Home
Categories
EXPLORE
True Crime
Comedy
Society & Culture
Business
Sports
Health & Fitness
Technology
About Us
Contact Us
Copyright
© 2024 PodJoint
Loading...
0:00 / 0:00
Podjoint Logo
US
Sign in

or

Don't have an account?
Sign up
Forgot password
https://is1-ssl.mzstatic.com/image/thumb/Podcasts211/v4/52/49/94/5249948c-0391-80d7-71a1-c11ad3f8dc7f/mza_2476408126427699344.jpg/600x600bb.jpg
Byline Times Audio Articles
Unknown
50 episodes
2 days ago
The latest articles from Byline Times converted to audio for easy listening
Show more...
Politics
News,
News Commentary
RSS
All content for Byline Times Audio Articles is the property of Unknown and is served directly from their servers with no modification, redirects, or rehosting. The podcast is not affiliated with or endorsed by Podjoint in any way.
The latest articles from Byline Times converted to audio for easy listening
Show more...
Politics
News,
News Commentary
Episodes (20/50)
Byline Times Audio Articles
'Geert Wilders' Far-Right Retreat Leaves a Very Dutch Political Mess'
Support our mission to provide fearless stories about and outside the media system
Packed with exclusive investigations, analysis, and features
SUBSCRIBE TODAY
Geert Wilders' PVV may have lost ground in this week's Dutch parliamentary elections, but the truth is that, contrary to all the talk in the international media, this modest European nation has not suddenly discovered how to defeat the extreme right.
In reality, these elections merely confirm that politics in the Netherlands remains inward-looking, hostile to strangers and politically clueless.
It's fair to say that Wilders himself may be nearing his expiration date. But his one-man party, with its backbenchers recently exposed for fabricating widely-circulated AI images of brown-skinned men harassing a young blond woman and left-wing leader Frans Timmermans being led away in chains by the police, still managed to secure 26 seats in parliament, their second best score ever.
Combined with the like-minded parties JA21, BBB and FvD (whose new leader seriously considers that the Aboriginals might have discovered fire just 50 years ago), the extreme right still command 46 seats in parliament, out of a total of 150, just two down from the previous elections.
Compared to these, the Dutch centrist Libersals Democrats 66, whose leader and possible new prime minister, Rob Jetten, looks like a beacon of reason. The only problem is that over the past decades, D66 representatives taking part in governments, national and local, have barely developed any real distinctive policy. They are like that guy who always shows up at parties: perfectly agreeable, but no one knows who invited him, and when you ask him what he would prefer, beer, wine or juice, he'll just smile and say: sure!
Reform UK Just Won Britain's Least-Prestigious Award - For 'Promoting Pseudoscience'
Nigel Farage's party was recognised for "widespread embrace of climate change denialism and antivaccine misinformation"
Josiah Mortimer
Before this election, D66 was regarded as being slightly left of centre due to their position on issues like trans rights, although they are often hard to pin down. However, during the campaign Jetten shifted course somewhat, forgetting about his green goals, changing his mind about refugees (who he said should now only apply at the European borders, and not on our soil) and was welcomed by a sea of Dutch flags on his triumphant election night. In short, it's impossible to predict exactly which direction Jetten wants to take this country.
He will need his apparent optimism once he starts building a ruling coalition, however. In a parliament with 15 political parties and no clear majority, any Government will always have to be a coalition. That's why the result would have been largely the same had Wilders' PVV won the elections. Wilders would then have spent two weeks or months trying to get others aboard, but all the large parties have ruled out stepping into a coalition with him, after he spent a year sabotaging his own Government before deserting it in June. Once Wilders gave up, it would be the turn of Jetten's D66, as it will be now. And his only option to build a majority coalition is to gather the four traditional parties left and right of centre.
This would be the equivalent of a new UK Government consisting of Labour, Conservatives and Liberal Democrats - obliged to join forces in order to keep Reform out of power. It would bring together parties who all have their old suspicions and animosities towards each other, on top of their irreconcilable political differences. Just take Gaza, which was barely mentioned during the campaign, one of the reasons why so many voters didn't show up at all. VVD is a strong supporter of the Netanyahu government, CDA deeply believes that Judeo-Christian culture built Europe, GroenLinks-PvdA has chosen to cease all arms trade with Israel - and D66, well, it would welcome a cease-fire.
This coalition will be impossible to form. It will also be impossi...
Show more...
2 days ago
6 minutes 58 seconds

Byline Times Audio Articles
Keir Starmer's Election Reforms Will Leave UK Politics Exposed to Dark Money and Foreign Interference, Warns Labour MP
Support our mission to provide fearless stories about and outside the media system
Packed with exclusive investigations, analysis, and features
SUBSCRIBE TODAY
Keir Starmer's planned reforms to elections in the UK will still leave gaping loopholes threatening to allow continued foreign interference in British politics, an influential Labour MP has warned.
Cat Smith, who was the party's former Shadow Democracy Minister warned that the proposed measures in the Labour Government's planned Elections and Democracy Bill, were "the bare minimum", "too timid" and represented only a "few welcome crumbs" towards tackling the democratic threats to UK democracy.
The Bill is set to introduce votes at 16 for Westminster elections, a move towards automatic voter registration, and limits to the potential for foreign influence of UK elections through donations.
Asked whether the changes go far enough, when speaking at an event of the UCL's Constitution Unit, Smith said: "Regrettably, a pretty emphatic no."
"The reforms proposed and indeed some of the ones already enacted I think are too timid. they're long overdue measures that the Government has [introduced]."
"I'm certainly not knocking them, but just to be really clear, I don't think they represent brave reform. I think they represent the bare minimum that we need to drag the UK electoral system into the 21st century," she told the panel.
The MP, who is on the left of the party, added: "The true test of a Government's commitment to electoral integrity lies not in the small palatable concessions it makes, but I think its willingness to reinforce the foundational pillars of trust and independence. And this test I'm afraid the Government has yet to pass."
ENJOYING THIS ARTICLE? HELP US TO PRODUCE MORE
Receive the monthly Byline Times newspaper and help to support fearless, independent journalism that breaks stories, shapes the agenda and holds power to account.
PAY ANNUALLY - £39.50 A YEAR
PAY MONTHLY - £3.75 A MONTH
MORE OPTIONS
We're not funded by a billionaire oligarch or an offshore hedge-fund. We rely on our readers to fund our journalism. If you like what we do, please subscribe.
Under particular fire - from Smith and the independent Electoral Commission itself - is the last Conservative Government's move to introduce a 'strategy and policy statement' to influence the previously-independent elections watchdog.
Labour has opted not to scrap that decision. Cat Smith said: "Creating [the] power for a partisan sitting Government… to issue policy guidance to the neutral body responsible for enforcing electoral law, [is] fundamentally corrosive to public trust. And I think it is the ultimate conflict of interest."
Smith helped lead the opposition to the Conservatives' Elections Bill - now Act - which introduced that change. She said: "I remember saying to Conservative ministers, you will not be in Government forever…You're setting up a system for any sitting Government to influence policy.
"And I say that today to my Labour colleagues who are the ministers responsible for the strategy and policy statement…It might be very nice when you're in Government and you think you can influence it, but it's not fair and it's not right."
Smith warned: "Every Government should remember that you're only in Government today and there's no guarantees for tomorrow…I will not be satisfied until I see the strategy and policy statement taken out of the law but given the Electoral Commission back its independence."
On big donations fuelling British politics, the Labour backbencher said the Government's reforms were "largely ignoring" the "deep structural overhaul of political finance" that was needed. She noted that threats from Elon Musk to donate huge sums to Reform UK, has "completely changed my approach" on the idea of implementing a cap on political donations, something the Government has also appeared to reject.
Don't miss a story
SIGN UP TO EMAIL UPDATES
Tom Hawthorne, head of policy at the Electoral Com...
Show more...
2 days ago
8 minutes 37 seconds

Byline Times Audio Articles
Dominic Cummings Lobbied Officials to Hand 'Test and Trace' Contracts to Palantir After Secret Meeting With Peter Thiel
Support our mission to provide fearless stories about and outside the media system
Packed with exclusive investigations, analysis, and features
SUBSCRIBE TODAY
Boris Johnson's former Chief of Staff Dominic Cummings lobbied Government officials to hand Covid 'Test and Trace' tech contracts to a firm run by a Trump-supporting billionaire, after he held a secret meeting with its founder, alongside the Prime Minister.
A recent Guardian investigation revealed that Cummings and Johnson held an undeclared meeting with Palantir founder Peter Thiel in August 2019. According to the report, the meeting was marked "private in a log of Johnson's activities that day and was not subsequently disclosed on the government's public log of meetings".
Now new emails released to Byline Times, following a freedom of information request, reveal the true extent of Dominic Cummings' subsequent involvement in lobbying senior officials to hand over huge Covid contracts to Thiel's company, and another one run by his fellow Trump-supporting billionaire Larry Ellison.
In September 2020, Cummings sent an email to Dido Harding - the Conservative peer appointed by former PM Boris Johnson to oversee the previous Government's £37 billion, flagship Test and Trace Programme.
In an email carrying the subject header "testing fundamentals", Cummings instructed Harding to ignore Cabinet Office procedures, claiming that if the programme needed to spend "100m quid" procuring goods to support the Coving Testing rollout then they shouldn't "worry about the CABOFF [Cabinet Office] paperwork". Crucially, the former advisor also insisted that officials should have "NO MINISTERS ON THESE CALLS".
Cummings demanded that officials should bypass the NHS when building the software to power the Test and Trace programme and instead look towards controversial US tech firm Palantir as well as IT firm Oracle, owned by Larry Ellison.
EXCLUSIVE
Michael Gove Lobbied Government Officials to Hand Conservative Donor Multimillion Pound Covid Contract
Private correspondence seen by Byline Times reveals that Ciga Healthcare's Brexit-supporting owner had pushed Gove to "take control" of the process
Russell Scott
Cummings said: "We need a cloud solution for the huge data needs - forget NHSX doing it, we need to get someone like Palantir or Oracle (Larry Ellison is offering free) to do this, but we need someone who really knows what theyre talking about to navigate this.
"Marc Warner/Faculty handled Palantir for the NHS in Feb-May - this was NOT done by NHSx and if left to NHS wd never have happened… this is incredibly urgent as the data infrastructure for millions of tests per day is highly non-trivial and we wont be able to do it in a fortnight, we need to get it going NOW for it to work in November".
In the next paragraph of the email Cummings claimed that the Cabinet Secretary, Simon Case, who had been CC'd in the message, had advised officials "that all normal processes are binned for testing" and that they could "hire exactly who they want from inside or outside civil service without need to wait even an hour for approval" before claiming that officials will be "absolved from legal blame if JRs [judicial reviews]" against procurement processes arose in the future.
Both Oracle and Palantir went on to secure covid contracts from Johnson's Government during the pandemic.
In 2023, The US firm landed the £330m Federated Data Platform contract from the NHS to Palantir.
As Byline Times previously reported Thiel had likened the UK's commitment to the NHS to "Stockholm syndrome" and backed a complete overhaul of the institution. In a clip still available online, Thiel said of the health service: "Rip the whole thing from the ground and start over".
Speaking at a Q&A event at the Oxford Union, the Thiel spoke of the need to fix the health service with "market mechanisms".
The first step to fixing the Health Service, Thiel said, was to break the public away from the idea that it is "the most wonderf...
Show more...
2 days ago
8 minutes 48 seconds

Byline Times Audio Articles
The Sun Newspaper Wages War Against Gambling Taxes - While Holding Huge Betting Stakes Itself
Support our mission to provide fearless stories about and outside the media system
Packed with exclusive investigations, analysis, and features
SUBSCRIBE TODAY
The Rupert Murdoch-owned Sun newspaper has launched a full-throttled campaign against higher taxes on gambling in the run up to the Chancellor's budget.
The paper's new 'Save Our Bets' campaign was given star billing on its front page on Wednesday, demanding of the Chancellor to: "Leave betting alone," and hitting out at a potential "budget tax grab" that would supposedly "hit thousands of jobs." The editorial and subsequent raft of articles echo gambling industry talking points that taxes would push "more punters…into the illegal black market."
On Thursday, Reform UK leader Nigel Farage also threw his weight behind the tabloid's activism, writing in the paper that: "Labour's pleasure police have ruined pubs and now they're coming after your innocent flutter…[It's] time, in the inimitable words of The Sun's ­headline, to stick up for your punter" against a mooted "tax blitz."
The tabloid has also roped in 'Blue Labour' peer Lord Maurice Glasman, who claimed to "have a flutter is one of the joys of life, so leave it alone", while Labour MP Gareth Snell claimed higher taxes could cost Bet365 jobs in his seat, a warning echoed by one of Labour's most conservative MPs, Graham Stringer.
The Conservatives have also officially backed the campaign, which comes as the Labour Chancellor is trying to find billions to fix public services and create more "fiscal headroom" in the face of economic pressures.
ENJOYING THIS ARTICLE? HELP US TO PRODUCE MORE
Receive the monthly Byline Times newspaper and help to support fearless, independent journalism that breaks stories, shapes the agenda and holds power to account.
PAY ANNUALLY - £39.50 A YEAR
PAY MONTHLY - £3.75 A MONTH
MORE OPTIONS
We're not funded by a billionaire oligarch or an offshore hedge-fund. We rely on our readers to fund our journalism. If you like what we do, please subscribe.
However, the stories and editorials have almost entirely failed to mention that The Sun is itself a gambling company - making millions of pounds a year from its Sun Vegas and Sun Bingo arms, and therefore stands to lose out financially by any so-called 'sin taxes' on the sector.
The paper also has extensive commercial advertising and referral partnerships with companies like Paddy Power, even employing senior, dedicated betting staff to further the relationships.
The paper's editorial on Tuesday night (28 October) had just one mention of this potential conflict, towards the end of the article, saying: "Both the Social Market Foundation and IPPR think-tanks want a tax rate of 50 PER CENT on online gaming, which includes our own Sun Bingo and Sun Vegas. The current rate is 21 per cent."
The editorial, and subsequent articles, do not refer to the paper's extensive advertising and referral deals with other betting firms, including BetFred, which is quoted in the article launching the campaign. The publication has often criticised politicians' alleged conflicts of interest.
The official page for the 'Save Our Bets' campaign is tagged, among other topics, alongside: "Betting offers for horse racing," "Betting on the go," and "Bookie offers for football."
Don't miss a story
SIGN UP TO EMAIL UPDATES
Former Prime Minister Gordon Brown and progressive think tanks like the IPPR are among those calling for the Chancellor to raise taxes on gambling in order to fund public services and reduce social harm caused by gambling addiction.
The Sun's owner, News Group Newspapers, latest accounts published in March made clear that betting was a commercial priority for the Murdoch titles: "Throughout the year, there has been a strong improvement in the Betting and Gaming division which has helped drive improved revenues.
"Product enhancements and targeted marketing in the Bingo and Vegas proposition have driven strong monthly active users. Following the success of Sun V...
Show more...
3 days ago
12 minutes 4 seconds

Byline Times Audio Articles
Reform UK Just Won Britain's Least-Prestigious Award - For 'Promoting Pseudoscience'
Support our mission to provide fearless stories about and outside the media system
Packed with exclusive investigations, analysis, and features
SUBSCRIBE TODAY
Reform UK has received an award for being the organisation that engaged in the "most prolific promotion of pseudoscience" during 2025.
Each year the UK's long-running publication for analysis of pseudoscience, conspiracy theory and claims of the paranormal, The Skeptic magazine, names their pseudoscientist of the year, and awards them the Rusty Razor prize.
The Rusty Razor this year went to Reform UK in recognition of "their widespread embrace of climate change denialism and antivaccine misinformation."
The award was announced in front of an audience of around 700 people at the QED science and skepticism conference in Manchester on Saturday night.
In the Rusty Razor Award category, Nigel Farage's party was recognised for 'promoting pseudoscientific claims'.
ENJOYING THIS ARTICLE? HELP US TO PRODUCE MORE
Receive the monthly Byline Times newspaper and help to support fearless, independent journalism that breaks stories, shapes the agenda and holds power to account.
PAY ANNUALLY - £39.50 A YEAR
PAY MONTHLY - £3.75 A MONTH
MORE OPTIONS
We're not funded by a billionaire oligarch or an offshore hedge-fund. We rely on our readers to fund our journalism. If you like what we do, please subscribe.
Climate Change Denial
Reform UK has publicly opposed Net Zero and climate change mitigation policies, despite the international scientific consensus on the need to reduce the scale of catastrophic global warming already contributing to natural disasters. Leading Reform UK figures have wrongly claimed that human-produced CO₂ does not contribute to climate change.
Deputy leader Richard Tice MP has made explicit claims denying human contribution to climate change, while Andrea Jenkyns (Greater Lincolnshire Mayor) has called climate change a "money-making racket" and claimed it does not exist.
Senior Reform councillors have described climate change as a hoax, with now Lincolnshire council leader Sean Matthews writing on X last year: "There is no climate crisis".
The Skeptic magazine also cites Reform's opposition to Net Zero policies and its proposed cuts to all renewable energy subsidies as reasons for this year's award.
Research from climate change outlet DeSmog found that since December 2019, Reform UK has received £2.3 million in donations from oil and gas interests, highly polluting industries, and climate science deniers - representing 92% of the party's donations.
Significant donors include Terence Mordaunt, a trustee and donor to the climate change denialist charity the Global Warming Policy Foundation.
Don't miss a story
SIGN UP TO EMAIL UPDATES
Covid-19 Vaccine Misinformation
At Reform UK's party conference last month, controversial doctor Aseem Malhotra gave a speech claiming "mRNA jabs have likely killed or seriously harmed millions of people", the World Health Organisation had been "captured" by Bill Gates, and - most infamously, and roundly-mocked - that Covid vaccines were "highly likely" a significant factor in cancer diagnoses amongst members of the royal family.
The year before, Richard Tice called for a full inquiry into the "serious problem" of thousands of people dying from Covid vaccine side-effects, a claim which is unfounded in the UK.
The UK's Medicines & Healthcare products Regulatory Agency says that for all Covid-19 vaccines, the overwhelming majority of [adverse side effect] reports relate to injection-site reactions (sore arm for example) and generalised symptoms such as 'flu-like' illness… Generally, these happen shortly after the vaccination and are not associated with more serious or lasting illness." Vaccination remains the single most effective way to reduce deaths and severe illness from Covid and many other diseases.
Other False Claims
In a September LBC interview, Nigel Farage picked up comments from Donald Trump and made "bogus" claims, linking auti...
Show more...
4 days ago
9 minutes 35 seconds

Byline Times Audio Articles
'No Faith' in X and Meta to Tackle Abuse in Politics, Says Speaker's Inquiry as It Suggests MPs Leave Platforms
Support our mission to provide fearless stories about and outside the media system
Packed with exclusive investigations, analysis, and features
SUBSCRIBE TODAY
Politicians should "feel empowered" to leave platforms like X - formerly Twitter - if they believe it presents a greater risk than benefit to their work, according to a damning new report from the House of Commons' speaker, Sir Lindsay Hoyle.
The report includes the strongest nudge yet for politicians to consider leaving X or Facebook altogether.
The official House of Commons report from the Speaker's Conference on abuse of politicians is damning about X, formerly Twitter, where toxic content appears to have got far worse since far-right billionaire Elon Musk took over in 2022.
While a spokesperson for X told the inquiry: "It is very important that people who use the platform are not victims of abuse" and that they take the issue seriously, the Speaker-led probe found that X was failing in its legal duties to remove threats of violence against politicians.
And the special conference from Speaker Lindsay Hoyle said X's written evidence was "often more evasive than it was informative". For example it noted that "when asked for the percentage of requests for information from the police they had denied due to insufficient evidence to support the request, X declined to say."
ENJOYING THIS ARTICLE? HELP US TO PRODUCE MORE
Receive the monthly Byline Times newspaper and help to support fearless, independent journalism that breaks stories, shapes the agenda and holds power to account.
PAY ANNUALLY - £39.50 A YEAR
PAY MONTHLY - £3.75 A MONTH
MORE OPTIONS
We're not funded by a billionaire oligarch or an offshore hedge-fund. We rely on our readers to fund our journalism. If you like what we do, please subscribe.
But the Commons body did extract important information from the social media platform, long seen as a "public square" for political debate in the UK and beyond.
X has "only 1,486 human reviewers working in English" despite receiving "more than 85,000 posts that breach their terms of service every day" according to the platform's own data.
It also found that X "shared information with the police in less than half of the instances when it was requested formally, and in only 30% of instances when it was requested informally" - compared to Meta's 85% compliance rate.
Both Meta - which owns Facebook and Instagram - and X had a higher bar for removing abuse when it concerned politicians.
The report notes that Meta only removes "violent threats against public figures, such as MPs and candidates if they are found to be 'credible'" - using a "high bar" including looking for "specific locations and timing of a potential attack". Meanwhile, X's enforcement considers whether content "may be a topic of legitimate public interest" - in other words, attacks on politicians are viewed as more acceptable than ordinary members of the public.
The critical assessment from the Speaker's Conference concluded: "We have no faith that Meta and X will resolve these issues unless they are legally obliged to do so. There is therefore no point in us recommending wholesale change of policies or modus operandi."
Don't miss a story
SIGN UP TO EMAIL UPDATES
Key concerns from the report found a general "unwillingness to remove abuse against MPs, candidates and other public figures", and indications that X and Meta's algorithmic recommendation systems actually give preference to incendiary and threatening content - because it boosts engagement on the platform.
Meta and X were also condemned for choosing to send "relatively junior witnesses" to the inquiry, suggesting a lack of respect for the process.
The report went on to question "their sincerity" - adding that the platforms do not appear to "understand the damaging impact they are having on democracy in the UK."
The Commons inquiry noted that having higher bars for removing threats against politicians than other individuals "normalises the idea that MPs...
Show more...
4 days ago
12 minutes 54 seconds

Byline Times Audio Articles
Russia is Using Drones and Deportations to Empty Southern Ukraine, UN Confirms
Support our mission to provide fearless stories about and outside the media system
Packed with exclusive investigations, analysis, and features
SUBSCRIBE TODAY
Byline Times first reported on Russia's "human safari" attacks on Ukrainians back in July 2024. At the time, Putin's drones attacks on civilians in Kherson City seemed to be a series of isolated atrocities, too brutal to form a pattern. However, more than a year later, the "human safari" has been officially recognised not only as a war crime and a crime against humanity but also as part of a coordinated strategy to drive Ukrainians from their homes.
On 27 October 2025, the Independent International Commission of Inquiry on Ukraine presented new findings to the 80th United Nations General Assembly, documenting a systematic campaign to depopulate southern Ukraine. This is the third report by the Commission and it builds upon previous findings. A conference room paper in May 2025 first documented drone attacks along a hundred-kilometre stretch around Kherson.
The new report expands the investigation to 300 kilometres, from Dnipropetrovsk through Kherson to Mykolaiv, and incorporates deportations and transfers into a broader picture of Russia's state-directed policy against civilians.
Drones as Instruments of Forced Displacement
The Commission confirmed that Russian forces committed the crimes against humanity of murder and forcible transfer of population through recurrent drone strikes across southern Ukraine. These attacks were coordinated and directed at civilians, homes, humanitarian distribution points, and critical energy infrastructure. First responders such as ambulances and fire brigades were also targeted, in defiance of their protected status under international law. The strikes rendered entire areas uninhabitable.
The Commission concluded that the use of drones was not random but part of a deliberate policy to depopulate Ukrainian territories, spreading terror and coercing civilians into flight. In Kherson, this pattern is clear. According to local authorities, since July 2024, over 200 civilians have been killed and over 2,000 civilians were injured in such attacks in the three oblasts. Almost 3,000 houses have been damaged or destroyed, also by drones.
Is Russia Losing the Great Game in Central Asia?
Iain Overton travelled to Tashkent, where cranes rise over Soviet relics and Chinese cars fill the streets, to see how Uzbekistan has become the lodestar of Central Asia's quiet pivot away from Moscow
Iain Overton
The Road of Death
Elvina Osmanova, a municipal services staffer in her early twenties, forgot her purse at home in Kherson as she set out on a business trip to Mykolaiv, a city 67 miles away. Before the Russian invasion, the drive took about an hour along a flat road lined with sunflower fields and southern steppes.
In August 2025, the road had turned into a surreal landscape. Elvina drove at a mad speed under fishing nets stretched high over wooden poles, forming a long, transparent tunnel. Her car twisted and turned around charred cars; black-and-red flames raged right next to her. The stench of burning fields and gasoline became suffocating. The fire was so close, and the heat so intense, that her windows began to crack. Was she trapped inside the anti-drone tunnel? Would a Russian FPV drone target her next? She saw the fishing nets melting and pressed harder on the gas. At a checkpoint, though, all traffic was stopped: swarms of Russian drones of different sizes and types attacked the M14 highway. Ukrainian electronic warfare (EW) units fought back, but the wait took what seemed to be forever.
Elvina made it back home only after curfew and had to stay and catch some sleep to the sounds of nonstop artillery fire. Before sunrise, now with her purse, she set out again - and soon a Russian drone dropped explosives 30 feet from her car. She saw people jumping out of burning vehicles and heard another explosion, but kept driving. She didn't know if she ...
Show more...
5 days ago
11 minutes 44 seconds

Byline Times Audio Articles
All the Big Government Reforms the Media Hasn't Been Telling You About
Support our mission to provide fearless stories about and outside the media system
Packed with exclusive investigations, analysis, and features
SUBSCRIBE TODAY
A whole heap of important legislation will become law this week. But with most of the media focusing on rows over Chinese espionage and one asylum seeker's release, they're likely to be largely missed.
Away from the newspaper front pages, the Labour Government has been busy with some pretty major reforms, as well as some smaller initiatives that could significantly affect people's lives.
So here's a collection of some recent news from Westminster and Whitehall you may have missed, as part of an occasional series looking at what the Government is really getting up to.
Here's our usual caveat: This list is by no means conclusive, and it is up to you whether you think the news is either good or bad. Mostly, as you'd imagine, they are things the Government sees as positive developments - as we've picked out announcements which haven't been extensively reported on.
However, the examples do offer a flavour of some of the things that we could, but aren't, talking about thanks largely to the priorities of the British press, or if you prefer, due to a maddening failure of communication by No 10.
ENJOYING THIS ARTICLE? HELP US TO PRODUCE MORE
Receive the monthly Byline Times newspaper and help to support fearless, independent journalism that breaks stories, shapes the agenda and holds power to account.
PAY ANNUALLY - £39.50 A YEAR
PAY MONTHLY - £3.75 A MONTH
MORE OPTIONS
We're not funded by a billionaire oligarch or an offshore hedge-fund. We rely on our readers to fund our journalism. If you like what we do, please subscribe.
1. London-Style Buses
The boringly-named Bus Services (No. 2) Bill became law on Monday night (27th October), enabling local transport authorities to implement franchising schemes for bus services in England - potentially reversing the decades-old deregulation of buses which opponents say has contributed to spiralling prices and worsening, reduced services while transport firms pay millions to shareholders.
But it will also end the (surprisingly recent) Conservative ban on councils setting up their own bus companies to directly compete with private firms.
Buses are the most frequently used form of public transport and are relied on by millions of people - disproportionately lower-income workers, young people, retirees and more.
Greater Manchester took up the opportunity of regulating buses by setting up the 'Bee Network', but the legal framework mayor Andy Burnham had to use to do it took years to utilise, and faced relentless challenge from transport firms. The new process is set to massively streamline it.
This bill won't make the front pages, but if councils take up the opportunity, it could revolutionise this vital form of transport in England.
Cat Hobbs, director of pro-public ownership campaign We Own It, told Byline Times: "After 40 years of bus deregulation and privatisation, it's fantastic that this government is making it easier to take back control of our buses," though she also called for the ambition to be matched with extra funding to help make this a success.
Hobbs added: "It's excellent news that the absurd ideological ban on new publicly owned bus companies, introduced under the last government, has now been reversed. Publicly owned bus companies like Lothian Buses and Reading Buses consistently win awards for their brilliant services."
Transport for London-style transport in Cornwall, Leeds, and Newcastle, here we come?
Don't miss a story
SIGN UP TO EMAIL UPDATES
2. Awaab's Law
Millions of social housing tenants in England are set to benefit from safer homes due to new rules coming into force in England this week, the Government says.
The first phase of 'Awaab's Law' will force social landlords (including councils and housing associations) to take urgent action to fix dangerous homes or face the full force of the law.
New legal duties w...
Show more...
5 days ago
17 minutes 40 seconds

Byline Times Audio Articles
Reform UK Treasurer Profited From Financial Ties to Elon Musk and Trump's Silicon Valley Billionaires
Support our mission to provide fearless stories about and outside the media system
Packed with exclusive investigations, analysis, and features
SUBSCRIBE TODAY
Nigel Farage's Reform UK claims to represent a people's revolt against the political elite. But documents reviewed by Byline Times, alongside corporate and regulatory filings in London and the United States, reveal that the party's own Treasurer was recently invested with the same Silicon Valley donor bloc - including Elon Musk - that powered Donald Trump's return.
The relationship highlights how the party's finances have been linked to the fortunes of America's pro-Trump elite, as Reform mirrors their pro-fossil fuel agenda and attacks on Net Zero.
Reform UK's Treasurer and property billionaire Nick Candy, is now the single biggest donor to the party, having given a total of £1 million. But until January 2024, Candy was also limited-partner investor in ACME Capital - a California venture fund specialising in early-stage technology companies. Its star portfolio contains SpaceX, the most valuable private startup in the world. SpaceX's eponymous founder and owner is Elon Musk, by far the biggest funder of Trump's return to power - who is now also funding the criminal defence of far-right convicted fraudster Stephen Yaxley Lennon, who calls himself 'Tommy Robinson'.
Musk's is not the only company linked to ACME Capital in Trump's donor network. Other major ventures which were kickstarted with support from ACME include Uber, Airbnb, Robinhood and OpenGov - companies whose founders and executives have collectively poured millions of dollars into Trump's super PACs, inaugural committees and Republican politicians.
Byline Times can reveal that Nick Candy's investment in this Silicon Valley venture fund, from which he exited in 2024, was made through an offshore entity based in Guernsey.
As Reform UK pledges to scrap Britain's net zero targets and "unlock" new oil and gas drilling, its policies mirror the fossil fuel revival now unfolding under Trump's second-term agenda - an agenda financed by the same tech billionaires linked to Candy.
Nick Candy's Silicon Valley Connection
When Candy poured money into the venture firm ACME Capital, he wasn't simply buying into start-ups. He was buying into Silicon Valley's most powerful new political constituency - what would soon become a billion-dollar network helping bankroll Donald Trump's return to the White House.
Candy Ventures Ltd was first set up by Nick Candy in 2015. By the end of 2023, the firm had a gross book value of £145 million and a net value of £60 million, with 17 portfolio companies. However, the total 'mark-to-market' value of its investments was reportedly around £350 million. Today, its website says that it has funded some 25 companies in total. One of the companies listed as part of the Candy Ventures portfolio on its website is ACME Capital.
ACME Capital's story begins in Silicon Valley's boom years, when its predecessor Sherpa Capital made some of the most lucrative early bets of the 2010s. In 2011, Sherpa's co-founders invested in Uber, helping turn a fledgling ride-share startup into a global disruptor. Around the same time, Sherpa took early stakes in Airbnb, then a scrappy home-letting platform, and Robinhood, a commission-free trading app pitched as "finance for the people." By mid-decade, the firm had added SpaceX, Elon Musk's rocket company, to its late-stage portfolio - a mark of its growing clout among elite venture investors - and joined the 2015 funding round for OpenGov, a civic-data company promising transparency in public finance.
When Sherpa's operations re-emerged as ACME Capital in 2018, those holdings formed the backbone of its first funds. It is not clear when or how much Nick Candy first invested in ACME Capital. In 2020, Candy Ventures first listed ACME Capital on its website, with the description "investing in breakthrough technologies including Cue, Airbnb and Uber." That was the year outg...
Show more...
5 days ago
17 minutes 57 seconds

Byline Times Audio Articles
'How to Stop Labour's Autumn of Discontent Turning Into Farage's Winter of Despair'
Support our mission to provide fearless stories about and outside the media system
Packed with exclusive investigations, analysis, and features
SUBSCRIBE TODAY
History doesn't repeat itself, but it does rhyme. We look back to make sense of complex and bewildering moments. As we face exactly such a time now, my mind keeps drifting back to the late 1970s and the foreboding gloom that something still opaque, still nascent was starting to cast its dark shadow over our lives and our country. Back then, what was to become known as Thatcherism, was still ill-formed, the old was not yet dead but was dying, the new had not been born but was gestating. And all around were morbid symptoms, not least Labour's Winter of Discontent.
Today it is Labour's Autumn of Discontent. It isn't just that they languish in the polls even slipping behind the Greens in fourth place in one, that the Prime Minister is the most unpopular on record, that tens of thousands have left the party, or that they face wipeout in their heartland of Wales following the Caerphilly by-election last week. It's that they have no plan to change any of this, no inspiring vision for the country, no alternative economic model, no way of running public services, no culture that creates the necessary alliances and networks for big change. The tragedy is that they actively reject the very ideas and the culture that will get them out of the dead end that they have decided to drive themselves into.
Instead, what we get is a Government on its knees to the shrine of growth, a goal over which they have little if any short or medium term influence and end up not with a mantra of long term investment in people and places, but desperate attempts to kick start an economy with tried, tested and failed remedies like "cutting business red tape", while repeating the economically illiterate mantra of the right that governments can't spend more or it will 'max out on its credit card'. We have been here before. We know where all this ends.
Having tried to blame the Conservatives for the doom and gloom, which was valid because of the economic inheritance they bestowed on Labour, but without any real narrative of hope, the Government is now starting to blame Brexit for its woes. And of course, Brexit was and is economically damaging. But we left the European Union before Keir Starmer became Prime Minister and they therefore knew about its economic consequences before they were elected. The case for rejoining the EU will grow stronger, but that will only be achieved on the basis of a consistent approach, not as a mere excuse for why this government is failing to lift people's living standards.
The Reform Backlash: Caerphilly By-Election Result Shows Nigel Farage's Party Is Much Weaker Than It Looks
Despite widespread media predictions of a Reform victory on Thursday, Farage's defeat shows his party continues to be overestimated, argues Adam Bienkov
Adam Bienkov
After little more than a year and with a huge majority, this is a Government that is now in survive the day mode and they will be shameless in pulling any rabbit, like the sudden announcement on ID cards, from any hat, to get them through the next 24 hours. Virtually none of it will be thought through or strategic and will reinforce the same self-defeating behaviour. The Government is in a nosedive of its own making.
Whether the Deputy Leadership election changes any of this remains to be seen. Lucy Powell now has her own independent mandate from the membership which she can use as radically as she decides. Given the existential crisis of the party, as the new Deputy Leader the onus is on her to push not just for reforms of the party but policies that first stop the haemorrhaging of support which has seen membership fall from over 500,000 to reportedly little more than 200,000, before credibility can be rebuilt. If she doesn't push sufficiently then what currently feels ominous can become inevitable and history will start to rhyme once mo...
Show more...
6 days ago
9 minutes 33 seconds

Byline Times Audio Articles
Is Russia Losing the Great Game in Central Asia?
Support our mission to provide fearless stories about and outside the media system
Packed with exclusive investigations, analysis, and features
SUBSCRIBE TODAY
From the top floor of Tashkent's Hotel Uzbekistan, one of the most striking Soviet Modernist buildings in Central Asia, twenty-seven cranes can be seen stretching out against the skyline, still busy even as the sun sets on the city below. They are busy building not the Madrassas and Mosques that draw countless tourists to this country, but new glass towers of commerce - and they are funded by Chinese, Gulf and Turkish money. Below, on the city's streets, the Russian Ladas of old have been displaced by the Chinese electric cars, with the electric "Build Your Dreams" a firm, shiny favourite.
Meanwhile, in the country's second city, Bukhara, a new art biennale is in full flow and with stars such as the British artist Antony Gormley and the German Carsten Höller on its rostra, its cultural lodestar is clearly pointing westward.
It's all part of a broader cultural shift away from Moscow's shadow. These cranes, cars and canvases tell a larger story: Central Asia, perhaps most epitomised in what is unfolding here in Uzbekistan, is fast rebalancing its loyalties in the Great Game of the twenty-first century. And Russia is not the only one at the gaming table.
Colonial Drift
Tashkent's notable neutrality over Russia's invasion of Ukraine conceals a pragmatic recalibration. Like its neighbours, Uzbekistan has neither endorsed nor condemned the invasion, but it has quietly asserted sovereignty.
In April 2025, it hosted the first EU-Central Asia summit in Samarkand, a meeting that infuriated Moscow. When the Minister of Foreign Affairs of the Russian Federation, Sergey Lavrov, complained that a new World War II memorial bore inscriptions only in Uzbek and English, a high-profile Uzbek academic responded that Uzbekistan "is not a colony." The terse responses to Lavrov symbolised a region redefining its identity. It was no longer deferential, no longer silent.
The country's economic transformation under President Shavkat Mirziyoyev has strengthened this autonomy. Since 2016, Mirziyoyev has liberalised the currency, trimmed subsidies, privatised state firms and courted foreign investment. Growth has averaged around 6 per cent annually. Construction booms at an even faster clip: 129 trillion soums (about $11 billion) of work was reported completed between January and August 2025, up nearly 8 per cent on the previous year. The state plans a new "City of the Future" east of Tashkent to house two million people across 20,000 hectares.
Elsewhere in the region, the shift is equally as clear. Kazakhstan's President Kassym-Jomart Tokayev not only refused to endorse Russia's invasion of Ukraine, but went so far as to meet Volodymyr Zelensky at the United Nations, backing international guarantees for Ukraine's sovereignty.
Closer to Europe, Armenia has suspended its defence alliance with Moscow after being left exposed in its conflict with Azerbaijan and is now seeking closer ties with Europe. Azerbaijan, for its part, has turned westward too, strengthening trade links with Turkey and welcoming Western investment in the South Caucasus corridor.
This month, the UK government lifted its long-standing arms embargo on Armenia and Azerbaijan, upgrading both countries to "strategic partners" and allowing arms exports for the first time since 1992. Meanwhile, Kazakhstan and Uzbekistan are laying a trans-Caspian fibre-optic cable to link with Azerbaijan by 2026, in yet another move where Central Asia quietly decouples from Russian digital networks and it turns its technological gaze westward.
In this way, Uzbekistan's approach exemplifies a wider pattern - something that Annette Bohr of the think-tank Chatham House calls Central Asia's "multi-vectoring." Regional leaders, she notes, have refined the art of telling each side what it wants to hear. With Moscow, they emphasise their fear of Western sec...
Show more...
6 days ago
13 minutes 19 seconds

Byline Times Audio Articles
The Sheer Scale of Conservative Mismanagement of the Asylum System Revealed
Support our mission to provide fearless stories about and outside the media system
Packed with exclusive investigations, analysis, and features
SUBSCRIBE TODAY
Three Conservative Home Secretaries wasted billions of pounds on a chaotic, costly and mismanaged asylum accommodation system, a new highly critical report from MPs reveals.
Priti Patel, Suella Braverman and James Cleverly presided over a surge in the cost of providing accommodation for asylum seekers, which means the cost of ten year contracts, estimated at £4.5 billion in 2019, is set to rise to £15.3 billion by 2029 when Labour has pledged to end the use of hotel accommodation.
Many of the contracts signed by the Home Office to provide accommodation were flawed, clauses to claim back excess profits by providers were rarely used and no penalties were issued by the Home Office for poor performance. No attempt was made to claw back any excess profits until last year.
As a result tens of millions of pounds are still in private providers' bank accounts which, could have been collected by the Home Office to use for other public services. The report also has a warning for the current Labour Government that it needs to urgently address these shortcomings or risk further public disillusionment over a system which has led to public protest in places like Epping.
The Reform Backlash: Caerphilly By-Election Result Shows Nigel Farage's Party Is Much Weaker Than It Looks
Despite widespread media predictions of a Reform victory on Thursday, Farage's defeat shows his party continues to be overestimated, argues Adam Bienkov
Adam Bienkov
Chair of the Home Affairs Committee, Dame Karen Bradley MP said: "The Home Office has presided over a failing asylum accommodation system that has cost taxpayers billions of pounds. Its response to increasing demand has been rushed and chaotic, and the department has neglected the day-to-day management of these contracts. The Government needs to get a grip on the asylum accommodation system in order to bring costs down and hold providers to account for poor performance.
"Urgent action is needed to lower the cost of asylum accommodation and address the concerns of local communities. While reducing hotel use is rightly a Government priority, there will always be a need for flexibility within the system, and the Home Office risks boxing itself in by making undeliverable promises to appeal to popular sentiment. It shouldn't set itself up for more failure.
"The Home Office has not proved able to develop a long term strategy for the delivery of asylum accommodation. It has instead focused on short term, reactive responses. There is now an opportunity to draw a line under the current failed, chaotic and expensive system, but the Home Office must finally learn from its previous mistakes or it is doomed to repeat them."
The number of asylum seekers in accommodation reached a peak under the last Conservative Government when Priti Patel proposed the now aborted scheme to send asylum seekers to Rwanda. This led to the Home Office ending the processing of asylum seekers. This led to the rushed use of hotels where costs are much higher. Hotels cost an average of £144 per person per night and the Home Office spent £4 billion last year on support for asylum seekers, with £2.1 billion spent on hotels.
Only one large site housing asylum seekers is left. Wethersfield,a former RAF airfield in Essex which can house 800 single males and a further 445 on a contingency basis. This costs £132 per person per night but this did not include the £105 million spent on acquiring the site and making it suitable for asylum seekers.
ENJOYING THIS ARTICLE? HELP US TO PRODUCE MORE
Receive the monthly Byline Times newspaper and help to support fearless, independent journalism that breaks stories, shapes the agenda and holds power to account.
PAY ANNUALLY - £39.50 A YEAR
PAY MONTHLY - £3.75 A MONTH
MORE OPTIONS
We're not funded by a billionaire oligarch or an offshore hedge-fund. We re...
Show more...
1 week ago
6 minutes 43 seconds

Byline Times Audio Articles
'How to Convert the Success of the No Kings Protests Into a Nationwide Anti-Trump Uprising'
Support our mission to provide fearless stories about and outside the media system
Packed with exclusive investigations, analysis, and features
SUBSCRIBE TODAY
On Saturday 18th October, as one does, I dressed up in a giant inflatable frog costume, and joined a local #NoKings protest, part of a nationwide series of demonstrations, against the Trump administration's cruel and increasingly authoritarian policies. The #NoKings aim is to call out Trump's imperial behaviour and remind Americans that America's democracy was founded in opposition to monarchy.
My frog costume was in honour of the protestors in Portland, who have been mocking Trump's decision to send National Guard troops to that city by dressing up in absurd costumes, such as inflatable frogs, unicorns, and pink ponies, and prancing around to music in front of an ICE detention facility, to disprove Trump's allegations that the city is rocked with violence. My costume was a hit. Dozens of other protestors lined up to take selfies with me; people cheered as I walked by; and cars hooted as they drove past.
Everyone was on their best behaviour - to avoid giving any pretext to Trump officials to accuse the participants of disorderly, unpatriotic or hateful conduct. There were lots of American flags on display. The overall atmosphere was good-humoured, and fun. A couple of policemen were on standby, but at a discreet distance. They told me they were just there to make sure no-one got hurt.
The turnout for the event, in the middle of the day when many families are busy driving their kids to events, or doing household errands, was also pretty good. I estimate there were almost two thousand attendees during the period I was there. I eventually had to retreat after - like the proverbial frog in boiling water - I became increasingly over-heated in my airless garb. According to the organisers, almost seven million Americans took part in over 2,700 similar protests across the country - with particularly large turn-outs in major cities such as Chicago, New York, and Washington DC.
The Reform Backlash: Caerphilly By-Election Result Shows Nigel Farage's Party Is Much Weaker Than It Looks
Despite widespread media predictions of a Reform victory on Thursday, Farage's defeat shows his party continues to be overestimated, argues Adam Bienkov
Adam Bienkov
This is a meaningful increase on the estimated five million people who participated in the first NoKings protest in June. The deliberate ridiculing of the administration with witty slogans, funny costumes and satirical memes is also a highly effective way to get under Trump's skin. The organisers are trying to sustain momentum by circulating guidance on new ways to challenge the administration, such as lobbying members of Congress, canvassing in upcoming elections, and helping register new voters.
And yet, I can't help feeling that this is not yet enough to make a difference. Seven million is barely two per cent of America's roughly 347 million population. Even in my neighbourhood, a highly educated, professional suburb just outside Washington DC, filled with federal workers, many of them working unpaid or on furlough during the current government shutdown, I came across people who literally had no idea the protests were taking place. One extremely well educated acquaintance of mine, whose business will potentially be seriously affected by Trump's ongoing trade wars, told me she simply had "no idea" who to believe these days, and felt "both sides" were equally to blame for America's current dysfunction.
At our event, it looked like almost everyone there was over 50 years old, many of them perhaps veterans of the civil rights movements of the 1960s, or of the anti-Vietnam war protests and women's rights movements of the 1970s. I saw very few young people, or people of colour, though the latter is perhaps understandable given the fear of ICE harassment. One participant told me she felt younger generations simply didn't understand what wa...
Show more...
1 week ago
19 minutes

Byline Times Audio Articles
The Reform Backlash: Caerphilly By-Election Result Shows Nigel Farage's Party Is Much Weaker Than It Looks
Support our mission to provide fearless stories about and outside the media system
Packed with exclusive investigations, analysis, and features
SUBSCRIBE TODAY
In the run up to Thursday's Caerphilly by-election there was acres of media coverage suggesting that the Welsh constituency was about to be taken by Reform.
"Reform could make massive Welsh breakthrough TODAY" shouted the Daily Mail as it insisted that "Nigel Farage's party is leading the race" for the seat.
Reporters, who previously couldn't even point to Caerphilly on a map, were dispatched to the seat to conduct vox pops in which Welsh voters explained why they would soon be electing a new Reform representative.
"Caerphilly is crumbling to Reform" reported the website Unherd, while the Independent found that Reform was "turning a red heartland light blue". Similar missives were filed by outlets including the Telegraph and Times.
There was only one problem. The actual voters had other ideas.
Indeed, when the final result came, far from "crumbling" to Reform's nativist politics, the people of Caerphilly instead handed a decisive victory to the centre left Plaid Cymru, with Nigel Farage's party coming in a distant second.
This was obviously not the result that many of the media organisations dispatched to report on Reform's supposedly inevitable victory had expected.
"I was amazed at how many journalists were at the count," reported Will Hayward, whose newsletter on Welsh politics most closely covered the race.
EXCLUSIVE
Reform Council Asks Opposition for Help Making Cuts After 'Desperate' Search for Savings Falls Short
Exclusive: Nigel Farage's struggling flagship Kent administration is now reaching out to other parties, after failing to identify the millions of pounds in savings they promised
Josiah Mortimer
"GB News were there in force, clearly desperate to herald the success of their presenter's party. Their disappointment was palpable as the results became clear."
Yet even once it became clear that Reform had actually lost, the script barely changed. Footage from the result showed the visiting caravan of Westminster-based journalists crowded around the losing Reform candidate, with Plaid's newly-elected representative stuck talking to local reporters instead.
Later write-ups of the result also focused almost entirely on Labour's collapse in the seat, while downplaying Reform's failure to win the seat, which these same outlets had suggested they would just hours before.
However, soon the reality of what had happened began to settle in for some.
"Nigel Farage should conclude that his party did not just fall short what it hoped for yesterday" wrote the respected pollster and commentator Peter Kellner.
"It fell short of what he needed to be on course to become Prime Minister."
Even some at GB News spotted the significance of the result.
"Nigel Farage's biggest electoral fear REVEALED as Reform's path to power narrows" conceded GB News editor Jack Walters, who wrote that the result showed that the level of dislike for Farage's party could lead to widespread and successful anti-Reform tactical voting in future.
"While Reform's support is strong, dislike for Mr Farage permeates around the country with equal fervour," wrote Walters.
"And one statistic more than any other proves that. Turnout in yesterday's by-election was 50 per cent, making it higher than the overall turnout across Wales in 2021.
"Some of those will be new voters giving Reform UK a chance, others will be people desperate to stave off another momentum-building victory for Mr Farage."
The result has a particular significance given it followed Reform's former Welsh leader Nathan Gill pleading guilty to taking bribes to spread pro-Russian propaganda.
The revelation, investigated extensively here at Byline Times, was used by Farage's opponents during the by-election campaign to highlight the dangers of putting a party like Reform in power.
'Stunned?' Farage's Admission He Knew Nathan Gill but Not His Kremli...
Show more...
1 week ago
8 minutes 47 seconds

Byline Times Audio Articles
The Public Wants to Ban 'Politician Presenters' Like Nigel Farage But Ofcom Isn't Listening
Support our mission to provide fearless stories about and outside the media system
Packed with exclusive investigations, analysis, and features
SUBSCRIBE TODAY
The British public are opposed to politicians presenting current affairs programmes, newly-released YouGov polling suggests.
The findings suggest broadcast regulator Ofcom's decision this week - to allow the likes of Reform UK's Nigel Farage and Lee Anderson to continue presenting their own political GB News shows - is out of step with public opinion.
A majority (51%) of voters surveyed by YouGov said they think politicians should not be allowed to present current affairs shows, while 29% agreed they should and 19% said they didn't know.
Once those who don't know are excluded, almost two thirds (64%) did not agree with Ofcom's rules that allow serving politicians to present current affairs programming on TV and radio, while 36% said they should, according to the YouGov polling for the University of Cardiff's School of Journalism.
Reform UK supporters are the only group of party voters who appear to support (44%) more than oppose (39%) politicians presenting current affairs programming in broadcast media, the research reveals.
ENJOYING THIS ARTICLE? HELP US TO PRODUCE MORE
Receive the monthly Byline Times newspaper and help to support fearless, independent journalism that breaks stories, shapes the agenda and holds power to account.
PAY ANNUALLY - £39.50 A YEAR
PAY MONTHLY - £3.75 A MONTH
MORE OPTIONS
We're not funded by a billionaire oligarch or an offshore hedge-fund. We rely on our readers to fund our journalism. If you like what we do, please subscribe.
Perhaps unsurprisingly, support rises to 58% for frequent or very frequent GB News consumers - the highest level of backing for politician-presenters among audiences - though 29% said they should not.
Following consultation, Ofcom made changes this week to its guidance on politicians presenting news and curent affairs programmes, amid growing concern about conflicts of interest.
Ofcom said its amendments now "make explicit" that if an MP presented news in a non-news programme, then their elected status would likely be a relevant factor in considering whether that news was presented with "due impartiality."
Existing guidance states that "no politician may be used as a newsreader, interviewer or reporter in any news programmes unless, exceptionally, it is editorially justified."
The updated code now clarifies "exceptional" circumstances are "those which cannot be controlled or foreseen by the broadcaster."
Don't miss a story
SIGN UP TO EMAIL UPDATES
"We also make clear that we would expect such situations to be rare, and for licensees who use politicians as presenters to put appropriate contingency arrangements in place to avoid these situations," Ofcom said in a statement.
However, politicians have traditionally side-stepped this rule by hosting what are deemed "current affairs" programmes, such as political panel shows, rather than straight-forward news presenting. These, such as Nigel Farage's four-times-a-week GB News show, are likely to continue as before.
Moreover, Ofcom consulted on a proposal bar politicians from being used as "a newsreader, news interviewer or news reporter in any type of programmes unless, exceptionally, it is editorially justified," but decided against it.
In a statement on the changes, Ofcom said: "There is no Ofcom rule that prevents a politician from presenting or appearing on a TV or radio programme - providing they aren't standing in an election taking place, or about to take place, and that the programme otherwise complies with the Broadcasting Code."
The regulator noted that some respondents "wanted us to extend our rules to prevent politicians from presenting non-news, including current affairs programmes" but it fell outside the scope of their consultation.
The broadcasting body asserted that its Broadcasting Code contains "robust rules" requiring broadcasters to preserve "due imp...
Show more...
1 week ago
8 minutes 56 seconds

Byline Times Audio Articles
Reform Council Asks Opposition for Help Making Cuts After 'Desperate' Search for Savings Falls Short
Support our mission to provide fearless stories about and outside the media system
Packed with exclusive investigations, analysis, and features
SUBSCRIBE TODAY
Reform's flagship 'cost-cutting' Kent County Council leadership has started approaching opposition parties for help finding extra cash, after struggling to identify the tens of millions of pounds in budget savings they promised, Byline Times can reveal.
The newly-won Council was heralded by Nigel Farage as a symbol of what the party could achieve nationally by cutting local government "waste".
The party went on to appoint Reform councillor Matthew Fraser-Moat as a £36,000 cabinet member for what the party calls DOLGE - the Department for Local Government Efficiency, mimicking Elon Musk's aborted efforts under President Trump in the US.
However, the administration has since descended into chaos, with four councillors suspended last week following leaked footage exposing major divisions within the council leadership.
As a result Kent is now reportedly among a series of Reform-led authorities set to break the party's pledge not to raise local taxes.
Opposition councillors have told Byline Times that the party is now so "desperate" for ideas on what to cut to make the upcoming budget add up that it is now arranging brain-storming sessions with opposition parties.
Don't miss a story
SIGN UP TO EMAIL UPDATES
An opposition councillor told Byline Times: "DOLGE is arranging meetings with all political groups because they have run out of ideas. They will not be able to find service delivery efficiencies which do not impact the most vulnerable in society.
"So far they have just been looking to see what can make the best headlines without anything to back it up."
It comes as Zia Yusuf stepped down on Wednesday as head of the national Reform "DOGE" unit that has been "struggling to find council waste to cut," according to Politico. He was just four months into the role and had already resigned once and returned to it.
The outlet reports that Reform second-in-command Richard Tice will take over instead. Yusuf will remain the party's head of policy.
Another opposition councillor, from a different party, told this outlet: "The most painless saving the council can make is to cut the DOLGE charade, because it costs the council about £70,000 a year, and they have failed to come up with any economies."
ENJOYING THIS ARTICLE? HELP US TO PRODUCE MORE
Receive the monthly Byline Times newspaper and help to support fearless, independent journalism that breaks stories, shapes the agenda and holds power to account.
PAY ANNUALLY - £39.50 A YEAR
PAY MONTHLY - £3.75 A MONTH
MORE OPTIONS
We're not funded by a billionaire oligarch or an offshore hedge-fund. We rely on our readers to fund our journalism. If you like what we do, please subscribe.
They claimed that when Kent DOLGE lead councillor Matthew Fraser-Moat presented to the scrutiny committee recently about what the team has done, "the paper presented was basically a rehash of all the claims made by Zia Yusuf and co when they rolled up at County Hall and started lying about our finances."
Asked why they thought DOLGE was asking opposition parties for things to cut, they replied: "I think they're desperate for ideas. We're on the other side of 14 years of austerity and because the fair funding review isn't going to be favourable to Kent County Council that will continue.
"We're not expecting the Government to be more generous than the Conservatives, and Reform have come in expecting to find profligacy in the council which hasn't been the case."
Every directorate of the council has trimmed their budget every year over more than a decade.
"There's no budget to cut at the moment. [Nearly all] the money that we spend is on statutory services that we cannot avoid", they said.
"The scope for reducing the rest of the budget is very small but the valued additional discretionary services include subsidised school bus passes, community wardens, librarie...
Show more...
1 week ago
9 minutes 37 seconds

Byline Times Audio Articles
Michael Gove Lobbied Government Officials to Hand Conservative Donor Multimillion Pound Covid Contract
Support our mission to provide fearless stories about and outside the media system
Packed with exclusive investigations, analysis, and features
SUBSCRIBE TODAY
Michael Gove personally lobbied Government officials to ensure that the award of a multimillion pound Covid testing contract to a Conservative donor and Brexit supporter was "unblocked".
On March 31 2020, one week after the UK entered into the first national lockdown, the then Cabinet Office minister Michael Gove received an email from Toby Baxendale - Director of the covid testing firm Ciga Healthcare.
Baxendale previously donated over £50,000 to the Conservative party, with his wife Catherine donating a further £50,000 and he was also a founding member of the right leaning think-tank the Cobden Centre.
In the email, which was disclosed to Byline Times following a freedom of Information request, Baxendale urged Gove to take action regarding his company's bid to supply antibody tests.
The pro-Brexit businessman was highly critical of the Government's Chief Medical Office, Chris Whitty and Chief Scientist Patrick Vallance, who he described in the email as being "hardened Remainers" who were "closed to any alternative views".
Baxendale pushed for Gove to "act with [his] instincts and take control" of the process, against the perceived wishes of the Government's senior health officials, claiming that by doing so the Conservative minister would "save the nation".
The message appears to have had an effect, given just 48 hours later, Gove then emailed the former Cabinet Secretary Mark Sedwill and other top civil servants working within No.10 on behalf of Baxendale, urging for any delays in the contract award to Ciga to be "unblocked".
Gove's email to Sedwill stated that: "I was contacted by Toby Baxendale, who was encouraged personally by the PM and Matt Hancock to help, and who has sourced 1 million antibody tests from China (with a possible further 1 million in the pipeline).
"He claims to have received resistance from PHE in getting them green lighted. Have all the problems been unblocked? Are we sure we are pursuing every angle on this simultaneously?"
Within a week of Gove's intervention Ciga Healthcare were selected by the UK Government to form a consortium of British based companies contracted by the Department for Health and Social Care (DHSC) to manufacture and develop "a home-grown [antibody] test".
ENJOYING THIS ARTICLE? HELP US TO PRODUCE MORE
Receive the monthly Byline Times newspaper and help to support fearless, independent journalism that breaks stories, shapes the agenda and holds power to account.
PAY ANNUALLY - £39.50 A YEAR
PAY MONTHLY - £3.75 A MONTH
MORE OPTIONS
We're not funded by a billionaire oligarch or an offshore hedge-fund. We rely on our readers to fund our journalism. If you like what we do, please subscribe.
The UK Rapid Test Consortium (UK-RTC) was established around April 8 2020, and comprised Abingdon Health, Oxford University, BBI Solutions, CIGA Healthcare and Omega Diagnostics.
On April 11 the consortium signed an initial six-month Memorandum of Understanding. Not long after the MOU was signed, contract awards began to flow to the group. On the June 1 the UK-RTC landed it's first £10million deal to develop an new anti-body test. This was followed by a much larger £75m deal in August 2025.
The contracts awarded to the consortium were highly controversial, and subject to a legal challenge by the Good Law Project.
During the course of the high court case 'explosive' emails were disclosed that revealed the contracts awarded to the consortium appear to have been funnelled through the fast track "VIP Route". Civil servants were recorded describing the Covid testing programme as "unlegit" and "no way to do business".
Gove is no stranger to the VIP Lane scandal. In March this year, Byline Times revealed how the Cabinet Office misled the public over Michael Gove's involvement with the PPE VIP Lane's biggest winner.
Unispace Global were awarded ...
Show more...
1 week ago
6 minutes 17 seconds

Byline Times Audio Articles
UK Government's 'Failure to Investigate Foreign Interference' Challenged in Europe's Highest Court
Support our mission to provide fearless stories about and outside the media system
Packed with exclusive investigations, analysis, and features
SUBSCRIBE TODAY
Three former MPs are stepping up their claim that the UK Government is failing in its duty to protect elections from foreign interference, in a new case lodged today with the Grand Chamber of the European Court of Human Rights.
The legal challenge from former MPs Caroline Lucas, Ben Bradshaw and Alyn Smith calls for "clear, positive duties to investigate and safeguard foreign influence".
In a statement on the court appeal, non-profit group The Citizens notes the recent conviction of former Wales Reform leader Nathan Gill.
In September, Gill pleaded guilty to eight counts of bribery following a Met Counter Terrorism Command investigation into payments for pro-Russia statements when he was a member of the European Parliament. Reform insiders told Byline Times it is 'inconceivable' that Reform leader Nigel Farage did not know about his close aide's pro-Russian statements.
Last week, Byline Times and The Nerve revealed that in 2021, after leaving Reform, Gill was preparing to give a presentation about the potential role of cryptocurrencies in political funding, for his Russian sponsors.
The appeal to the European Court of Human Rights points out that electoral interference from hostile states threatens member nations as we speak.
EXCLUSIVE
'Thick as Thieves': Nathan Gill and Nigel Farage's Putin Problem
Far from being distant from the Reform UK Leader, insiders told Byline Times that the former MEP convicted of bribery was one of Farage's closest aides, while we reveal how Gill worked on the Kremlin's strategic plan to crush Ukrainian independence with 'Moscow's Man in Ukraine'
Peter Jukes
Interference across Europe
The filing from Caroline Lucas and others states: "There is credible evidence that the Russian Federation interfered in Moldova's elections of 28 September 2025. Alleged Russian interference prompted Romania's Constitutional Court to annul the first round of its presidential election in December 2024, undermining public confidence in democracy and the rule of law."
And it points out that the European Union (separate to the ECHR) has identified that the Russian Federation "has engaged in a systematic, international campaign of media manipulation and distortion of facts…especially during election periods."
It also comes amid allegations of Brits spying for China, with the Prime Minister confirming his intent to publish witness statements from the recent collapsed espionage case (the two individuals deny lawbreaking).
The Grand Chamber is the equivalent of the ECHR's 'Supreme Court' and only hears cases of 'exceptional importance or complexity' and the claim is the final stage of a five-year legal battle that was first launched in 2020.
The Citizens and the MPs are represented by law firm Leigh Day. In 2020, the crowdfunded case was the first time a group of sitting MPs had sued the Government over matters of national security.
Even though all three MPs have now left parliament, they have persevered with the claim and are now appealing to Europe's top human rights court.
The claims asks the court to confirm "a clear, enforceable duty on the UK to investigate credible foreign interference in elections and to adopt proactive safeguards," under Article 3 of Protocol 1 to the European convention on Human Rights - the right to free and fair elections.
The group first challenged the Government in the UK High Court after parliament's Intelligence and Security Committee published the Russia Report citing "credible evidence" of Russian interference. Following that report, then-Prime Minister Boris Johnson refused the demands of MPs on the committee to launch an inquiry.
Among those who provided evidence and urged action was Lord Peter Ricketts, the UK's first ever national security advisor. He said he was "very surprised" the Government had not sought evidence over Russi...
Show more...
1 week ago
15 minutes 15 seconds

Byline Times Audio Articles
The Real Energy Scandal The Media Won't Tell You About
Support our mission to provide fearless stories about and outside the media system
Packed with exclusive investigations, analysis, and features
SUBSCRIBE TODAY
Many British people will be completely unaware of the fact that the UK's national electricity grid was privatised by the Conservatives back in 1990.
Nor are they aware of the scandalous fact that, just like the water industry, the privatised industry has pocketed huge profits, while failing to fulfil its core mission - to build a national grid fit for purpose.
More importantly, they will have no idea how much this is adding to their energy bills.
Last week I was able to highlight this scandal when asked to do so during a combative interview on Talk TV with Ian Collins, about an article in the Telegraph wrongly blaming wind-energy for the high cost of UK electricity, along with the energy analyst Andy Meyer from the Tufton Street-based think-tank, the Institute for Economic Affairs (IEA) who produced the research the article was based on.
To the casual viewer, I was on a British TV station, discussing an article in a British newspaper, about a report by a British think-tank about the cost impacts of Britain's wind industry on Britain's national grid.
The reality was somewhat different, however.
In truth I was being interviewed on a US-Australian billionaire owned TALK TV station. whose owner, Rupert Murdoch, has been accused of using his global media empire to oppose climate action.
The news report itself was in The Telegraph, which is set to be soon jointly owned by US billionaire hedge funds and the Abu-Dhabi petro-dictatorship. It too is also notorious for endlessly attacking every aspect of climate and nature protection.
The IEA "think tank" under discussion has also previously been exposed as having received donations from multi-billion-dollar global oil corporations, while constantly producing "reports" attacking climate action.
Meanwhile, the National Grid itself is a privatised corporation partly-owned also by the Abu Dhabi petro-dictatorship and US billionaire owned hedge funds.
Thus while it may have looked like I was doing a simple interview, I was in reality wading through layer upon layer of a billionaire owned industrial-media complex whose own interests align with sabotaging Britain's transition to the clean energy economy.
EXCLUSIVE
Inside Epstein's Russian Tech Web: How Oligarch Cash and Three Women Connected Moscow to Silicon Valley
Leaked records obtained by Byline Times reveal how Kremlin-linked investors used Epstein's network to channel oligarch money into Silicon Valley
Matt Bernardini
However, despite this, I was still able to highlight the above-mentioned national grid scandal.
In 2025 the annual Underlying Operating Profit for the National Grid plc was £5.36 billion. This was paid for by consumers energy bills, costing each household £187.
It could therefore add up to a staggering £53.6 billion over a decade. Yet despite pocketing these huge profits, it has failed in its core mission: building and maintaining a fully functioning grid.
In 2023 the BBC estimated that there was about £200 billion in clean energy projects awaiting connection to the national grid, with the longest waiting times in Europe to be connected.
Some projects were listed as taking up to 15 years to get connected, as the grid did not have the capacity for them.
And in addition to lack of capacity for new projects, the national grid also cannot cope with current levels of cheap green energy output when it is abundant on especially windy days.
These failures by the national grid add another two layers of costs onto bills.
As new renewables have for a number of years now, been far cheaper than fossil fuels, it means that the grid had to pay out billions of pounds more for expensive gas electricity, when it could have been taking advantage of the cheaper green electricity projects waiting for connection.
Secondly, consumers are having to pay for constraint payments to wind-ene...
Show more...
1 week ago
8 minutes 44 seconds

Byline Times Audio Articles
Two Major Ukrainian Cities Lose Power Overnight as Russian Infrastructure Attacks Grow More Effective
Support our mission to provide fearless stories about and outside the media system
Packed with exclusive investigations, analysis, and features
SUBSCRIBE TODAY
Russian forces renewed their campaign to knock Ukraine's interior lights out on Monday, striking at the heart of civilian life in the northern city of Chernihiv and the eastern hub of Kharkiv with guided aerial bombs aimed at combined heat and power (CHP) plants.
The blasts caused partial power outages in both cities, underscoring Moscow's evolving strategy of crippling the country's energy grid as temperatures across Ukraine begin to drop.
In Chernihiv, a northern region already reeling from months of intermittent strikes and shelling, power was lost completely in the early hours of the morning, causing a city-wide blackout. According to the Ministry of Energy of Ukraine, it has been unable to carry out necessary repairs on Tuesday morning as Russian long-range loitering drones "continuously circle over the damaged facilities, making repair work impossible and deliberately prolonging the humanitarian crisis."
City officials have urged residents to stock up on water while critical infrastructure has been switched to generator power. Officials in Kyiv have reported that Slavutych, a Chernihiv region city built to house workers after the 1986 Chernobyl disaster, also suffered power outages as a result of the strike.
Earlier this month, the Chernobyl Nuclear Power Plant experienced an energy blackout lasting several hours after a power substation in Slavutych was hit in a Russian attack, leaving the New Safe Confinement facility, which isolates the destroyed fourth power unit of the decommissioned plant, without power. At the time, Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy accused Moscow of attempting to create the risk of a nuclear incident, writing on Telegram: "The Russians could not have been unaware that a strike on facilities in Slavutych would have such consequences for Chornobyl."
'A Serious Escalation': Putin Launches Russia's Largest Aerial Assault on Ukraine Since 2022
Russian aggression against Ukraine continues to escalate, despite Putin's pretence at seeking peace, reports Zarina Zabrisky
Zarina Zabrisky
Meanwhile, in the northeast of Ukraine, the city administration of Kharkiv announced emergency power outages will come into effect after Russian forces launched six guided aerial bombs at the city, primarily targeting an industrial region of the city. Local officials in Kharkiv reported that the most recent attack used updated guided aerial bombs, capable of longer glide ranges, while last week the city of Lozova in the Kharkiv region was hit with a new rocket-powered guided aerial bomb.
What distinguishes this cycle of attacks from previous winter campaigns is the precision, persistence, and focus. Earlier in the war, Russia's air campaigns often struck multiple sectors simultaneously; energy, transport, military targets, and civilian zones in broad-brush assaults. This year, as the cold season begins in Ukraine, analysts say Moscow's tactics show a sharp evolution. Instead of broad waves of simultaneous attacks on many targets across the country, Moscow appears to be concentrating its firepower on critical facilities, repeating strikes until a target is destroyed. In doing so, it exploits the strain on Ukraine's air-defence umbrella, which, after more than three years of war, is stretched thinner and struggling to keep up.
The result is fewer dispersion opportunities for Ukraine's air-defence forces, who are already managing rising demands on radar, missiles, and interceptor assets. Technological advancements like ballistic missiles that can shift from their expected trajectory or cruise missiles which can release flares shortly before impact are also making strikes more difficult to prevent. For Ukraine, this presents a difficult challenge. With air-defence resources stretched, each guided aerial bomb, each hit on a CHP plant or sub-station, has long-last...
Show more...
1 week ago
7 minutes 55 seconds

Byline Times Audio Articles
The latest articles from Byline Times converted to audio for easy listening