Home
Categories
EXPLORE
True Crime
Comedy
Society & Culture
Business
Sports
Technology
Health & Fitness
About Us
Contact Us
Copyright
© 2024 PodJoint
00:00 / 00:00
Podjoint Logo
US
Sign in

or

Don't have an account?
Sign up
Forgot password
https://is1-ssl.mzstatic.com/image/thumb/Podcasts115/v4/d1/31/17/d131171b-4964-7888-e91b-56aa1ac8c979/mza_15699604858467724354.jpg/600x600bb.jpg
Road to Open Science (R2OS)
Open Science Community Utrecht
6 episodes
7 months ago
In the 4th and last part of the OS4P mini-series, Erik van Sebille shares his experience with academic activism and proposes some practical advice on finding the right balance between preserving trust in science and taking a stance on socially-urgent issues based on scientific findings.
Show more...
Science
RSS
All content for Road to Open Science (R2OS) is the property of Open Science Community Utrecht and is served directly from their servers with no modification, redirects, or rehosting. The podcast is not affiliated with or endorsed by Podjoint in any way.
In the 4th and last part of the OS4P mini-series, Erik van Sebille shares his experience with academic activism and proposes some practical advice on finding the right balance between preserving trust in science and taking a stance on socially-urgent issues based on scientific findings.
Show more...
Science
https://i1.sndcdn.com/artworks-DnLdbv9FO2yzAXRs-bGnDEQ-t3000x3000.jpg
OS4P part 3, A Critical Look
Road to Open Science (R2OS)
30 minutes 21 seconds
1 year ago
OS4P part 3, A Critical Look
How do we know if Open Science practices can make science more reproducible? In the part 3 of this mini-series, we talk with Inge Stegeman nuero-otologist and associate professor at UMC Utrecht about her research plan to check on the claims of the open science advocates using empirical data and randomized controlled trials.
Road to Open Science (R2OS)
In the 4th and last part of the OS4P mini-series, Erik van Sebille shares his experience with academic activism and proposes some practical advice on finding the right balance between preserving trust in science and taking a stance on socially-urgent issues based on scientific findings.