The biggest episode of the Fish Bowl podcast from Young BSF is here! In this special edition, Timotej and Marko take on the roles of two “naive spirits,” asking simple but probing questions about the liberal order, multilateralism, and security. Their exchange unfolds like a Socratic dialogue, where ideas are tested, challenged, and clarified. Two contrasting perspectives emerge: one defending the liberal order and its achievements in protecting human rights and preventing conflict, the oth...
All content for Naivni Duh is the property of Inštitut Gajst and is served directly from their servers
with no modification, redirects, or rehosting. The podcast is not affiliated with or endorsed by Podjoint in any way.
The biggest episode of the Fish Bowl podcast from Young BSF is here! In this special edition, Timotej and Marko take on the roles of two “naive spirits,” asking simple but probing questions about the liberal order, multilateralism, and security. Their exchange unfolds like a Socratic dialogue, where ideas are tested, challenged, and clarified. Two contrasting perspectives emerge: one defending the liberal order and its achievements in protecting human rights and preventing conflict, the oth...
Titi Habicht: Bi morala Slovenija odstopiti od Pariškega podnebnega sporazuma?
Naivni Duh
42 minutes
8 months ago
Titi Habicht: Bi morala Slovenija odstopiti od Pariškega podnebnega sporazuma?
Gremooo! Meta in Titi (Andraž pavzira) se dobita v Gajst HQ nekje ob Ljubljanici s hudim razgledom na Rog in udarita pogovor o okolju in oblikovanju okoljskih politik pa zavez v mednarodni skupnosti. Titi Habicht je aktualna mladinska okoljska delegatka in nekdanja predsednica Model United Nations Slovenia Cluba (MUNSC). Trenutno se ima fajn v absolventskem letu in zaključuje svoj enoletni mandat, že letos pa se odpravlja naprej na magisterij v belgijski Leuven. Kot mi, je tut ona razoč...
Naivni Duh
The biggest episode of the Fish Bowl podcast from Young BSF is here! In this special edition, Timotej and Marko take on the roles of two “naive spirits,” asking simple but probing questions about the liberal order, multilateralism, and security. Their exchange unfolds like a Socratic dialogue, where ideas are tested, challenged, and clarified. Two contrasting perspectives emerge: one defending the liberal order and its achievements in protecting human rights and preventing conflict, the oth...
