The biggest episode of the Fish Bowl podcast from Young BSF is here! In this special edition, Timotej and Marko take on the roles of two “naive spirits,” asking simple but probing questions about the liberal order, multilateralism, and security. Their exchange unfolds like a Socratic dialogue, where ideas are tested, challenged, and clarified. Two contrasting perspectives emerge: one defending the liberal order and its achievements in protecting human rights and preventing conflict, the oth...
All content for Naivni Duh is the property of Inštitut Gajst and is served directly from their servers
with no modification, redirects, or rehosting. The podcast is not affiliated with or endorsed by Podjoint in any way.
The biggest episode of the Fish Bowl podcast from Young BSF is here! In this special edition, Timotej and Marko take on the roles of two “naive spirits,” asking simple but probing questions about the liberal order, multilateralism, and security. Their exchange unfolds like a Socratic dialogue, where ideas are tested, challenged, and clarified. Two contrasting perspectives emerge: one defending the liberal order and its achievements in protecting human rights and preventing conflict, the oth...
FISH BOWL POD: Varnost in obramba v liberalnem svetovnem redu (feat. Young BSF)
Naivni Duh
1 hour 8 minutes
4 months ago
FISH BOWL POD: Varnost in obramba v liberalnem svetovnem redu (feat. Young BSF)
To ni Naivni duh, je ČIST NEKI DRUZGA. V sklopu raziskave, ki jo delamo za letošnjo različico YoungBSF, smo pripravili podkest v treh delih. Za prvo epizodo smo si uzel pravo poslastico. Vprašanje obrambe, varnosti, služenje v vojski, NATO, EU vojska? Zelo lušakana in iskrena debata, ki jo objavljamo na dan NATO SUMMITA. Podkest je potekal v obliki fishowbla (zato fishbowlpod), kjer smo govorci krožili in tako ustvarili dinamično debato. Kot gostje so z nami debatirali Mark Dragaš, Ema ...
Naivni Duh
The biggest episode of the Fish Bowl podcast from Young BSF is here! In this special edition, Timotej and Marko take on the roles of two “naive spirits,” asking simple but probing questions about the liberal order, multilateralism, and security. Their exchange unfolds like a Socratic dialogue, where ideas are tested, challenged, and clarified. Two contrasting perspectives emerge: one defending the liberal order and its achievements in protecting human rights and preventing conflict, the oth...
