Woodford’s appeal against a multimillion-pound FCA fine and ban is under the spotlight in this episode, with David Masters and Neil Robson asking what the tribunal could uncover - and whether his reputation can ever recover. They examine how cosmetic fixes created only the illusion of liquidity, why the regulator called his understanding of his role “defective and unreasonably narrow,” and how the tribunal could reveal private emails, board minutes and correspondence that reshape the na...
All content for (mis)Conduct, Money & Reputation is the property of Lansons Team Farner, Katten and is served directly from their servers
with no modification, redirects, or rehosting. The podcast is not affiliated with or endorsed by Podjoint in any way.
Woodford’s appeal against a multimillion-pound FCA fine and ban is under the spotlight in this episode, with David Masters and Neil Robson asking what the tribunal could uncover - and whether his reputation can ever recover. They examine how cosmetic fixes created only the illusion of liquidity, why the regulator called his understanding of his role “defective and unreasonably narrow,” and how the tribunal could reveal private emails, board minutes and correspondence that reshape the na...
In this episode, David Masters and Neil Robson unpack the high-stakes appeal by Jes Staley against his lifetime ban from the FCA, and the tangled web of his relationship with Jeffrey Epstein at the heart of this case. The conversation turns to the newly uncovered extent of their relationship, the regulator’s rationale for such a decisive penalty, and whether the appeal has unintentionally magnified public scepticism. Beyond that, it revisits a lesser-known whistle blower episode that ma...
(mis)Conduct, Money & Reputation
Woodford’s appeal against a multimillion-pound FCA fine and ban is under the spotlight in this episode, with David Masters and Neil Robson asking what the tribunal could uncover - and whether his reputation can ever recover. They examine how cosmetic fixes created only the illusion of liquidity, why the regulator called his understanding of his role “defective and unreasonably narrow,” and how the tribunal could reveal private emails, board minutes and correspondence that reshape the na...
