Arguing Consent in Sexual Assault Cases: Analysis of U.S. v. Mendoza

https://is1-ssl.mzstatic.com/image/thumb/Podcasts211/v4/64/22/1e/64221e24-1590-979c-553c-7295b33c910f/mza_8798188339367145607.jpeg/600x600bb.jpg

Military Justice Today

Robert Capovilla and Mickey Williams

56 episodes

2 months ago

Hosted by Robert Capovilla and Mickey Williams covering the full range of military law topics from all branches of the Armed Forces. Made possible in part by the law firm of Capovilla and Williams. Learn more at: www.MilitaryJusticeToday.com

Government

RSS

All content for Military Justice Today is the property of Robert Capovilla and Mickey Williams and is served directly from their servers with no modification, redirects, or rehosting. The podcast is not affiliated with or endorsed by Podjoint in any way.

Government

Arguing Consent in Sexual Assault Cases: Analysis of U.S. v. Mendoza

Military Justice Today

26 minutes

10 months ago

Arguing Consent in Sexual Assault Cases: Analysis of U.S. v. Mendoza

In this episode of MJT, attorneys Rob Capovilla and Brad Simon discuss issues of consent in military sexual assault cases in light of the new CAAF case, U.S. v. Mendoza. Topics include capacity, charging, notice, due process, and defense strategies