Rad N Bad drops a tactical nuke on the ABA industry's most toxic and manipulative legal tools: non-compete and non-solicitation clauses.

Hosts Sean Yocum and Michael Carrero call out the corporate rulebook, arguing that these contracts are not about protecting proprietary secrets—they're instruments of aversive control used to weaponize the labor market, restrict client choice, and hold practitioners hostage.

Using the lens of behavior analysis, this episode dismantles the legal "scarecrows" that rely on fear to manage a young labor pool. Is your company's mission statement client-centered, or does its contract signal that your primary function is to simply generate revenue? We argue that loyalty is earned through high-rate positive reinforcement, not imposed by legal threats.

If your agency relies on forcing compliance over fostering competence, you're building a system on quicksand. Demand better.

Hot Takes Include:

• Why non-competes create a business-centered agenda that is mutually exclusive to a clinician-centered workforce.

• The science of loyalty: Why legal threats foster avoidance behavior instead of ethical commitment.

• The ethical failure of prioritizing revenue over a client's right to their preferred, effective provider (a known generalized conditioned reinforcer).

If this fires you up, buckle up. We're here to unmask the whole thing.