The biggest episode of the Fish Bowl podcast from Young BSF is here! In this special edition, Timotej and Marko take on the roles of two “naive spirits,” asking simple but probing questions about the liberal order, multilateralism, and security. Their exchange unfolds like a Socratic dialogue, where ideas are tested, challenged, and clarified. Two contrasting perspectives emerge: one defending the liberal order and its achievements in protecting human rights and preventing conflict, the oth...
All content for Naivni Duh is the property of Inštitut Gajst and is served directly from their servers
with no modification, redirects, or rehosting. The podcast is not affiliated with or endorsed by Podjoint in any way.
The biggest episode of the Fish Bowl podcast from Young BSF is here! In this special edition, Timotej and Marko take on the roles of two “naive spirits,” asking simple but probing questions about the liberal order, multilateralism, and security. Their exchange unfolds like a Socratic dialogue, where ideas are tested, challenged, and clarified. Two contrasting perspectives emerge: one defending the liberal order and its achievements in protecting human rights and preventing conflict, the oth...
Ciril Horjak: Kakšna je vloga politične satire v današnjem norem svetu?
Naivni Duh
1 hour 13 minutes
1 year ago
Ciril Horjak: Kakšna je vloga politične satire v današnjem norem svetu?
Nemoremo potegniti preproste sinteze tega pogovora v enem naslovu. Preprosto sta modela povedala toliko zanimivih zadevc. Necenzurirano. S kom smo se pogovarjali? Boris se je na kavč usedu s Cirilom Horjakom. Stripovc, Prešernov nagrajenec, avtor več kot 2000 risb za Večer (med katerimi so kakšne tudi dobre), predavatelj, oče štirih otrok, kantovnsko razumski človek, ki preferira čustva, absolutna gofjla v najboljšem pomenu te besede, velik prijatelj našega inštituta in seveda tudi avtor sla...
Naivni Duh
The biggest episode of the Fish Bowl podcast from Young BSF is here! In this special edition, Timotej and Marko take on the roles of two “naive spirits,” asking simple but probing questions about the liberal order, multilateralism, and security. Their exchange unfolds like a Socratic dialogue, where ideas are tested, challenged, and clarified. Two contrasting perspectives emerge: one defending the liberal order and its achievements in protecting human rights and preventing conflict, the oth...
