The biggest episode of the Fish Bowl podcast from Young BSF is here! In this special edition, Timotej and Marko take on the roles of two “naive spirits,” asking simple but probing questions about the liberal order, multilateralism, and security. Their exchange unfolds like a Socratic dialogue, where ideas are tested, challenged, and clarified. Two contrasting perspectives emerge: one defending the liberal order and its achievements in protecting human rights and preventing conflict, the oth...
All content for Naivni Duh is the property of Inštitut Gajst and is served directly from their servers
with no modification, redirects, or rehosting. The podcast is not affiliated with or endorsed by Podjoint in any way.
The biggest episode of the Fish Bowl podcast from Young BSF is here! In this special edition, Timotej and Marko take on the roles of two “naive spirits,” asking simple but probing questions about the liberal order, multilateralism, and security. Their exchange unfolds like a Socratic dialogue, where ideas are tested, challenged, and clarified. Two contrasting perspectives emerge: one defending the liberal order and its achievements in protecting human rights and preventing conflict, the oth...
Luka Pečar Pahor: Kaj je vizija za gajst 2030? (aka. najlepši brejkup episode)
Naivni Duh
1 hour 17 minutes
11 months ago
Luka Pečar Pahor: Kaj je vizija za gajst 2030? (aka. najlepši brejkup episode)
Boris se na kavč butne zadnjič. To ni zadnja epizoda Naivnega duha, je pa zadnja epizoda nekoga, ki je definiru zvočno zaznavni vidik inštituta. Boris je imel eno željo za zadnjo: To bova snemala z Luko. O gajstu. O diplomaciji. O izobraževanju. O geekanju. O pešnu. O porodnih krčih inštituta. O Lukovih fejlih na gimnaziji in komolčkanju na faksu. O tem kako smo se prpravlal na prvo epizodo naivnega duha s Tanjo Fajon. O familiji v diplomaciji. O clashu osebnih prepričanj in zuna...
Naivni Duh
The biggest episode of the Fish Bowl podcast from Young BSF is here! In this special edition, Timotej and Marko take on the roles of two “naive spirits,” asking simple but probing questions about the liberal order, multilateralism, and security. Their exchange unfolds like a Socratic dialogue, where ideas are tested, challenged, and clarified. Two contrasting perspectives emerge: one defending the liberal order and its achievements in protecting human rights and preventing conflict, the oth...
