Interview with UltimatDJz - The State of STFC

https://is1-ssl.mzstatic.com/image/thumb/Podcasts115/v4/ab/1a/d1/ab1ad18e-b3fc-c465-2544-4a05f13a39d8/mza_7053363764544737622.jpg/600x600bb.jpg

Trek Talk with Tech and Kirk

Techman16

120 episodes

5 days ago

Techman16 and StrangeKirk, along with fellow guests talk about various topics revolving around Star Trek, the Star Trek Fleet Command mobile game, and conduct various interviews with players.

Science Fiction

Fiction

RSS

All content for Trek Talk with Tech and Kirk is the property of Techman16 and is served directly from their servers with no modification, redirects, or rehosting. The podcast is not affiliated with or endorsed by Podjoint in any way.

Techman16 and StrangeKirk, along with fellow guests talk about various topics revolving around Star Trek, the Star Trek Fleet Command mobile game, and conduct various interviews with players.

Science Fiction

Fiction

https://d3t3ozftmdmh3i.cloudfront.net/production/podcast_uploaded_nologo/14659727/14659727-1619111561740-13d0724a2cd27.jpg

Interview with UltimatDJz - The State of STFC

Trek Talk with Tech and Kirk

54 minutes 31 seconds

3 years ago

Interview with UltimatDJz - The State of STFC

Hosts: StrangeKirk, Handy
Guests: UltimateDJz (15), DragonKeeper (52), JimmJones, Trojan, Sloterer, SARRescueRanger, DonaldTrump (34), Stratalorian(9), MadamStarGazer (66)

List of notable things:
0:00 - DJz interview starts, and he is aggravated about the game!
2:26 - Monetizing content is ok, for example the Dukat officer purchase model.
5:06 - Frustrations with the time now required from the game to stay on par (grinding).
15:56 - DJz thinks people would riot if Scopely didn't release new content one month. I think if Scopely said they were going to address a list of meaningful bugs we've all been complaining about, as well as address some gameplay improvements we've been clamoring for, not only would we not riot we would throw Scopely a fucking party! There are a lot of players that would like to put more money into their bases or ships as well, and never can because they're all but forced to invest in whatever the latest content is. A gap month would not cause Scopely any undue fiscal or "social contract" harm IF they were upfront about what they wanted to address and those things are items that players care about. /rant
18:40 - How about we look at long existing events and loot tables!!!
27:24 - Ty'Gokor is a bug, it was never meant to be the way it is.
29:31 - Scopely ignores too many things for too long. And speaking of, if Scopely encouraged us to not save up forever, we'd spend what we've held onto and probably buy more packs as well. And if there wasn't an Arc, instead put up older content items and let people buy those. Or to encourage spending boost station and ship packs with an extra 10% mats that month. People will buy, and you're not breaking the bank on that it's a small boost that will buy them the time to do game improvements that people will truly appreciate, while still making their money that they want to make.
36:30 - Simplify things by, for example, allowing the new content to satisfy faction dailies. You're destroying another faction! Consolidate these grinds, which doesn't really encourage spending anyways.
41:35 - Scopely needs to listen a little more to the people that are tied into the player base.
43:25 - Questions and Answers with DJz from the audience (listen up, there's some fun questions in here).

And remember...spread the hate!

Visit Trek Talk Discord: https://discord.gg/MKZZhK7CSA for more related Star Trek related content, and to interact with a greater Star Trek Fleet Command community.

#STFC #StarTrek #StarTrekFleetCommand #TrekTalkwithTechandKirk