Home
Categories
EXPLORE
True Crime
Comedy
Society & Culture
Business
Sports
History
Music
About Us
Contact Us
Copyright
© 2024 PodJoint
00:00 / 00:00
Sign in

or

Don't have an account?
Sign up
Forgot password
https://is1-ssl.mzstatic.com/image/thumb/Podcasts116/v4/e9/46/1b/e9461b5b-21e6-b7ef-f722-2965258d4caa/mza_14945636862357042797.jpg/600x600bb.jpg
Reviewer 2 does geoengineering
Andrew Lockley
219 episodes
5 days ago
Reviewer 2 quibbles with actual experts in Solar Radiation Modification and Carbon Dioxide Removal, before rejecting their work on spurious, spiteful and capricious grounds. You'd expect nothing less from R2.
Show more...
Technology
RSS
All content for Reviewer 2 does geoengineering is the property of Andrew Lockley and is served directly from their servers with no modification, redirects, or rehosting. The podcast is not affiliated with or endorsed by Podjoint in any way.
Reviewer 2 quibbles with actual experts in Solar Radiation Modification and Carbon Dioxide Removal, before rejecting their work on spurious, spiteful and capricious grounds. You'd expect nothing less from R2.
Show more...
Technology
https://d3t3ozftmdmh3i.cloudfront.net/production/podcast_uploaded_nologo/8385484/8385484-1644436279296-bd6cad2241991.jpg
SRM's socioeconomic cost - Bronsther & Xu
Reviewer 2 does geoengineering
58 minutes 23 seconds
2 months ago
SRM's socioeconomic cost - Bronsther & Xu

Jacob Bronsther & Yangyang Xu discuss their recent paper on the socioeconomic costs of Solar Radiation Modification. While SRM’s direct technical costs appear modest (~$18B/°C cooling), the authors argue that its broader costs are far greater. They estimate that Stratospheric Aerosol Injection could generate between $0 and $809 billion annually in side-effect harms, with potentially higher figures for Marine Cloud Brightening.


The conversation also explores SRM’s reliance on unprecedented global cooperation, the political risks of weather accountability, and the dangers of termination, which could impose major financial costs. They contrast these challenges with large-scale Carbon Dioxide Removal, noting that although CDR entails immense technical expenses, it avoids some of SRM’s political and termination risks.


The discussion highlights the complexity of weighing the full spectrum of costs and benefits when evaluating climate-engineering strategies.


Paper: Bronsther, J., & Xu, Y. (2025). The social costs of solar radiation management. npj Climate Action, 4(1), 69. https://doi.org/10.1038/s44168-025-00273-y


Reviewer 2 does geoengineering
Reviewer 2 quibbles with actual experts in Solar Radiation Modification and Carbon Dioxide Removal, before rejecting their work on spurious, spiteful and capricious grounds. You'd expect nothing less from R2.