The biggest episode of the Fish Bowl podcast from Young BSF is here! In this special edition, Timotej and Marko take on the roles of two “naive spirits,” asking simple but probing questions about the liberal order, multilateralism, and security. Their exchange unfolds like a Socratic dialogue, where ideas are tested, challenged, and clarified. Two contrasting perspectives emerge: one defending the liberal order and its achievements in protecting human rights and preventing conflict, the oth...
All content for Naivni Duh is the property of Inštitut Gajst and is served directly from their servers
with no modification, redirects, or rehosting. The podcast is not affiliated with or endorsed by Podjoint in any way.
The biggest episode of the Fish Bowl podcast from Young BSF is here! In this special edition, Timotej and Marko take on the roles of two “naive spirits,” asking simple but probing questions about the liberal order, multilateralism, and security. Their exchange unfolds like a Socratic dialogue, where ideas are tested, challenged, and clarified. Two contrasting perspectives emerge: one defending the liberal order and its achievements in protecting human rights and preventing conflict, the oth...
Dr. Anže Logar - Je med Demokrati in SDS razlika v zunanji politiki?
Naivni Duh
1 hour
7 months ago
Dr. Anže Logar - Je med Demokrati in SDS razlika v zunanji politiki?
Meti pa Andražu se pridruži nekdanji zunanji minister in dolgoletni poslanec stranke SDS, zdaj pa predsednik stranke Demokrati, dr. Anže Logar. Minimalno je govora o satelitih in maksimalno o zunanji politiki ter razmerah po svetu. Govorimo o stvareh, kot so pomembnost močne in povezane EU v konteksu pretekle energentske vezanosti na Rusijo in varnostnega naslanjanja na ZDA ter zakaj na študentskih protestih v Srbiji ne vidimo evropske zastave. Anže s pomočjo Lenina opiše ekspanzionistično ru...
Naivni Duh
The biggest episode of the Fish Bowl podcast from Young BSF is here! In this special edition, Timotej and Marko take on the roles of two “naive spirits,” asking simple but probing questions about the liberal order, multilateralism, and security. Their exchange unfolds like a Socratic dialogue, where ideas are tested, challenged, and clarified. Two contrasting perspectives emerge: one defending the liberal order and its achievements in protecting human rights and preventing conflict, the oth...
