When a deceased-donor offer arrives, the on-call surgeon rapidly weighs donor organ quality, recipient need, and logistics within OPTN/UNOS policy. For kidneys, decisions hinge on KDPI, creatinine/AKI course, machine-pump metrics, procurement biopsy (e.g., glomerulosclerosis/arteriosclerosis), HLA antibodies/virtual or physical crossmatch, and the patient’s wait time/sensitization; kidneys tolerate longer cold ischemia and can be deferred a few hours if needed. For livers, the focus is MELD/urgency, donor stability (pressors/arrest), DCD status and warm ischemia, steatosis by appearance/biopsy, extreme transaminases, size match, and the ability to transplant quickly (short cold time ± normothermic perfusion), with far less emphasis on HLA. Logistics—distance/transport mode, OR and team readiness, projected cold ischemia, and availability of perfusion—can tip the balance for either organ. Donor infections (e.g., HCV NAT+) are acceptable with informed consent and modern antivirals; ABO compatibility is mandatory (liver ABO-incompatible only in rare emergencies). UNOS DonorNet, offer filters, image/biopsy sharing, and emerging AI triage tools streamline evaluation, while center-specific protocols and national metrics encourage timely, appropriate acceptance rather than reflexive decline. Ethically, surgeons balance utility and equity—accepting enough risk to save the right patient now without wasting scarce grafts—recognizing that kidney transplantation is comparatively elective in timing, whereas liver transplantation is often urgent and less forgiving of delay.