All content for The Naturocrit Podcast is the property of Rob Cullen and is served directly from their servers
with no modification, redirects, or rehosting. The podcast is not affiliated with or endorsed by Podjoint in any way.
Critical analysis of naturopathy from the point of view of scientific skepticism.
In this multi-part Naturocrit Podcast Episode 015, aka s02e05, titled “The JACM 2019 Special Issue on Naturopathy”, aka SIN, I’ll be primarily looking at a collection -- as published in the Journal of Alternative and Complementary Medicine and sponsored by the University of Technology Sydney, Australia -- of around 15 articles specifically about naturopathy from contributors largely located in Australia and North America.
---In this final third of Episode 015 Part 1, I continue a traipse concerning 'fake integration' versus 'true integration' particularly as relates to hacking and ignoring evidence as seen through naturopathy’s knowledge-type coining, fake labeling, camouflaging, and recalcitrance. Here, an Australian ND's [surprising] advice to embrace critical thinking, an example American naturopathy oncology IM practice and its denials of quackery while endorsing homeopathy and kind, and then criticisms from Steven Salzberg at forbes.com and Britt Marie Hermes at seti.org.
The Naturocrit Podcast
Critical analysis of naturopathy from the point of view of scientific skepticism.