Yes, More Stuff on CS Skin Closure

https://is1-ssl.mzstatic.com/image/thumb/Podcasts221/v4/0d/b8/70/0db87007-3e09-394e-5246-60810ea32ab3/mza_4040002773671845254.jpg/600x600bb.jpg

Dr. Chapa’s Clinical Pearls.

Dr. Chapa’s Clinical Pearls

1015 episodes

15 hours ago

Relevant, evidence based, and practical information for medical students, residents, and practicing healthcare providers regarding all things women’s healthcare! This podcast is intended to be clinically relevant, engaging, and FUN, because medical education should NOT be boring! Welcome...to Clinical Pearls.

Science

RSS

All content for Dr. Chapa’s Clinical Pearls. is the property of Dr. Chapa’s Clinical Pearls and is served directly from their servers with no modification, redirects, or rehosting. The podcast is not affiliated with or endorsed by Podjoint in any way.

Science

https://d3t3ozftmdmh3i.cloudfront.net/staging/podcast_uploaded_nologo/384576/384576-1750529996117-3533a831767a1.jpg

Yes, More Stuff on CS Skin Closure

Dr. Chapa’s Clinical Pearls.

36 minutes 40 seconds

2 weeks ago

Yes, More Stuff on CS Skin Closure

What’s best for skin closure at C-Section? Staples or suture? This debate has raged for over 20 years. Past data has shown greater odds of wound complications with metal staples compared to suture. But new a meta-analysis from June 2025 is challenging the prior results. In this episode, we will explore the data from 2010 to present day. PLUS, we will summarize a separate meta-analysis examining if wound dressing removal is tied to any wound complication. This was just published July 15, 2025 in the “Pink” journal. Listen in for details.

1. 2010: Basha SL, Rochon ML, Quiñones JN, Coassolo KM, Rust OA, Smulian JC. Randomized controlled trial of wound complication rates of subcuticular suture vs staples for skin closure at cesarean delivery. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2010 Sep;203(3):285.e1-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2010.07.011. PMID: 20816153.

2. 2015: Mackeen AD, Schuster M, Berghella V. Suture versus staples for skin closure after cesarean: a metaanalysis. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2015 May;212(5):621.e1-10. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2014.12.020. Epub 2014 Dec 19. PMID: 25530592.

3. Jan 2025: Gabbai D, Jacoby C, Gilboa I, Maslovitz S, Yogev Y, Attali E. Comparison of complications and surgery outcomes in skin closure methods following cesarean sections. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2025 Jul;312(1):125-129. doi: 10.1007/s00404-024-07911-6. Epub 2025 Jan 25. PMID: 39862268; PMCID: PMC12176926.

4. June 2025: Post-cesarean skin closure with metal staples versus subcuticular suture in obese patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Luis Sanchez-Ramos et al (Univ Florida). https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002/pmf2.70061

5. DRESSING REMOVAL: July 15, 2025: Leshae A Cenac, Serena Guerra, Alicia Huckaby, Gabriele Saccone, Vincenzo Berghella. Early Wound Dressing (soft gauze/tape dressing) Removal after Cesarean Delivery: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Trials: Short title: early wound dressing removal after cesarean, American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology MFM, 2025; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajogmf.2025.101739.

6. https://www.cdc.gov/nhsn/pdfs/pscmanual/9pscssicurrent.pdf