This research paper examines the impact of an artificial intelligence tool for materials discovery on the productivity and performance of scientists working in a large U.S. firm's R&D lab. The study exploits a randomized rollout of the AI tool across teams of scientists, allowing the researchers to draw causal inferences about the effects of the technology. The paper demonstrates that the AI tool significantly increases the rate of materials discovery, patent filings, and product innovation, but these benefits are unequally distributed among scientists. The researchers find that the AI tool is most beneficial to scientists with strong judgment skills, which involve the ability to evaluate and prioritize AI-generated candidate compounds. The study also reveals that the AI tool automates a significant portion of idea generation tasks, resulting in a reallocation of scientist labor towards judgment tasks. This reallocation, along with the increased demand for judgment skills, explains the heterogeneous impact of the AI tool on scientific performance.
All content for The Daily ML is the property of The Daily ML and is served directly from their servers
with no modification, redirects, or rehosting. The podcast is not affiliated with or endorsed by Podjoint in any way.
This research paper examines the impact of an artificial intelligence tool for materials discovery on the productivity and performance of scientists working in a large U.S. firm's R&D lab. The study exploits a randomized rollout of the AI tool across teams of scientists, allowing the researchers to draw causal inferences about the effects of the technology. The paper demonstrates that the AI tool significantly increases the rate of materials discovery, patent filings, and product innovation, but these benefits are unequally distributed among scientists. The researchers find that the AI tool is most beneficial to scientists with strong judgment skills, which involve the ability to evaluate and prioritize AI-generated candidate compounds. The study also reveals that the AI tool automates a significant portion of idea generation tasks, resulting in a reallocation of scientist labor towards judgment tasks. This reallocation, along with the increased demand for judgment skills, explains the heterogeneous impact of the AI tool on scientific performance.
Ep45. Multi-expert Prompting Improves Reliability, Safety and Usefulness of Large Language Models
The Daily ML
11 minutes 30 seconds
11 months ago
Ep45. Multi-expert Prompting Improves Reliability, Safety and Usefulness of Large Language Models
This paper describes a novel method called Multi-expert Prompting that aims to improve the reliability, safety, and usefulness of large language models (LLMs). The method simulates multiple experts with different areas of expertise and aggregates their responses to a query, ultimately selecting the best answer based on criteria like truthfulness, factuality, and informativeness. This process is inspired by the Nominal Group Technique, a human-designed decision-making framework. The authors demonstrate that Multi-expert Prompting significantly outperforms existing prompting methods, especially in scenarios where diverse perspectives are valuable, and surpasses prior methods on various benchmarks. The paper also discusses ethical considerations related to the potential for bias amplification and explores ways to mitigate these risks.
The Daily ML
This research paper examines the impact of an artificial intelligence tool for materials discovery on the productivity and performance of scientists working in a large U.S. firm's R&D lab. The study exploits a randomized rollout of the AI tool across teams of scientists, allowing the researchers to draw causal inferences about the effects of the technology. The paper demonstrates that the AI tool significantly increases the rate of materials discovery, patent filings, and product innovation, but these benefits are unequally distributed among scientists. The researchers find that the AI tool is most beneficial to scientists with strong judgment skills, which involve the ability to evaluate and prioritize AI-generated candidate compounds. The study also reveals that the AI tool automates a significant portion of idea generation tasks, resulting in a reallocation of scientist labor towards judgment tasks. This reallocation, along with the increased demand for judgment skills, explains the heterogeneous impact of the AI tool on scientific performance.
