The biggest episode of the Fish Bowl podcast from Young BSF is here! In this special edition, Timotej and Marko take on the roles of two “naive spirits,” asking simple but probing questions about the liberal order, multilateralism, and security. Their exchange unfolds like a Socratic dialogue, where ideas are tested, challenged, and clarified. Two contrasting perspectives emerge: one defending the liberal order and its achievements in protecting human rights and preventing conflict, the oth...
All content for Naivni Duh is the property of Inštitut Gajst and is served directly from their servers
with no modification, redirects, or rehosting. The podcast is not affiliated with or endorsed by Podjoint in any way.
The biggest episode of the Fish Bowl podcast from Young BSF is here! In this special edition, Timotej and Marko take on the roles of two “naive spirits,” asking simple but probing questions about the liberal order, multilateralism, and security. Their exchange unfolds like a Socratic dialogue, where ideas are tested, challenged, and clarified. Two contrasting perspectives emerge: one defending the liberal order and its achievements in protecting human rights and preventing conflict, the oth...
Dr. Vasilka Sancin - koliko vojnih zločincev mirno dočaka lepo starost?
Naivni Duh
44 minutes
1 year ago
Dr. Vasilka Sancin - koliko vojnih zločincev mirno dočaka lepo starost?
Dr. Vasilka Sancin je strokovnjakinja iz področja mednarodnega javnega prava. Nekaj izkušenj si je nabrala tudi v diplomaciji, je članica Svetovalnega odbora Združenih narodov za človekove pravice, vodi inštitut za mednarodno pravo in mednarodne odnose in že 20 let predava na pravni fakulteti Univerze v Ljubljani. Ve torej stvar ali dve o Boris se je z našo gostjo in njeno prikupno psičko (ki ima na pravni že legendaren status) pogovarjal o vesolju, morju, mednarodni kriminalni odgovorn...
Naivni Duh
The biggest episode of the Fish Bowl podcast from Young BSF is here! In this special edition, Timotej and Marko take on the roles of two “naive spirits,” asking simple but probing questions about the liberal order, multilateralism, and security. Their exchange unfolds like a Socratic dialogue, where ideas are tested, challenged, and clarified. Two contrasting perspectives emerge: one defending the liberal order and its achievements in protecting human rights and preventing conflict, the oth...
