Home
Categories
EXPLORE
True Crime
Comedy
Society & Culture
Business
Sports
History
News
About Us
Contact Us
Copyright
© 2024 PodJoint
00:00 / 00:00
Sign in

or

Don't have an account?
Sign up
Forgot password
https://is1-ssl.mzstatic.com/image/thumb/Podcasts126/v4/3b/92/d7/3b92d705-1783-0769-2755-757cfd206cab/mza_9991389940285522271.jpg/600x600bb.jpg
The Andrew W. Marshall Papers™
Andrew W. Marshall Foundation
5 episodes
1 day ago
Papers published by the Andrew W. Marshall Foundation.
Show more...
Social Sciences
Science
RSS
All content for The Andrew W. Marshall Papers™ is the property of Andrew W. Marshall Foundation and is served directly from their servers with no modification, redirects, or rehosting. The podcast is not affiliated with or endorsed by Podjoint in any way.
Papers published by the Andrew W. Marshall Foundation.
Show more...
Social Sciences
Science
https://d3t3ozftmdmh3i.cloudfront.net/production/podcast_uploaded_nologo/37011603/37011603-1679577627439-4360e12d54f7c.jpg
America's Reactive Foreign Policy
The Andrew W. Marshall Papers™
1 hour 8 minutes 45 seconds
1 year ago
America's Reactive Foreign Policy

Written by Elliot M. Seckler and Travis Zahnow

Narrated by Patrick Kirchner


Winner of the 2022 Andrew W. Marshall Paper Prize on The Role of Organizational Behavior in Competition

This paper critiques the U.S. foreign policy community’s approach to strategic competition with China and raises a crucial question: Is the U.S. government basing strategic competition with China on U.S. interests, or is it reacting in ways that advance the strategic goals of the Chinese Communist Party (CCP)?

This paper argues that, because of its organizational culture, the U.S. foreign policy community approaches strategic competition in ways that disadvantage the United States. Through an analysis of the political, military, economic, and psychological condition of U.S. foreign policy, this paper posits that the United States has formed a reactive strategy toward China that leaves it vulnerable to China’s own competitive strategies. Through exploring historical examples and contemporary issues such as Taiwan and integrated deterrence, an underlying pattern emerges. Because it has ill-defined objectives and definitions of success, brought about largely by organizational factors, the United States is developing a reactionary foreign policy that is susceptible to CCP strategies, interests, and advantages. While this paper does not provide a definitive answer, it diagnoses American susceptibility to Chinese strategic manipulation and highlights the need for the United States to develop a more proactive and well-defined strategy to counter China’s competitive strategies effectively.

Read the Paper

The Andrew W. Marshall Papers™
Papers published by the Andrew W. Marshall Foundation.