Home
Categories
EXPLORE
True Crime
Comedy
Business
Society & Culture
Health & Fitness
Sports
Technology
About Us
Contact Us
Copyright
© 2024 PodJoint
00:00 / 00:00
Podjoint Logo
US
Sign in

or

Don't have an account?
Sign up
Forgot password
https://is1-ssl.mzstatic.com/image/thumb/Podcasts125/v4/34/48/1a/34481a7b-0cf4-cd84-7831-2adec1884ff3/mza_3785196379776457853.jpg/600x600bb.jpg
The Public Philosopher
BBC Radio 4
17 episodes
9 months ago

Harvard political philosopher Michael Sandel examines the thinking behind a current controversy.

Show more...
Government
RSS
All content for The Public Philosopher is the property of BBC Radio 4 and is served directly from their servers with no modification, redirects, or rehosting. The podcast is not affiliated with or endorsed by Podjoint in any way.

Harvard political philosopher Michael Sandel examines the thinking behind a current controversy.

Show more...
Government
https://is1-ssl.mzstatic.com/image/thumb/Podcasts125/v4/34/48/1a/34481a7b-0cf4-cd84-7831-2adec1884ff3/mza_3785196379776457853.jpg/600x600bb.jpg
The Global Philosopher: Should Borders Matter?
The Public Philosopher
41 minutes
9 years ago
The Global Philosopher: Should Borders Matter?

Michael Sandel explores the philosophical justifications made for national borders. Using a pioneering state-of-the-art studio at the Harvard Business School, Professor Sandel is joined by 60 participants from over 30 countries in a truly global digital space.

Is there any moral distinction between a political refugee and an economic migrant? If people have the right to exit a country, why not a right to enter? Do nations have the right to protect the affluence of their citizens? And is there such a thing as a 'national identity'?

These are just some of the questions addressed by Professor Sandel in this first edition of The Global Philosopher.

Audience producer: Louise Coletta Producer: David Edmonds Editor: Richard Knight

(Image taken by Rose Lincoln)

The Public Philosopher

Harvard political philosopher Michael Sandel examines the thinking behind a current controversy.