The biggest episode of the Fish Bowl podcast from Young BSF is here! In this special edition, Timotej and Marko take on the roles of two “naive spirits,” asking simple but probing questions about the liberal order, multilateralism, and security. Their exchange unfolds like a Socratic dialogue, where ideas are tested, challenged, and clarified. Two contrasting perspectives emerge: one defending the liberal order and its achievements in protecting human rights and preventing conflict, the oth...
All content for Naivni Duh is the property of Inštitut Gajst and is served directly from their servers
with no modification, redirects, or rehosting. The podcast is not affiliated with or endorsed by Podjoint in any way.
The biggest episode of the Fish Bowl podcast from Young BSF is here! In this special edition, Timotej and Marko take on the roles of two “naive spirits,” asking simple but probing questions about the liberal order, multilateralism, and security. Their exchange unfolds like a Socratic dialogue, where ideas are tested, challenged, and clarified. Two contrasting perspectives emerge: one defending the liberal order and its achievements in protecting human rights and preventing conflict, the oth...
FISHBOWL POD: Ekonomski liberalizem in (ne)enakost (feat. Young BSF)
Naivni Duh
1 hour 2 minutes
1 month ago
FISHBOWL POD: Ekonomski liberalizem in (ne)enakost (feat. Young BSF)
Fish Bowl tokove smo tokrat zamenjali s trgovskimi tokovi in preplavali naš zadnji podkast v YBSF trilogiji. Boris, Marko, Matej, Miha in Timotej so se pogovarjali o razlogih za nastanek ekonomskega liberalnega reda ter o njegovih izzivih, o alternativah in prihodnosti. Če te zanima, kako obogateti čez noč in it na Sejšele živet za pol leta, morda ta podkast ni zate. Če ta pa zanima vpliv ekonomije na odnos med posameznikom in družbo, med davki in svobodo, bitcoinom in osebno varnostjo, umetn...
Naivni Duh
The biggest episode of the Fish Bowl podcast from Young BSF is here! In this special edition, Timotej and Marko take on the roles of two “naive spirits,” asking simple but probing questions about the liberal order, multilateralism, and security. Their exchange unfolds like a Socratic dialogue, where ideas are tested, challenged, and clarified. Two contrasting perspectives emerge: one defending the liberal order and its achievements in protecting human rights and preventing conflict, the oth...
