10:00 – Exploration of what algorithms are, including foundational insights from VisiCalc and orthogonal programming logic.
15:00 – Critique of fantastical thinking in Silicon Valley: effective altruism, Singularity, and AI determinism vs. randomness.
20:00 – Deep dive into AI devices, focusing on the Limitless Pendant, its usability issues, and Sam Altman's conflicted role as early investor.
25:00 – Speculation on hardware innovation, Raspberry Pi and Arduino, and ethical concerns around investing in competitors.
30:00 – Analysis of Google’s product culture, its failure in product management, and DeepMind's limited integration.
35:00 – Reflection on monopolistic behavior, moonshot divisions, and overfunding as a source of magical thinking.
40:00 – Final thoughts on institutional IT, comparing Apple, Netflix, and Chinese firms like Huawei in real-time software integration.

Key Insights

1. The Internet's Evolution into Walled Gardens: The Stewarts reflect on the shift from an open, user-driven Internet to a closed ecosystem dominated by platforms like Facebook and Twitter. While early services like AOL were walled gardens, there was a middle era of openness with the rise of the web. The arrival of mobile apps—especially Facebook's mobile transition—cemented a new kind of user lock-in, where links out are suppressed and attention is algorithmically contained.
2. Mobile as the Turning Point: The transition of Facebook to mobile marked a pivotal shift. Initially resistant to app development because of its open web ethos, Facebook eventually embraced mobile, realizing it granted total control over the user experience. This catalyzed the modern model of platform dominance, where linking out is discouraged and algorithmic prioritization curates user attention.
3. Algorithm Awareness and Cultural Impact: The rise of social media brought public awareness of algorithms as tools that influence behavior and visibility. What was once a backend concept known only to programmers became part of everyday language. The Stewarts trace this shift to platforms like Instagram and Facebook, which made algorithmic curation central to user experience and discourse.
4. AI Devices and the Limitless Pendant: Stewart II reviews the Limitless pendant, a wearable AI device that records conversations and summarizes them, calling it a “peek into the future” with usability flaws. The device’s origins as Rewind AI and its investment from Sam Altman raise ethical questions, especially now that Altman is backing potentially competing ventures like Jony Ive’s AI projects.
5. Magical Thinking in Silicon Valley: The episode critiques Silicon Valley’s drift from engineering rigor to speculative idealism—highlighting effective altruism, singularity thinking, and techno-utopian visions. They note how once-practical cultures are now marked by dualisms: doomer vs. accelerationist, utopian vs. dystopian, with little room for nuanced middle grounds.
6. China’s Role in Tech Innovation: Huawei’s expansion into cars prompts a reflection on whether Chinese firms’ multi-domain innovation reflects cultural differences. The Stewarts ponder whether China’s success is driven by collective orientation or state direction, and what it implies for U.S. competitiveness in hardware and manufacturing.
7. Institutional Knowledge and IT Competence: The episode closes on the importance of institutional IT knowledge, citing Apple and Netflix as companies that deeply understand their operational infrastructure. This understanding, they argue, enables better product development and company coherence—unlike firms that spray money across moonshots without disciplined management.