Home
Categories
EXPLORE
True Crime
Comedy
Society & Culture
Business
Sports
Technology
Health & Fitness
About Us
Contact Us
Copyright
© 2024 PodJoint
Podjoint Logo
US
00:00 / 00:00
Sign in

or

Don't have an account?
Sign up
Forgot password
https://is1-ssl.mzstatic.com/image/thumb/Podcasts125/v4/34/48/1a/34481a7b-0cf4-cd84-7831-2adec1884ff3/mza_3785196379776457853.jpg/600x600bb.jpg
The Public Philosopher
BBC Radio 4
17 episodes
9 months ago

Harvard political philosopher Michael Sandel examines the thinking behind a current controversy.

Show more...
Government
RSS
All content for The Public Philosopher is the property of BBC Radio 4 and is served directly from their servers with no modification, redirects, or rehosting. The podcast is not affiliated with or endorsed by Podjoint in any way.

Harvard political philosopher Michael Sandel examines the thinking behind a current controversy.

Show more...
Government
https://is1-ssl.mzstatic.com/image/thumb/Podcasts125/v4/34/48/1a/34481a7b-0cf4-cd84-7831-2adec1884ff3/mza_3785196379776457853.jpg/600x600bb.jpg
Global Philosopher: Should there be any limits to free speech?
The Public Philosopher
41 minutes
7 years ago
Global Philosopher: Should there be any limits to free speech?

Sixty people from around the world join Professor Michael Sandel in a digital studio at Harvard to discuss free speech. Free speech is a cornerstone of democracy and freedom of expression is regarded as a fundamental human right. But even in democracies there are disputes about the limits to free speech. And most countries have laws restricting free speech, such as libel laws, or laws controlling forms of pornography. But should limits be placed on free speech? Should people be allowed to say and write whatever they like, even if it is untrue and is deeply offensive to vulnerable individuals or groups? Professor Sandel unpicks the philosophy of free speech.

Audience producer: Louise Coletta Producer: David Edmonds Executive Producer: Emma Rippon

The Public Philosopher

Harvard political philosopher Michael Sandel examines the thinking behind a current controversy.