Home
Categories
EXPLORE
True Crime
Comedy
Society & Culture
Business
Sports
Technology
Health & Fitness
About Us
Contact Us
Copyright
© 2024 PodJoint
Podjoint Logo
US
00:00 / 00:00
Sign in

or

Don't have an account?
Sign up
Forgot password
https://is1-ssl.mzstatic.com/image/thumb/Podcasts211/v4/e4/5c/6a/e45c6a8f-136f-7882-e3b6-f3fa752d4bdc/mza_15797614049904436157.jpg/600x600bb.jpg
Notebooking Cinema
Dir22
6 episodes
3 days ago
Explaining iconic articles on Cinema in easy to grasp manner
Show more...
Film History
TV & Film
RSS
All content for Notebooking Cinema is the property of Dir22 and is served directly from their servers with no modification, redirects, or rehosting. The podcast is not affiliated with or endorsed by Podjoint in any way.
Explaining iconic articles on Cinema in easy to grasp manner
Show more...
Film History
TV & Film
https://d3t3ozftmdmh3i.cloudfront.net/staging/podcast_uploaded_nologo/43643086/43643086-1746893387995-2b1c79359f6cb.jpg
Pauline Kael on Auteur Theory
Notebooking Cinema
23 minutes 31 seconds
5 months ago
Pauline Kael on Auteur Theory

This discussion is from another foundational article T titled "Circles and Squares" by Pauline Kael, published in Film Quarterly in 1963. Kael critically examines the "politique des auteurs," or auteur theory, particularly as adopted in England and the United States. She argues against its core premises, including technical competence, distinguishable personality, and interior meaning as criteria for evaluating a director's work, using examples and analogies to illustrate her points. Kael posits that the theory often leads to misplaced praise for commercial, formulaic films and dismisses the importance of story content and overall artistic vision. She suggests the theory stems from a potentially anti-art stance and a desire by some critics to justify their focus on "trashy" films.

Notebooking Cinema
Explaining iconic articles on Cinema in easy to grasp manner