Continuing on with The Gospel Reliability Audio-Blog series, I examine the case against miracles. Are miracles really impossible? Or if they're possible, can they never be evidentially established? This is what the 18th century Scottish philosopher David Hume argued. In this episode of The Cerebral Faith Podcast, I will be giving my refutations of Hume, showing that miracles are both possible and are capable of being established as long as the evidence is good enough. While miracles have a somewhat low antecedent probability in isolation, that antecedent probability is not so low that a posteriori evidence cannot overcome it. This is important because in the next episode, I will be arguing for the historicity of Jesus' resurrection.

To see the blog post, click here --> https://cerebralfaith.net/the-case-for-the-reliability-of-the-gospels-part-8-can-we-really-believe-in-miracles/