The biggest episode of the Fish Bowl podcast from Young BSF is here! In this special edition, Timotej and Marko take on the roles of two “naive spirits,” asking simple but probing questions about the liberal order, multilateralism, and security. Their exchange unfolds like a Socratic dialogue, where ideas are tested, challenged, and clarified. Two contrasting perspectives emerge: one defending the liberal order and its achievements in protecting human rights and preventing conflict, the oth...
All content for Naivni Duh is the property of Inštitut Gajst and is served directly from their servers
with no modification, redirects, or rehosting. The podcast is not affiliated with or endorsed by Podjoint in any way.
The biggest episode of the Fish Bowl podcast from Young BSF is here! In this special edition, Timotej and Marko take on the roles of two “naive spirits,” asking simple but probing questions about the liberal order, multilateralism, and security. Their exchange unfolds like a Socratic dialogue, where ideas are tested, challenged, and clarified. Two contrasting perspectives emerge: one defending the liberal order and its achievements in protecting human rights and preventing conflict, the oth...
Luka Mesec - Kdo je kriv za porast iliberalne demokracije v Evropi?
Naivni Duh
59 minutes
1 year ago
Luka Mesec - Kdo je kriv za porast iliberalne demokracije v Evropi?
Boris in Luka se počta na kavč in v pičli urci obdelata zunanjo politiko, notranjo politiko, memepejdže in knjige. Lahko bi rekli, da je Luka Mesec za današnje novoobrazne standarde že kar starosta slovenske politične scene. Sivi lasje so dokaz in trademark! Pri pičlih 37ih ima deset let izkušenj in mnogo naših mladih poslušalcev se ne spomne obdobja, ko Levica, ki jo je pomagal ustanoviti, ni obstajala kot stranka. No sedaj je že dve leti v vladi, dogajajo se spremembe, prevzema se odgovorno...
Naivni Duh
The biggest episode of the Fish Bowl podcast from Young BSF is here! In this special edition, Timotej and Marko take on the roles of two “naive spirits,” asking simple but probing questions about the liberal order, multilateralism, and security. Their exchange unfolds like a Socratic dialogue, where ideas are tested, challenged, and clarified. Two contrasting perspectives emerge: one defending the liberal order and its achievements in protecting human rights and preventing conflict, the oth...
