Notebook LM review of a July 2025 Supreme Court opinion in the case of Diamond Alternative Energy, LLC, et al. v. Environmental Protection Agency, et al., along with two dissenting opinions. The central issue discussed is whether fuel producers have Article III standing to challenge the Environmental Protection Agency's (EPA) approval of California regulations. These regulations mandate that automakers manufacture more electric vehicles and fewer gasoline-powered vehicles, impacting the demand for liquid fuels. The Court ultimately reversed the lower court's decision, concluding that the fuel producers do have standing based on monetary injury, causation, and redressability, and remanded the case for a decision on the merits.