Ethiopia's Potemkin Party or PP's expansionist ambitions regarding access to the Red Sea

These claims are a direct threat to Eritrea's sovereignty.

Ethiopia's PP rhetoric, are "delusional" and based on historical fallacies, population statistics, and a sense of entitlement rather than international law.

Eritrea's independence and borders are firmly established through self-determination and international agreements, making its coastline non-negotiable. The sources highlight the historical context of past conflicts fueled by Ethiopia's pursuit of sea access, emphasizing the devastating human and economic costs, and reject the idea that being landlocked constitutes a "historical injustice" that permits overriding another nation's sovereignty. Ultimately, the texts assert that diplomacy and trade, not coercion or historical myths, are the appropriate means to address logistical challenges, and firmly state that Eritrea's Red Sea access is not for rent or subject to external redefinition.