Summary
In this episode, the hosts discuss the different types of rejections that can be issued by the Patent Office when filing a patent application. They focus on 102 rejections, which are based on prior art, and 103 rejections, which are based on obviousness. They explain the timing of responding to rejections and the options for overcoming them, including amending the claims and making arguments based on the prior art. They also highlight the importance of carefully considering the prosecution history and avoiding creating a messy trail. Overall, they provide a helpful overview of the process of responding to rejections. The content of this podcast should not be interpreted as legal advice. All thoughts and opinions expressed herein are only those from which they came.
Takeaways
The Patent Office can issue various rejections when filing a patent application.
102 rejections are based on prior art, while 103 rejections are based on obviousness.
When responding to rejections, it is important to carefully review the references cited and consider amending the claims.
Arguments based on the prior art should be supported by evidence and should be carefully considered to avoid creating a messy prosecution history.
The timing of responding to rejections is typically three months, with the possibility of extensions.
Chapters
00:00 Introduction and Overview
03:20 Types of Rejections
10:50 Timing of Responding to Rejections
15:04 Responding to 102 Rejections
29:27 Avoiding a Messy Prosecution History
35:06 Conclusion
