Home
Categories
EXPLORE
True Crime
Comedy
Society & Culture
Business
Sports
History
Fiction
About Us
Contact Us
Copyright
© 2024 PodJoint
00:00 / 00:00
Sign in

or

Don't have an account?
Sign up
Forgot password
https://is1-ssl.mzstatic.com/image/thumb/Podcasts125/v4/0e/f9/d6/0ef9d68f-ad7b-ea62-e052-e59ab64611b7/mza_9044313343618449563.jpg/600x600bb.jpg
Oxford Transitional Justice Research (OTJR) conference podcasts
Oxford University
48 episodes
7 months ago
A panel discussion among an academic, a company representative and practitioners, held on 21 June 2016, hosted by the Oxford Business and Human Rights Research Network and the Business and Human Rights Resource Centre. How can business support or hinder the process of peace-building after armed conflict? This panel discussion looks at the role of the private sector in countries emerging from conflict. An academic, a company representative and practitioners engage with questions of corporate complicity and accountability in transitional justice settings, as well as the way in which companies may contribute positively to creating peace. Panellists: Professor Sabine Michalowski, University of Essex, School of Law Irene Pietropaoli, Business and Human Rights consultant at Amnesty International in Myanmar Jo Zaremba, Livelihoods Officer at the UN High Commissioner for Refugees Yves Nissim, Vice-President, Head of Transformation and Operation in CSR at Orange Moderated by Maximilian Spohr, Max Planck Foundation for International Peace and the Rule of Law In this blog, organisers Anneloes Hoff (Oxford Business and Human Rights Research Network) and Isabel Ebert (Business and Human Rights Resource Centre) reflect on the issues discussed by the panel. https://business-humanrights.org/en/business-and-human-rights-in-transition-from-conflict-to-peace
Show more...
Education
RSS
All content for Oxford Transitional Justice Research (OTJR) conference podcasts is the property of Oxford University and is served directly from their servers with no modification, redirects, or rehosting. The podcast is not affiliated with or endorsed by Podjoint in any way.
A panel discussion among an academic, a company representative and practitioners, held on 21 June 2016, hosted by the Oxford Business and Human Rights Research Network and the Business and Human Rights Resource Centre. How can business support or hinder the process of peace-building after armed conflict? This panel discussion looks at the role of the private sector in countries emerging from conflict. An academic, a company representative and practitioners engage with questions of corporate complicity and accountability in transitional justice settings, as well as the way in which companies may contribute positively to creating peace. Panellists: Professor Sabine Michalowski, University of Essex, School of Law Irene Pietropaoli, Business and Human Rights consultant at Amnesty International in Myanmar Jo Zaremba, Livelihoods Officer at the UN High Commissioner for Refugees Yves Nissim, Vice-President, Head of Transformation and Operation in CSR at Orange Moderated by Maximilian Spohr, Max Planck Foundation for International Peace and the Rule of Law In this blog, organisers Anneloes Hoff (Oxford Business and Human Rights Research Network) and Isabel Ebert (Business and Human Rights Resource Centre) reflect on the issues discussed by the panel. https://business-humanrights.org/en/business-and-human-rights-in-transition-from-conflict-to-peace
Show more...
Education
https://is1-ssl.mzstatic.com/image/thumb/Podcasts125/v4/0e/f9/d6/0ef9d68f-ad7b-ea62-e052-e59ab64611b7/mza_9044313343618449563.jpg/600x600bb.jpg
Media and the Search for Criminal Evidence: Learning from the (non-) cooperation between journalists and international criminal tribunals
Oxford Transitional Justice Research (OTJR) conference podcasts
1 hour 27 minutes
9 years ago
Media and the Search for Criminal Evidence: Learning from the (non-) cooperation between journalists and international criminal tribunals
Second panel in the Innovative Media for Change in Transitional Justice conference, A Debate between Journalists, Academics and Practitioners on Transitional Justice, Media and Conflict held on 22-23 June 2015. It is well known that open sources and in particular journalistic sources can play a key role in providing information on the commission of international crimes and as such are relevant to the work of International Criminal Tribunals (ICTs). When it comes to gathering and disclosing information, however, the relationship between media and ICTs becomes complicated: On the one hand, investigators and prosecutors may need open sources and journalistic information to build their cases; material gathered by people in the field might perform an essential function in this respect. At the same time, they are faced with stringent legal requirements that apply to evidence and procedure. On the other hand, journalists are often the first and sometimes the only professionals who witness and record events that are relevant for criminal investigations and prosecutions. However, in the performance of their tasks, they are bound by their own professional obligations – which do not necessarily reflect the interest of law enforcement agencies – and may be faced with various dilemmas when asked to provide information to ICTs or evidence as expert witnesses. In short, the cooperation between media and ICTs is often times fraught with tensions and ambiguities. The panel will use this insight as a starting point to explore the following questions: What are the concerns and expectations of both sides in terms of information gathering and sharing? What are ways of creating a constructive debate between both sides? What principles can be established to ensure a fruitful cooperation? Against this backdrop, the panel aims to discuss first ideas around best practices directed at both practitioners from ICTs and journalists. Panelists: Payam Akhavan – Professor of International Law, McGill University, Montreal, Former First Legal Advisor to the ICTY-ICTR, served with the UN in Bosnia, Croatia, Cambodia, Guatemala, Rwanda, and Timor Leste. Nerma Jelacic – Head of External Relations for the Commission for International Justice and Accountability (CIJA), London, Former Spokesperson and Head of Outreach and Communications for the ICTY, Ella McPherson – Lecturer in the Sociology of New Media and Digital Technology, University of Cambridge, Don Ferencz (Facilitator) – Convenor of the Global Institute for the Prevention of Aggression, Research Associate at the Centre for Criminology, Faculty of Law, University of Oxford
Oxford Transitional Justice Research (OTJR) conference podcasts
A panel discussion among an academic, a company representative and practitioners, held on 21 June 2016, hosted by the Oxford Business and Human Rights Research Network and the Business and Human Rights Resource Centre. How can business support or hinder the process of peace-building after armed conflict? This panel discussion looks at the role of the private sector in countries emerging from conflict. An academic, a company representative and practitioners engage with questions of corporate complicity and accountability in transitional justice settings, as well as the way in which companies may contribute positively to creating peace. Panellists: Professor Sabine Michalowski, University of Essex, School of Law Irene Pietropaoli, Business and Human Rights consultant at Amnesty International in Myanmar Jo Zaremba, Livelihoods Officer at the UN High Commissioner for Refugees Yves Nissim, Vice-President, Head of Transformation and Operation in CSR at Orange Moderated by Maximilian Spohr, Max Planck Foundation for International Peace and the Rule of Law In this blog, organisers Anneloes Hoff (Oxford Business and Human Rights Research Network) and Isabel Ebert (Business and Human Rights Resource Centre) reflect on the issues discussed by the panel. https://business-humanrights.org/en/business-and-human-rights-in-transition-from-conflict-to-peace