The biggest episode of the Fish Bowl podcast from Young BSF is here! In this special edition, Timotej and Marko take on the roles of two “naive spirits,” asking simple but probing questions about the liberal order, multilateralism, and security. Their exchange unfolds like a Socratic dialogue, where ideas are tested, challenged, and clarified. Two contrasting perspectives emerge: one defending the liberal order and its achievements in protecting human rights and preventing conflict, the oth...
All content for Naivni Duh is the property of Inštitut Gajst and is served directly from their servers
with no modification, redirects, or rehosting. The podcast is not affiliated with or endorsed by Podjoint in any way.
The biggest episode of the Fish Bowl podcast from Young BSF is here! In this special edition, Timotej and Marko take on the roles of two “naive spirits,” asking simple but probing questions about the liberal order, multilateralism, and security. Their exchange unfolds like a Socratic dialogue, where ideas are tested, challenged, and clarified. Two contrasting perspectives emerge: one defending the liberal order and its achievements in protecting human rights and preventing conflict, the oth...
Arina Šmidt - So mladinski delegati v OZN samo za okras?
Naivni Duh
43 minutes
1 year ago
Arina Šmidt - So mladinski delegati v OZN samo za okras?
Boris je Arino vprašal, če lahko mladinski delegati v OZN kaj spremenijo? Arina misli, da lahko. Drugače tega ne bi počela. Debata teče o plenarnih zasedanjih v New Yorku, pisanju govorov v Ženevi, pogovoru s folkom v Sloveniji in vseh izzivih zastopanja glasu mladih v svetu. Zakaj in kako postati mladinski delegat? Jih kdo posluša? Kdo se jih boji? Lahko rečejo, kar si mislijo ali morajo slediti politiki države, z mandatom katere govorijo? Pogovarjala sta se tudi o študiju mednarodnih odnoso...
Naivni Duh
The biggest episode of the Fish Bowl podcast from Young BSF is here! In this special edition, Timotej and Marko take on the roles of two “naive spirits,” asking simple but probing questions about the liberal order, multilateralism, and security. Their exchange unfolds like a Socratic dialogue, where ideas are tested, challenged, and clarified. Two contrasting perspectives emerge: one defending the liberal order and its achievements in protecting human rights and preventing conflict, the oth...
