Home
Categories
EXPLORE
True Crime
Comedy
Society & Culture
Business
Technology
Health & Fitness
Sports
About Us
Contact Us
Copyright
© 2024 PodJoint
Loading...
0:00 / 0:00
Podjoint Logo
US
Sign in

or

Don't have an account?
Sign up
Forgot password
https://is1-ssl.mzstatic.com/image/thumb/Podcasts114/v4/76/56/b5/7656b5f6-5932-43c5-ad62-747f64639f5d/mza_17898629207236249167.jpg/600x600bb.jpg
The Litigation Psychology Podcast
litpsych
279 episodes
1 week ago
Show more...
Social Sciences
Business,
Science
RSS
All content for The Litigation Psychology Podcast is the property of litpsych and is served directly from their servers with no modification, redirects, or rehosting. The podcast is not affiliated with or endorsed by Podjoint in any way.
Show more...
Social Sciences
Business,
Science
https://is1-ssl.mzstatic.com/image/thumb/Podcasts114/v4/76/56/b5/7656b5f6-5932-43c5-ad62-747f64639f5d/mza_17898629207236249167.jpg/600x600bb.jpg
The Litigation Psychology Podcast - Episode 280 - Frequency and Dilution Errors in Opening Statements
The Litigation Psychology Podcast
33 minutes
1 week ago
The Litigation Psychology Podcast - Episode 280 - Frequency and Dilution Errors in Opening Statements
Bill Kanasky, Jr., Ph.D. breaks down two critical mistakes attorneys make in opening statements: dilution of their message and their communication frequency. Frequency refers to the attorney’s delivery dynamics - energy level, confidence, rhythm, and emotional tone - that either engages jurors or turns them off. Common problems with communication frequency include defensiveness, nervousness, over-talking, and coming across as if trying to sell something to the jury rather than telling them a compelling story. Dilution occurs when attorneys talk too long, over-explain, or defend unnecessarily, which weakens the message and causes jurors to tune out. Bill explains why less is more and that potency comes from repetition, silence, and reframing the narrative right from the start. He urges attorneys to avoid “dead zones” in the middle of openings, stay high-level (“in the clouds, not the weeds”), and let witnesses handle details later. Finally, Bill highlights the value and importance of testing openings with focus groups to gather feedback from mock jurors to help guide and fine-tune delivery, frequency, and clarity before trial.
The Litigation Psychology Podcast